|
I've actually been giving this serious consideration.
1. It can't get any lower price-wise; not much anyway when you're talking about a $3000 house. Didn't one of the Rothschilds say "Buy when there's blood in the streets"? Sounds like Detroit.
2. Taxes - yeah, the assessments are high, but the city is so broke, they can't afford to kick people out of their homes. Many people are way behind and have been allowed to keep their homes. Also, they're losing the enforcement ability. The cops actually don't answer calls after 8pm.
which brings me too
3. governmental collapse - it's a good thing. The quicker they let the government of Detroit die completely, the better. There is already a private police force that has started up to good reviews. There is also a private bus system that is probably the best in the nation as far as service goes.
|
|
|
|
I met Jones in Denver when he was hanging out at Joby Weeks' house (an admitted mason descended from William Sinclair of Rosslyn chapel fame).
Jones is a mason and CIA asset. Hate to break the news to his fanboys.
Outta curiousity, why does www.freeworldmarket.com now redirects to http://www.infowars.com/ ? I'll be adding companies from my website - www.freeworldmarket.com. They already accept privately minted silver medallions, so its a warm market.
WHOIS search results for:FREEWORLDMARKET.COM(Registered)
Is this your
domain?
Add hosting, email and more.
Want to buy
this domain?
Get it with our Domain Buy service.
Domain Name: FREEWORLDMARKET.COM
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2012-02-19 12:43:01
Creation Date: 2007-10-17 19:47:03
Registrar Expiration Date: 2015-03-05 06:59:59
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
DomainStatus: clientDeleteProhibited
DomainStatus: clientRenewProhibited
DomainStatus: clientTransferProhibited
DomainStatus: clientUpdateProhibited
Registrant Name: Joby WeeksI think you answered your own question. Joby has the domain and redirected it to Infowars. I let him buy the domain back when we were still friends. I built the site, had business cards made but he had the domain from the start. Alas, it really doesn't matter since the premise of the site - silver backed electronic currency - was/is pretty much destroyed by bitcoin anyway. |
|
|
|
Interesting choice for a name, considering the masons pretty much incorporate butterflies in everything they touch.  |
|
|
|
Full quote: “There's nothing of any importance in life - except how well you do your work. Nothing. Only that. Whatever else you are, will come from that. It's the only measure of human value. All the codes of ethics they'll try to ram down your throat are just so much paper money put out by swindlers to fleece people of their virtues. The code of competence is the only system of morality that's on a gold standard.” Everything else is just subjective mental meanderings... |
|
|
|
Um, no. I'm getting a bit sick of this attitude of entitlement floating around the USA, and keep in mind I work in the field of social services.
Though I'm in 100% agreement with you about American's sense of entitlement, as a gov't employee, you're the wrong person to be talking about it - the hypocrisy is almost painful to witness. |
|
|
|
The code of competency is the only moral philosophy on a gold standard.  |
|
|
|
|
According to the trolls on this forum, the banks aren't worried about bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
As for cryptoanarchist, here he shows that he does not understand the rocket equation. More basic than that, his error is in not understanding the relation between velocity and momentum. or gravitational potential energy, or Newton's laws of motion... Yeah...great explanation. I suppose you're gonna say the Easter bunny is real too? "CryptoAnarchist just doesn't understand the candy-giving bunny equation." Do you realize how pathetically stupid you sound? I guess you believe this too:  Yeah, totally looks real.  I'm not sure why you use words like "believe". They have no real place in science or engineering. There is a world of facts. You are in denial of a lot of those facts. I didn't say "I believe", dumbfuck. I said I guess "YOU believe", because you aren't basing your arguments on facts or logic, but just believing what you've been told, like children believe in santa. |
|
|
|
As for cryptoanarchist, here he shows that he does not understand the rocket equation. More basic than that, his error is in not understanding the relation between velocity and momentum. or gravitational potential energy, or Newton's laws of motion... Yeah...great explanation. I suppose you're gonna say the Easter bunny is real too? "CryptoAnarchist just doesn't understand the candy-giving bunny equation." Do you realize how pathetically stupid you sound? I guess you believe this too: Yeah, totally looks real. |
|
|
|
I don't really need math to spot such an obvious fraud. It's pretty simple: It took a Saturn rocket to take off from earth, but only something the size of a Lincoln Navigator to take off from the moon. Does that really require anything more than common sense to see that that's bullshit? What's your deal anyway? Are you here to give crypto anarchists a bad reputation by acting mathematically illiterate? I'm sure I'm better at math than you. I went through three Calc courses. Are you trying to prove you're an idiot by not getting the point that math isn't needed? Are you trying to prove that only shit fills your cranium by not understanding the point that common sense is enough to prove that moon landings never happened? You're clearly a dumbass. What you're saying is like saying that I'm acting mathematically illiterate for not believing in Santa Claus because I won't debate the velocity characteristics of reindeer in-flight or the aerodynamics of sleighs. |
