Luiz Suarez was released on a free transfer by Atletico Madrid. The latest news is that his agent offered him to Lazio, on the other hand, it is reported that Aston Villa also wants Suarez's services under the care of his former team-mate Gerrard. If Aston Villa really want him I think very soon he will join and sign a contract.
It is possible that Luis Suarez joined Aston Villa, Luis Suarez is not without reason to move to Aston Villa, the first factor is the presence of Steven Gerrard, Luis Suarez was a teammate with Steven Gerrard when they were still defending Liverpool. Second, after appointing Steven Gerrard as manager, Aston Villa made a promising maneuver in the transfer market. Philippe Coutinho was successfully brought in from Barcelona, Aston Villa also brought Lucas Digne who was bought from Everton. The Steven Gerrard factor can trigger Luis Suarez to land at Aston Villa, especially when there is Philippe Coutinho who was a partner when they were still defending Liverpool and Barcelona. well i read that argentine club river plate is interested in luiz suarez and that luis suarez said he needs 7 10 days to make a decision, i also heard that sevilla and real sociedad are also interested in him. i think that if he chooses aston villa he would be making a choice where he would have to be on the bench many times, i doubt that at aston villa he will play every game for 90 minutes, actually choosing to go to some english club he will be condemning themselves. so my opinion would be that he would choose the Argentine club of River Plate. that way he could finish his career very well Aston Villa can be a good place for Luis Suarez because I really believe that he still has the potential of playing well in the English Premier League in him. I really don't understand how people just throw the players away when they reach a certain age. I believe Suarez will still be able to play really well even though his last season was not so great with Atletico Madrid. But if he is looking to play for a longer time and not retire in the recent future I think Liverpool can be a good place for him. |
|
|
|
The market is no more favourable to many coins now, especially new coins. I would only recommend top coins on coinmarketcap. Coins like Solana, Polkadot, Dogecoin, Xrp, fantom and Sandbox. These coins mentioned will possibly give 10x profits once the bearish market is over
Exactly, Instead of investing in new coins that don't have any guarantee of return, we should focus on the top coins as they have also dropped a lot in price. Just buy and wait for the next bull season they will x10 from this price is possible. Holding the top coins helps us to reduce risks and have a much higher chance of making a profit compared to new projects. |
|
|
|
India lost the second match as well as the first T20. Indian players have been playing in the IPL for a long time, at the same time India is the host of this series. However, their performance in both the matches was poor. In the first match, India lost badly despite giving a huge target of 212 runs. In today's match, India has given a target of only 149 runs. Heinrich Klaasen's devastating 81 off 48 balls helped South Africa to win today. With three matches left in the series, India's chances of winning the series still exist.
It was meant to be as the target was low. South Africa now leading the 5 match T20 series with two victory. I believe that South Africa will win this series. India lost the first match for their poor bowling figure during the death overs. And they lost the match today as their batsmen failed to set a big target. Indian team should change their game plan. South Africa won the toss and decided to bat bowl first in both match. And they have chased the target without any difficulties. South Africa will do the same thing if they win the toss in next match. The Indian players were extra confident after delivering a big target in the first match. This is why they have been defeated. The performance of the bowler was weak, and Indian fielding was not good. In the second match, the performance of both Indian batsmen and bowlers both was poor. With a target of only 149 runs, it was not possible for South Africa to win against this experienced team. I totally agree with you. India lost the first match due to overconfidence. Otherwise, 212 was a good enough target for India to win. But South Africa easily won the match by collecting 212 runs. However, the bowling of Indian bowlers was uncontrolled in the second match as well. South Africa lost 3 wickets for just 29 runs. And South Africa's collection in 8 over was only 36 runs. But South Africa scored 138 runs in 16 overs. South Africa scored 102 runs in just 8 overs. With such uncontrolled bowling, India will also lose in upcoming matches. We have to accept that the Indian bowling line-up is also weak now. And since the bowling lineup is weak, it is very important for the batsmen to perform more better. An experienced bowler like Bhumrh is not in the squad. And It is very difficult to find 5 experienced bowlers in India now. Though Bhubaneswar Kumar bowled brilliantly but the performance of other bowlers was not satisfactory. |
|
|
|
As expected, Pakistan has won the 3rd ODI match too. West Indies got whitewashed by Pakistan. Now Pakistan team is at a safe position in the ICC Men's Cricket World Cup Super League table. They were at 10th position before the start of this series, but now they got the 4th position with 9 wins. Perhaps, it won't be easy for South Africa to enter in the top 8. New Zealand may enter in the top 8 of World Cup Super League table. The squads from South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan and England are now very strong. On the other hand, the Australian and Indian squads have weakened. And so my guess is that the above i mentioned teams will be at the top of the World Cup Super League table. The performance of India and Australia needs to be further improved. The performance of their players is now completely irregular. |
|
|
|
PSG have had good managers so far. It is a sure thing to me. The problem is that they still haven't been able to find the one who can make them reach the Champions League championship easier. People are all talking about Zinedine Zidane to be the most fitting manager for PSG now. To be honest it is the same for me too. I just trust him a lot as I really admired his management at Real Madrid. Why wouldn't he experience the same success with PSG too? There isn't still any official news linking PSG to him for now but I hope a deal like this can happen.
