|
Fuck a duck you are into some weird shit, it like denying you've ever watched "2 girls one cup" cause I know you have and regretted it.
|
|
|
|
Wow thank you, I will need to organize and split up all the Blocks a little better for Staking, I have a ton of really small Blocks in my other wallet but are not Staking as well with sub 100 Coin Blocks. I am putting together a website with Cryptohustler to replace the one I had overwrote and getting a little help in building it so I can focus on other things. |
|
|
|
@HippieTechI posted this topic specifically for you pretty much.. Crestington Legit or Not ? (PM's inside)I don't think "crusty" liked me posting ALL of his pm's he ever sent me but i was giving them to you mainly HippieTech. And knowing that would be a far more appropriate place than the Cryptsy topic here. Feel free to tear him a new ass on that topic all you want  Fantastic, I'm sure it will be a great asset to the Libel and Cyberstalking case I am compiling. I don't even have to go out of my jurisdiction if I decide to take you to court. Dude chill out man.. are you going HippieTech on me ? I posted some PM's and tried to get this guy to shut up about you. One good way to do that was to create new topic and show everyone the PM's you sent me. No. 1 that would draw him over to the other topic. No. 2 low his complaining. No. 3 That would possibly vindicate you from HippieTech's obsession against you. I told you also in part i was having doubts whether you are some other guys around Crypto we all. Based mainly on stuff HippieTech has been posting about you lots. Go check out the rep forum topic on Crestington. You can see i was not trying to put your down or insult you. If you feel like i stabbed you in the back or anything Crestington you really do have my sincere apologies man. I shit you not i mainly wanted to give everything i know about you to HippieTech etc so maybe the lynch mob on you would stop with it all. Libel and Cyberstalking ? Where the hell are you getting that from ? Cresty come on #Cryptsy on Freenode IRC and talk with me / us. I will try and be there frequently. Crestington you have always been a super nice guy and fun to talk to & i have nothing bad to say about you. I am sorry if you feel i have done you wrong. But do remember that HippieTech started posting a lot negative stuff about you on -THIS- topic before. So i was trying to get it moved over to a new topic, instead of here Sorry man, I'm just tired of all the harassing that goes on around here, not just to me, I see some very nasty and racist remarks being directed at you as well. I just don't appreciate being libeled as some kind of monster when I have tried to help people where I can. I haven't even really been following the service discussion for some weeks now but I think you guys may be correct in Cryptsy being insolvent. I have friends with withdrawals being stuck for more than a week and only today I went through the service discussion and there are far more reports of problems and missing Coins than needs to be. I'll help you guys with whatever you need but I haven't been involved in illegitimate operations at the expense of others. My Skype logs only go back as far as the end of April 2014 and even from what I remember (or old Skype logs I have logged), I could not see anything considered fraudulent. If Cryptsy is insolvent, it would likely be due to something internal they are not sharing. Yes poor you.. poor "i cant wait to make a new account and start another crypto ponzi", YOU. I have not slandered you.. and even if anyone has, it would never make it to court because you have never properly identified yourself. You talk n talk.. As the pm stated I have started necessary steps in pursuing the matter. I have also been advised not to respond other than stating the intentions that I plan to pursue this.
Regards
Defamation? It ain't defamation when its true. You will lose your case anyway because: a) You do not have a legal business b) You don't pay taxes on what you earn here c) Hippie Tech's criticism is warranted and fair. You refused to refund him for a service you didn't deliver upon, and he followed forum protocol by opening an accusation against you. d) You have no terms of service. e) Neither of you signed a contract. f) You delivered a non working executable. g) You attempted to extort him into letting you premine his coin. a. I do have a legal business. b. I pay taxes. c. He requested the amount was up to me. By opening this thread he has tried to defame me and my business. d. Has nothing to do with defamation. e. Dont need to. f. I delivered the exe. g. Extortion " to secure (money, favours, etc) by intimidation, violence, or the misuse of influence or authority". if it up to me how much to return, there is no merit for extortion. Business is business and I pay my taxes just so I can protect the business. Again, I'm not Mudda for the umpteenth time so give it a rest. You have been stalking me for some 2 years now based on your obsession with the guy and I have had enough. I would appreciate to have you desist libeling and slandering me based upon your "theories". |
|
|
|
|
Probably better to implement your own exchange so that you can tailor the rules of the Fees. I don't see the Fees being the actual problem, just that Cryptopia and other exchanges only withdraw based on a flat rate so if you want to implement a % based withdrawal Fee, it doesn't fly without them recoding their exchange.
