|
I've never heard of this two step process before..
I like that idea. IDGAF how we move forward but we must.
|
|
|
|
|
Something MUST change.
1MB is dumb, just doubling it is dumb. I'd go for a linear progression as moores law would smash it but non the less something must change.
|
|
|
|
|
SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE ABOUT THIS 1MB SHIT...
1MB is just stupid at this point.. We need a plan for blocksize.. IMO this is now the most pressing issue.. it's been going on for far to long.
|
|
|
|
|
BU is going to be the way we go? Anything else out there besides segwit or BU? (like that is actually doing something).
I don't know how I feel about nodes deciding block size. Seems like a good idea but I also see the potential for a group to control the blocksize..
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone re-write this to make it sound like it will start two generators instead of one?
FEATURE 7 - ENGINE START CONTROL CONTACT
INITIATED BY THE DROPOUT OF CONTROL PANEL RELAY (NR) FOLLOWING EXPIRATION OF THE FEATURE 1C TIME DELAY (DELAY TO OVERRIDE MOMENTARY NORMAL SOURCE OUTAGES). CONTACT CLOSES TO SIGNAL ENGINE START REQUIRED. CONTACT RESETS FOLLOWING RETRANSFER TO THE NORMAL SOURCE AND EXPIRATION OF THE FEATURE 2E (ENGINE COOL DOWN) TIME DELAY.
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried I think 20 different hubs.. 18 have shit the bed, 1 works great, 1 works... lol
|
|
|
|
I believe the U.S. SEC and PBoC have financial connections. I believe the SEC wants to shore up any "bad actors" ahead of the COIN ETF approval and launch, including those in China. That launch is exactly 4 weeks from now. I believe the SEC/PBoC knows that there will be a buying frenzy when the COIN ETF launches, and wants to make sure that any Chinese bitcoin buyers are in compliance with KYC/AML policies. I believe that if/when the COIN ETF gets approved, we will not only see more U.S.-based Bitcoin ETFs also get approval, but also Chinese-based Bitcoin ETFs as well as those in other countries will also start popping up. All of this is BULLISH AF.  I like this theory better LOL. I just find it hard to believe gov agencies doing something for the good of the people. |
|
|
|
What a troll, it won't even reach $850.
Or maybe you must have meant $2000 and just forgot a 0.
I wouldn't be soo sure about that... The PBOC is playing their plebs like a fiddle. |
|
|
|
|
A bullish outlook for the future?
Just like any sort of pressure.. it continues to build.. and takes more and more force to keep it contained. Two things can happen.
A) The pressure continues to build to the point no amount of physical force can stop the pressure from escaping and the Item under pressure escapes and expands insanely fast.
B) The pressure dies down and the item can easily be contained.
Very curious to how this will play out. With enough buyers (pressure) no matter what PBOC does they are doomed to fail at keeping the price at $1000.. and eventually it overpowers them and skyrockets. Wondering if there will be enough.. it is seeming more and more like PBOC is doomed to watch BTC blow up in their face but hey perhaps not.
|
|
|
|
|
Like right op?
Poor panic sellers china is playing you like a fiddle.
|
|
|
|
|
Satoshi's white paper mentions hashcash does it not... ?
|
|
|
|
|
You're seriously going to nic pick over actual bannings and threatening to ban...................... go smoke some weed and chill out. I don't do English arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
You're only going to get played with a stop loss on bitcoin.
For the reason above, people will tank the price into your sell limit and wtfbbqsaucepwn you.
I would bet a few people pay to know large stop losses on exchanges..
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get how people still fall for this China shit.. The PBOC must just get together and laugh themselves retarded at this point.
Honestly I think the PBOC is just doing it for giggles as this point.
"Think we can get BTC to crash again by saying we are calling exchanges?"
"I'd say no but god damn these guys have fallen for it every single time.. not even monkeys fall for things 20 times in a row.. it's gotta work again"
"yup it worked LMAO BHAHAHA, I wonder how these traders even have money to trade anymore?"
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus how do people fall for the boy that called wolf over 20 times.. LIKE fuck boys.. didn't you learn after #12?
|
|
|
|
|
It's gotta be like 20 times now?
How do people fall for the same thing 20 times in a row..
|
|
|
|
I don't really know where else to go from that.. 1MB will seem like 1KB soon enough. What do..
No one said that they want 1 MB forever except a very small amount of people. Everyone in Core devs except one dev wants to raise the blocksize after segwit gets activated. Activate segwit in order to safely raise the blocksize. No segwit? no blocksize increase, blame miners and not Core devs. I am not blaming anyone. I just would like to try to get a attempt to do something about it going. I like something like an increase of 50% every year.. keep it under moores law not equal to. I dunno.. THEMOS.. lead the charge!!! |
|
|
|
Bitcoin price continues to increase and that is what matters, the system is stable although not very reliable because one can never know when a transaction will be confirmed, if more transactions are important people can use some other coin like litecoin.
As far as investment goes, bitcoin is perfect as it is...
The security of the blockchain is king, without it the price will go to zero. Which leads into the hesitation to change things it would seem. Logical but.. I stand by my title.. I offer no great solution just something like a linear increase in size so mores law dominates any linear increase but that isn't much of a suggestion.. All I know is 1MB in 2040 will just be overly silly. |
|
|
|
|
Oh that is super easy!! Thanks a lot man!!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