PSG have a lot of money, they have enough talented and star players. Their only weakness is their lack of experienced and tactical coaches. I believe that if Zidane takes charge of PSG then the situation of PSG will change. Zidane's match strategy is very nice. At the same time he will be able to find out the problems of the players and take appropriate steps to solve the problems. |
|
|
|
Honestly, it seems to me that Mourinho’s time has passed and that he is no longer a top coach with new ideas, as he was 10 years ago at his peak.
I think there are a lot better coaches than him right now, more innovative and modern, like Guardiola or Klopp.
There is another problem with Zidane. While coaching Real Madrid he achieved great results in the Champions League, but not so much because of the system or the game plan, but more based on the individual quality of the players.
That’s why he was much worse with Real in the Spanish football league and doesn’t have a lot of Spanish league titles.
I’m not sure they’re a good choice for PSG.
I wonder how Klopp's innovativeness manifests itself in your opinion? His team plays the same football as 5 and 10 years ago. As for Guardiola, I can't think of anything about him that would make him stand out among hundreds of other coaches. His only "innovation" is to get a top team and take titles with it - Barcelona then Bayern with which he could not win the Champions League and now City which spend space money on football players but again he cannot win the Champions League. I don't think that only winning the Champions League should suggest the quality of a coach. But in this case, exceptions can be made because Pep Guardiola has a very good team playing under him. I really think that he should have won the Champions League this time with Manchester City. But they have lost to Real Madrid which absolutely can be said did not have a very good squad, hope they will be able to do better in the next season. Unfortunately, Manchester City lost to Real Madrid this season. Manchester City was ahead till 90th minutes of the match. And 90 minutes later, City conceded three goals and lost. This is nothing but misfortune. However, Guardiola wants to make his team stronger. They will definitely be aiming for the Champions League title again next season. |
|
|
|
That performance of Neymar has been on a steady decline since the moment he left Barcelona. And the last season of him was also not good at all. At least not up to his standards of football.
After joining PSG, Neymar's performance began to decline. He has been sidelined for a long time due to injury in almost every season. As a result, his performance tends to be worse. Since Neymar's fitness is not good, I do not expect a good and regular performance from him next season. Neymar played his highest match in Paris Saint-Germain's jersey in the last season. He has performed in 22 matches. Although he has scored only 13 goals. In the 18-19 season he played with 17 mats and in the 19-20 season he has played in only 15 matches. PSG gives Neymar very high wages. So Neymar's poor performance is very disappointing. |
|
|
|
Barcelona need to become successful to make more money to solve their financial problems. This means that they will need to fight hard for the La Liga title and for reaching as good stage as possible in the Champions League at the same time. They are both hard to do tasks for them as they are recovering newly. But the football they played recently has made me excited about their next season performance. I hope they can maintain and improve this level more by next season.