You should just throw iFUD4BTC on ignore if you are finding him too distracting and focus on solutions.
|
|
|
|
Poking for my name & address is creepy.. sorry but it is.
I would never have asked those things of anyone on the web in my whole life.
Considering i have had a LOT of problems with people here it makes it look worse for me.
From my perspective i have had everyone all over PM me all kinds of crap for ages.
99% unprovoked.. I NEVER PM people.
No offense Crestington but i want to hear what everyone thinks.
A couple guys have been poking at you saying you may be known as other people.
For me that may seem almost like a betrayal... *IF* true !
I am not condemning you Cresty ..you always did me a solid and have been fun to talk to.
I just want to see what other guys think etc.
For example HippieTech and maybe Gleb Gamow seem to think you are using other known names
and may be up to coin shenanigans so i hoped what i posted will HELP clarify things.. good .. or ..bad !
Do i have to remind you all.. again ..i have had TONS of threats of all kinds here ?
I never poked around for your address, you posted the city where you live on some other forums and it ended up here, you also posted about it as well. I'm not using other known names despite what Gleb and Hippietech think, there is a lot of theoretical association of people being other people based on a low amount of evidence. Take the smallest example, link it and repeat it over and over until everyone starts to think it's true. A prime example would be your fight against Stakeminers where you associate Cyberpinoy with many associated accounts, the only possible alt account could be WolvMan but I still doubt that as well. On the other side you have Cyberpinoy thinking that you, Gleb, HippieTech, Xian01 and whoever else are also the same person so I end up hearing it from both sides. Everyone thinks everyone is everyone else based on little to no proof so who knows what is real? Crestington, personally, I don't believe you have other accounts [at this time], albeit the "me" is "interesting". I concede that Wofvman and Leroy Fodor are two different people, but that doesn't mean that both hasn't or won't post via the other's nym, Cryberpinoy being Leroy. The issues I have with Leroy go far beyond the very first post I penned about StakeMiners that was immediately deleted, with my second post in the same thread deleted in virtually 15 seconds. Maybe this would help? I did some searching of google images for some old Skype logs that refer to the person as "me". This is not a Skype log of mine though.  |
|
|
|
@HippieTechI posted this topic specifically for you pretty much.. Crestington Legit or Not ? (PM's inside)I don't think "crusty" liked me posting ALL of his pm's he ever sent me but i was giving them to you mainly HippieTech. And knowing that would be a far more appropriate place than the Cryptsy topic here. Feel free to tear him a new ass on that topic all you want Fantastic, I'm sure it will be a great asset to the Libel and Cyberstalking case I am compiling. I don't even have to go out of my jurisdiction if I decide to take you to court. Dude chill out man.. are you going HippieTech on me ? I posted some PM's and tried to get this guy to shut up about you. One good way to do that was to create new topic and show everyone the PM's you sent me. No. 1 that would draw him over to the other topic. No. 2 low his complaining. No. 3 That would possibly vindicate you from HippieTech's obsession against you. I told you also in part i was having doubts whether you are some other guys around Crypto we all. Based mainly on stuff HippieTech has been posting about you lots. Go check out the rep forum topic on Crestington. You can see i was not trying to put your down or insult you. If you feel like i stabbed you in the back or anything Crestington you really do have my sincere apologies man. I shit you not i mainly wanted to give everything i know about you to HippieTech etc so maybe the lynch mob on you would stop with it all. Libel and Cyberstalking ? Where the hell are you getting that from ? Cresty come on #Cryptsy on Freenode IRC and talk with me / us. I will try and be there frequently. Crestington you have always been a super nice guy and fun to talk to & i have nothing bad to say about you. I am sorry if you feel i have done you wrong. But do remember that HippieTech started posting a lot negative stuff about you on -THIS- topic before. So i was trying to get it moved over to a new topic, instead of here Sorry man, I'm just tired of all the harassing that goes on around here, not just to me, I see some very nasty and racist remarks being directed at you as well. I just don't appreciate being libeled as some kind of monster when I have tried to help people where I can. I haven't even really been following the service discussion for some weeks now but I think you guys may be correct in Cryptsy being insolvent. I have friends with withdrawals being stuck for more than a week and only today I went through the service discussion and there are far more reports of problems and missing Coins than needs to be. I'll help you guys with whatever you need but I haven't been involved in illegitimate operations at the expense of others. My Skype logs only go back as far as the end of April 2014 and even from what I remember (or old Skype logs I have logged), I could not see anything considered fraudulent. If Cryptsy is insolvent, it would likely be due to something internal they are not sharing. |
|
|
|
|
I tend to think most of what is being said is mostly trolling but I have to say that I have begun to see many reports in the last few weeks of people not being able to withdraw their funds.
