I'd also like to share an opinion on this matter, although it will be, probably, most unusual OP heard so far.

I understand that the percentage of 24% is ridiculous. I also understand there are no KYC-less ATMs in Greece. Working with banks is also totally not recommendable as you share almost same risks as with centralized crypto exchanges (not all risks the lattest present but still most of them).

I see some users suggested decentralized exchanges or peer-to-peer transfers.

---

In case you are really interested, in Bucharest you will find three KYC-less methods for changing BTC with fiat.

.1 The KYC-less ATMs of BitcoinRomania: these can be found thorough entire country but best prices are at the ones from their headquarter, which is in Bucharest downtown. You can cash out amounts up to 1000 euros without any kind of KYC and amounts between 1000-3000 euros by offering a phone number. I asked them why they request the phone number and they said that in case you lose the receipt given by the ATM, which contains the transaction internal code, at least you have a text message from them containing that code, thus if you call them you can easily receive assistance. You can perform multiple withdrawals with amounts between 1000-3000 euros or, alternatively, some more withdrawals with amounts of 0-1000 euros, in case you don't want to use a phone number. In any case, you can buy a KYC-less phone sim card at the price of 2 euros and use it with an old phone. ATMs have prices with ~10-11% lower than BTC value on CoinMarketCap. You can also show yourself in front of these ATMs while wearing a hoodie, sunglasses and face mask -- their internal software won't block the transaction although the camera is not detecting your face.

2. In Bucharest you can find a very serious guy, named Razvan_BTC. He is offering crypto-fiat exchanges of any amounts, at a very small fee (about 3.5-4.5%). Razvan is very correct and I am personally granting for him. I made multiple deals with him and each time he was very correct. I know that it looks risky but if my word presents any sort of trustworthiness then you can talk to him at any time. He performs his activities also in Bucharest downtown.

3. Third option is a regular money exchange, which I found by pure chance. It is located near BitcoinRomania headquarter and, excepting money, it also operates with gold, silver, various jewelry etc. The owner (I think he was the owner) told me that at his echange you can also change crypto with fiat, for a very good fee (about 5% if I remember well). Obviously, also KYC-less. However, I have not tried yet their services.

I used services of BitcoinRomania in the past and I vouch for them, in case you feel safer inside the precincts of an actual company. Then I switched to Razvan_BTC's services and the financial advantage is huge.

A round-trip flight from Athens to Bucharest is only 203 euros and in 1.5h you are here.

Since you said you don't want to sell under 50.000 euros, the 203 euros for plane tickets represent 0.4% of the 50.000 euros transaction. I guess it's a good deal compared with the 24% you mentioned in OP, isn't it? 

In case you will ever think about this or actually take the decision, you can always contact me or contact Razvan and let him know that I introduced him to you. As a plus, you'll also have the chance to see Bucharest downtown, where the old city is also located, and which is a very nice area to visit!

February 2023 update: sadly, the Youtube link containing the documentary is not functional anymore. It actually works, but the user which posted the film restricted access to it by making it private.

I also tried to access the website freeross.org, knowing that it was also hosting the documentary. Yet another surprise:



Afterwards I tried to search the documentary on Google: still nothing. Apparently, the material is not present anymore on any website; or, at least, it's not accesible to public anymore. I searched using many keywords, including "Railroaded", this being the term used for the initial presentation of the material.

Now I'm asking: why did the Youtube user restrict the access to the film? Furthermore: why can't the documentary be found anymore on any other website? Even more importat: why was it eliminated even from the website of Free Ross foundation? If, for some reason, the websites hosting the material could choose to restrict public access to it (although it seems hard to believe that all those websites took this decision), still the question remains: why doesn't it appear anymore even on the site of the organization meant to support Ross?

Were all these websites pressured or threatened by agencies?

Maybe none of these questions will ever be answered.

However, if anyone manages to find the documentary online, please share it here as well.

Din pacate, link-ul de Youtube care continea documentarul nu mai functioneaza. De fapt functioneaza, insa cel care a postat filmul a restrictionat accesul la material, acesta fiind acum privat.

Am incercat sa accesez si site-ul freeross.org, stiind ca si acesta detinea documentarul. Surpriza insa:



Am incercat apoi sa caut documentarul pe Google: nimic. Aparent, materialul nu mai este prezent pe niciun site; sau, cel putin, nu mai este disponibil publicului. Am cautat dupa mai multe cuvinte cheie, inclusiv "Railroaded", acesta fiind termenul cu care a fost prezentat initial materialul.

