I have been away for a while, but I'm back! Your bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=293474Your current posts count (including this one): 1257 Amounts of merits that you earned in the last 120 days: 0 Your blackjack.fun username: Josepht Will change everything to whatever is required after being accepted |
|
|
|
Can the OP update the information about DuckDice? They got now 10 currencies instead of 5.
You are very right about that; in the mean time they even got 13 currencies in stead of the 10 or 5. |
|
|
|
|
Is there an ETA on the sportsbook on stake?
And will we be able to bet with all coins that are available on stake?
|
|
|
|
I noticed a mistake in your article If you’re having $50 on Real Madrid:
3.80 x 50 = $190
Your return includes your original stake - meaning your real profit is $190.
Since the payout includes the original bet, the real profit is 2.8 * $50 = $140, not $190 |
|
|
|
|
Really sad to see the investment option leave YOLOdice. Not only did I make a nice buck by investing on your website, but the idea that investing money that I love (BTC) in a industry that I love (casino's) is awesome, and it's sad to see it go.
|
|
|
|
I am usually sceptical when I hear those claims, so I compared Cloudbet's odds with sportsbet.io and Nitrogensports, and these are the results for today's matches in La Liga:  As you can see, their claims are (at least for today) correct. |
|
|
|
|
Site looks bad, feels bad. Can't imagine it competing with other dice sites.
|
|
|
|
|
luckygames.io lets you roll whole numbers from 1 to 99. They offer gambling with like 100 altcoins, so I would say it's worth checking them out.
|
|
|
|
And, as of now Stake is considering having sports betting in their platform which I think is great, since most gamblers prefer sports betting aside from casino games.
Let's hope so. More competitors creates (hopefully) better prices. Yes, sure. If you did not know, some of these sites offer affiliate systems. If someone signs up with my link, I get a small percentage as a reward. I am willing to share half of it with the person who signs up with that link if they contact me beforehand.
Thank you for the fast reply. You haven't explained how this rakeback would work or how much will it be and that is why I asked my question. Of course, I know about affiliate programs and thought that this is this case but wasn't sure and wanted to check because maybe there are promotions I don't know about. Is always good to ask if you are in doubt, I assume. I am also interested in the rakeback that OP is offering . I hope OP could give out more information about it and how to calculate the rakeback that we would get. Well, just read the google forms page, and it'll be clear. Edit: I removed safedice from my list, since I have doubts if it would be safe to play on their site. |
|
|
|
Yeah sure, someone on primedice's own forum has an objective opinion  |
|
|
|
Thank you for the link. Do you have a demo URL where prospective purchasers can see v1 running?
And since you are not selling a licence for v2 could you please explain how ethercrash has an almost identical looking site to bustabit?
I might be off here, but you already have all the information you need. Ethercrash runs the V1 version of bustabit. That should answer both of your questions. |
|
|
|
I need to get that extra verification, so here is a picture of me today on the phone:  |
|
|
|
There are some sites in your list which aren't active. I would suggest marking them with a red asterisk with a short comment so that people know about their status (since you haven't added their thread links)
There are some ongoing problems with Safedice and Kingdice. Hope you will look into it and will update your list accordingly.
Thanks, I will implement those things soon! Finally, I have found a topic about a list of all casinos with overviews. which is very helpful to me. Want to follow this topic for the next update. Hope the OP will be updated in the future with another legit casino. really thanks for doing such type of good job man.
Thanks man. from all gambling sites that are in first message from ts i can say that i played on few of them, personally recommend bitsarz and betchain, never had any issues there, all payments was fast and also they have some deposit bonuses, just usual ones like almost all casino sites have. also few times when i ask for non deposit bonuses they gave me, but ofc its not often offer and its kind a depends on support
I think they are all right, but not the best ones out there. |
|
|
|
Are you still doing this? Im interested
Yes, I try to keep things up to date. To be honest, I may have fallen behind in adding new sites. Mostly because I think that new sites need to prove themselves to be trustworthy first before I would advise them to viewers of this thread or the site. Just stumbled on this thread and I am impressed with the manner in which you reviewed a wide variety of casinos op. Your website is pretty good too. Both this thread and your website are enough to help anyone interested in cryptocurrency casinos.