|
|
|
|
What can I add for the giveaway? I would like to add some as well.
Keep it up!
And never give up.
You Will Win in the End.
I see one specific problem (throughout the whole Cryptocoin Community) Many people are just hoarding their Coins and are spending nothing to improve or contribute and just waiting for the Devs or "knights" to do the work. How can we improve that? Maybe some time later we need to implement a system in the Cryptocoin Space that encourages people to contribute ideas and their fair share (maybe though higher X% PoS Rewards for contribution and negative PoS rewards for "just hoarding"?) I call it "Anti-Hoarding" System. I know here are a lot of people just hoarding (and staking) a LOT amount of coins and do nothing to improve "their" Coin. However, this is only a suggestion and just my 2 cents Regards Tom Hmm, can you detail a little more as what you are thinking about your anti-hoarding idea? Negative Staking may not work as well if the Negative blocks are known because people could skip these Blocks. If possibly gaining negative interest on a Coin, I think that would put people off from being a part of it. |
|
|
|
I like FLY and the FLY Community.
Keep it up!
And never give up.
You Will Win in the End.
I see one specific problem (throughout the whole Cryptocoin Community)
Many people are just hoarding their Coins and are spending nothing to improve or contribute and just waiting for the Devs or "knights" to do the work.
How can we improve that?
Maybe some time later we need to implement a system in the Cryptocoin Space that encourages people to contribute ideas and their fair share (maybe though higher X% PoS Rewards for contribution
and negative PoS rewards for "just hoarding"?)
I call it "Anti-Hoarding" System.
However, this is only a suggestion and just my 2 cents
Regards
Tom
Hey tom! Nice to see you here! I agree completely. One of the biggest issues is that everyone is waiting for everyone else to do the work that needs to be done, the biggest need is to figure out solutions and what can be added based on each person's ability. People get more skilled as time progresses, but as a community (Bitcointalk as a whole), we need to stop focusing on trying to tear each other down and find ways where we can help. For your Anti-Hoarding, it may not work as you want as if the negative reward Blocks are known, then people can skip these Blocks. Can you detail a little more as to your idea? |
|
|
|
I like  I'll keep adding a little and clean them up a bit. I've since added the logo to the main page of the ones that don't have them, ideas and suggestions are greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
I think ideally you would want to have high quality smart contracts, speed of less than 1 second transaction times, high anonymity and if possible derived from a type of Proof of Stake.
Of those only 1 second transactions are my first priority, and some other priorities you didn't mention. Once you see what I am up to marketing wise, then I think you will understand why. I think Bitshares delegate Proof of Stake is a bit of a hindrance when it comes to adoption because everyone wants to be on the receiving end of Staking so you get more people who would want to buy traditional Proof of Stake over Delegate Proof of Stake.
The fact that PoS can't do distribution is one of its major hindrances. As people lose their private keys, the currency is highly deflationary which is very bad for encouraging people to spend and use the currency, and use for exchange is what makes the network effects spread the most. The other hindrance for PoS is that it is impossible for it to be secure without centralized control. Proof-of-stake coins work because they are just private clubs, so there is an apparency of security. I will in the future try to outline (in a future paper) specifically how and why the security of these PoS coins will fail. The problem with traditional Proof of Stake is that ongoing funding becomes a problem so you have a bit of a catch 22.
It is going to be difficult to fund these crypto projects that don't have widespread adoption. I don't think the paradigm of mining debasement has much to do with it. If a project is widely adopted, the devs will get funded one way or the other. When it comes to buy/sell pressure from pricing I do not like Proof of Work because it's cost intensive and weighs on price far more than in a Proof of Stake system since you have outside influences that do not have the psychological price barrier of entry so they sell at any price that is profitable, then holders sell into the downward spiral.