Stau si ma intreb: de ce a retras utilizatorul de Youtube accesul la film? Mai mult: de ce nu mai poate acesta fi gasit pe niciun alt site? Si mai importat: de ce a fost eliminat chiar si de pe site-ul fundatiei Free Ross? Daca, din diverse motive, site-urile care il gazduiau puteau opta sa nu il mai ofere publicului (desi ar parea greu de crezut ca absolut toate site-urile respective ar fi decis sa procedeze similar), totusi, ramane intrebarea: de ce nu mai apare nici pe site-ul organizatiei construite spentru a-l sprijini pe Ross?

Au fost oare toate aceste site-uri supuse amenintarilor de catre serviciile secrete americane?

Probabil ca toate aceste intrebari vor ramane fara raspuns.

Totusi, daca cineva mai gaseste materialul online, sa posteze aici link-ul catre documentar.

Autor: GazetaBitcoin
Topic original: Silk Road Case: The Real, Untold Story. Is Karpelès Satoshi or DPR?

---

---

A mai vizionat cineva cel mai recent documentar despre Ross Ulbricht? Poate fi găsit pe Youtube (sau la acest link secundar) și a fost creat de organizația Free Ross.

Întreb deoarece am sesizat niște afirmații interesante, pe lângă toată injustiția practicată de-a lungul procesului. Injustiția de care a avut parte Ross este bine știută (cred) de majoritatea celor care cunosc detaliile cazului; multe dintre aceste detalii au fost detaliate și de xtraelv, în topicul său foarte interesant.

Totuși, documentarul expune și unele detalii neștiute (cel puțin de către mine). Unele sunt foarte departe de realitate (cum ar fi suspiciunea că Mark Karpelès ar fi Satoshi, ceea ce eu consider a fi o inepție, însă nimeni nu știe adevărul), însă unele ridică semne de întrebare… În plus, filmul vine și cu ideea conform căreia Karpelès ar fi și DPR, nu doar Satoshi.

• De pildă, la începutul documentarului (între 0:04 și 09:22), se expune faptul că prima mențiune despre Silk Road a avut loc pe forum și a aparținut utilizatorului silkroad. Postarea a apărut în cadrul topicului Silk Road: anonymous marketplace. Feedback requested (ceea ce este corect). Jared Der-Yeghiayan, primul agent care a investigat cazul (și care nu a spus niciodată cum a aflat despre existența SR), a descoperit că site-ul menționat în topic (silkroadmarket.org) era doar o platformă a Internetului de suprafață, care îi informa pe vizitatori despre cum să utilizeze Tor și cum să acceseze adevărata piață neagră SR, care se afla pe Internetul ascuns. Der-Yeghiayan a mai descoperit că silkroadmarket.org a fost înregistrat prin intermediul XTA.net, un server de domenii deținut de o companie a lui Mark Karpelès numită Mutum Sigillum. După cum știți deja, Karpelès este fostul proprietar al exchange-ului defunct Mt. Gox. Din acest moment a început suspiciunea că DPR (noul proprietar al Silk Road, după ce Ross i-a predat site-ul) este unul și același cu proprietarul Mt. Gox.
• În acea etapă, conform spuselor lui Ross, el nu mai deținea SR. El a declarat că se simțea copleșit și, după ce a găsit pe cineva care-l ajuta mult cu site-ul, a decis să i-l predea acestuia. Pseudonimul acestui personajj era DPR (Dread Pirate Roberts) și el este cel suspectat a fi Karpelès.
• De aici, lucrurile devin și mai interesante: Karpelès a cumpărat Mt. Gox cam în aceeași perioadă în care SR a fost lansat. În documentar se ridică ideea că acest Karpelès ar putea fi Satoshi (ceea ce eu nu cred) și că ar fi avut toate motivele din lume pentru a lansa SR, putând plasa acolo cantitățile de BTC obținute prin intermediul Mt. Gox și vice-versa. Pe lângă aceste coincidențe stranii, se lansează și afirmația absurdă că proprietarul BitcoinTalk ar fi tot Karpelès, informația fiindu-i furnizată lui Der-Yeghiayan de un informator secret, care fusese anterior angajat de Karpelès. Această supoziție a apărut după o altă coincidență expusă în film, după cum urmează: platforma SMF, utilizată pentru site-ul BitcoinTalk site, a fost folosită de asemeneă și pentru forumul de discuții al Silk Road. Pe lângă acestea, dată fiind raritatea utilizării SMF în cadrul forumurilor, faptul că totuși ambele platforme erau bazate pe SMF a trezit suspiciunea investigatorului, determinându-l să creadă tot mai mult că și SR și BitcoinTalk aveau un singur proprietar, ceea ce ducea la presupunerea că Mark Karpelès ar fi putut fi Satoshi.

