Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 03:08:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 »
581  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Casualty List on: April 17, 2015, 12:16:00 PM
How could anyone forget these:

- Bitcoinica
- Tradehill

582  Other / Meta / Re: Vod is trying to trash my sales on: April 17, 2015, 07:14:51 AM
There have been problem with MSDN sales. Search in Meta and in Scam Accusations.

=snip=
What exactly is a MSDN Account ?

MSDN Offer you different benefits like free Azure VPS with $150 Credit per month till 1 year  and also on each account it's an amount of Retail keys for Microsoft Products (Windows 8.1,8,7, Office..etc...) &you will get a windows phone developer account too.

Can you please clarify? AFAIK it is used for development and testing. It can be sold only if you have license. Isn't it misleading?

No, depending on the level of your subscription you are also allowed production (non-test & development) use of certain types of Microsoft software included with the subscription. For example you are allowed to use one production copy of Office, Visio, Project, etc., if you have a higher subscription such as MSDN Premium or Ultimate. However, even if you are only allowed to use one copy of Office for production use, the subscription might come with 10 so called retail keys (which you can activate several times, unlike real retail keys), so in theory you could still use a legit subscription illegally. An example of this if you have an MSDN subscription from work and installed copies of Outlook on your work computer and your home computer (unless you were specifically using one copy for doing Outlook-related software development).
583  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: Disable new user registration, Invites only on: April 17, 2015, 12:15:32 AM
I doubt that account farmers and scammers would find it difficult to get invites. This proposal would only inconvenience real newbies who we want to welcome to the forum.
584  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Do you think quantum computers would break Bitcoin's security? on: April 16, 2015, 11:31:46 PM
We are decades away from a quantum computer brute-forcing a 256bit key.

Edit:
Found an old article - http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-08/quantum-processor-calculates-15-3x5-about-half-time

Looks like the qunatum computer solves only one problem, which is to factor 15. This means that it is not even a programmable computer. If we extended this technology to find the private key of a given address then we'd need to build a different computer for each address for which we are trying to find the corresponding private key.
585  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin and closing tax havens on: April 12, 2015, 09:48:31 AM
It's not on their radar yet. It will be if Bitcoin gains mass adoption and we need to be prepared for that time.
586  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What if YOU could put 1 feature, change, whatever, into the Bitcoin protocol? on: April 09, 2015, 12:34:38 PM
Block reward down to every year.

You mean block reward halving?

Yes halving, that would cause some fireworks.

You wouldn't necessarily have to cut down the reward in half every year, you could just go and multiply it by 0.9 or something, which would smoothen things up a bit.

The current implementation using an integer shift operation to approximately halve the reward is very simple and elegant to those who can read and understand the code. There are lots of problems associated with replacing that with some kind of floating point operation, the biggest one being that you need to make sure that the reduction of reward is the same across all platforms. This is not as simple as it sounds because different computing platforms have different rounding errors. The second problem is how you would deal with the last few Satoshis? I mean if you were down to 3 Satoshi block rewards you can't reduce it so 2.7 Satoshis at the next reduction.
587  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fingerprint private key on: April 08, 2015, 08:19:21 AM
Keep in mind that your biometric data is not necessarily private. For example, my former employer already has one of my thumbprints and my retina scans of both eyes on file because I needed access to an area secured by biometric scanners. I am not sure what their data retention policies are for employee records, but I am not trusting them 100% that they won't share or leak this data at some point in time.
588  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Coinbase Seeks 'Invasive' Details on US Bitcoin Mining Operations on: April 03, 2015, 03:21:12 PM
Well then please enumerate those risks not associated with violating AML/KYC rules that an exchange could face from not knowing it's customers' source of funds.

Fraud / Defaulting. If you know your customer has funds in a high risk business you just shut him down.

I am a little older and I remember the days when financial institutions did not care about the source of funds as long as their own interests were adequately protected. Think of Swiss banks up to the 70's or early 80's. There is no reason to shut down a "high risk" customer, such as a drug kingpin, if you were not forced to by the government.
589  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Coinbase Seeks 'Invasive' Details on US Bitcoin Mining Operations on: April 03, 2015, 02:58:40 PM
Shocking: A financial business is requesting information about their customers

Like seriously: What do you expect? Even without AML/KYC laws: there's something called financial risk management which involves gathering information about customers and closing accounts of high risk customers.

Well then please enumerate those risks not associated with violating AML/KYC rules that an exchange could face from not knowing it's customers' source of funds. My bank did not even ask those kinds of questions when I opened a business account for a shell LLC that I set up for myself.
590  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [Amazing!] Is Bitcoin "Rad", "Sick", "Hella-good", or 'the Bomb'? on: April 03, 2015, 10:36:02 AM
I prefer to type "Bitcoin is the shit".

And watch how many people who don't understand the slang mistakenly read it as "Bitcoin is shit".

591  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Wow! KnC Neptunes are insanely cheap on Ebay! on: March 31, 2015, 08:45:24 AM

ID say if it's a full cube like he says wouldn't it run at 1950 W  it shows in the spec he does  Processing Speed (GH/s):3300

He is selling one fully functional cube (20% of a Neptune), not a full Neptune.
592  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A basic question on: March 31, 2015, 06:39:47 AM
Note that to convert from private key to bitcoin address you need to go through 2 transforms that are each "one-way", at least for now.

private key -> public key -> address

Someone already mentioned what these transforms are (EC PK cryptography and SHA256). Cryptographers spend their careers designing as well as trying to break these transforms, because they protect other stuff much more valuable than bitcoins.

