Bitcoin Forum
September 20, 2024, 09:39:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 »
741  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (mini-blockchain implementation) on: June 08, 2014, 04:49:14 AM
Yeah looks like the network exploded, all our nodes crashed. We're looking into the issue now.
742  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (mini-blockchain implementation) on: June 08, 2014, 04:34:31 AM
i wasn't sure if that was the right address to use, i sent 100 back
Ok, if you like I can send you 1000 coins to mess around with or you can try mining your own coins using the following command:

./cryptonited -testnet setgenerate true 1

You replace the 1 with the number of cores you wish to use for mining.

And you can stop mining with this command:

./cryptonited -testnet setgenerate false
743  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (mini-blockchain implementation) on: June 08, 2014, 04:20:13 AM
received them but how do i send them back? i am not to familiar with bitcoin api calls
There is an example of how to send coins in the opening post:

./cryptonited -testnet sendtoaddress mvqH4czVQg2HdGpkV7PWVZJpRXVwLnMXpN "0.01000000ep"

Just replace the address and the amount with what ever you want. The address in that example is mine.

You can also view a full list of API commands on the following page:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Original_Bitcoin_client/API_calls_list
744  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (mini-blockchain implementation) on: June 08, 2014, 04:01:26 AM
it seems to be working now, here is my address muXpk6wmutEiKYJf7hH6gtr26gQvQUgR3u
Cool. I just sent you 100 coins, you should get them when the next block is solved.
745  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (mini-blockchain implementation) on: June 08, 2014, 03:50:09 AM
i have openssl 1.0.1g

I can run the bitcoin bitcoind fine with no errors. I cannot get yours to run.
Ok well that's a bit weird. We aren't sure why it's giving you warnings but it should work.

EDIT: removed irrelevant text.
746  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (mini-blockchain implementation) on: June 08, 2014, 03:24:16 AM
I have lib64openssl1.0.1 installed or do i need something else?
It appears that you might have a version of OpenSSL older than 1.0.1e so the heartbleed fix isn't applied to your version. That will work, but as mentioned you will continue to get those warnings.
747  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (mini-blockchain implementation) on: June 08, 2014, 01:06:23 AM
Nice concept. Is there another announcement thread on this forum?
No this is the only thread besides the logo bounty thread (which is already closed). We will make a proper announcement thread when we release the finished binary along with the source, but for now this is the only thread we need.

Can you give us a rough idea when the windows alpha will be released?
Well if we don't get enough linux testers we may release a Windows binary within a few days, but otherwise we want to wait until we've eliminated as many bugs as possible during this testing phase and once that is done we probably want to implement some rather large changes on top of that. So probably at least a few weeks before Windows users will get a turn to try it out.
748  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / [TEST RELEASE] Cryptonite binary for linux (NEW: Qt and Windows builds) on: June 07, 2014, 10:33:09 PM
WARNING: this is a test release, it runs in testnet mode, do not place any value on the coins because you will lose them!

It has been over a year since I first proposed the mini-blockchain scheme, and a few months ago I finally found some developers capable of building it. In a very small amount of time an incredible amount of work has been done. We started with the Bitcoin code base and so far we have altered tens of thousands of lines of code, and lots still needs to be done. But at last we have reached the point where we can release some binaries for testing to help us weed out some of the bugs and figure out what needs to be done next. We need all the testers we can get and we appreciate your help during this testing phase.

First it should be mentioned that the binaries will only work on 64bit systems right now, we plan to add 32bit support in the future and we also have a binary for Windows systems which will be released at a future point for testing (the Windows binaries have now been released, see the link below for a list of available binaries). We encourage you to test out all the features and try to break the system, if you do find any bugs could you please report them in this thread along with as much detail about the problem as you're able to provide (we may also request log files in some cases).

