The 1.2147557 one won, so the winners got double? The won amount is yet to be paid. or txid?
follow the trans. all is open . the 1.2147557 won ,but his opposite is not enough to pay him ,so the most of the winner get his bet amount directly back. To say the least, I am not yet sure how this works. From OP, don't you owe the winner 2.4295114? we will show you the eighth hash after all of them get up to 0.5btc and any one of the above address(girl/boy) get up to 1btc. and according to the result, if you get the right choice (girl/boy) ,you will get your btc doubled
From your reply to my post... what does it mean? mmhm...... if the first address gets 0.001, and the second gets 1 BTC, and the second address wins the everyone who bet on the second address gets 2 BTC? if the first address wins the everyone who bet on the first address gets total 0.002 BTC?
if the condition happens , we will return the 1-0.001=0.999btc firstly to the later player. In other words, this round is playing one game with 0.001btc wager. If I am reading this right, your game works like this:? Players bet on two addresses. The lower amount in both the addresses goes to the next step, and the remaining is refunded. (proportionately? or the last bets?) Winner is decided, and the winning side gets the rest of the amount. |
|
|
|
|
I am sure I have seen that live at least twice. I don't remember the url. Game was off-chain. 1 or 3 confirmation on deposit. Player has to buy tokens to bid. First bid was free or had a low price, a token cost 0.005, and a fifty cost 0.2 or so. Last player to bid get 50%, second last 25% and third 15%. House takes 10%. (it may have been 50:20:10:20) I highly suspected the owner had some bot running. The pool usually ended with tens of bitcoins. Quite unreal.
|
|
|
|
So it would be safe to say you hate the hackforum rank naming system as that would be misleading of their membership classes too.  I'm not familiar with that particular naming system and my search engine ... You ... have your own search engine!! Wow  here is my list anyway  1250 Vodlike 1500 EPIC 2500 ndnh 5000 Admin 7777 Founder 10000 Spammer (edited) P.S. Is it Google? |
|
|
|
I want to PM out a special offer -50% to all my previous customers.
I know I can do it by adding there names in send message: "member", "member2"
but to protect their privacy I don't want each member to receive the full list of other members I've messaged
e.g
How can I send out a BCC PM message to all my pervious customers?
You can use this format: To: "wallet4bitcoin" Bcc: "Customer 1", "Customer 2", "Customer 3", "Customer 4" Subject: 50% discount ..... (edit: exactly the same Cloverdale posted lol.. probably I should delete this post) I don't recommend mass PMing. This could get you banned. Read h&c's reply above. |
|
|
|
fortunejack
I got a special rate that allows me to give 20% back
If I lose 10 BTC and someone else win 10 BTC, we both know you are not going to pay me 2 BTC from your pocket. |
|
|
|
|
The 1.2147557 one won, so the winners got double? The won amount is yet to be paid. or txid?
|
|
|
|
Are all binary options sites also bucketshops (lost when we win)?
I'm seeking a binary option site which is not a bucketshop and accept bitcoin on deposit and AML, KYC is not required.
Is that an utopia?
Coinut.com ? I have not used it much. Appears close enough to what you are looking for. Yes this is what I'm looking for. Unfortunately, Coinut is not so active (less liquidity and wider spreads I mean)  I know. People don't use it because they have wider spreads, and they have wider spreads because people don't use it. This is usually what goes wrong with some websites. |
|
|
|
I agree that legendary is nothing special these days (was it ever, though?). Most of the really old accounts stopped posting a while back
Time for a new rank? admin at 1500 and most of the active legendaries are from 2013. Yeah! |
|
|
|
I beg to differ. If a user derails your thread even after repeatedly asking him not to post in the thread, you can get a mod to interfere. Nothing wrong with that.
Are you begging to differ with me? I think you misunderstood me if so. I have no problem with enforcing the rules, especially the ones that keep a thread on topic. I mean I politely disagree with these statements: I don't think it's ok to give anyone the right to dictate who can and can't post in the main forums. admins and mods can ban dictate who can and can't post in the main forums, and can't I keep those who are spamming in my thread out?
