Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 02:44:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
501  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: May 09, 2015, 11:26:23 AM
Following
502  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Devastation on: April 26, 2015, 02:39:23 AM
Gold and BTC are preparing (within next several months) to dump down to a final capitulation low some 20% or more lower.

I have been and remain a seller until next year.

So you think the lows will be slightly after 2015.75?
503  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: April 12, 2015, 05:25:42 PM
Thanks!
504  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: April 12, 2015, 12:14:53 PM
holy shit i was suprised today how fast block reward is going down. soon under 10 xmr per block  Shocked
found a block on my desktop. my first impression was this has to be a trx, since its too small to be a block reward.
everything we need for the perfect storm Cool

Can someone post a link to a graf of the total issuance of Monero over time? Would appreciate it to look into the inflation some more.
505  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: December 02, 2014, 03:54:12 PM
Nice chart. I'm curious what it looks like farther back. Last year it must have been negative correlation, at least during the bubble formation in btc.
506  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: November 09, 2014, 03:43:21 PM
Then we have Bitcoin which I (Anonymint) predicted (in this forum numerous times reiterated) would decline from $1000 to $150, based on the fact that adoption was declining due to take over by Coinbase, Bitpay, etc (losing network effects) and because all Private assets will align and move down for a bottom in 2015.

But, despite the decline in price, adoption has actually been increasing drastically, compared to previous years, and possibly thanks to things like BitPay and Coinbase, which are reinforcing network effects. Many believe that the decline in price is actually precisely due to increased adoption and increased use of bitcoin that used to be hoarded, but is now spent more easily and frequently, with the end result of more of it being dumped on the market. It doesn't seem like it will be hitting $150, either, though we still have two more months to go.

So, it looks as if your adoption prediction was wrong, and price prediction is in the right trend, but may still be missed exactly, but with the reason behind the price decline being wrong too.

Bitcoin still has another 11 months to hit a low of $150 if we look at Armstrongs ECM model (publc vs private waves)
507  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: November 06, 2014, 11:01:59 AM
The fact that conspirators carefully avoid leaving hard evidence doesn't make the claims true, either.

their aims are all in your face (FATCA, etc.). The aim of the control grid is to milk every taxable cent from the peasants wherever they go (and the power of expropriating them just pressing a button). This for the masses. For higher levels knowing the dirty laundry of everyone makes them blackmailable.

I might add. It is about power, not about money. The world is abundant with resources currently, it can be proven by observing that 90% of people in western countries do not do useful work, rather all they do is connected to generating money to pay taxes, and the taxes in turn pay the jobs that do not exist to produce anything, except more suffocating control and making it even more difficult for the minuscule minority to live and produce.

There is no need to collect taxes, if there was no need to enslave people in the system. When you pay taxes next time, remember that none of it (in general) is used in anything else but to enslave you even more with the system. If all taxes would be abolished, the people would do just fine. The production of useful goods would not suffer. Only all the jobs that only exist to systematize human life would disappear since no one would even consider paying for them from his own pocket.

No it was not always like this. This is the endgame. Most of the degradation has happened in the last 50 years, and the last 25 years have already brought great advances, but also shown the totality of the dystopy that the self-proclaimed "elite" will want to force on us. In my understanding, we are about to enter in the millennial kingdom, and the evil enslavement plans will suffer loss.

Personally what puzzles me the most, is how it's only so tiny percentage of people who get it. It's just sad to see them in the law courts judging me for non-compliance with the enslavement, and nothing at all they understand what is going on. Christians, at minimum, should realize that compliance with the enemy is not ok. And with adequate revelation, this does force some changes in your life (to the better, ofc Wink )


Great post!!
Please put more time into posts like this instead of your silly Monero game.
508  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: November 02, 2014, 11:22:19 PM
So what is the conclusion here? Bitcoin is dead and will never see a new ath? A side chain that is superior will emerge? I really don't understand this (haven't spent much time reading up on it) but wouldn't side chains mean bitcoin would have to survive? People would be buying btc and sending them to different side chains, taking btc off the market and price should go up not down because of this? What am I missing?
509  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: October 17, 2014, 10:23:21 AM

Fun facts: Netflix (NFLX) shed more than the entire market cap of bitcoin yesterday



That's crazy
510  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: October 05, 2014, 05:55:08 PM
I think the fear has reached an extreme far higher than anything in 2014 yet. People (including me) are talking about getting back to work, putting castles for sale, and the price reaching $100-$200 in a matter of weeks.

Typically, extreme fear is associated with prices that in nearly all timeframes provide far above-average returns. Unlike most extreme fear situations, the one in Bitcoin now is very easy to capitalize on, because bitcoins can easily be bought 24/7.

Even if buying more is not a realistic option due to the portfolio already being heavy in BTC, selling is generally not warranted unless you want to be one of those taken advantage of.

When you think about it, Bitcoin is a real threat for economy in a given society, when the value goes up that fast ( as you claim it will) many people will be leaving their daily productive jobs.... and when thinking about mass adoption I start thinking about a bunch of greedy lazy bastards.... this surely will result to the collapse of that society.


Thankfully, after being home for 7 months now, I started looking for a job.

Very much the opposite. The falling global economy will create massive unemployment so a few new millionaires won't have an affect. If anything they will make things better since they won't end up being welfare cases and they might even create some new jobs (Risto already has).
511  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Cryptocurrency with the best distribution? on: October 01, 2014, 12:18:05 PM
Following
512  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: September 21, 2014, 06:53:17 PM
MEW - Monero Economy Workgroup communication

A taskforce is set up to address the issue of a possible "BCX exploit", and an ultimatum by BCX to find and fix it in 72 hours lest a serious attack is launched upon Monero.