Agreed this is a problem when there is a huge double-digit percentage annual debasement due to PoW that is mostly ending up in professional miners hands. The professional miners locate their latest model ASICs next to hydropower plants have 1/4 the electricity costs (compared to residential) and 1/100th - 1/1000th (for a specially designed PoW hash function such as the one I will soon release, not SHA) the computational costs compared to general CPU at home, thus their cost of mining for example a Bitcoin is less than $50 each. They will always have an incentive to add more resources to capture a greater percentage of the mined coins. But that isn't the only way to structure PoW mining. There are two ways to deal with this problem: 1) Force every user to submit PoW with their transactions, i.e. no transaction gets on the block chain without PoW attached. Note getting this sort of design to be robust, requires an entirely different way of structuring a block chain. If the attached PoW is low enough difficulty, then it costs more to farm it out (network latency cost) than to mine it locally given it is an insignificant and unnoticeable cost. 2) Limit debasement to a small annual percentage. In that case, the professional miner will not be able to mine a significant quantity of the coins, and they will not be selling a significant percentage of the market cap. Thus the downward pressure on the price that impacts Bitcoin will be abated. I did read your paper on the DDOS protection, a little over my head but a good read nonetheless.
For a decentralized cryptocurrency design to do micro-transaction (1 second) block chain that isn't just a set of private servers (which is basically what a PoS system is, such as DPOS), then DDoS is one of the major design hurdles. I am nearly certain that if someone wants to DDoS attack Bitshares, they could do so effectively, because there is one designated server responsible for processing each block. If there is a sufficiently liquid market for Bitshares, then it could be potentially profitable to short it and DDoS attack it. But as I understand, most of the market caps at coinmarketcap.com are just an illusion. The volume is fake and created by the insiders who own most of the coins, trading to themselves. Thus there really isn't a liquid market and thus you can't really profit by attacking these altcoins, because their markets are actually tiny. It is all a mirage. Now if you plan to create a currency with millions of users and deep liquidity, then you indeed have to be concerned about DDoS attacks, because they will surely be incentivized. Apology I didn't really consider the layman when composing that document. I was more interested in making all the key points as concisely and as abstractly generalized as possible. As marketing goes on, those aspects that need to be explained more carefully to laymen, can be. Thank you for answering my questions. I have a few more, apologies if I may be repeating myself. I am genuinely interested in Blockchain Tech, maybe my questions can be of some help in some way. How would you cope if the uptake is not as strong as you had hoped and funding becomes an issue? What would happen to the project in the event that you are unable to continue working on it due to health problems? Is it mainly anonymity, transaction times and DDOS protection you are aiming for? What type of feature sets are you looking to include beyond that? If working with POW, how will you incentivize mining enough in order to secure the Blockchain? |
|
|
|
|
What can I add for the giveaway? I would like to add some as well.
|
|
|
|
@HippieTechI posted this topic specifically for you pretty much.. Crestington Legit or Not ? (PM's inside)I don't think "crusty" liked me posting ALL of his pm's he ever sent me but i was giving them to you mainly HippieTech. And knowing that would be a far more appropriate place than the Cryptsy topic here. Feel free to tear him a new ass on that topic all you want Fantastic, I'm sure it will be a great asset to the Libel and Cyberstalking case I am compiling. I don't even have to go out of my jurisdiction if I decide to take you to court. |
|
|
|
Answer my previous question, Crusty. How did you forget about posting this and other chatlogs on your.. mudda's.. forum ? Is it possible that you are not the previous owner of this username ? hmmmm ? Is it YET ANOTHER FREAKED OUT coincidence that Leroy and/or BigVern have also experienced similiar bouts of amnesia ? PWN'd again ?  I didn't forget about it, I just don't delete anything (except once when asked to remove personal information). As always you are taking some detail, coming to your own conclusion and posting about it as if you believe it to be fact. |
|
|
|
Thanks Bill, your thoroughness is much appreciated.
Out of curiosity, I made a snapshot where I pruned all balances < 10000 satoshis, and the size was about half of the full snapshot.
