AM is deploying their next gen in September/October, took my losses from ActM and slapped them into AM.
we understood it, you can stop to keep repeating it, this is the third time |
|
|
|
Does this mean for those of us in GB2 that opted for a refund can expect it pretty soon?
Cheers.
SM.
GB2 is not refundable at the moment |
|
|
|
any news from john k.? We have to be fast and ask for a refund before this wednesday, or we could not receive it anymore update: zefir just received 3 of his batches refunded: |
|
|
|
|
I must admit that one was funny. I'm delaying to ignore him for some other posts
|
|
|
|
I don't mean to sound condescending, but did eAsic make any promises to buy back ActM stock? If you concentrate, and believe with all of your heart, you'll find the answer ... which is (say it outloud!) "No, they did not. They don't know me from a hole in the wall."   What the hell, eAsic is a fabless company and it is not intersted in buying stocks, bonds, shares or whatever else. eAsic only need to develop chips and they are good in that, so this is enough to make me confident for a good deal. Concentrate. This is what you're replying to. Watch for the red font -- it's a hint Apparently no-one is paying attention to the short squeeze happening as i type this. Who knows if it will last but there will be a MAJOR squeeze coming when we hear from Ken.
crumbs, i will buy the fuck out of 0025. We are all forgetting that ACTM has promised to pay back 0025 per share before they start taking profits...its a no brainer.
I take promises of Belize-registered virtual entities traded on a virtual exchange which explicitly tells me it's "for entertainment value only" with a grain of salt. But that's just me. this virtual entity has a partnership with eAsic, that it isn't properly a virtual entity, but a solid company with enough feedbacks to be sure they will develop what they are aiming for Are you telling me that Ken has lied to us?  Why would he do that? what are you talking about? Lied about what? That Active Mining is a virtual entity read better what I wrote. I said eAsic is not a virtual entity, and they have a relationship with VMC I don't mean to sound condescending, but did eAsic make any promises to buy back ActM stock? If you concentrate, and believe with all of your heart, you'll find the answer ... which is (say it outloud!) "No, they did not. They don't know me from a hole in the wall." If you can't pay attention, don't reply plox. I'm not talking about the evidence given by Ken. You don't trust him, we understood that. We are talking about evidence given by EASIC about a deal between them and VMC. Or you don't even trust eAsic? |
|
|
|
Hi all
At the moment of writing group buyers owning 5778 chips have asked for a refund using the form provided. Initially I set September the 2nd as the deadline for communicating the desire to get a refund form AVALON; however, with owners of over 57% of the chips in our batch 1 asking for a refund I will immediately instruct John K to action the refund request from AVALON.
I will ask John K to keep us also updated on the process.
I would expect AVALON refund to be for the full amount paid to them, therefore 782.10BTC. I hope you would understand that the escrow fees and also the small amount I was charging for organizing this group buy are not expected to be refunded. Therefore, the refund will be for 0.07821BTC/chip. If you are not happy with this please let me know but I do not believe I would be able to do anything. Nevertheless, I hope you really understand the amount of work organizing these groups buys has represented to me in addition to the big stress which all the issues faced has represented.
Please note, that the refunds will be done to the verified BTC address you used to make the payment when buying the chips.
Let's hope we will have news from John K latest tomorrow.
Cheers.
I think there is no doubt you and John K. should be paid for your services, even if this story did not go as we would have liked... But the refunds should not differ by the amount paid? I mean someone bought chip for 0.08, someone else for 0.082, why everyone is getting the same amount? |
|
|
|
I don't mean to sound condescending, but did eAsic make any promises to buy back ActM stock? If you concentrate, and believe with all of your heart, you'll find the answer ... which is (say it outloud!) "No, they did not. They don't know me from a hole in the wall." What the hell, eAsic is a fabless company and it is not intersted in buying stocks, bonds, shares or whatever else. eAsic only need to develop chips and they are good in that, so this is enough to make me confident for a good deal. partnership with eAsic
Subcontracting is not being in a partnership. Stop being so deluded. eAsic confirmed they are developing a 28nm chip with VMC, so call the relationship as you want, that is all I'm interested of. And btw, somestranger above me is right, I'm feeding trolls that are here only to spread FUD, and maybe buy cheap shares. Never seen anyone use so much efforts for something they are not interested |
|
|
|
Apparently no-one is paying attention to the short squeeze happening as i type this. Who knows if it will last but there will be a MAJOR squeeze coming when we hear from Ken.
crumbs, i will buy the fuck out of 0025. We are all forgetting that ACTM has promised to pay back 0025 per share before they start taking profits...its a no brainer.