I would like to suggest that the mods/admin stop going out of their way to keep "self-moderated" thread starters happy. Transparency is good. Self-moderated threads are opaque. (<---does that word work like that?) well, I agree it can be abused, but I am okay with how this works at the moment so mods may help keep out spammers from threads.
Why not just enforce the General Forum rules and leave it at that? The fact that op has power to delete any post they want doesn't mean they should be entitled to the power of the ban hammer also. it is I think up to the mods to decide (ban) not the OP
(edit. Added my thoughts in italics ) According to hilariousandco, users who start self-moderated threads have the right to privately black list any user without saying a word about it in the thread or to the black listed user. All they have to do is inform a mod they don't want a user to post in their thread anymore. The mod then informs the blacklisted user that they will be banned if they post again in the thread. Doesn't matter why or what has been posted in the past, the mod is just following the rules. I am not sure about this, can't the mod use his discretion in choosing whether he should or should not act? AFAIK the mod could simply turn it down or not reply at all. I only noted while making this post that you are talking about a particular context. |
|
|
|
We highly appreciate your input, but the visual bug at question has already been reported and our top specialists in technical field are working to have it resolved ASAP. It is a visual bug and does not affect the outcome of the game in any way.
Incorrect. The 'visual' bug makes players to make the opposite bet. You have an obligation to compensate OP for his losses and time. Your top specialists in the technical field are taking too much time for fixing this 'visual' bug. OP reported it a week ago. A bug bounty for OP is well deserved. |
|
|
|
A lot of users have been hacked this past few days, weeks or months. I'm not sure. I'm one of those who have been recently hacked.
And thanks to Cyrus and Theymos i managed to get my account back. The things is i don't want this kind of thing to keep on happening!
I don't want this to happen to other users and i think my idea would be a great leap to our forum's security.
So here's how it's going to work. Most of us that we're hacked weren't able to regain access on our account because our email was changed.
What if every time a user wants to change his email he needs to authenticate that request using the current email address registered to his account.
And after authenticating the request there will be a 24 hour process. The user can still cancel it within 24 hours if he change his mind.
24 hour process for what? You have to wait 24 hours to change the email? That's just plain stupid. What if the hacker got into your email as well? The only good idea here is to validate that the email or password was changed. Unfortunately that isn't going to happen since a lot of users here just registered with a fake email address.Yup. Anyway, the new forum should have 2FA. |
|
|
|
|
I beg to differ. If a user derails your thread even after repeatedly asking him not to post in the thread, you can get a mod to interfere. Nothing wrong with that.
|
|
|
|
Did fj answer you and compensate you, if pay you a bug report bounty, it would be great.
Bounty? They are not even replying to my PMs, they are not even paying me back my lost amount. Really irresponsible on their part. I didn't get any response either. They haven't fixed anything yet. Edit Thank you for sharing this information to us. Our technical team will check it and as soon as our investigation is done we will update the player who has found a but with results. Just found a glitch on fortune jack that made me loose a few dollars.
So here is the glitch : [IMG ]https://i.imgur.com/c6azrLg.jpg[/img]
In the above pic see the two encircled areas, i was betting on 2.093x, and on left of 2.093x in the circle you'd be able to see "<52.70" which means that i shall win if number is less than 52.70, but when the bets showed up, in the game column, it says ">52.70", so basically ">52.70" is mathematically correct, but in the beginning i was shown wrong info which made me loose, i always choose "less than" while betting and this confused me, and by the time I realized what is happening, the auto bet had busted me.
As this was a fault on part of thw house, I would appreciate if I am refunded my lost amount(wasn't a lot, but money is money).
Thanks
Confirmed! This giltch is found in the mobile version of FJ dice. https://m.fortunejack.com/game/dice First 2 bets are >52.70 3rd and 5th bets are <90.00 I didn't make the 4th bet?! |
|
|
|
Hi everyone!
First of all, we'd like to thank you all for your patience and really HIGH attention to this case. You're a unique community and this is what makes us believe in great future of bitcoin!
As for the investigation – sadly it is still being carried out, but we're going to announce the results really soon. We're sorry for this slight delay, but this is necessary for safety of all our users' funds.