Exemplu de similitudinea între site-uri în ceea ce privește interfața cu utilizatorul:

• Revenind la Ross și la modul în care invetigația a fost demarată (32:00 - 34:46): se afirmă că guvernul a apelat la o “construcție paralelă” a cazului, pentru a-l face pe Ross să pară vinovat și să pară că este adevăratul DPR. Mai precis, un agent al IRS (n.b. fiscul american), pe nume Gary Alford, a găsit o postare pe BitcoinTalk în care apărea emailul lui Ross, postarea fiind scrisă înainte de topicul găsit de Der-Yeghiayan (menționat anterior). Practic, Der-Yeghiayan a găsit topicul Silk Road: anonymous marketplace. Feedback requested , care a fost scris la data de 1 martie 2011, de utilizatorul silkroad, în timp ce Alford a afirmat că a găsit o postare a utilizatorului altoid din data de 29 ianuarie 2011 (fără a menționa numele topicului). Documentarul spune că Der-Yeghiayan nu ar fi avut cum să găsească această postare în timpul investigației, întrucât aceasta nu exista. În schimb, Alford a susținut că a găsit respectiva postare ca fiind citată de un alt membru al forumului, în cadrul unei discuții despre SR (eu nu am putut găsi această postare, chiar dacă am căutat destul de mult). Ulterior, Alford a menționat adevărata postare a lui altoid, din 11 octombrie 2011 (pe care am putu-o găsi și eu: IT pro needed for venture backed bitcoin startup), aceasta conținând o adresa de email: "rossulbricht at gmail dot com". Și din acest moment autoritățile au început să suspecteze că Ross era cel din spatele Silk Road.

Totuși, se spune în documentar, această informație ar fi putut fi plantată de Karpelès (cel despre care se spune că ar fi putut fi proprietarul BitcoinTalk) sau de un alt utilizator care să aibă un înivel de acces. În plus, modul în care Alford a găsit respectivul email este comparat cu “a găsi acul în carul cu fân” (comparație cu care sunt total de acord). Cu alte cuvinte, dintre toți oamenii care încercau să afle informații despre proprietarul SR, doar Alford a reușit să găsească acest email. De aici a apărut și ideea că informația ar fi putut fi plantată. Și pare și mai realistic să fi fost cineva cu un nivel înalt de acces, care să fi scris respectiva postare ca și cum ar fi fost făcută de Ross, apoi să predea informația lui Alford.

Deși întregul documentar este foarte interesant, doar primele 35 minute sunt cele care ridică întrebările detaliate în acest topic. Ar fi putut fi Karpelès Satoshi și DPR? Un alt amănunt, nespecificat în documentar, dar cunoscut pe forum, este acela că Mark Karpelès a realizat și un audit pentru BitcoinTalk. Poate că un asemenea aspect ar fi ridicat și mai multă suspiciune în documentar.


La final, țin să menționez că m-a fascinat întregul film, acesta aducând noi detalii despre cazul lui Ross, despre modul incredibil în care a fost tratat de judecător sau despre sabotajele realizate de unele agenții / agenți secreți la adresa altor agenții / agenți. Recomand tuturor vizionarea, este un documentar de neratat!

Topicul este auto-moderat pentru evitarea spam-ului.

I have to confess that this question also popped into my mind.

I actually made some digging on this matter. And the results are... how to say... fascinating. Apparently, saxydev made another "Houdini move" when he sent the payment to c0ldbrewz, as he managed to pay without having a XMR wallet At least this is what I can understand from this sentence, which I found in the other topic:


Since the active businessman scammer said he will install a XMR wallet, this means he did not have one, right? Then taking into consideration that there are infinitesimal chances for him to delete a XMR wallet just after paying to c0ldbrewz (as he would not have any reason to do that), we conclude that he made the payment on Monero network without having a wallet, which is, again, pure magic. Fabulous! Am I missing something here?

Shush guys, please don't make any noise as saxydev is having his 48-72h beauty sleep and it would not be nice to disturb poor man from his nap. We all know how hard working he is and that he really needed to rest well.

Let's talk in silence.

---

I appreciate your good intentions, but I think that your effort is like asking the "sup fellas gang" to stop spamming. Do you remember the "sup fellas gang"?

Sup holydarkness? 

---

Flag supported from my side as well. Good job, OP!

---

I said in multiple occasions that this pauper is eating dirt from under his fingernails but, however, he seems to be working with "OK amounts" of money:


You hear that, NotATether? 200.000E are an "Ok amount". From his tone this sounds like "not good, not bad" So I also do not understand what could possibly happen for him to not be able to pay the 2200$ owed to dkbit98 nor the 90$ owed to OP. His "financial department" also failed to make the payment. Very strange.