I take promises of Belize-registered virtual entities traded on a virtual exchange which explicitly tells me it's "for entertainment value only" with a grain of salt. But that's just me. this virtual entity has a partnership with eAsic, that it isn't properly a virtual entity, but a solid company with enough feedbacks to be sure they will develop what they are aiming for Are you telling me that Ken has lied to us? Why would he do that? what are you talking about? Lied about what? That Active Mining is a virtual entity read better what I wrote. I said eAsic is not a virtual entity, and they have a relationship with VMC |
|
|
|
Apparently no-one is paying attention to the short squeeze happening as i type this. Who knows if it will last but there will be a MAJOR squeeze coming when we hear from Ken.
crumbs, i will buy the fuck out of 0025. We are all forgetting that ACTM has promised to pay back 0025 per share before they start taking profits...its a no brainer.
I take promises of Belize-registered virtual entities traded on a virtual exchange which explicitly tells me it's "for entertainment value only" with a grain of salt. But that's just me. this virtual entity has a partnership with eAsic, that it isn't properly a virtual entity, but a solid company with enough feedbacks to be sure they will develop what they are aiming for Are you telling me that Ken has lied to us? Why would he do that? what are you talking about? Lied about what? |
|
|
|
Apparently no-one is paying attention to the short squeeze happening as i type this. Who knows if it will last but there will be a MAJOR squeeze coming when we hear from Ken.
crumbs, i will buy the fuck out of 0025. We are all forgetting that ACTM has promised to pay back 0025 per share before they start taking profits...its a no brainer.
I take promises of Belize-registered virtual entities traded on a virtual exchange which explicitly tells me it's "for entertainment value only" with a grain of salt. But that's just me. this virtual entity has a partnership with eAsic, that it isn't properly a virtual entity, but a solid company with enough feedbacks to be sure they will develop what they are aiming for |
|
|
|
What about zefir's batches? He ordered them in april. Where are the 10 weeks? Third batch was ordered on 20 April. 10 weeks means 29 June! So?
you really expect answer from this chinese motherfucker? cmooon please avoid chinese from your insults, racism doesn't help. Just use moherfucker  |
|
|
|
|
come on, easics confirmed several times about a relationship between them and Ken and VMC covered by NDA, it's not likely a scam.
We just need to wait, but as I've already asked:
Ken, PR, is there an estimated date when the NDA should close? Are we talking about days? Weeks? Months?
|
|
|
|
I'd just like to have an estimated date about when the NDA should end
ffssixtynine was saying that the advisory board has made Ken very well aware of the shareholder desire to get the NDA behind us. I'm confident that everything in ActM's power is being done to do that - no reason to think otherwise. I'm not thinking otherwise and I'm confident about it, but still I'd like to know about when we could breach in the NDA... Days? Weeks? Months? |
|
|
|
|
I'd just like to have an estimated date about when the NDA should end
|
|
|
|
What are the current plans for chip development?ActiveMining is in the process of gathering necessary funds for paying NRE costs on its 28nm chip. We hope these funds to be gathered soon, so that chip production can start as soon as possible. Estimated dates after NRE payment are: - Chip samples delivered in 9 weeks;
- Low-volume chip production starting in 12 weeks, using an e-beam process;
- Normal volume chip production starting in 16-18 weeks.
The above is from Ken on the first page of this thread. Ken has mentioned the bitcoins have have already been converted to fiat, and therefore I presume the NRE has been paid. So ....... 9 weeks after NRE is paid, we should get news about chip samples being in hand. Anyone hazard a guess as to when the NRE was paid, and so 9 weeks is when?? chips samples were already delivered about 10 days ago and prototype are hashing. edit: uh I thought you were talking about avalon chips |
|
|
|
I want my chips... Not a refund... I hope it's still possible to receive chips and yofu will NOT refund just all orders... Do you have a 10k order for yourself or you joined some group buy? In the second case, I don't think it is possible to split orders and ask for a refund only for a part of them |
|
|
|
they are processing batch #3 miners refunds |
|
|
|
|
I'm pissed as you, but now insult Yufu like there's no tomorrow does not help anybody.
He broke ToS with the delay, now he is trying to remedy in some way. Although the simple refund may not be enough (assembly costs already paid, deals fallen, community works trashed (see Bkk), etc...) he seems willing to find a solution.
Good suggestions can help.
Insulting only, not.
|
|
|
|
|
If we are going for a refund, I'll suggest to fill the yufu's form as soon as possible, Avalon has not been the fastest company to delivery refunds (see batch #3).
|
|
|
|
Selling 128 Avalon chips from Bizwoo Batch #1. My order ID is 68 (160 chips) in Batch 1 Orderstatus. Order details: sample chips arrived on 13 August Hashrate of one chip is >431 MH/s with burnin designed PCB. There are also other PCB designs available (see List of Avalon-ASIC-Miner-Developers and Assemblers). Bizwoo group buy works closely with the assembler Nekonos, so you could prefer him, or whoever you want. I'm actually in list for 8 4,5GH/s miners with 32W power consumption each, shipping estimated for mid september. Escrow possible, but the cost is up to the buyers. Chips price is 0.09 BTC per chip. Buyout price for all 128 chips is 11 BTCFor any info PM me |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
