|
My coin endeavors have killed off the weak cryptos and strengthened the strong ones. I've been watching DGC since it's release. Not only does it have an extremely strong backing as shown by this 127 page thread, but seems to have an extremely active developer, and is the only coin that hasn't completely tanked after being added to an exchange.
I am interested to see where we can take this project.
|
|
|
|
Why don't you start by telling us who you are?  |
|
|
|
|
Missing some key parts, but I'm not gonna be the one to fill in the gaps for you.
|
|
|
|
|
So someone hacked your account... And used it to send messages... Instead of robbing you.
Okay...
|
|
|
|
Yes, Litecoin ASICs do not exist yet, but are not harder (or costlier) to build than any Bitcoin ASIC. It's just a different hashing algorithm!
Scrypt has different parameters than SHA256, but those obstacles should be easily tackled.
really this old arguement again. scrypt is sha256. scrypt does a salsa20 8 times mix backwards and forwards, it makes the lookup tables difficult to predict. you need to load it all into memory to hash it. it requires a lot of on die memory to load the tables into. there are no fpga boards on the market that have that much on die ram. it would cost a fortune to develop. with most scrypt coins having low value and low liquidity there is not incentive for an investor to deploy the several million it would take to build an fpga or asic just so that can make a few hundred grand. they woould be competing with GPUs manufacturers which have already invented the wheel. Thank you for saving me from have to say this. |
|
|
|
Latest version of bitcoin is 0.8.2 and this client doesn't even run it. He also couldnt figure out how to change the ports  Good stuff... |
|
|
|
|
Theres's a billion altcoins out there, why do you people bother with premined shit like this?
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about  haven't had a lot of real sleep dude - lots of coffee- and booze |
|
|
|
What are you talking about |
|
|
|
|
Heres some nodes:
184.155.113.224
71.77.233.192
147.175.177.4
|
|
|
|
Lol, AMC is better than those hazard-coins A coin with 7000 blocks premined is better than mine? Stay delusional. |
|
|
|
Rest assured I am not mining this coin at all. Too big of a premine |
|
|
|
Wait, what's going to happen to all the old i0coins?
They'll still be there. |
|
|
|
Dumping appears to be over, price set to skyrocket now.  |
|
|
|
Love watching these threads. I have "ignored" all the idiots with all the crap coins. Now all I see is a thread with c4n10's comments. Appears he is winning the battle but I can't truly tell because most everyone else's comments are ignored. I will however agree user Hazard is and idiot for taking someone else's work and selling it with a few minor lines of code changed. Keep up the assault C4n10!
Translation: I'm mad because I didn't think of it first |
|
|
|
|
Correct.
Currently the plan is to just get the block chain to load under 0.7.2 by disabling block checking, and seeing if the memory leak issue is fixed (which it should be). Then I can move onto applying the merged mining patch and release it.
|
|
|
|
Shit, I've been discovered |
|
|
|
Merged mining will come, it's just not my primary concern right now. I'm currently trying to fix a coin that I don't even have the blockchain for I'm sure you see how that could be problematic. YOu cannot do profiling looking for memory leaks etc if you cannot run the client, so you just need the current client and blockchain and a debugger / profiler, no hard fork no new bitcoin code just find the damn bug and fix it. But better might be to help get the merged-mining.patch applied cleanly to the latest bitcoin code. By latest I hope you mean 0.7.2  |
|
|
|
Merged mining will come, it's just not my primary concern right now. I'm currently trying to fix a coin that I don't even have the blockchain for I'm sure you see how that could be problematic. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
