Hello everyone!
Does this miner support TeraScale/VLIW Radeon GPUs?
it should work, but you wont get speeds like on old claymore. Which card do you have? Radeon 5770 1GB GDDR5. And yeah, hashing speed is only half compared to Claymore v9.7...
|
|
|
Hello everyone!
Does this miner support TeraScale/VLIW Radeon GPUs?
|
|
|
Hello, Please add "-pow7 1" to "Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v9.7 Beta - POOL", thanks! He did...and called it "Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3" Does v11.3 support TeraScale/VLIW GPUs? Not sure...but how efficient can 5xxx and 6xxx be while coin prices are so low? Some people have free electricity, so efficiency doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Hello, Please add "-pow7 1" to "Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v9.7 Beta - POOL", thanks! He did...and called it "Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3" Does v11.3 support TeraScale/VLIW GPUs?
|
|
|
Μόλις σήμερα θυμήθηκαν να μου πουν ότι δεν είναι έγκυρο το δελτίο αστυνομικής ταυτότητας που τους έστειλα, γιατί λέει έχει λήξει.
Εγώ τι να κάνω τώρα; Να πάω να βγάλω καινούρια (και σε λίγο καιρό θα βγουν οι βιομετρικές); Διαβατήριο δεν έχω.
Πιο μπουρδέλο ανταλλακτήριο δεν έχω ξαναδεί... στο coinbase με έκαναν verify μέσα σε λίγα λεπτά. Στα @@ μου οι προμήθειες όταν είναι τόσο ΜΑΛΑΚΕΣ οι άλλοι...
|
|
|
This coin is dead. Is anyone willing to take the source code and restart it?
|
|
|
Τρελή άνοδος σήμερα και στο BTC και στο EOS... τι γίνεται ρε παιδιά;
|
|
|
Η Revolut δεν ζητάει ΑΦΜ. Άλλαξε κάτι;
|
|
|
It's no problem that CCNM will not support terascale anymore, problem is people are too lazy to work out a solution for themselves. People are not "lazy" as you like to believe. Every situation is different (dedicated mining rig vs home PC, Windows 7 vs Windows 10 etc etc.) 14.4 is not a solution for everyone.
|
|
|
When new versions with v7 algo support???
In a few days. Hey Claymore, Are you going to support TeraScale/VLIW GPUs again? Claymore v9.7 is the last version that works with 5xxx/6xxx cards and it doesn't support Monero v7 algo. I wouldn't mind paying dev fees for an updated version. Hi, There's no worries, XMR stak now fully works with TeraScale gpus. Me and a couple of other members worked hard to troubleshoot it. Please check https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/882ogg/summary_and_final_guidepointers_on_how_to/and comments at https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak/issues/472Basically, you need to use 14.4 driver, nothing else works with Stak, and then there are some extra sweet spot intensity settings you can find if you read through what was posted Result is getting 400 h/s per core of HD 6990 on xmr stak, that is about 800 h/s + per one HD 6990, guaranteed to work with V7 monero algo. Well, the thing is Claymore v9.7 works fine with 15.7.1 (it actually asks for 15.x Catalyst for maximum performance/compatibility)... it would be nice if the latest Claymore added TeraScale support again. Right, I see that, but you're missing my point. The drivers you use don't matter if it's a dedicated mining rig, and with 14.4 drivers, if you compile XMR stak from source, you can remove the dev fee, and you literally get the fastest miner for free. With those drivers and correct intensity/worksize, XMR stak outperforms claymore on terascale by 20%, plus you pay no fee. I see your point, but not everyone has a dedicated mining rig. Dev fee is not a problem, as long as the miner works as it should. I can use xmr-stak with 15.12 drivers and HD 6950 no problem.
How? Does it detect more than 384MB of RAM?
|
|
|
When new versions with v7 algo support???
In a few days. Hey Claymore, Are you going to support TeraScale/VLIW GPUs again? Claymore v9.7 is the last version that works with 5xxx/6xxx cards and it doesn't support Monero v7 algo. I wouldn't mind paying dev fees for an updated version. Hi, There's no worries, XMR stak now fully works with TeraScale gpus. Me and a couple of other members worked hard to troubleshoot it. Please check https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/882ogg/summary_and_final_guidepointers_on_how_to/and comments at https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak/issues/472Basically, you need to use 14.4 driver, nothing else works with Stak, and then there are some extra sweet spot intensity settings you can find if you read through what was posted Result is getting 400 h/s per core of HD 6990 on xmr stak, that is about 800 h/s + per one HD 6990, guaranteed to work with V7 monero algo. Well, the thing is Claymore v9.7 works fine with 15.7.1 (it actually asks for 15.x Catalyst for maximum performance/compatibility)... it would be nice if the latest Claymore added TeraScale support again.
|
|
|
When new versions with v7 algo support???
In a few days. Hey Claymore, Are you going to support TeraScale/VLIW GPUs again? Claymore v9.7 is the last version that works with 5xxx/6xxx cards and it doesn't support Monero v7 algo. I wouldn't mind paying dev fees for an updated version.
|
|
|
No one uses VLIW GPUs?
