Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 06:49:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47]
921  Bitcoin / Electrum / Electrum won't start on: December 07, 2013, 05:10:35 AM
Win 7 -64, was using program earlier today.  Now when I click on the desktop icon.  Nothing happens.
Please advise.
922  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Need help - confused on: December 06, 2013, 10:13:45 PM
Please forgive my newbiness.  I have successfully created an offline wallet system and am ready to send a payment.  I saved the transaction, loaded it into my offline computer, signed it, saved and have reopened the saved transaction in the online wallet computer.  This is where I am confused.  I am attempting to send 1 BTC to an address and that address shows up under Outputs.  The problem is that the BALANCE of my wallet ALSO shows up under Outputs with an address that I did not enter.  I went to Bitcoin Blockchain explorer, entered the address that I didn't recognize and it said "No transactions found for this address, it has probably not been used on the network yet."

Is this correct?  Or if I hit save am I going to send the balance of my wallet to someone?

Please advise and thanks in advance!

It is correct. This is your change address from your wallet. If you have 2 BTC on address A and you want to send 1.5 BTC to address B, change of 0.5 BTC will be sent to your own change address C.

You can actually disable change addresses in preferences if you want. In that case when you send 1.5 BTC from address A to address B, 0.5 BTC will be sent back to address A.


https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Change

Thank you very much for your reply.  I was thinking that that is what was going on but when you have 3 digits worth of BTC in the "change."  I am sure you can understand why I wanted to be sure!  lol
923  Bitcoin / Electrum / Need help - confused on: December 06, 2013, 07:22:42 PM
Please forgive my newbiness.  I have successfully created an offline wallet system and am ready to send a payment.  I saved the transaction, loaded it into my offline computer, signed it, saved and have reopened the saved transaction in the online wallet computer.  This is where I am confused.  I am attempting to send 1 BTC to an address and that address shows up under Outputs.  The problem is that the BALANCE of my wallet ALSO shows up under Outputs with an address that I did not enter.  I went to Bitcoin Blockchain explorer, entered the address that I didn't recognize and it said "No transactions found for this address, it has probably not been used on the network yet."

Is this correct?  Or if I hit save am I going to send the balance of my wallet to someone?

Please advise and thanks in advance!
924  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: December 06, 2013, 03:05:44 AM
bingo, that's the one.

Good luck!
Is legacy 32 bit? I need 32 bit for XP.

No, they are all 64 bit.  I don't have a 32 bit miner.
925  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: At just $1, QUARK will be #3 on the planet on: December 05, 2013, 11:38:21 PM
I would like to know more about the PR machine.  How, what and where?
926  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: December 05, 2013, 09:00:49 PM
bingo, that's the one.

Good luck!
927  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: December 05, 2013, 08:39:00 PM
Cryptsy has QRK creeping up.  To .000138 now.  Maybe the new bottom is .00011.

Anyway, I mine on several CPUs using the "Legacy" minerd for win 6 64 bit found in the depths of this thread.  I don't have any recent machines, but I'll give you an idea of my hashrates:

AMD Phenom II x4 965 be:  121.43 khash/s  times 4, of course

Intel Xeon X3430 at 2.4 Ghz: 87.43 khash/s times 4

Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 at 2.33Ghz : 71.28 khash/s times 2

AMD Phenom II x4 905:  89.45 khash/s  times 4

I use pool with http://www.coinmine.pl/qrk/ and I am averaging about 24 QRK/day since the reward was halved to 16.

Not too great, but steady.  I welcome recommendations for improvement.

Juan



damn i only get 60 khashes/s per core on my phenom II x4
are you using this? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2948566#msg2948566



Nope, my is the one where they upped the proggies to sourceforge and there were several versions including: i7, Bulldozer, AMD, etc. and Legacy.  Sorry, I can't remember the exact name.  BTW, that deneb chip, 965 runs real hot 60-62 C when it is hashing.  I may be burning it up, don't know!
928  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: December 05, 2013, 08:08:10 PM
Cryptsy has QRK creeping up.  To .000138 now.  Maybe the new bottom is .00011.

Anyway, I mine on several CPUs using the "Legacy" minerd for win 6 64 bit found in the depths of this thread.  I don't have any recent machines, but I'll give you an idea of my hashrates:

AMD Phenom II x4 965 be:  121.43 khash/s  times 4, of course

Intel Xeon X3430 at 2.4 Ghz: 87.43 khash/s times 4

Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 at 2.33Ghz : 71.28 khash/s times 2

AMD Phenom II x4 905:  89.45 khash/s  times 4

I use pool with http://www.coinmine.pl/qrk/ and I am averaging about 24 QRK/day since the reward was halved to 16.

Not too great, but steady.  I welcome recommendations for improvement.

Juan


929  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: About people Spinning the China Ban News on: December 05, 2013, 01:48:24 PM
This is just another central bank throwing down the challenge to us.  I say we should pick up the challenge and stick it to the banksters.  Buy more.  Quit using their fiat as much as possible.  Take away their power.  Make them squirm.

BTC FTW!
930  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: December 04, 2013, 11:44:58 PM
HUUUUUGGGE mistake to change the logo now.  The time to do that was last month.  Too late, don't mess with destiny.
931  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: hi on: December 04, 2013, 10:30:11 PM
I'd say it's a lot better to use a wallet where you yourself have direct control of your bitcoins, instead of using web wallets. I'd recommend Bitcoin-QT or Multibit (haven't used the latter myself though).


I highly recommend Electrum.  Check it out.
932  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: The average person can never own a single Bitcoin on: December 04, 2013, 10:20:54 PM
Nobody will every buy gold, because 1 ton of gold is out of reach for 99% of the people on the planet.  BTW at last spot 1 ton of gold is worth $36,000,000 or 35,000 BTC.   

+1
933  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: The average person can never own a single Bitcoin on: December 04, 2013, 08:27:18 PM
Ever heard of a Satoshi?  A Satoshi is (currently) the smallest divisible unit of a bitcoin.  It is 0.00000001 BTC.  Enough for about each of the 7 billion people of earth to own 300,000.  So, yeah, I think they thought of that.

So, 1 BTC = 100,000,000 Satoshis.
934  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Alt-Coins on: December 04, 2013, 07:16:09 PM
So where is the best file source location for pool mining QRK?  I assume Minerd is trusted.
935  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: bitcoin worth $98500 says this article on: December 04, 2013, 06:57:13 PM
My own personal calculations show Bitcoin going to $3500 by January.  $10,000 by March.  $30,000 by April.  Of course, I am free to make up any formula for determining my outcome as I desire.   Grin

In all honesty, I think that we are all the future very wealthy gentlemen.

Nice, to meet you.  Do you have any Grey Poupon?

Juan
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!