I highly doubt PoW will overtake PoS. They're very different and we're rushing towards cheap renewable energy.

PoW is objectively the best initial distribution model of a coin. And if it's using a CPU or GPU algo (and not ASIC) it's the fairest.

PoS can't be used for initial distribution; you have to have coins to stake more so you have to either use a PoW period or sell coins (ICO).


But even after a decent initial coin distribution (PoW period) a switch to being a PoS only coin is bad in the sense that it incentivizes people to hoard the coin. It's a rich gets richer scheme.

Bittrex is the same as Poloniex and Kraken. You can buy and hold there.

I would not hold big amounts on any exchange though, especially for long periods of time.


And you'd be missing out on staking.

Depending on the size of the purchase, I'd consider getting an old, dirt cheap laptop, format it, install an OS, firewall, antivirus, etc. and stake my coins there with the added benefit of the battery acting like a UPS for non-stop staking.

Not that exciting considering the dev has 100 times more.

A fix percentage premine this size in 2017 is not acceptable. The premine should slowly automatically go to the dev over time, for example 3% of all sweepstakes.

Anyway, if someone seens some opportunity in this coin I have 1 mil for sale (no sweepstake).

Staying a 100% authentic copy paste Dash clone I see.

A few days of flashmining is a feature, not a bug.

Did you actually check the voltage?

I would be surprised if you'd get 240 volts when all the rigs are running. And since I(A) = P(W) / V(V), with lower voltage you'll trip with fewer rigs.

CPUs have like 4-16 powerful cores while GPUs have something like 2000-3000 cores - typically speaking.

Now imagine each CPU core being like a super strong and heavy fighter and each GPU core being a small but nimble kid.

If you're still following, hashing algorithms are like picking up berries from the ground; thousands of kids are much better at it than a few strong dudes...

WTS up to 380k SWEEP (no sweepstake win, just regular blocks), PM.




But it does as it reduces the risk and variance which is the main reason pools exist in the first place.

I would think so since the sweepstake reward seem to comes from PoW blocks, not from staking - even though it's called sweepstake.

So it kind of defeats the purpose and encourage pool mining on the biggest pool instead of solomining.

Unless it comes from PoS blocks, in which case the OP is not obvious.

Come on, be realistic. For such a massive company that is Bittrex, server costs are negligible compared to having to run the wallet and sometimes having to upgrade.

They should just have a clearly disclosed minimum required trading volume rolling average so we could get it above the limit instead of a sudden removal of a coin that's volume was 100% exclusive to their exchange.

It's both ridiculous and unprofessional.

Talking about being unprofessional... at the very least they should reply to messages in a timely manner.

I guess they're earning so much from p&d scams lately that they don't care about lesser coins anymore.

As much as I liked Bittrex in the past, in the last few months they became pretty bad.

Anyone contacted Bittrex trying to keep the coin there or asking why it's planned for removal?

It's an older miner from sp_. Max intensity is 24.8 for me and with high (possibly unstable) OC and max power target I get flat 30 Mh/s. But that would be too much for my PSU.

Probably using dozens of bot/script controlled accounts.

Yes, but a couple of quarters are still stupidly cheap for transactions considering the benefits of Bitcion. Either you have a spammed and bloated blockchain or a genuine competition based around transactions fees.

As much drama and ridiculous fork attempts are going on for bigger blocks, the current system is capable of holding the number of non-peanut transactions for years to come (not indefinitely though).

Bitcoin simply shouldn't be used for dust transactions anymore which is fine; there are dozends of coins to chose from to do that. But the loud minority on various forums are going apeshit in the delusion of representing every Bitcoin user screaming for bigger blocks while the silent majority is doing perfectly fine with the current block size.

That's like almost 2 x 1070:

You might need some dummy plugs. Didn't know this was still an issue for AMD.

Why do you talk about shit you know nothing about? It's far from a copy paste coin and "dwindling price" at $1.64?

A low, only ~110 days worth of subtle and humble premine.  

What is this, 2013?

Edit: Oh, and it's you, the serial shitcoin creator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=681157;sa=showPosts).

I only used 970 minis (so higher power than 1070) but never again. Super loud, throttles a lot and slower even without termal throttling.

I ignore every single non mineable coin not just because I'm a hobby miner, but mainly because non mineable coins have inferior initial coin distribution.

Mineable and non mineable coins also tend to attract different groups of people; ICOs generally attract gamblers/investors/cryptonewbies while mineable coins mostly attract enthusiasts/investors. Make no mistake, both groups are focusing on profits but they're different.

Coins created out of thin air by the dev for free and sold for an arbitrary price is just feels fake compared having to actually compete against other miners to get coins.

Not that mining is difficulty but it requires more than just giving some random anon dude money in exchange for a few pretty pictures and promises.


We're rushing towards cheap renewable energy partly of the electricity demand created by Bitcoin. And the faster we get there the better.

"no good reason" - other than better (at least initial) distribution, a much stronger network and decentralized control and the coin having a price floor as it costs a certain amount to mine them.