|
|
|
I currently use a Radeon 5770 (please don't judge, electricity is not a big issue and we're in a bear market right now, so it's mostly experimentation for now) and Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v9.7. GPU is overclocked to 960/1320 MHz (core/memory) and yields 176-177 H/s (stock 850/1200 clocks yield 165-166 H/s). According to HWiNFO64, GPU utilization is 99-100% and VRAM usage is ~800MB. This old and unsupported miner software is utilizing my old GPU to its full potential. The thing is, I'm trying to prepare for the inevitable Monero v7 algo change (most altcoins will also adopt it) and I'm experimenting with different miner apps (xmrig-amd, xmr-stak). Both xmrig-amd and xmr-stak (latest versions) only give me ~65 H/s, which is pretty low, even lower than my CPU*. Default hash count is 160 threads and if I try it to increase it to 320, then I get OpenCL errors that the memory capacity does not suffice. GPU utilization is 50% and VRAM usage is ~500MB. Something is clearly not optimal... On top of that, these miners slow down my PC a lot, while Claymore v9.7 doesn't... * My CPU (Q9550 overclocked to 422 FSB, 3587 MHz) yields 112-113 H/s with xmrig. I'll post my configs with some comments in case someone can help: -o ssl://server:3333 -allpools 1 -u wallet_address -p w=desktop_PC_GPU -a 3 #optimized mining algo for TeraScale/VLIW GPUs -dbg -1 -li 1 #low intensity to be able to use my PC -nofee 1 #I disabled the fee because it uses old pools that lose connection pretty often and thus mining stops altogether -h 320 #320 threads 2MB each = 640MB VRAM needed { "algo": "cryptonight", "background": false, "colors": true, "donate-level": 1, "log-file": null, "print-time": 60, "retries": 5, "retry-pause": 5, "opencl-platform": 0, "threads": [ { "index": 0, "intensity": 160, "worksize": 8, "affine_to_cpu": false } ], "pools": [ { "url": "server:3333", "user": "wallet_address", "pass": "w=desktop_PC_GPU", "keepalive": true, "nicehash": false, "variant": -1 } ], "api": { "port": 0, "access-token": null, "worker-id": null } } /* * GPU configuration. You should play around with intensity and worksize as the fastest settings will vary. * index - GPU index number usually starts from 0 * intensity - Number of parallel GPU threads (nothing to do with CPU threads) * worksize - Number of local GPU threads (nothing to do with CPU threads) * affine_to_cpu - This will affine the thread to a CPU. This can make a GPU miner play along nicer with a CPU miner. * strided_index - switch memory pattern used for the scratch pad memory * 2 = chunked memory, chunk size is controlled by 'mem_chunk' * required: intensity must be a multiple of worksize * 1 or true = use 16byte contiguous memory per thread, the next memory block has offset of intensity blocks * 0 or false = use a contiguous block of memory per thread * mem_chunk - range 0 to 18: set the number of elements (16byte) per chunk * this value is only used if 'strided_index' == 2 * element count is computed with the equation: 2 to the power of 'mem_chunk' e.g. 4 means a chunk of 16 elements(256byte) * comp_mode - Compatibility enable/disable the automatic guard around compute kernel which allows * to use a intensity which is not the multiple of the worksize. * If you set false and the intensity is not multiple of the worksize the miner can crash: * in this case set the intensity to a multiple of the worksize or activate comp_mode. * "gpu_threads_conf" : * [ * { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1000, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : true, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true }, * ], * If you do not wish to mine with your AMD GPU(s) then use: * "gpu_threads_conf" : * null, */
"gpu_threads_conf" : [ // gpu: Juniper memory:384 // compute units: 10 { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 160, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },
],
/* * Platform index. This will be 0 unless you have different OpenCL platform - eg. AMD and Intel. */ "platform_index" : 0, Is there any hope for TeraScale/VLIW GPUs (Radeon 5xxx/6xxx) after the Monero v7 fork?
|
|
|
Another shit coin!
Why do you say that?
|
|
|
Can anyone help me. I'm using claymore 11.2 on my RX 570 and only getting 420 h/s for Monero. My card is bios flashed overclocked and with blockchain drivers. I'm getting on the high ends for claymore ETH 29mhs and zcash 312 sols so I'm confused why it's so insanely low in cryptonote. Also I have tried mining Monero in Minergate software for comparison and im getting 700 h/s so I feel something is definitely wrong.
This does sound low for a RX570 on Monero, I get almost 500 h/s on an R9 270x 2GB mining Cryptonote, and 750 h/s on an RX 470 4GB. But what I found is that the R9 270x runs much better on Claymore v9.7 than it does on v11.2, so try using earlier version of Claymore and see if that helps. v9.7 doesn't support the new algo change (v7).
|
|
|
Το πινακάκι στο Wiki λέει 2021, αλλά έστω... αναμένουμε την επόμενη εκτίναξη το 2020.
|
|
|
δε νομίζω ότι υπάρχουν τέτοιοι κανόνες.
την κάθε χρονική στιγμή υπάρχουν γεγονότα που είτε ρίχνουν είτε ανεβάζουν την τιμή χωρίς να μπορούν να προβλεφθούν. απλά τον Δεκέμβριο-Ιανουάριο όλοι πέσαν επάνω με στόχο το γρήγορο κέρδος και όχι την πίστη στο ψηφιακό νόμισμα και τώρα έχουν πανικοβληθεί.
Δεν είπα κανόνες, αλλά pattern. Εδώ κάποιοι αναλύουν γραφήματα και βρίσκουν patterns με fibonacci κλπ. Έχε υπόψιν σου όμως ότι μπορείς να "δεις" patterns οπουδήποτε. Οι άνθρωποι το έχουμε αυτό το κακό, στην προσπάθεια να εξηγήσουμε κάποια πράγματα. Γενικά όμως συμφωνώ, πως δεν είναι καθόλου απίθανο τα 100k στα επόμενα 5 χρόνια. Για παραπάνω δεν ξέρω, δεν το αποκλείω αλλά τότε θα έχουμε περάσει σε άλλο "καθεστώς". Κάτι ακόμα που -ίσως- επιβεβαιώνει την θεωρία μου: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supplyΤο 2021 θα έχουμε το επόμενο halving event... κάτι που θα αυξήσει το scarcity.
|
|
|
|