Yet after all these, Rizzrack-the-fan-of scammers and his alt accuse me for daring to expose this scammer!

---

Lol.


Perhaps he just did "The Houdini move"?

However, he anticipated doing this multiple occasions:


Maybe he just decided to keep his words, as a honorable person which he is.

Time for some more statistics, thanks to icopress

• 1358 views since launch
• 551 completed works
• 7'3" Avg. Time to Complete
• 12.07 Avg. Correct Answers

• 740 views since launch
• 301 completed works
• 8'17" Avg. Time to Complete
• 10.66 Avg. Correct Answers

For those interested in a comparison, we have a 83% increase of views compared to December 2022; 83% increase of completed works; average time to complete decreased with 1'14"; average correct answers increased with 13.2%. The fact that average correct answers increased is a clear trend that users are learning from this quiz!

Here are the previous statistics:

December 2022

February 2022

Those interested to see all in-depth details of previous statistics can do it here.

Hey ibminer, thanks for your reply! I fully understand the reasons behind your decision. I understand why you kept working on your project and also why free time is not your friend. What can I say, I have same situation For 1.5 years I had two full time jobs. And, of course, family duties, a baby, other chores, all which don't leave too much free time... This is life!

However, I am glad to hear that you kept secretly ( ) working on your project. I remember reading Welsh's topic back then, while I was active here for just a month (indeed, my profile was made in 2017 but I only became active in late October 2019). And I remember I was so hungry to read everything I could on the forum. By pure chance I found Welsh's topic too and I found the idea to be very appealing. However, time passed and, as I kept reading every topic which came at hand, I was just like a dry sponge absorbing information; in the end I actually forgot about that topic's existence.

Yet you brought it back to my memory! Seeing that you kept working on this matter makes me hope that at some point in time your cards will come to fruition. And the fact that you kept working is what makes to be a small chance for this to happen. What can I say? I will encourage you to keep working, when you have some free time and who knows, maybe after some years something nice will happen 

---

To say the least, now you have a better picture of our favored DT member clown Have you seen also what feedback he left on my profile? I asked him in many occasions to make the slightest proof for his dumb allegations yet he never replied to me, lol

Salut si bine ai venit!

Ai venit, poate, in cel mai potrivit loc pentru a obtine informatii despre crypto  Eu, de pilda, de multe ori cand vreau sa aflu ceva din crypto scriu pe Google "[ce_ma_intereseaza_pe_mine]spatiuBitcoinTalk". Asa vad si daca s-a discutat despre subiect pe forum. Daca da, urmaresc si eu ce spune lumea si, cu precadere, caut ideile utilizatorilor cu experienta.

---

Din fericire, ai aparut la timp aici pentru a preveni o situatie riscanta in care te afli. Din nefericire, ea nu poate fi ameliorata complet. Am sa iti redau mai jos ce scrisesem altui utilizator roman, care s-a ars deja nerespectand regulile de mai jos:


Revenind, daca cele de mai sus te-au pus pe ganduri si vei inceta sa mai folosesti exchange-urile centralizate, tot ramane o problema, asa cum scrisesem mai sus: datele personale odata dezvaluite nu mai sunt personale. Din pacate, tu ti-ai predat deja datele catre Binance. Este foarte greu, daca nu chiar imposibil sa le ai sterse, chiar si daca iti inchizi contul. Vreo 5 ani, daca nu ma insel, ti le pastreaza ei oricum, in vederea unor eventuale situatii legale ce ar putea aparea. Mai departe, poti invoca tu orice GDPR, tot nu vei avea certitudinea ca ti-au sters datele.

Mai departe, stiai ca si Binance a fost spart de hackeri? Faptul ca iti detii banii la Binance nu reprezinta nicio siguranta. Fondurile trebuie sa stea mereu in portofelul tau personal, unde tu detii cheile private.

Ai idee cate exchange-uri au fost sparte pana acum? Pe langa Mt. Gox, care a insemnat cea mai mare pierdere posibila in toata istoria crypto (s-a furat o suma de peste 800.000 BTC, din care au fost recuperati vreo 200.000 BTC, gasindu-se un portofel "uitat"), acest topic iti poate deschide ochii in fata numarului acestor orori.

Referitor la ce a spus NeuroticFish, intr-adevar, la sume mici (de care sa nu iti pese daca le pierzi), poti ignora riscul de a pierde bani. Insa in continuare nu stii ce se va intampla cu datele tale personale. Acum depinde de cat pret pui tu pe datele tale personale.