The taskforce consists of several Monero developers, AnonyMint, CZ, jl777 and me.

There are differing opinions in the taskforce concerning the severity of the threat. No coinkiller is yet found and several avenues are probed. The members who have technical competence are talking about their views themselves.

Regardless of the outcome in the technical side, this is a serious economic attack on Monero - about 15% of the pre-ultimatum value is lost, and there is a great information asymmetry plaguing traders currently. It is notable that nobody has offered to borrow XMR for shorting (which I could provide against full guarantee deposit of BTC). Neither has anyone bought the PUT options. This means that the downside speculation has so far been limited to selling out from a trader's own stash. An economically motivated player who knows for sure about a lethal attack might decide to take leverage for personal gain.

I believe that the Monero devs are up to their task and can mitigate the potential exploit, and fix the code in preparation of the announced attack. I further believe that Monero will rise even stronger. Since I am not in possession of any knowledge that indicates that a realistic attack could take place, I can only estimate the probability that it exists unnoticed, and my estimate is 4-8%.

The MEW will be inaugurated on Tuesday, and also the devteam has important announcements (not related to the attack). Provided that our coin still exists, I am sure we have a great future ahead of us as a community with these new methods of organizing our activities for the mutual benefit.



This was the kind of response I was waiting for from the developers. I guess rpietila takes on the role as the CEO which kind of makes sense.
513  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: September 21, 2014, 05:01:42 PM
When bitcoin was in its infancy and experiencing some of its first bug exploits do you think Satoshi was whining about not getting payed, how the project wasn't his whole life and he rather spend time on the beach with his wife? As core developers you are suppose to believe in the project so much that you see the extreme potential and the coins you hold on to from the beginning will eventually be worth so much that it will compensate you for all your hard work.

514  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: September 21, 2014, 04:31:23 PM
Anonymint doesn't seem to have any affiliation with Monero and he seems to be working his ass off. Even during dinner.  As a core developer you are  the equivalent of the CEO and in so you have the responsibility towards the share holders (investors) to be on top of this. If I was invested in a company where they hit some serious problems I'd be pretty pissed off if the CEO said he would hit the beach with his wife and stated there are other things in life that matter, not only this company. I would expect the CEO to be working at full speed. If he couldn't solve it himself he would be networking, talking to people who potentially could, speaking to investors trying to calm the market etc. Your reply was another fail in my eyes.

I have gotten paid 0 dollars for the hundreds of hours of work I've put into this coin, so I really don't have any obligation to anyone to do anything. I'm here because I like the work and the coin.

What's the mater with you developers? You have to believe in your product. Go all in. Don't sit here and say this is your hoby project. An anonymous crypto with the correct attributes has enormous potential. Show us your enthusiasm and commitment!
515  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: September 21, 2014, 04:01:01 PM
Pretty comical that a core developer chooses to go to the beach when this is going down. I have a family as well but if my coin was at risk of dying I'd put 100% in fixing that first.

How do you get that? There's been a claim with virtually no details, that we can neither refute or accept. So what are we meant to fix, exactly?

Would you prefer it if I feverishly read through every line of code in an abject panic?

Until BCX either provides some more technical details, or he just carries out his attack in 2 days time, we don't know *if* there is an exploit, what its nature is, or where to even start looking. So we carry on as normal, investing plenty of time in Monero, without needlessly panicking, because if we panic we will accomplish nothing.

Anonymint doesn't seem to have any affiliation with Monero and he seems to be working his ass off. Even during dinner.  As a core developer you are  the equivalent of the CEO and in so you have the responsibility towards the share holders (investors) to be on top of this. If I was invested in a company where they hit some serious problems I'd be pretty pissed off if the CEO said he would hit the beach with his wife and stated there are other things in life that matter, not only this company. I would expect the CEO to be working at full speed. If he couldn't solve it himself he would be networking, talking to people who potentially could, speaking to investors trying to calm the market etc. Your reply was another fail in my eyes.
516  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: September 21, 2014, 03:20:22 PM
Pretty comical that a core developer chooses to go to the beach when this is going down. I have a family as well but if my coin was at risk of dying I'd put 100% in fixing that first.
517  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: September 21, 2014, 09:19:32 AM
Following with interest
518  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: September 19, 2014, 12:43:29 PM
The number of transactions are closing in on ath. Number of transactions and price have had a close correlation before and probably will in the future (see Peter R work relating to Metcalfe's law). Either that correlation is broken or something has to give.

Number of transactions excluding popular adddresses.
https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-excluding-popular?showDataPoints=false&timespan=&show_header=true&daysAverageString=7&scale=0&address=

And the hashrate just keeps going like crazy

Yes hashrate and difficulty are 2 other factors that suggest the price at the moment isn't reflecting the fundemental values and probably more of a technical emosional dump that should turn up soon.
519  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: September 19, 2014, 12:40:01 PM
The number of transactions are closing in on ath. Number of transactions and price have had a close correlation before and probably will in the future (see Peter R work relating to Metcalfe's law). Either that correlation is broken or something has to give.

Number of transactions excluding popular adddresses.
https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-excluding-popular?showDataPoints=false&timespan=&show_header=true&daysAverageString=7&scale=0&address=
520  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: September 16, 2014, 07:27:15 PM
Anyone notice that the number of transactions per day broke to the upside today? If Peter R is correct with the correlation between transactions and price either the correlation is starting to break or price is lagging and we will see a shot for $500 soon.

Also the hash rate is looking very healthy.

Either way I wouldn't be shorting atm.

IMO we still haven't met litcoin target and although bitcoin is lagging now litecoin's recent strength, the next litecoin push down should drag bitcoin down heavily until we see strong buyers.
I was speaking about the correlation of transaction volume and price, what on earth does this have to do with litecoin?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!