Yup simple is good . Looking good we are moving forward now ,
maybe Now  I do not mean to be rude... But.... does TEK need the face-lift? can't hurt to fresh'n up the look & feel, I think colors are good but better with a white background myself, then red black over the top |
|
|
|
So people can only play one table at a time with random seating to ensure there's no collusion? Will there be a new currency created to play the games or will it use ETH?
good questions, I'd say 'yes' & 'yes', but that's just a guess. Would be good if mutilple currencies were available to deposit & play with 'pokereum' native token |
|
|
|
|
If the vTorrent dev ever gets his act together ...
|
|
|
|
|
WTB 500GIOTA @ 5 bitcoins
|
|
|
|
|
people will just create their own accounts, there's no advantage to having 'aged' sockpuppet accounts on STEEM, only here on BTT (for scammers mostly)
|
|
|
|
|
cool idea, might get some media attention for crypto
|
|
|
|
Hey Guys, I am searching a mass Bitcoin brainwallet generator that can convert an text file which contains every line a brainwallet phrase, word or something like this to the associated bitcoin address and private key. I hope somebody could help me.  Best regards, Patrick what application are you making? |
|
|
|
From memory, they put close to 20 bitcoin in the ICO. A rough estimate would give them around 50 TIota.
is jl777 the largest whale? 50Ti is pretty HUGE |
|
|
|
That's some good news, wow, it's been ages since Neos was launched, still has promise |
|
|
|
 It’s been an extremely productive month following the release of the Syscoin 2.1 public beta [1]. We’ve been added to the Coinomi wallet which gives Android users the ability to send, receive and hold Syscoin on their Android mobile devices, Syscoin has been added to Brave New Coin’s services, Livecoin exchange and we’ve also received confirmation that Syscoin will be added to Bittylicious, a UK based fiat gateway and exchange, in the near future. Development has been speeding along as well. With the help of the community we’ve been able to identify and fix bugs and implement changes that improve the overall Syscoin user experience. We’ve identified two more features; an in-wallet wanted section and currency editing. These will add further value to the Syscoin platform and will take a few days to finalize. While they are being worked on we wanted to share the latest improvements by releasing the a new Syscoin 2.1 public beta 2. Beta 2 includes the major fixes and user experience updates that we’ve completed so far. We want to release to mainnet as soon as is reasonably possible, targeting the first week of August timeframe. Progress on our Blockmarket initiative has been moving along extremely well, we’ll have a more detailed updates on that in a separate post. To use the latest beta you will need to delete any/all existing beta files – including the app/exe and the Syscoin testnet data directory; Syscoin.conf remains the same as with the first beta. If you discover issues we want to hear about them and you can submit them either via slack #bugs channel or our Github issues page. We’re excited to be one step closer to releasing 2.1 to mainnet with all its huge new features and look forward to sharing what we’ve been working with Blockmarket very soon! Download the Syscoin 2.1 beta 2 using the links below. You’ll need to use this syscoin.conf, which will only connect to testnet. If you have an existing syscoin.conf from beta 2 there is no need to change it, if not please back it up prior to participating in the beta. You must delete any/all pre-existing Syscoin 2.1 beta 1 testnet data (the testnet3 folder entirely) before you can run/use Syscoin 2.1 beta 2 properly.Windows Syscoin 2.1 Beta 2 DownloadMac OSX Syscoin 2.1 Beta 2 DownloadGithub Source Zip for Syscoin 2.1 Beta 2For questions/comments please catch us directly on our Slack channel! We look forward to talking with you! Good update guys |
|
|
|
|
is Killer still working on Blitz?
|
|
|
|
Why isn't Lisk added to poloniex margin yet ?
Because Poloniex don't want LISK to get as big as Ethereum. Polo doesn't care one way or the other what coin is big or small, like all exchanges they make money on trading fees. +1 it's all about volume first, then everything else *might* happen, like margin |
|
|
|
Common guys, we really need this 11 terra iotas! There will be no big deal without foundation! Just 1 terra iota per 1 whale  Is it really so hurd ? Who is in game? looks like foundation will get up but not big deal, is that workable for David, CfB, Dominik etc |
|
|
|
I'm coining the phrase, "to post a STEEMING link" , I predict it will rival "to google" one day i prefer 'forge a STEEMING link' ... |
|
|
|
|
any tips for getting iOTA working on Windows 7? All my nodes are "null", have disabled firewall and opened port 14265 on my router ...
|
|
|
|
Don't get me wrong here, I hope you're right, I'm just not sure DAO's are going to have as many use cases as some people think, but in some areas like 'Internet of Things', I can see DAO's taking over some industries completely, whereas I also see the hype creating multiple train wrecks like 'The DAO'.