---

Sincer, nu stiu cati din cei mai vechi, cu experienta sau maximalisti Bitcoin vor fi interesati de monede marunte. Poate doar cei care merg pe premisa ca "au pierdut trenul Bitcoin" (ceea ce este, desigur, o mentalitate gresita: cel mai bun moment de a cumpara BTC este "acum", iar acest "acum" a fost valabil incepand cu ziua in care au fost cumparate cele doua pizza cu 10.000 BTC  ).

Here's another picture of the CEO, CTO, CFO, the whole customer service department, financial department being also included

Amico mio, be very careful, as you are walking on a thin ice here Have you seen what happened to poor icopress? 

Excepting our Supreme Leader, as she is above and beyond your league (mine too, lol) there are some chances to be some girls around though. Let's see...

For once, I remember that Yatsan made a post from which we can elaborate there are more than 90% chances for being a girl. Sadly, there are still 10% chances that those fingernails belong to a man 

Then I also remember LoyceV, which switched his mind from


to


Then let's see... We also have


Besides, there also some which you'd never think they are girls


Let's not forget that LoyceV was nominated in 2020 as well at this select category (Satoshi too!)

---

Digging some more, there are also Helena Yu, SmartGold01, Disruptivas, Fattcatt, Bagiira, Majestic_milf (now that's an interesting name for sure!), mk4, Sandra_hakeem, womanderful, Lesbian Cow, BitcoinBunny, suchmoon, sheenshane, SatoPrincess, 5Ksana_HandMade, Sarah Azhari, TMAN (yes, TMAN, lol!).

Or, why not, BitcoinGirl.Club (as per people's belief  ) or even yahoo2278.

---

Having all these said, I think that you'll reconsider your position.

On a second opinion, ignore all I wrote excepting my first sentence. That should be enough for making you change your mind

Guten Abend 1miau und der Rest des Publikums.

Ja, es ist in Ordnung für mich, die Preise von Tradingview zu nehmen.
Ich freue mich auf unser Bitcoin vs. Alts.

vielen Dank für diese regelmäßigen Updates!


Ich stimme zu 


Ich glaube und hoffe sehr, dass mein Coin bis zum Schluss den Wert von 1$ haben wird. Schließlich habe ich mich dafür entschieden

Ich denke jedoch, dass Sie nur Zeit verlieren, wenn Sie sehr genau sein und diese extrem kleinen Schwankungen zählen möchten. Wenn die Münze nicht auf 0 fällt, werden diese sehr kleinen Schwankungen schließlich definitiv nichts an meiner Position auf der Teilnehmerleiter ändern. und dasselbe gilt auch für sam00.

Oh well... maybe because of this?


I warned you, haven't I?  


Now look at you! You are grounded outside the foxhole and you look through the fence holes!

---

You did, young padawan! Yet this can not undo the terrible act you did almost three months ago! Have you said your prayers, at least? Be honest!


Say now if you said the prayers! Say it right now!!!

---

Maybe there is a chance for being forgiven though... Maybe buying some precious gems, for raising their price, would also help...

---

That is a wise decision.


Remember what I did last time was here sober?

If you browse around here too much while being sober who knows what could happen...?!  

Congrats for opening this thread, OP! You should have done this for a while now, but better later than never.

Now let's see... As dkbiy98 already emphasized,


Next step now is to open another flag against the scammer and use this topic as reference link. Perhaps you are afraid that he won't pay you anymore if you open the flag, but you were already in this situation since you made the deal with the scammer. Perhaps you still hoped for a while, but it was useless. If you are really afraid that he won't send you the money anymore if you open a flag then better think that he was not going to pay anything since you pointed the finger at him in the other thread. In any case, the truth is that he was not going to pay you since Jan 23rd, when you provided him the materials.


Do you actually believe this? What financial department? And what financial department would not have 90$? Even the financial department of a Mom & Pop's store would have this kind of money. In any case, if you actually believed there is a real financial department, of a real company, how was this department going to pay you XMR, huh? Companies work with fiat, not with Monero. I really hope you never bit the scheme with the "financial department". Let's think even more far: suppose that department would work with XMR. How can a company take money out of its treasury without an invoice? I believe you haven't issued him any invoice, have you? Lol. I said that since the beginning: this scammer is eating the dirt from under his fingernails and is here for pilfering. If you sell your shoes you have enough money to buy him together with his entire family consisting in 15 brothers and sisters, all Gypsies, his parents, his four grandparents, all living in a 20 square meters one room dirty apartment from a hood full with paupers and unemployed. Like pajeets, as TMAN used to say. Do you know what a pajeet is? A smelly dirty curry drinking hairy Indian that poos in the Loo. Except that this scammer is Gypsy and poos in the Danube.


