You provided a lot of things I didn't ask for and that are of no use. You repeatedly ignored that I was telling you that a Bitcoin signed message was the only thing that would be acceptable when someone claims an account is theirs even when they don't have the email account associated with that account.

---

It is reckless to tell people that using a strong password is enough to secure their accounts. Now you are doubling down on dumb advice by telling people to trust Google to secure their accounts rather than take responsibility and do it for themselves.  When 2fa is available to secure an account containing crypto currency and someone doesn't choose to use it they are failing to take basic precautions.

From a quick look at your post history, I would guess that you are rather new to Bitcoin and probably only see it as a way of making some loose change from faucets. Anyone who had been around for a while would understand that the whole principle of Bitcoin is based on using cryptography to enable people to take control of their own money rather than rely on third parties. I would kindly request that in the future you refrain from giving security advice to my customers because you clearly don't have the first clue what you are talking about.


There are many ways a hacker could also access ALL that information. I ask for a Bitcoin signed message because that's the only method that is foolproof. In cryptography I trust and so should anyone else that has had any involvement with Bitcoin.


No, it is a policy that protects 100% of accounts from phishing. The number of customers that have recovered accounts using a signed message and have expressed gratitude to me so having such a robust policy to ensure their account wasn't at risk greatly exceeds the number that complain because they can't.

That is terrible advice. If your email is hacked as has happened in the past with database leaks that are no fault of your own someone can simply reset your password and authorise their login from your email account. We don't force anyone to use 2fa we simply put a message advising anyone with a significant balance to use it. Maybe only a few people use 2fa overall but nearly 100% of high rollers use it.


Completely wrong. I'm not ignoring the fact that he has stated that can't sign a Bitcoin message because I have replied to him explaining that means he can't prove the account is his so I can't hand it over to him. He was ignoring that and simply repeatedly asking me if there was another way and then ignoring the answer being negative every time.  Asking the same question over and over will not change the answer. You don't seem to have any issues with the English language but you are also ignoring the answers I gave him.


It isn't written because it is an absolute last resort procedure only used by people who failed to take every other simple step to secure their accounts. It is completely unimportant to the vast majority of people because only 0.00001% of them will ever need it.

It's a malfunctioning spambot. We get them in our thread for a promotion that ended in 2013 quoting the original thread title that has changed many times over the years.

To everyone else reading this, please learn how to secure your account.

You should enable 2fa and make sure you make a secure backup of your 2fa secret key. Add a recovery telephone number for security against losing both copies of your 2fa secret key. In the event of your email account getting hacked this will protect you in 2 ways. Firstly, the hacker will not be able to log in to your freebitco.in account without a 2fa code. Secondly, if you are unable to get your email account back you will be able to change the email address using a 2fa code.
In the very unlikely event that all these things haven't protected your account, you should also get yourself a Bitcoin wallet that you can sign messages from and change your profile address to one in that wallet. I can verify that a Bitcoin signed message is real but I can't accept anything that could easily be knocked up using Photoshop. If someone has hacked your email account they will have access to all the information they need to do that.

There will be a record that isn't the Bitcoin signed message I need. Refusing to accept the answers I give you doesn't change the facts.


I will not reply to you again because you just ignore what I tell you.

No.


Freebitco.in isn't a Taiwanese Bitcoin account


Nothing else will do.

People use 2fa to protect their account in the event of their email account getting hacked. Anyone who has hacked their email will have access to the confirmation emails we sent after each deposit and withdrawal and likely the same information from any exchange they used. They have a right to expect me to protect their account from that hacker by not resetting their 2fa just because someone asks me to. Instead, I need absolute proof in the form of a Bitcoin signed message because that's the only proof that can't be faked.


I can only reply in English. What do you expect me to do when they just ignore my answers and keep asking again and again? Am I supposed to give in and just hand someone else's account to them because they refuse to take no for an answer?

Nothing.


Nobody.


You can accept that you made a bad mistake in locking yourself out of an account and now you have lost it. Stop wasting any more time asking again and again when I have already explained to you many times that the only thing that proves that money is yours is a Bitcoin signed message from the address it was sent from.

How many times do you expect me to answer the same questions?

It is clear that you can't sign a Bitcoin signed message from the address you deposited from so you can't prove the account is yours. That means you have lost it and posting other stuff here isn't going to change that.

No. That's why I have already told you this:
It is clear that you can't sign a Bitcoin signed message from the address you deposited from so you can't prove the account is yours. That means you have lost it and posting other stuff here isn't going to change that.

No. That's why there is no point containing to post things other than the Bitcoin signed message I asked for.

You should edit that post and delete them immediately. Whatever they belong to is now compromised.

It is clear that you can't sign a Bitcoin signed message from the address you deposited from so you can't prove the account is yours. That means you have lost it and posting other stuff here isn't going to change that.

You create a signature by signing from your wallet.

---

The jsquery.com doesn't support IPv6. It should still work because we use Cloudflare and they convert everything back to IPv4 addresses. For some reason, people using one particular ISP started getting this problem a few days ago. I'm still trying to work out how and why.

I replied to your PM. Send me the Bitcoin signed message and I can reset your 2fa.

It isn't just you but everyone that has reported this problem has one thing in common. They all use the same ISP. PM me your user ID.


It's not actually a difference. In the hypothetical example I gave the film isn't subject to copyright in the country the website is in so they are not doing anything illegal.


I wasn't getting into any moral judgement about which laws it is OK to break. As you say how seriously laws are enforced varies greatly from country to country. Something that in one country would get a caution or a small fine at worst might lead to imprisonment somewhere else.

Try going to your device's network settings and then disable IPv6 on your network adapter.

---

Message failed to verify!

It's probably easier to explain what I'm getting at using a different example. Someone has a website hosting a downloadable copy of a film. That film is subject to copyright in the UK but the site is hosted in a country that doesn't have any restrictions so the owner of that site isn't doing anything illegal. The copyright owner obtains a court order forcing UK ISPs to block access to that site. Someone in the UK uses a VPN to circumvent that block. When they download the film they are now guilty of possessing pirated material. It isn't anything to do with the blocking or using a VPN that's illegal, it's downloading bootlegs. If someone is forced to use a VPN to access a casino then there is a possibility that they might be doing something that's illegal in their country. I'm just pointing out that just because you can get around something with a VPN it isn't necessarily a good idea.

---

I mean was rather than still am. You need to get recertified every 3 years and mine expired many years ago.

I asked which one to check you know which exchange is used for all our calculations.


The base prize was actually 0.8 cents when WoF was first introduced so you're still getting well over what we budgeted for.

---

That's a misconception. Take it from a retired Cisco Certified Internet Expert that governments don't control ISP's infrastructure. They simply pass laws that force ISPs to comply with orders to block things. China is an exception to that because they control the Great Firewall of China. People in China aren't really on the internet they are on a private network with restricted internet access.

All eligible claims paid up to this post.
Reminder: You must post a screenshot of your roll on the FREE BTC page.

it seems that you haven't yet read how provably fair works to find out that there is no algorithm. The system only uses randomly generated seeds one of which is created by your device so we can't influence the results.



That would be fair but unfortunately, it is more often used as an excuse after someone gets caught abusing the service. If the same person is using many accounts the existence of a family does not justify it.