I'll have a look at Pokereum when it launches, any idea when that might be?
I've heard whispers that Pokereum will exit stealth mode and start a public crowdfunding round next month, to add to the funding they already got from angel investors, but that's not definite, just what I've been told. An announcement should be soon ... |
|
|
|
A new decentralised Poker based DAO, 'Pokereum' , is launching soon. What can they learn from 'The DAO'?
Online Poker is a much better candidate for a DAO than an investment fund. Everything about online gaming can be systematized and run by robots & code, Pokereum has a chance to be massive, there are some lessons to be gained from The DAO (i.e. nail the code, test, and test again), and all the recent media attention on DAO's is priceless free marketing. One to watch. I agree, decentralised online Poker is a much better test case for a DAO. There'll still be governance issues to deal with, but most day-to-day operations of Pokereum as a Poker gaming service should be easy to automate. I also can't see Pokereum having the same strategic behaviors & voting system issues as 'The DAO' did, as Pokereum will be much simpler, so i can't see the Pokereum token holders having to vote all that often. More of a 'set-and-forget' type investment. |
|
|
|
A new decentralised Poker based DAO, 'Pokereum' , is launching soon. What can they learn from 'The DAO'?
What are the key ingredients for a successful DAO ... governance is one, code review is another, development funding, legal setup ... what else?
Can we specify (in theory) ALL the essential components for a successful DAO?
As a community we can't afford another Titanic sized failure, otherwise we risk killing the whole DAO & smart contract concept before it's had a chance to do any good in the world. What do future DAO projects need to be successful?
I'm not sure a DAO will ever outperform a competent CEO with a good management team. The human brain is flexible and agile, and can react to changing conditions almost immediately. A DAO will always be conservative and rigid by definition. What we need are better ways to measure and reward success, and better ways to discover and eliminate corruption and failure. I don't think a DAO is the panacea some are hoping for. A well constructed DAO will outperform a CEO in the long run, why ... a DAO isn't subject to human failures like greed and corruption. The critical task is to design and code the DAO 'well', and I have more faith in that happening than in humanity ever eliminating human nature. Remember that while it might be possible to find a great CEO once, what happens when they leave? A well designed DAO can last 'forever', and as long as the designers and coders get in right at the start, the DAO's governance is 100% stable. With a CEO, they leave, or retire, so the task of maintaining good 'governance' is ongoing. Despite the experience of The DAO, I think the future will show that a DAO will outperform traditional CEO & management governance in 99% of cases. We just need to learn from every iteration. |
|
|
|
A new decentralised Poker based DAO, 'Pokereum' , is launching soon. What can they learn from 'The DAO'? What are the key ingredients for a successful DAO ... governance is one, code review is another, development funding, legal setup ... what else? Can we specify (in theory) ALL the essential components for a successful DAO? As a community we can't afford another Titanic sized failure, otherwise we risk killing the whole DAO & smart contract concept before it's had a chance to do any good in the world. What do future DAO projects need to be successful? will the likely collapse of The DAO change plans for Pokereum?
some lessons on governance maybe
Nothing has changed!...everything they did wrong from; ineffective implementation of quorum voting rules, to implementing weird "dao-split" mechanisms to address 51% attack, where things that we came across, discuss, solved and worked on conceptually since early 2014 before even Ethereum was live.
The last thing we did right was not to rush to be first by waiting to make sure we properly test and that our strategy is right where we can deploy in stages!
We even did a live simulation on the community without them realizing to test out incentives. Expect something soon
So yeah we preemptively determined the best way for a DAO create and run Dapps effectively. All those issues they had are things we talked about two years ago.
I am not sure public discussion would have had any weight with the "the DOA" . It was more beneficial to keep our heads down and show the world what we had when we make the announcement than to engage in endless debates!
|
|
|
|
can some one fill me in on how NXT is going, it seemed to be one of the best but the devs seem to be going to other projects, this is general impression i had ....
It also seemed to have so many features ....
did the initial distribution kill it?
NXT is undergoing a renaissance ... it was beautiful, still is, and gets better by the day! NXT tech is superior to nearly everything else, but yes, the distribution didn't fund development, and while it was 100% fair, it did create a LOT of jealousy, and was a nightmare for community to overcome. The great thing with NXT 2.0 is all the good things remain, BUT the previous mistakes have been corrected! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