If Barcelona have not yet overcome the financial crisis, it would be foolish for them to buy more strikers next season. The Barcelona forward is now stable. They need to increase the strength of midfield and defense. If he can't strengthen the defense, it will be difficult for Barcelona to win the title next season. |
|
|
|
Switzerland 1 : 0 Portugal
I am now watching the match between Switzerland vs Portugal. Today my guess is that Switzerland will win. Because the main player in Portugal's squad Ronaldo is missing today. Switzerland took a 1-0 lead with a goal just 1 minute into the match. My prediction is that Switzerland will be able to win this match 1-0. Let's see what will happen.
I think your precdiction is going to be correct. Because after scoring in the first minute, the players of Switzerland are not trying to attack any more. They are playing completely defensive. And in 30 minutes they were able to make only one shots. They will probably want to win this match 1-0 by playing defensively. |
|
|
|
Yes indeed when Ronaldo was still playing with him, Benzema was always able to compete. After Ronaldo decided to leave he was the only player who was consistent with his goals. I don't mean to compare the two, because both are equally good players even though there are some things that each one of them lacks. The potential of players who can replace his role does exist, but for now there is no visible player who really stands out.
After Ronaldo left the team, Benzema became his worthy replacement. And in the last few seasons he has been consistently performing well. But Real Madrid are unlikely to find a worthy replacement after Benzema leaves the team. Mbappe or Haaland could have been worthy substitutes, but Real Madrid have failed to sign both players. Vinicius will probably be Real Madrid's most important player after Benzema leaves the team |
|
|
|
I think new projects are a good opportunity for profit, as we know the market is currently red and investing or holding old coins is very difficult to profit, I make new projects the largest portion, then I see progress after 6 months, if it looks promising then I will buy more.
You are right, new projects bring more profit and even big profit for investors. But do you know how risky investment projects can be, finding a gem is like finding a needle in a haystack. If you are good enough and confident that you can find it then you can invest and make sure you can afford to lose if the new projects are scams. |
|
|
|
1/6 Bitcoin (BTC)
1/6 Ethereum (ETH)
1/6 Polygon (MATIC)
1/6 ApeCoin (APE)
1/6 Aave (AAVE)
1/6 Astar (ASTR)
Why not put majority of your portfolio on BTC and ETH? We should learn our lessons from the Luna fiasco, it was a solid and even in the top 10 but all of a sudden it was a failure and the price almost goes to 0. And with that, Apecoin and Astar seems to be questionable investment for me, just saying. Better if you have BNB or ADA or your list. what do you think about nee NFT p2e projects? are they good for the long term? and is there a bigger chance to get more profit than in crypto There is still nothing to confirm the future of P2E will continue, P2E is also just a temporary trend in the market and its attraction has decreased significantly instead of the M2E trend. Plus the market is volatile so investing in p2e at this time is very risky, I recommend looking for the top coins to hold during this time instead of investing in new projects or uncertain coins sure about the future. |
|
|
|
I'm looking for any crypto companies that are not gambling related.
Can you be more specific what you are looking for?, crypto companies as far as I know they have nothing to do with gambling. It is normal for gambling sites to choose certain cryptocurrencies as payment methods and it has almost no effect on the reputation of those coins. I'm looking for any businesses that are crypto related that have nothing to do with gambling. So no casinos, or companies that have a native crypto token that is pegged to their services/products. Most gambling companies only accept some popular cryptocurrencies like btc, eth, ltc...The fact that a coin is used in gambling does not affect the value or reputation of those coins. No one can ban those businesses from using the coins they want. if you want to find coins that are not accepted by gambling companies there are dozens of such coins. |
|
|
|
I'm looking for any crypto companies that are not gambling related.
Can you be more specific what you are looking for?, crypto companies as far as I know they have nothing to do with gambling. It is normal for gambling sites to choose certain cryptocurrencies as payment methods and it has almost no effect on the reputation of those coins. |
|
|
|
1/6 Bitcoin (BTC)
1/6 Ethereum (ETH)
1/6 Polygon (MATIC)
1/6 ApeCoin (APE)
1/6 Aave (AAVE)
1/6 Astar (ASTR)
The risk of your portfolio is too high because you are giving the same weight to those relatively unknown altcoins than the importance that you are giving to bitcoin and ethereum, in my opinion bitcoin and ethereum should at minimum constitute 67% of your portfolio, and then you could think about how to distribute the remaining 33% of your capital to the rest of the coins. Agree, he has evenly distributed his assets among coins, it is too risky to put too much on Ape, the rest of the altcoins are potential alts but they are still altcoins and still carry unforeseeable risks. If it were me, I would put 70% of my assets in bitcoin and ethereum, the rest I will buy altcoins. |
|
|
|
Of course, it's not a good idea to hold coins during a bear market, but not everyone gets out in time when a bear market occurs. For those who have not had time to cashout and still hold, I think instead of holding them in the wallet and doing nothing, we can take it to staking to increase the number of coins.