The binary can be downloaded from here:
http://gpile.it/cryptonite/

The dependencies are the same as Bitcoin with one extra requirement: libgmp-dev

You must start cryptonited in testnet mode using the following command:

./cryptonited -testnet

All API commands should include -testnet flag or they wont work.

See the wiki for more info: Cryptonite API

Here is a message from our lead developer which contains more details about this release:
Quote
Cryptonite is significantly different from bitcoin and it's
derivatives. Large swaths of code have been changed and entire
algorithms rethought. In a way this puts us kind of back in the stone
age. Much like the early days of bitcoin, the security and reliability
of Cryptonite is questionable regardless of it's theoretical
underpinnings. As coins are now generally expected to work without
problems at the time of launch, we must find a way to test this
codebase to the requisite level. We propose vast testing on the
testnet, and that's where you come in.

Keep in mind that while we encourage you to make use of the testnet
network and all it's capabilities. It is possible, and in fact likely
that we will completely reset the blockchain periodically as changes
become necessary. Slated changes to the client will make it difficult
to maintain wallets across certain versions as well. Cryptonite is not
complete. While it is currently believed that no changes will need to
be made to the blockchain, this is far from certain as huge sections
of code have not been implemented. Bugs are also likely, some may
cause crashes, others may force us to reset the chain. No effort will
be made to maintain the testnet chain via forks.

After all that down talk, you might wonder why we need testers at this
point. The answer is that much code has actually been written and many
things have changed. The program in it's current state, and the
program with all future changes should remain functionally identical
from the users perspective, plus a few minor features. Testing will
give an opportunity for users and service providers to interact with
the new model and provide testing and feedback. As an example of the
kind of changes in thinking, Cryptonite does not support scripts, and
does not require change when sending transactions. Cryptonite also
does not necessarily know the origin of coins. Common utilities such a
blockchain explorer may be practically impossible. Changes like these
could have a profound impact on the way people use the program.

The current binary release is made available only for x86-64 linux.
The binary should run on all debian derivatives such as ubuntu/mint
etc.

~Catia
749  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY] Need logo for innovative new coin (0.15 BTC reward) on: June 07, 2014, 08:49:22 PM
Very impressive sadface. After some thought and discussion we have decided to pick your submission as the winner. Although we don't have any other submissions yet I feel that yours will be hard to beat and I don't want a bunch of people wasting their time for no reward. I will PM you my email address where you can send the files to. And if you could please post or PM me your bitcoin address I will send you the 0.15 BTC once I receive the files.
750  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [CONTEST/BOUNTY] Need logo few new coin (0.15 BTC reward) on: June 06, 2014, 11:07:19 PM
By the way guys, the logo you create doesn't necessarily need to include the entire coin, we already have a coin template we can use, we mainly just need a logo to go into the center of the coin. But if you want to create a logo which includes your own coin template that is fine too.
751  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [CONTEST/BOUNTY] Need logo few new coin (0.1 BTC reward) on: June 06, 2014, 10:22:45 PM
Yes it's worth about $65 right now. That seems to be a fairly common rate for decent quality logos. I don't expect anyone to spend endless hours on it. 2 or 3 hours should be enough to create something of good quality. But to make it slightly more appealing I'll increase the reward to 0.15 BTC (that's about $100).
752  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / [CLOSED] Need logo for innovative new coin (0.15 BTC reward) on: June 06, 2014, 09:47:47 PM
Hi guys, I need a logo for a new altcoin which will be called "Cryptonite". I don't want to ramble on with all the technical details of the coin right now but I will say it's going to the be the first implementation of my mini-blockchain scheme, so it's not going to be another cheap rip off of Bitcoin, we have altered tens of thousands of lines of code so far. So I don't want some cheap dodgy logo, what we are building deserves an original and creative logo. Post your submissions in this thread and I'll pick the best one after about a week or so (there will be no voting). The winner will also have their name permanently embedded into the project credits, in the GUI and on the website, if they want that. Thanks and good luck.