Also we'd like to point out that we've been paying out wins to chelashin for several months with no hassle, but this exact payout was counted as suspicious by our security team. No reason to worry for chelashin if there was no actual fraud.
We'll keep you updated on this case soon.
Speed it up! but this is necessary for safety of all our users' funds. ? Yes. I am pretty confident that Coinprofit.io and btc-casino.io are the same people.
Could be, I am not sure. Pocketdice anyway has a better history than BTC-Casino. Why would a dice site not want bots on their site?
Also, how is collusion possible? I'm not familiar with this site.
It's a dice site so I doubt there is any collusion possible. They just lifted the TOS from one of these probably: Google search for an excerpt of pocketdice.io TOSLooks like that lol!  |
|
|
|
You are scammer, don't argue, if this is your system glitch, you should compensate him all the winnings, his betting way is acceptable in other legit bookies, if you don't pay, therefore you are scam.
I had a small discussion with mbitcasino, and I have reached the conclusion that mbitcasino's actions were not unjustifiable. |
|
|
|
Holy Shnitzels you guys scared me!
Showing BTC to a friend, I randomly picked up this website, and accidentally sent too much. Withdrawal button greyed out. Googled and found this thread. Banged my head on the wall…
WtF!! It works perfectly !!
It just requires 6 confirmations before releasing funds, and no mention of that anywhere until they're cleared, which is stupid.
Got my funds back nice and dandy. Just reporting here, NOT ADVISING IT'S LEGIT
It is not really built to scam players (like 999dice) The owners of this do not have a history of being responsible, professional, fair or honest. They may just choose not to allow you to withdraw if they think they found something wrong (you didn't claim any bonus, or play, or win something, so it happened fully auto), and some others iirc include error on withdraw, withdraw not working after wagereing was completed for bonus, fake top 5 big wins etc With lots of scam accusations, it is better not to even visit fairproof. I stand COMPLETELY CORRECTED !! AARG !! after playing a bit I made a nice profit, waited way more than 6 confirmations, and I simply can't withdraw! Says INVALID DATA No matter what amount I pop-in. Contacted support, will report back… very weird indeed. Why did you deposit again?  ... very weird indeed. Not at all, to be honest. |
|
|
|
Where is autobet feature?
The admin says don't play at fairproof, the whole community says don't play at fairproof, and you still want to know?  Autobet = Keeps betting till you press stop or you run out of balance. |
|
|
|
But why your account is hacked? They already provided you with the facility to protect your account with 2fa function? Did you use that option? If not, it is your fault, and you can't blame to fortunejack.
If someone is exploiting FortuneJacks website somehow and can change account name/email so that support has no record of it while they are able to withdraw user funds, then of course you can blame FortuneJack. Confirming email change is pretty standard practice these days. I agree. If they are not able to offer an explanation to this mess, I think it is reasonable to take that Fortunejack is vulnerable and has below standard security practices. |
|
|
|
FortuneJack is a pure scam!!! I activated the bonus and was afraid of withdrawing the funds do to the fact that all my winning would be forfeited. Soon after that my account was hacked and all funds removed. They have yet to prove to me that the bonus requirements were met prior to the withdrawal.
Before the bonus money is converted into money that can be withdrawn, the bonus money must be turned over 40 times in the Casino (minimum wagering requirements) before the player can request a withdrawal from their Fortunejack account; unless otherwise stated on the specific promotional details or rules.
Wagering requirements can be met by playing on slot and casino games only. Bonus money begins when your original cash deposit is depleted. ‘Playing for fun’ on any game does not count towards any wagering (turnover) requirement there may be.
If a player requests a withdrawal before wagering requirements have been met, all bonus money and winnings accrued from bonus money will be forfeited
Have you sent details to their support team on that? I hope they will resolve issue soon. But why your account is hacked? They already provided you with the facility to protect your account with 2fa function? Did you use that option? If not, it is your fault, and you can't blame to fortunejack. There are some things that are suspicious - for example, I think the hacker was able to change his username (how did he?), and now this. If wagering requirements were not met, how did the hacker withdraw the balance? They should blacklist the hacker's address, and check if any other accounts were compromised. I doubt they did anything. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
