|
Can someone explain how InstantX doesn't run a risk due to blockchain reorganization?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Withdrawals have resumed and there won't be any more dividends until the number of SuperNET on bter is less than 1% of total assets.  |
|
|
|
Hi, I am trying to rebase some old btc code the current. It is before CBlock and CBlockHeader were split into two separate classes. When it syncs and receives a 'block' message from a peer, it gets an error: if (strCommand == "block"){
CBlock block;
vRecv >> block;
...
Shifting vRecv into block gives me an error. ReadCompactSize(): size too large . However, if I make 'block' a CBlockHeader, it all works. (Except it doesn't have the tx list and everything else I need). |
|
|
|
Hi, I am trying to rebase an old codebase to the latest BTC (.10) with headers first sync. I am getting the correct block hashes in order from peers, but when it calls ReadCompactSize() it throws 'size too large' error. else if (strCommand == "headers" && !fImporting && !fReindex) // Ignore headers received while importing
{
std::vector<CBlockHeader> headers;
// Bypass the normal CBlock deserialization, as we don't want to risk deserializing 2000 full blocks.
unsigned int nCount = ReadCompactSize(vRecv);
if (nCount > MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS) {
Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 20);
return error("headers message size = %u", nCount);
}
headers.resize(nCount);
for (unsigned int n = 0; n < nCount; n++) {
vRecv >> headers[n];
ReadCompactSize(vRecv); // ignore tx count; assume it is 0.
}
If I comment out if (nSizeRet > (uint64_t)MAX_SIZE)
throw std::ios_base::failure("ReadCompactSize(): size too large");
in serialize.h, then it works somewhat. The genesis block at headers[0] is correct, but every subsequent block hash is shifted 4 bytes to the left. |
|
|
|
Please remember to withdraw your SuperNET from Bter people! I want my Jay dividend  |
|
|
|
What currencies can you trade on this? Cryptocoins? Fiat? How are the orders fulfilled?
Any asset can be traded (also MScoins can be supported). So the InstantDEX is a fully decentralized way of trading fully decentralized NXT assets. That means whatever assets exist, can be traded, such as multisig deposit backed MGW crypto assets. InstantDEX <-> (NXT assets) <-> asset issuers The following has detailed description of how the orders fulfilled with the v1 InstantDEX https://nxtforum.org/index.php?topic=8535.msg167082#msg167082James * Do I understand correctly that you can only trade NXT AE assets on InstantDEX? * If there is a NXT AE asset which represents bitcoin, I can use the MGW exchange to convert to actual bitcoins? * If the above two statements are true, why do I even need to bother with InstantDEX, since I could just trade decentralised on the plain AE, and use MGW to cash out? 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. InstantDEX gives you the ability to trade any Nxt Asset <-> any Nxt Asset automatically. Currently you can exchange mgwBTC <->Nxt and mgwBTCD<-> Nxt, but with iDex you can trade mgwBTC<->mgwBTCD, for example. Also, InstantDEX will support advanced tradebots. |
|
|
|
Pretty crazy how fast things are coming since InstantDEX got prioritized after the BTER incident. agreed, exciting stuff. |
|
|
|
i don't like the chart font. really ugly, childish and hard to read. Keep in mind that it is a beta gui. It's already working at the api level. |
|
|
|
No but im using InstantX  What does DRK quicker tx's have to do with a decentralized exchange?? I'm confused. Along with 6-7 other cryptos IIRC. A number that can only grow over time.
Yes, plus assets. I hope many coins will be added. We need to get away from centralized exchanges! |
|
|
|
No but im using InstantX ? DRK will be available for trade |
|
|
|
|
Apparently now HZ is 'crowdfunding' a MGW clone.
Why crowdfund what jl777 did by himself, especially when the original is open source?
Please explain this to me, I want to understand.
|
|
|
|
UPDATE2: For all those who said the gui looked terrible:  UPDATE: An InstantDEX beta gui is in the works and being released: Video here: https://vid.me/kIcSDemo it here: http://52.10.20.52/InstantDEX/ It seems InstantDEX is almost completed. Honestly, I am really excited. We have seen too much money get stolen due to hacking, thievery, etc. I can't wait to use a decentralized exchange, and since we won't need to even download the software (due to litewallets), it won't even be that great of a leap in terms of learning curve. |
|
|
|
Why not get your own ideas instead of constantly ripping off jl777?
Seriously, are you obsessed with him or something?
jl777 wanted Horizon to join Supernet actually. I read the Pastebins myself, and initially I wanted to join. For the value of our node system he claimed, and he wanted to use it in Supernet for something he had planned. HZ is the first clone of NXT, but with what we think is a much better distribution system than NXT. I also didn't know that jl777 made NXT? I thought he was behind Supernet and various assets? If you are talking about Blocknet, they are not using the Cluster design of Supernet and doing something *very* different. Anyway, free market competition is fine really, plenty of alts are based on Bitcoin, and HZ was the first based on NXT. What cluster design of SuperNET? I'm still waiting to hear how a kademlia network is not defined as p2p? Also, no, I meant MGW. HZ is crowdfunding something jl777 did himself with no outside funds. Why not just release it? |
|
|
|
|
Why not get your own ideas instead of constantly ripping off jl777?
Seriously, are you obsessed with him or something?
|
|
|
|
He did though, he changed "Bitcoindark" to "Xcoin" several times. XCO is also the original Darkcoin. Xcoin. I'm pretty sure he means that all the text is exactly the same except the name. Dev didn't even change the specs for this coin in the readme lol I know, I was kidding around. I actually thought it was coingen, but at least it is cloned from something decent? Thinking about mining it, just not sure about it. It would really need to get on other exchanges to get anywhere. Oh, lol, I see. Yeah, sha256 is hard to find these days. |
|
|
|
He did though, he changed "Bitcoindark" to "Xcoin" several times. XCO is also the original Darkcoin. Xcoin. I'm pretty sure he means that all the text is exactly the same except the name. Dev didn't even change the specs for this coin in the readme lol |
|
|
|
Great story, if only it weren't so true  |
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to the next installment!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