PS- if someone posts a logo that I really like I'll instantly accept it and pay out the reward.
753  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Runoff Poll: "ubit" vs "centoshi". Which should be the rival to "bit"? on: June 05, 2014, 01:56:16 AM
we know the technical terms; the whole idea is find non-technical terms.
Microbitcoin is the full technical term, microbit is the shorter casual version. There's no need for anything else.
754  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Runoff Poll: "ubit" vs "centoshi". Which should be the rival to "bit"? on: June 05, 2014, 01:41:41 AM
It's microbit. End of story.
microbits are too small, not needed yet
What does that have to do with anything? This thread is about what to call 100 satoshis (aka 0.000001 BTC). Microbit is the most organic and technically correct term I've seen so far. It's also the accepted term according to the wiki.

Quote
0.01 BTC = 1 cBTC = 1 centibitcoin (also referred to as bitcent)
0.001 BTC = 1 mBTC = 1 millibitcoin (also referred to as mbit or millibit)
0.000001 BTC = 1 μBTC = 1 microbitcoin (also referred to as ubit or microbit)

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/FAQ#What_do_I_call_the_various_denominations_of_bitcoin.3F

PS - 'Bit" is a ridiculous term for 1 μBTC because it has no relevance. If anything bit should be another term for satoshi.
755  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Runoff Poll: "ubit" vs "centoshi". Which should be the rival to "bit"? on: June 05, 2014, 01:26:34 AM
It's microbit. End of story.

cBTC = bitcent = 0.01 BTC
mBTC = millibit = 0.001 BTC
uBTC = microbit = 0.000001 BTC
756  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Willy Report...What do you guys make of it? on: May 26, 2014, 03:24:36 PM
Well I read the report, and my conclusion is, Karples deserves life in prison.
757  Economy / Digital goods / Re: BitShop - digital bitcoin shop script [PHP/MYSQL] (v1.0.0) on: May 26, 2014, 04:39:14 AM
Yes that issue has been fixed.
758  Economy / Digital goods / Re: BitShop - digital bitcoin shop script [PHP/MYSQL] (v1.0.0) on: May 25, 2014, 03:12:15 PM
Ok I just released v1.0.0 RC2, which fixes a small formatting issue in the payment gateway and also fixes a problem with the confirmation email received by buyers after a purchase.
759  Economy / Digital goods / Re: BitShop - digital bitcoin shop script [PHP/MYSQL] (v1.0.0) on: May 25, 2014, 12:11:58 PM
Sorry folks, I had changed the script to generate testnet addresses and forgot to change it back. I just uploaded the correct version but you can also replace line 27 of the lib/bitcoin.lib.php file with the following line to fix the problem:

  public static $address_version = "00";

EDIT: also if you tried to purchase BitShop and couldn't try again now.
760  Economy / Digital goods / Re: BitShop - digital bitcoin shop script [PHP/MYSQL] (v1.0.0) on: May 23, 2014, 11:01:40 AM
Good news folks, I have just released BitShop v1.0.0 RC1. It adds support for the coinbase API, adds an alternative 2nd theme, adds support for mBTC and other price formats, comes with an automated install script, has multi-language support, the settings controls have been simplified, the database code has been updated to mysqli, among other things.

RC1 means it's still a release candidate for version 1.0.0 (since it contains many updates since the last version it's going to need a bit of testing before I release the final version of 1.0.0). The coinbase functionality is also going to need some testing as it wasn't created by me and I haven't really tested much of it, but it seems to work from what I can tell.

Existing clients can download the latest release from the client file area. Please report any problems with v1.0.0 in this thread. The price of the script has gone up now that we're at v1.0.0, just like I warned it would. I have also created a new installation tutorial which shows how to install v1.0.0 (video link also available in the client file area).

@tao67: sorry I wasn't around to help with your problem, I was focused on releasing v1.0.0 and another important project that I'm working on so I didn't notice you were posting in this thread. I will try to keep a better eye on this thread in the future.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!