|
|
|
It's pretty easy to figure out to me. The moon's gravity is 1/6th of the earth's. Look at the NASA picture I posted of the fake spacecraft - does that in any way seem like 1/6th of a Saturn rocket? Keep in mind that the bottom portion supposedly stayed on the moon and just the top half takes off. It's about the size of a SUV. Logically, that would mean that the Saturn rockets would have only needed to be the size of about 6 SUVs. That and about 1000 other things don't add up. Next time you're trying to figure out how big a spacecraft needs to be, try using math instead of just guessing. Does this mean that the Saturn V that carried both the lunar lander and itself does not have to be 6 times bigger than the part of the lunar lander that doesn't have to carry any part of the Saturn V even if the gravity difference is 6x? And does it mean that as the fuel is exhausted that the vehicle loses mass at the rate of the fuel exhaustion and so takes less to move it over time? I don't really need math to spot such an obvious fraud. It's pretty simple: It took a Saturn rocket to take off from earth, but only something the size of a Lincoln Navigator to take off from the moon. Does that really require anything more than common sense to see that that's bullshit? And that's just one thing. We could talk about the mountains of problems with the footage and photos, the fact that NASA conveniently just lost all the flight data, the problem with traveling through the van allen belts, the behavior of the astronauts after the fact, the proven fake moon rocks, and the fact that with 40+ years of advancing technology, no one seems to be able to go there anymore. If you can look into all those things and still blindly think that America and the TV would never lie to you, then you're just a brainwashed dumbass. |
|
|
|
im skeptical of the moon landing myself (note this is not the same thing as saying "i know we never landed on the moon") but you dont seem to understand the physics of traveling in a zero g vacuum. it doenst require a great deal of fuel to lift off of the moon and from that point you just coast along, there is no friction to slow you down so you only need enough fuel to accelerate and decelerate.
It's pretty easy to figure out to me. The moon's gravity is 1/6th of the earth's. Look at the NASA picture I posted of the fake spacecraft - does that in any way seem like 1/6th of a Saturn rocket? Keep in mind that the bottom portion supposedly stayed on the moon and just the top half takes off. It's about the size of a SUV. Logically, that would mean that the Saturn rockets would have only needed to be the size of about 6 SUVs. That and about 1000 other things don't add up. |
|
|
|
Wow...so you used an ad hominem to describe people who use ad hominems - classic! You might want to reconsider calling yourself an idiot.
Remember: ad hominem is a direct attack at a person as an argument. Exactly. |
|
|
|
He was the main voice on this forum calling pirate a scam
You are very much confused. Well, he started a pretty long thread about pirate here a year ago: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=94900Kinda funny reading through that thread now and reading the posts defending pirate. Might be a good reference for those still holding out hope that BFL will deliver their ASIC miner. |
|
|
|
First sign of an idiot: Uses the ad hominem argument (especially of the "you're very stupid (but I'm not)" variety) Second sign of an idiot: When not using the ad hominem argument: propaganda, propaganda, propaganda. This subforum has degenerated into a shit-sling. What's a rational argument anymore? Forget those--lets just say the exact same thing over, and over, and over, and over, and over, until someone agrees.  Wow...so you used an ad hominem to describe people who use ad hominems - classic! As far as scientific proof these fake shootings actually happened - there isn't any, just fake witness accounts. As far as rational arguments that they've been staged - there are mountains of proof. Sandy Hook is possibly the most obvious fake event (although the moon landing is pretty obvious too). I'd like to hear the "TV-never-lies" people explain some of the stuff brought up here: http://nodisinfo.com/Home/sandy-hook-what-we-know-for-sure/ with something beyond the usual "tin foil hat" comments. But I won't, because they can't/ |
|
|
|
|
You're already ignored shill/moron. No one buys your shit.
|
|
|
|
Stuff like this is moronic and offensive to those with brain cells. Do you really believe that school shootings are made up? It's one thing to believe that the moon landings are fake (you're still an idiot if you believe they're fake) or that 9/11 is a hoax (double idiot points) but it's another to believe that stuff like this is fake. Why would anyone bother faking this, and why wouldn't someone who lives in the Sandy Hook area come out and say something if it was fake? Also, that website is hilarious. That guy doesn't wear tinfoil hats, he wears tinfoil suits. If you believe that that shit was real you're industrial strength stupid. My guess is you're a shill., as usual. |
|
|
|
We already know how "Free State Wyoming" is going. Nowhere, that is.
Right - because it was a bad idea and poorly managed. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone who voted 'Colorado', please PM me for some new info.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
