As my experience in last 2 year, starting of a altcoins season, big coins would always pump first, then other with potential tech coins, and ending with xrp, this sequence repeat more than 1,
. In my opinion, buy some top coin in dumping time is very likely bring you profit, it just as much as high risk coins. But using partial of your fund to invest in high risk - high return coins is not a bad idea.

To me, I think with altcoins as eth and xrp, they would be fine with built up trust yet, people would still use it anyway because of advantages, but to the others, there are too much altcoins’re being born everyday, they can hardly survive such lots of pressure from others. With that, Ithink the one which have enough money that could succeed, otherwise, there’s no chance.

The problem cryptocurrency’s altcoins is facing now that there are too much of them, investors are too hard to make a choice among them, and such a wide variety of them made money flow too fragmented. And I think that’s the main reason why they’re so hardly to grow faster.
That’s my opinion though.

Tronx is a good coin with high-tech core, fast transaction speed and stand behind is a man with such experienced in crypto, I think he is the name could stand beside with binance founder - CZ.
But after some over-hyped pump in the past, I don’t think trx worth to invest,
To me, I think they just consider trx as a tools to pump and dump, right now, they’re might working on some other coin with other outstanding fixtures. And make another hype. Then pump and dump. This would never end for greedy. As before, trx’s money was flowing to EOS...(making an example)

In my hometown where I'm living, converting is super easy, I just have to find a local dealer, then all the trading stuff will be executed directly between 2 people.
you'll get money right away when he received the bitcoin.
nothing to do with tax and legal paper. most of local dealer can handle every money amount that under 50k$.
I think yours might be the same, get some local dealer, or online but trusted dealer. good luck.

Don't think that's true.
To me, Shatoshi is not relative to bitcoin quite long time ago, since he public and said it's a decentralize currency.
Bitcoin is now controlled by the whole decentralized network. That's the real value, the only thing that made it stand out right the beginning. if he still in control, I don't think people would be happy to know, and no one's using it means the death.

what is this all about?
sarcasm?
it's quite rude anyway.
Anything that go up too fast, will soon corrupt as fast.
and I don't think cryptocurrency is one of them, cause after 90% lose compare ATH, but still some value left, and I think from now on, the real value will go on, continue to define the truth what it be, this kind of tech is really have potential to change the world, or at least, it's application will widely spread.

yep, it's your choice to buy or sell. but in this case, even 5 years of experienced trader (as my main job right now), I can hardly sure what I think about next movement of bitcoin is right. I think market is not just too small, easy to control.
Even I know it has much potential left (that's why now I'm still into this).
But continue this way just make everyone exhausted, and one by one give up.
Hold tight, the best always there, for the one who deserve, last man still believe. sit tight and cut loss, increase amount of coins.

there's always some exception, I think
but it's kind of a rule: you will likely can never get rich if you're not good at anything.
as crypto investors, if don't have any knowledge, so it's no different from gambling.

Bitcoin is both an asset and a medium of exchange with goods.  Consider bitcoin as gold, there are a number of countries where people use gold to exchange goods.  Bitcoin is valid for exchange at the time its rate is set.  Bitcoin is a form of investment asset when someone holds Bitcoin long enough for Bitcoin to increase or decrease in value.  To say that Bitcoin is not a means of exchange is not true.

It seems that they are trying to control cash flow, limiting cash transactions will make transactions more transparent.  This makes the anonymity of monetary transactions lost.  Cashless transactions will reduce costs such as printing costs, transportation costs and cash flow losses.
It seems that Indonesia is learning from China and other countries in the region about making cashless transactions.

This will not be possible as miners will never accept this proposal from the bitcoincore team.  The miners spent a great deal of money to build their mining system.  If they were only to propose alternative hardware, it would continue to be another way for hardware companies to make a profit.  Currently this proposal is not feasible.

Mining will cost a lot of money to buy equipment and set up electric networks.  Not to mention the cost to pay for electricity each month.  If you have a small amount of money to buy equipment, abandon the idea of ​​mining Bitcoin because mining requires more diggers connected to create a larger network.  You will have to make a loss as some single machines will not work.  I have several friends who have liquidated their entire system because there is not enough profit to pay their electricity costs.

Mining all of Bitcoin in 2140 is theoretical.  Bitcoin is mined based on the power of the computer, Blockchain will pay for each block created based on the computing speed of the computer, also known as Genesis minning.  If there are many computers working together to solve the Bitcoin problem, it means that the mining speed will be faster.  So the time to create a block is relative.

Playing games on Blockchain can make that altcoin's blockchain heavier and generate some unintended errors.  Game history can be specifically and accurately recorded.  I was worried about being able to hack to cheat in the game because not long ago someone hacked EOS blockchain in a Dapp and he made a lot of money by raising the win rate.

in just 2 years 1 million Bitcoin was mined.  the rest will certainly be mined before 2100. Although Bitcoin is limited, we can divide Bitcoin into 10,000,000 Satoshi units, so rest assured that we still have plenty of Bitcoin to use.

WEEK 2(20/11 - 26/11)
Telegram Campaign
Telegram Username: @langbqq9
Bitcointalk Username: ilovealtcoins
Wearing IMO Ecosystem Telegram Avatar: YES
Wearing https://www.imoex.top on Telegram Name: YES
UID Number From IMO Wallet: 72838
1. https://t.me/imoexchange/65719
2. https://t.me/imoexchange/65721
3. https://t.me/imoexchange/66360
4. https://t.me/imoexchange/67018
5. https://t.me/imoexchange/67023
6. https://t.me/imoexchange/67339
7. https://t.me/imoexchange/67438
8. https://t.me/imoexchange/67460
9. https://t.me/imoexchange/68831
10. https://t.me/imoexchange/68845

They saw the potential of Blockchain technology.  At the end of 2017 they witnessed the peak of Bitcoin and they wanted to create their own crypto.  The advantage of Blockchain technology is clearly seen in the strict management, which does not allow payment of 2 times for the same amount.  So for auditors it is an advantage to avoid command space in their financial systems.  Their government has absolute control.  
Bitcoin can be created by mining operations, but national crypto will be created by that country and licensed by that national currency similar to tether, usdc ... They cannot put Bitcoin into the system.  their official monetary system because in this race they have come later and they will not give up on their front.

1 Bitcoin can split up to 100,000,000 satoshi so don't worry.  The decrease in bitcoin circulation means that the market will be more scarce and people will want to own more Bitcoin.  The market situation is now dominated by some bad news and bitcoin holders are trying to manipulate the market to own more bitcoins.

I don't understand why there are some projects that organize IEOs that only fall in $ 500,000 or maybe less.  Organizing the IEO alone is a challenge.  They need money to develop projects and cover various costs.  Blockchain engineers are few, so hiring them is expensive and long term.  Another problem is the manipulation of the value of the trading floor and the project owner.  If they hadn't done so at Binance, houbi, okex, bitmat ... then maybe people wouldn't blindly rush in.