In the other topic you first said he promised you the payment on Jan 25th, right? Then he delayed to Feb 3rd. Now is Feb 13th. Do you think he'll take you out tomorrow, on Valentine's Day, buy you a meal and pay you the 90$? I believe not, so we get back to this:


And now he says


"Brb 48-72 hours"?!? What kind of "brb" is that? In what part of the world "be right back" means 48-72 hours? So it's not a "bbl" (be back later), but a "brb"! I wonder what "bbl" means for him, if "brb" means 72 hours. And who sleeps "28-72 hours"? This guy should be an example for all women from around the world, with a new definition of "I'll be ready in 5 minutes". When a woman says this it usually takes from 10 to 60 minutes, lol. But he is going to "be right back" in 72 hours. I short nap of 28-72 hours. All good.

Are all these enough reason for you, OP, to open a flag? Furthermore: even if he would pay you right now, the flag should still stand, for violating the contract you had! The payment does not make him clean, as a burglar is not exempted from jail if he pays back the victims what he stole from their house. The payment is only a form of accepting the guilt.

---

Ooooooooooooooo tell us! What resources did you have to pull? Did you have to carry mill stones? Did you have to run 50 km? Did you have to climb up to 100th floor of a building without elevator? Or what resources are we talking about here? I act like you made a herculean effort.

Wrong. Re-read what I wrote above: I said I think it's so (without being certain), as he opposed the flag just after you made your first post here. And today again: he wrote that he wanted to say something then he changed his mind and 20 minutes later you appear with another post. This is a big coincidence, isn't it?

In any case, as I also wrote once more,


Do you understand this? It does not matter if you are his alt or not.

---

Let's not. Do you think I am as imbecile as saxydev?


First of all, as I said above, it does not matter who's alt you are.
Second of all, I am not as imbecile as the scammer, to accept such lure.
Third of all, as 1miau also wisely said, there is no way in the world for you to prove in an undeniable way you are not Rizzrack's alt.

So please find someone else to make deals with, I am not saxydev.

Instead, I see that again, like Rizzrack, you throw some words then change the subject. I answered to every statement of yours, point by point. Why don't you answer to mine? I will repeat them below, highlighted, thus you can see the questions, in case you missed them.

First question

Second question

Third question

Fourth question

And you continued writing it from your alt. Similar to first time, when you wrote from your alt then you opposed the flag from your main account, now you show up from your main account, say a few words then continue from your alt, at just a few minutes distance.



This is why he opposed the flag just after you wrote here? And that's also why you popped here again just a few minutes after he said he wanted to write something then he changed his mind? He changed his mind meaning that he decided to say what he wanted to say through his alt, not from his main account?


High ranking account? Yeah, he's a hero (a "hero" spelled with "h", not "H"!)! A hero at defending scammers. In moments like this I really miss Lauda.


Yes, I am a sort of master puppeteer and I'm controlling all accounts which wrote here, excepting yours. In rest they are all my alts, right?


Seeing how dumb he is as scammer now you changed your mind and start saying you agree he is a scammer; then do the same from your main account too, right?


I just wanted to raise awareness about him as he seemed to be a scammer. In just a few days he proved himself right here to be a scammer and scammed 3 users in 3 weeks. So the purpose of the thread was correct: he seemed to be a scammer and actually proved himself to be one. What's the problem here? And you are pointing the finger at me, for starting this thread and having a scammer exposed? Are you out of your mind???


I have already explained this to you once. Have you read my reply to your post? Or why do you keep writing this non-sense?



"Play" there and allow him to scam users from international section? He was not going to scam Romanians from Romanian board as (1) mostly NeuroticFish, you (Rizzrack) and I are present; and (2) he knew he won't manage to scam any of us. So he headed to international boards. This is why I started the thread: for people to be aware about him and prevent getting scammed.


So now you're talking to yourself?

---

Lol, the scammer pays so much attention to his privacy that not even the one who he dealt with deserves to see a proof of payment.

There was no statement about this matter so far.


On the other hand, DDmr's nature has been questioned in the past

However, most allegations about a user being AI were headed towards LoyceV which, as you can see, is still trying to deny reality the supposition

I, for one, am still confused about these cases. I'd highly appreciate if someone would con-fuse me 

I did not say anywhere anything about any kind of donation. All you are writing is pure BS, as you already admitted. Don't worry, your attempt to distract the heat which is over you now simply won't work. If you were not a scammer I would have said that you are acting like a 12 years child.

---

Actually, he did read carefully. And, at first, he activated an alt account for taking the scammer's side. I may be wrong, but the coincidence is too big to go unnoticed: immediately after that user posted, Rizzrack opposed the flag. And, by then, not even saxydev was opposing the flag, lol.