At the same time, you need to carefully choose a platform for staking, if you still decide to increase the number of coins in this way. It very often happens that an investor sees a large percentage of profitability offered by a dubious platform and decides to place his coins there for staking and as a result of such a decision loses his money. In general, the best solution is to receive passive income from staking such coins that you do not need to withdraw outside your wallet using the Proof-of-stake algorithm. I only stake on reputable and trusted platforms like binance, houbi, kucoin... There is no reason to bet on new and unknown platforms, only projects and platforms with matching APY will be selected. not too low and always be wary of platforms that pay unusually high APY. |
|
|
|
Your opinion, NFT last long or not ?
-
I'm not really sure NFT can last long, I think it's like a popular trend and will disappear one day, and is nothing new in the cryptocurrency industry. But this is just my opinion, if you believe it, please continue I'm not very interested in NFT, and I'm not really into it either, although I know something could work in my favor there, but it's about interest Honestly, aside from the hype, the NFT isn't nearly as useful so I'm also skeptical about the future of NFT. As bear season dominates the market, NFT, P2E trends are struggling to find living space so it is difficult to talk about their future. Maybe they will disappear and be replaced by new trends but really serious projects can still exist and continue to grow. |
|
|
|
When is a good time to start buying altcoins? Is bitcoin ever going to 25,000$ in the coming weeks? How do you plan to start building your portfolio for the next bull market? Is now a good time to start buying?.
There have been many predictions bitcoin will drop to 25k but that is just a prediction and no one knows how bitcoin will move tomorrow. Looking at the market, many of the top coins have also lost more than 70% of their ATH value so I think this is the time to buy but buy many times if the price continues to fall, not buy all at once. |
|
|
|
In a bear market like now, I think it's better to stake than hold and do nothing, the market hasn't recovered quickly so it's perfectly appropriate to stake now. All are risky so even holding so staking is a way to effectively increase the number of coins.
In a bear market, it is better not to hold coins at all, in this case, when the price drops, you will be able to buy these coins at a lower price. And in this case, their quantities will be several times more than what you will receive as a profit from staking. Of course, it's not a good idea to hold coins during a bear market, but not everyone gets out in time when a bear market occurs. For those who have not had time to cashout and still hold, I think instead of holding them in the wallet and doing nothing, we can take it to staking to increase the number of coins. |
|
|
|
One state, one vote idea is not fair, because in India the states and union territories and not similar in size. On one hand we have Uttar Pradesh with a (growing) population of 250 million, and on the other hand we have Sikkim with a (declining) population of 600,000. And there are Union Territories with a population in five digits. So how can it be justified, if Sikkim is given the same voting rights as Uttar Pradesh? The existing system of giving multiple votes to some of the states is wrong, but Lodha's stupid recommendation is even worse.
This might not look good on argument because of economics but in a longer run if one wants to break monopoly of few states in the BCCI then 1 state, 1 vote seems viable solution and it's BCCI job to empower weaken states. We've discussed UP once, Personally i'm big supporter of UP fielding at least 3 teams (4 if you count Bundelkhand, basic formation according to district distribution) but in doing so we're are creating another Maharashtra type of model as far as voting is concern. Ideally any states should be allowed to have multiple teams according to population and financial situation but must get only 1 vote. Exactly. If the bigger States have more power they will obviously try to abuse their power. And the smaller States will obviously feel inferior compared to the biggest States. It is obviously not going to be a solution for now. and it might also cause a lot of problems regarding the power position but it is a good solution for the long run. But let me be clear I don't support equality. I support justice and I think this will be a justifiable option so that no state feels inferior or superior compared to others. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