Criteria required for reviewing casinos in my opinion:
- Customer support
- Provably fair
- Quality of games on the website
- Withdrawal and deposit speeds
- KYC
Well thanks! Those are indeed some important factors that I might use in the near future to review the casinos. I personally prefer casinos with KYC, since it's just a mess that could prevent customers from getting their money. IMO, bitcoin gambling should be anonymous, and KYC is disastrous for that. ...From now, I am offering a rakeback system...
Op how can you offer a rakeback for this casinos? Can you explain if this is not a secret? Yes, sure. If you did not know, some of these sites offer affiliate systems. If someone signs up with my link, I get a small percentage as a reward. I am willing to share half of it with the person who signs up with that link if they contact me beforehand. Betking.io investment been good up almost 1 etherium only started with 3 etherium.
That's cute, but I have heard some negative stories about betking, so I deleted them from my list. |
|
|
|
I'll list some data here: I played with payout 1.5-1.6, win chance 66-61.87%. The overall win chance of my lastest 2000 rolls is 65.3%, well, this is fine. But the win chance decrease while the bet amount is doubled:
Bet amount 0.001, win chance 65.5% (>65.3%)
Bet amount 0.002, win chance 66.8% (>65.3%),
---here is where the trick comes in---
Bet amount 0.004, win chance 65.0% (<65.3%),
Bet amount 0.008, win chance 63.4% (<65.3%),
Bet amount 0.032, win chance 64.3% (<65.3%),
Bet amount 0.064, win chance 55.6% (<65.3%).
See? The higher the bet, the lower the win chance!
We can see clearly the trend from 2000 rolls, the trend will be more clearer if the Fortunejack team can provide all my history.
If you insist the data is not enough, the Fortunejack should be obliged to provide enough data against my proof and conclusion.
This is not proof. This is just some data about some rolls that were made in the last 2000 bets. If (for example) you bet with lower risk at smaller amounts, and higher risk at larger amounts, it makes sense that the higher bet amount as a a lower win percentage in the end. Also, I would assume that less bets were made with the high value, so it is a tiny sample. You would need a way bigger sample to provide proof. Lastly, Kiritsugu already explained that the fact that you can verify the rolls already makes it impossible to be rigged. |
|
|
|
|
Hey FJ,
I sent you guys another PM like 2 weeks ago, and a message in the affiliate homepage 4 days ago. How long do I have to wait to get a response?
|
|
|
|
Site is working for me.
I like playing here because the minimum bet allowed for Lightning Roulette only 1.2 BCH, I play only small bets so this is great for me.
That's about 0.06 BTC minimum bet, and you consider that small? I feel like you made a mistake there, since I feel like a casino would have a lower minbet. |
|
|
|
|
mOgliE is addressing a serious point that I have noticed in the past, but didn't want to comment on.
These images (which I see on twitter every few days as well) makes it look like it's really common for gamblers t owin huge amounts of money. In the description, it often says stuff like 'this guys showed us how to turn X amount of money into Y amount of money, which is often not true since most gamblers need to make a huge amount of bets before they even hit that big multiplier.
|
|
|
|
Hey Stunna, or any mods of Stake, I noticed that on your site homepage, you show blackjack as a 0,5% house edge game. In the rules however, you tell us that the game has a 0,4% house edge. Firstly: this is a discrepancy. Secondly, I used the ( wizzardofodds tool) to calculate that the actual edge is 0,6%. Why do you choose to show wrong information? 0,1% or 0,2% might not seem like much, but compared to the 0,4% you show in the rules, it's a 25 or 50% increase in house edge! Someone might want to call this misleading. I don't want to go that far, but please show the correct house edges on your site. Thanks! My question still remains unanswered. |
|
|
|
From the screenshots he sent me his friend who is traveling abroad with him also has a account and lost 0.65 worth of bitcoin and about 3 bitcoin cash. This friend was never asked for KYC and is now saying since he is also a American Citizen who is traveling abroad with him his bets should be voided and the bitcoin and bitcoin cash should be returned. From a legal standpoint shouldn’t players who only lost in the same situation
have there bets voided and the bitcoin returned?
I don't know the details of this situation, but to be honest, it would be stupid to give them their money back. If that'd be the case, everyone can gamble huge, and if they win keep the money and if they lose complain to get the money back. That's not how it supposed to work. If you gamble online, you know the risks, and if you win you win and if you lose you lose. Just my two cents. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
