Frankly I dont think we will ever know who has the coin. with 39 coins with 0 BTC. there really is no incentive to peal your coin. The value of this coin lies in the story and potential for the win. So when no one peels we all win.
Everyone has .04 basically unless winner redeems. I was good with the way the last one went down. Maybe something different this time but I don’t like there being an incentive to peel. well the only incentive would be to see if you won. if you are ok without knowing then you wouldnt peel. |
|
|
|
|
txn id - b80ef7e7642d91457569a99c58d944b0ca50082b89bac47696acf145e0824ce8
forgot to post this earlier this morning when I made payment - was waiting for the above post confirming auction win.
|
|
|
|
Not too happy about that at all...as these ideas really screw up the idea of hodling a physical Bitcoin. I was too eager to buy the coin without really reading what the decision was to be. Too bad....was looking forward to having a physical loaded Bitcoin and not having to peel and ruin it to find out what I have or in this case now peel to outrun whomever is sweeping the coins.  I can understand that - these though have not been so much about hodling a guranteed "loaded" item but more about the scammers and what they did. 1. FTX - took the funds but never really allocated it to the depositers in reality and instead put it all in his giant slush fund - pay for anything and everything account at Alameda. 2. Yogg - took the funds, loaded items then periodically swept random cards - leaving some intact in same cases these coins are following - somewhat - in those same steps. In the end, you can leave it intact - slabbed perhaps and potentially you could be the recepient of the funding. |
|
|
|
When the fuck was that decided? I was not aware!
40 coins produced..... 1 winner and 39 REKT 
Load per person will be 0.001BTC plus coin price & shipping
This will make the winning coin have a load of 0.04BTC 
This was one of the ideas put forth in the original thread - other ideas were presented but this is what was decided and what was posted in the eventual sales thread. The second one is kinda the same concept except people will be able to sweep their own coin prior to it getting swept - this then however rules them out from winning the pot. |
|
|
|
|
76 - MoparMiningLLC thanks!
|
|
|
|
The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.
After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones
Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin. So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds? No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins. Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others. I think you’re mistaken if you think the SBF losing coins have any BTC on them. Only one coin has the BTC and the rest are rekt ALL the SBF coins have SATS one them ....just that one has more than other...none are REKT...or swept unless the owner decided to do that. Incorrect - only one SBF coin has any funds. The rest are empty |
|
|
|
The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.
After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones
Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin. So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds? No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins. Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others. In the end the result is the same - one coin will be funded and the rest will be empty |
|
|
|
The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.
After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones
Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin. So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one You can take the pk and load it without sweeping and check balance and then just leave it alone - just saying. |
|
|
|
|
I really like this - my lasers can lightly etch (have used them to put pks on coins) but I cannot cut into the metal like this takes - looks great!
|
|
|
|
Mopar, Steeley, avi8rjeff & Honeybadger thank you again! 🙏 It was fun!!
And Saigo congrats again, hope you’re enjoying your Builder! 🤖
More to share soon.
Always happy to help and/or assist. We have a truly great community here. |
|
|
|
|
Congrats @dernoste and thank you krogoth for the raffle!
|
|
|
|
|
The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.
After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones
|
|
|
|
|
I am in for my same number - #10
|
|
|
|
|
Very nice coins - thought I would never see you selling any squirrelbits
.021 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
you know I am in to help again.
|
|
|
|
when I decided to start selling my altcoin items (main goal and focus was always centered on Bitcoin collectibles) she quickly swooped in and took all the silver pieces that I had --- gave me spot price as well.  So, she reads here mostly. But if she sees a raffle for precious metals or loaded items, she is quick to join. Omg, thanks for this. I can't believe we are watching a husbaand and wife collector argue about coins, that's gotta be a bitcointalk first.  Congrats on the high grades. Not sure what to do with mine yet, still thinking on it.  there is no argument - it is my coin, not hers. |
|
|
|
yes, she is  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