In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not, this is not first time when Rizzrack sides with a scammer. He did it in the past once more, with another Romanian scammer, although he supported him only in a softer form.

Do you remember andulolika? Yes, andulolika which made death threats, andulolika the self-admitted ban evader, andulolika the load defaulter, andulolika the scammer.

Long story short, after saying he wanted to slit a forum user's throat andulolika decided to start a topic in Romanian board, saying trying to say that he wants to be hired as translator. The scam was the following: since andulolika is even more illiterate than saxydev (although this may look impossible), this it was obvious that he was unable to perform any translation. He was barely able to spell his name. Therefore, anyone paying him would have been scammed, as the underclassman was not able to provide any kind of translation. This is an example of how illiterate he is. The post contains all the spelling mistakes he made within a five sentences post: 24 mistakes. As a consequence of writing that bad, from his topic title could not be sensed if he wanted to hire a translator or to be hired as a translator. And, when I found the topic, I assumed he is looking to hire a translator. Therefore I wrote him a post saying I am interested to be hired as a translator. When he replied he started swearing and talking very bad.

So seeing how bad he writes I quickly understood that he is unable to perform any translation, since he is unable to spell (not even in Romanian). So I wrote this in English inside his thread, encouraging users also to read the feedbacks andulolika received. From that point forward he started to yell even more, to curse, swear etc. That's less important, but I had to say for you to understand the context.

And here comes Rizzrack which, instead of exposing the scammer, like anybody which wanted to say something would have done, he actually took scammer's side, in a way. Inside the quoted post he is patronizing like he is the forum owner^*, saying that if I and andulolika want to continue the back and forward to do it in English.

^*Acting like the forum owner can be sensed in this sequence: "Va puteti certa peste tot in engleza (meta, reputation, scam accusation, offtopic, twitter etc.) dar aici scrieti in romana! [...] Ma astept ca toata lumea sa faca la fel. Am mai facut aluzii dar nu prea au fost intelese"

In English it means the following: "In English you can fight anywhere [...] but here you write in Romanian! (n.b. notice the exclamation point from the end of the sentence, like it was an order) [...] I am expecting everybody to do so (n.b. He was expecting, lol. And who was he? Forum owner?). I made some allusions before but it seems they were not understood (n.b. again, acting like an owner. Who was he to make any allusion, anyway?).

And this is precisely what I told him too: I told him I sense the patronizing from his tone and that his allegations sound like orders. Then I recommended him to lose the air of superiority, as he is not superior to anybody here and, certainly, this is not his forum. Besides, there is no rule forbidding English in a local board. And even if I were to break a rule -- which I did not -- that would not entitle him anyway to patronize and talk like he is the landlord and the forum is his land and the users are his slaves. After that he shut up, being forced to do so also by andulolika, which locked his thread.

In any case, until this point, it was a soft attempt of him to side with the scammer. However, he continued. After andulolika told me that he will piss on me and burn me I opened a topic in Meta, asking if this statement can be considered a death threat. Rizzrack showed there as well, now taking scammer's side in plain sight, by saying there is no scam. Obviously, since andulolika did not sign any contract for a translation no scam exists. However, if he were in the situation to get hired, the client would have been certainly scammed. Since the scammer could not spell correctly even the word "Ok", then how could he deliver a translation?!

In the end, this is second time Rizzrack supports a Romanian scammer. And his behavior was noticed by other users too, not just by dkbit98:

---

Your guts were right. As things developed, saxydev "managed" to scam 3 individuals already only since this thread was started. Meaning in only 22 days. That's something, isn't it?

---

Well, it's way easier to blah-blah than taking money out of your pocket, isn't it?

---

Playing dumb at level 99+. Obviously, ScamViruS is trying to tell you that you are not addressing the debts you have to pay.


Playing dumb again, to distract attention. dkbit98 already sent you the link. It's right here:



Obviously, by your judgement everyone which is posting here is doing it just for spamming a signature campaign.


I did not deny what? And what means that I proved myself? I proved myself as what?


This is a common sense conclusion. I am, indeed, replying to what I'm interested in: to be more precise, to expose what a scammer you are. However, I am not twisting any of your words. This is exactly what you write.

---

There is nothing to prove. The scammer only tries to distract the attention. He already admitted he is making up words.

Like here:


Or here:


Lol, he is far beyond any level of ridiculousness.

---

First of all, it's "right", not "wright".
Second of all, are you following your favored scammer's path? Twist someone's words? dkbit98 did not make any bet with the scammer. He proposed him a an offer, a deal:


So stop lying in plain sight!