Are you able to detail how a snapshot is made? |
|
|
|
Anybody have another way for me to help? I'm still only a year old in the Cryptocurrency world, so I'm not much help in the BTC donation area unfortunately, I'll do my best to spread the word around. I love this coin, the dev, and the community!
Welcome to our CONmunity. Sorry if that is lame but I enjoy using CON as a play on words. I am with you as far as not being able to donate BTC. If you are staking CON you can donate a part of your stake to Crest. Getting the word out about CON would be a great help. Any "marketing" you can do will help build our community. What skills do you have that you think could be used to help CON? If you do not have any development skills but have ideas please let us know. There are people in the community that can make your ideas come to life. I do not have any development skills but I do have a developer I use for my projects. I am glad to see that you are willing to help. I will help you help CON. I just love the support of this CONmunity  I will definitely market CON in anyway I can, and like you've mentioned I think everybody should donate a small 2% of their stakes to Crest (I'll do that as soon as I get done with this post). 2% isn't much out of your profits, but if enough people do it, then it could surely help Crest in some form or another. My development skills are limited, I know java pretty well, but I'm by no means an expert. I also know a little bit of Python and C++, but not much. If I think of anything I feel is helpful to this project, I will definitely speak up. Thank you for the reply!! Thank you I much appreciate it and I'll add it to the pooled funds for CON development. I have my Con wallet listed in my address as well so I can confirm that it is ok to send to. My other wallet is this one PVU3ojAsZfE1jCYsNNppcRqcEtUzPNWsT9 which give a total of 0.59 BTC and 130k CON to use for whatever funding we can come up with. I have sent 0.13 BTC to Znort for the addition of PayCon to his Blockparser. This is somewhat of an important addition because it allows us to play around which Blockchain analytics, create snapshots and other useful information. You can check it out here https://github.com/znort987/blockparserIf I remember correctly, your plan is to grab all the unspent outputs and then build a new chain with a new distribution of those outputs? Yes, it's one of the longer term things I want to achieve. I have a little testnet up and running to play around with but the actual chain would take a little time. |
|
|
|
|
Just keep calm, bugs happen when trying to do new things.
Ever work in a busy kitchen? Same mantra, things gets missed and mistakes happen but if you are spending time arguing about who's fault it was rather than focus on a solution, you are wasting valuable time.
|
|
|
|
lol, Spoetnik is a FUD artist, I can't believe so many people got trolled by a topic title.
OMG I CAN'T BELIEVE HE SAID THAT!?!?!?!111
Grow some balls.
He's right though about the Monero marketing tactics, it's annoying to see the forum constantly bombarded by spam threads and spending all your time bashing Dash. Do I care about Monero? no. Do I care about Dash, no. I do find it offensive that a community will spend all it's time trying to bash another project rather than focusing on improving itself (regardless of Dash instamine etc.).
There is no strength in elevating ones self by the degradation of others.
On topic: I hope David ends up recovering financially and wish the best for him, he seems like a nice guy and hope to see an update with some more details.
It goes both ways. DASH has been busted faking PMs from Satoshi Nakamoto and posting on the Bitcoin.com forum as Andreas A. pretending to be an XMR supporter. I really don't understand the bias against Monero for marketing spam, something the devs have no control over (and again, that goes both ways). it must just be fashionable to attack monero Dev's can ask people not to make a million threads and bump them all, can also not engage in trolling but keep the relevant stuff in the scam accusation section instead of bringing it into every topic. You like Monero, that's great but from the outside looking in, I see a group of people attacking anyone that has anything negative to say. It's probably only a handful but it's enough to notice and judge the entire community by. |
|
|
|
|
lol, Spoetnik is a FUD artist, I can't believe so many people got trolled by a topic title.
OMG I CAN'T BELIEVE HE SAID THAT!?!?!?!111
Grow some balls.
He's right though about the Monero marketing tactics, it's annoying to see the forum constantly bombarded by spam threads and spending all your time bashing Dash. Do I care about Monero? no. Do I care about Dash, no. I do find it offensive that a community will spend all it's time trying to bash another project rather than focusing on improving itself (regardless of Dash instamine etc.).
There is no strength in elevating ones self by the degradation of others.
On topic: I hope David ends up recovering financially and wish the best for him, he seems like a nice guy and hope to see an update with some more details.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
