Hmm so if your averaging say 100xpm per day with 50 servers, you should average 200xpm per day when you add in another 50 servers funded by the shareholders.
200xpm ÷ 26 shareholders = 7.69xpm for each share holder/day x 7 days = 53.84xpm per share holder per week?
54xpm at current exchange rate= 0.485btc.
Does that sound right?
It could be less, or it could be more. I don't want to commit to anything because it is sort of 'staging' answers, which we know isn't true.
This doesn't launch today (it could be a weak from now until all 25 is reserved) - so your exchange rate calculations will not be accurate tomorrow.
My guess is, double what I am doing or more, if cost allows for me to expand for more resources.
Is it possible to divest at a later point the BTC? It seems a bit misleading using the term "shareholders" for this
@digit
I do not understand your first sentence.
Not sure if I put too much info out in one thread. It is certainly hard to call it what it is... maybe I should say, group buy?
but it is share holders in a sense because our group buy of servers -> leads to mining -> and shares go out (just like a pool) and divided among investors.
Call it what you want, but I am not trying to be misleading. What would you call it?
I misunderstood before as my understanding the word shareholder is someone who has bought and owns shares in the service/business and so has share of the profit/loss/dividends etc and can also sell their share to someone else.
I understand what you mean now but i think a better term would be "subscribers" then shareholders if people will only paid as long as payment of 0.5BTC is received each week (please correct if i'm mistaken here).
An the total BTC received by the would 50BTC/month if limited to 25 people, i don't see how there could there be enough XPM mined make a profit for any of the subscribers, only the service provider who profits from the BTC coming in only.
Show Posts