Now you come out of the blue, claim you know nothing about cryptography, but assert that is should be easy to go directly from address -> private key because there must be some pattern that should be easy to find?
593  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: storing wallet backup in the cloud? on: March 30, 2015, 11:30:38 AM
What do you mean you need to make frequent backups of your wallet.dat? Wont one suffice?

Well, using the standard client, when you make a new receiving address or when the wallet makes a new automatic change address you'd want to save that. I think the standard wallet keeps a pool of 100 reserve addresses by default (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Key_pool) that gets saved as part of the backup, so you only need to do backups when you are about to use up the pool. In the past, many people lost BTC when they restored a wallet from an old backup that did not contain  newer receiving addresses that were created after the backup was made.

Of course if you don't use your wallet or your only use is for coins to keep coming in to the same address(es) then you don't need to keep making backups.
594  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: storing wallet backup in the cloud? on: March 30, 2015, 02:51:22 AM
As long as the PGP private key is kept in a safe place storing your private keys in the cloud (while PGP encrypted)  should be safe. Although if you are going to be securing something with your PGP key then you might as well backup your private keys in the same place that you keep your PGP key (ideally on an offline computer). If you are going to need a backup of your private keys, then you would probably need a backup of your PGP key as well so securing it this way is somewhat of a catch 22 - although you could encrypt it with a passphraise, although this is less secure

In practice it makes a difference where you might store your PGP key vs. your wallet.dat because the PGP key is static but the wallet.dat keeps changing and backups need to be made periodically. For example, you can store a cold (unencrypted) copy of your PGP key in a safety deposit box and use a very strong passphrase to encrypt the active copy without having to worry too much about forgetting the passphrase because you could always run to the bank in the event that you do forget. However, it probably is not convenient to run to your safety deposit box every night with your updated wallet.dat each time your private keys change.
595  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: storing wallet backup in the cloud? on: March 29, 2015, 08:01:23 AM
what do you think of storing your wallet backup in the cloud? like a storage service. like google drive / drop box / iCloud drive / etc...?

of course there is the USB stick and paper option too...

also how do you load a backup into bitcoin-qt?

Yeah, I use this method. I first PGP encrypt the wallet backup, then zip it, and finally attach it to a message on Gmail or some other mail service. Pretty convenient.

Even with a password protected wallet I would never leave it on the cloud without secondary encryption because someone could still see your transactions and addresses.

To restore the backup for bitcoin core, shut down the client and replace the current wallet.dat with your backup copy. Then restart the client.
596  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Is it safe to keep your coins in Bitstamp? on: March 27, 2015, 12:32:31 PM
I used to keep a lot of BTC on Bitstamp and lend them out for a small interest to other traders. I even wrote a bot that attempted to price my swap offers at what I thought was the optimal price based on the historical trend of the FRR. In the end I collected only a small amount in interest payments. I figured that it wasn't worth the risk and withdrew everything.
597  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: May 51% Attack Achieved Cheaper? on: March 26, 2015, 12:07:35 AM

Attacker needs to find their connection to the outer network. They should use some ip addresses to broadcast block candidates. So it really doesn't matter their inner connection.

They probably use Matt Corallo's private backbone to broadcast transactions amongst themselves first. You'd have a hard time plugging all the egress points. Even if you did, the big players already see each other's blocks first.
598  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: May 51% Attack Achieved Cheaper? on: March 25, 2015, 11:54:09 PM
Big farms make direct stratum connections to their own pools through private networks. You can't DDoS these.

My little farm connects to BTC Guild, but will failover to my local p2pool node if BTC Guild goes down. Furthermore, my p2pool node makes direct connections only to trusted non-mining p2pool nodes that I control, so you can never hit my mining node directly from the internet.
599  Other / Meta / Re: Just remove signatures already. As in delete, disable, gone. on: March 25, 2015, 11:14:13 AM

But I just want to ask something, most of the campaigns banned off-topic section and don't pay you for posts written there. Yet, people are posting there as before (with signatures) and spam is real.

Why?

1) Because some people are idiots
2) To increase their post count

You probably have no idea how much I've learned from this forum in 2010-2012 because this place was a lot different back then. I spent a year lurking before registering because I felt that I couldn't post anything worthwhile compared to the other posters.

Today I when I read the forums chances are that I learn absolutely nothing because all I see are these garbage posts. 1-2 year old members (sophomores) with sig ads talking out of their ass like they were experts but making factually incorrect posts. Give me a break!
600  Other / Off-topic / Re: Do girls use Bitcoin ? on: March 24, 2015, 11:30:39 PM
In 2013 I sent 0.4 btc to a girl to purchase a his comic book. (She didn't spend it yet)

In 2013 I had a spare Gen 1 Avalon and set it up in some girl's basement to mine to her wallet. When Bitcoin hit $1000+ she had accumulated 8 BTC but she never sold them. Later I kept giving her my obsolete hardware so that she was always mining with about 700W of slightly dated hardware. Currently she has 2 Neptune cubes running at 1.3 TH/s and I think she has about 13 BTC now. So far she has not touched them. I keep a copy of her wallet.dat in case her computer crashes because she does not back it up (it is password protected). Sometimes I wonder if she even knows what she has, though she is aware that she is paying $120/month extra for her electric bill.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!