And you understand that from where? And what's the relevance in this case? What's the connection between this habit of dkbit98 (either if he has it or not) and the fact that saxydev scammed him? What you just said is as relevant as you would have said "I understand dkbit might drink more coffee than me". Okay, he may drink more coffee than you. So what? What's the connection?


The fact that you do not expect a win, yet you wait to see the result and the result is the one you anticipated, does not make you ineligible to claim what you just won.

And why don't you quote also the later replies of those which you quoted above? Here, let me help you out:


Picture this: you go to a gambling place and bet that a basketball game will end with a draw. I don't know what you know about basketball, but chances for ending in a draw are infinitesimal. Then, guess what?, the game actually ends in a draw. So you go to the cashier to pay you the money you just won. Based on your judgement, in this example, the cashier is supposed to say: "You never expected to be paid for this, right?". Furthermore, also based on your judgement, if the cashier will not pay you it will be fine. In the end, you did not expect for that game to actually end in a draw. Right?


And why do you care if dkbit98 gambles more than you?

---

Do you see the pattern here?

This waiting and seeing won't take you anywhere. Instead of waiting and seeing you'd better follow dkbit98's advice:


If you are not aware of what is the description of a flag, let me help you out:



So only the fact that he lured you for 19 days already is reason good enough for creating a flag. And, based on your words, it's been 19 days since he was supposed to pay you.


Furthermore, same thing should have been done by the other user which was delayed with payment (unlike you, this guy was luckier and received the payment, although it was made after the settled date):


In all these cases, based on flag's definition, saxydev violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages.

Da, sunt pusi la stalpul infamiei. Bine ca nu suntem in urma cu cateva sute de ani, ca i-ar fi spanzurat in piata publica sau i-ar fi rastignit la drumul mare, sa vaza tot norodu' ce-nseamna sa n-asculti stapanirea!


In privinta lui Satoshi nu prea acum cum sa vin cu vesti. Insa cu informatii despre Assange am sa revin, de fiecare data cand voi mai afla ceva nou despre progresul procesului.

---

Sa te bucuri de ele! Le meriti cu prisosinta!  Cu ocazia asta bifez si eu ceva nou, intrucat niciodata nu am promovat pe cineva la rangul de Legendar


IntimitateG, dupa cum ti-am mai explicat o data, cand activezi in gasca puiului de vulpe ajungi sa controlezi chiar si timpul  Acum, na, pentru cine nu poate asa ceva, in acest topic exista un tabel cu toate perioadele de activitate din 5 ianuarie 2016 si pana in 26 decembrie 2060. Conform tabelului, pe 8 martie (hehe, ce zi frumoasa!) vei deveni Hero, intrucat atunci activitatea ta va fi mai mare sau egala cu 480 (mai precis, va fi 490). Deci nu mai e mult pana atunci


Pai asa umbla vorba pân' targ pe forum: odata ce ai atins pragul de merite pentru un rang, esti considerat ca ai acel rang Faptul ca nu ai inca punctele necesare de activitate nu mai reprezinta o problema, fiind doar vorba de o chestiune de rabdare. Dar te asigur ca in ochii tuturor esti vazut acum ca membru Legendar

Acum ce sa zic, nici cu rabdarea nu-i tocmai usor. In cazul tau, iti lipsesc minim 313 puncte de activitate (pentru a atinge minimul de 775, prag de la care incepe sa se acorde rangul "oficial"). Acest lucru se va intampla toooocmai pe 27 decembrie, la actualizarea de atunci a perioadei de activitate, cand vei avea 784 puncte (ce sa-ti fac daca te-ai grabit si ai strans atatea merite in asa scurt timp? ). De aici incolo nimic nu mai este cert, intrucat rangul se acorda intre 775 si 1030 puncte de activitate si nimeni (in afara lui theymos, cel mai probabil) nu stie cand. Practic, la crearea profilului ai primit si un seed, care spune la ce numar de puncte de activitate vei deveni Legendar, insa nu ai cum sa stii aceata valoare. Prin urmare, dupa ce ai aflat data de la care poti incepe sa fii Legendar (daca ai un noroc imens), tot ce poti lua in calcul este data maxima la care vei primi rangul. Urmarind acelasi tabel, la actualizarea din 4 septembrie 2024 vei avea 1036 puncte de activitate.

Pe scurt, intre 27.12.2023 si 04.09.2024 vei avea si rangul scris in dreptul profilului

I think you just got your answer:


Quoted for reference.

Welcome to the club, c0ldbrewz. As I said before, you are not the only one to whom he said that.

---

I believe you imagine that if the scammer made the payment he could have written the txID from first time, right?

---

If you look up a bit, you will see that the scammer actually admitted that he is writing words in my name, words which I never said: