Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 01:29:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 »
621  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Official Litecoin shared domain litecoin.net on: July 27, 2012, 06:19:33 PM
I updated the OP with a requirement I forgot to mention:
- should be a free service/tool useful to the Litecoin community. businesses should just get their own domain.

litecoin.net is shared so that someone creating simple tool like a mining calculator would not have to pay for a their own domain. It is not meant for businesses. Businesses should get their own domain.
622  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: July 27, 2012, 07:09:44 AM
Since the change is simply to just add a single extra checkpoint to the code (a single line of code) ...
Why not write some code to allow for a checkpoint to be specified in the config file?
That way you can just post a checkpoint and ask everyone to use it
(and it's easy to verify if it is valid)
Thus IF someone was actually going to attempt a 51% it's quicker to get people to add in a new checkpoint.

That was one of the ideas that I came up with previously. Upside is that it's quicker to release new checkpoints. Downside is that it could cause many different forks if people all have different checkpoints configured. At least with the current way, I know that if you are running 0.6.3c, you will be on the same chain as me.

In the end, I decided to not go through with this idea right now. The solution to a 51% attack is not checkpoints. It's more hashing power. It seems like the threat of an attack has actually galvanized our little community into working together to defend this attack. People have jumped to solo mining in case there was going to be a DDoS of pools. And we saw a lot of miners willing to jump in and help out. Our current network hashrate is at 315 mhash/s. That may be an all time high! So in the end, that's doing a lot more to defend this attack than the checkpoint I added.
623  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: July 27, 2012, 06:03:50 AM
Coblee, I wish you would sign releases with PGP/GnuPG, like the Bitcoin team does. It would give more assurance that these binaries are really authentic.

Sure I will do that.
624  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Official Litecoin shared domain litecoin.net on: July 27, 2012, 04:09:23 AM
Thanks coblee.

Note for liteco.in users, this is where things are being migrated to:
abe.liteco.in -> explorer.litecoin.net
liteco.in -> forum.litecoin.net
blockchain.liteco.in -> blockchain.litecoin.net

hold off on the forum.litecoin.net
I haven't decided what to do with that yet.
625  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / [ANN] Official Litecoin shared domain litecoin.net on: July 27, 2012, 03:54:09 AM
I'm announcing that I'm opening up litecoin.net to be used as a shared domain. I think it is beneficial to group all useful Litecoin services/tools under one domain.

This is not a land grab. If you are not providing a useful service or if you currently don't have the service ready yet, I will not approve the subdomain. If it's a work-in-progress, do PM me and I will let you know.
This is first come first served. For example, if you are the first one to provide a mining calculator at calc.litecoin.net, the next mining calculator (even if it's a much better one) will need to use a subdomain that's probably not as easy to remember.

There are 2 special domains (possibly more) that will not be first come first served: forum.litecoin.net and wiki.litecoin.net
Since these will be seen as the "official" forum and wiki, I would need to be sure that I can trust the operators. So if you are interested in operating the "official" forum or wiki, send me a PM.

A few requirements
- should be a Litecoin related site... duh!
- should be a free service/tool useful to the Litecoin community. businesses should just get their own domain.
- should not refer to Litecoin as LiteCoin <- this is my pet peeve Smiley
- should not have other altcoin related services/tools because I am not endorsing any other alt chains. Though Bitcoin is ok.
- wallets, exchanges, and pools are not allowed. you should get your own domain. I'm not in a position to deem any site as an official wallet, pool, or exchange.
- basically any site that holds users' litecoins are disallowed mainly due to me not wanting to be held responsible if users lose their litecoins for any reason.
- use a subdomain name that sort of describes your site. for example, I'm not going to approve awesome.litecoin.net no matter how awesome your site is.
- do not claim that your site is the "official" site unless you ok'd it with me.
- do not have excessive ads. I realized that ads are useful to help pay for hosting and such, but if your site is filled with ugly flashing ads, I will not approve it.

So if you have a service/tool that you would like to serve up at *.litecoin.net, sign up here: http://freedns.afraid.org/subdomain/edit.php?edit_domain_id=813116

Here are some I have in mind:

explorer.litecoin.net - block explorer (Someguy123 plans to move abe.liteco.in over)
address.litecoin.net - address tools (Greedi plans to move address.liteco.in over)
calc.litecoin.net - mining calculator
source.litecoin.net - already forwards to GitHub
download.litecoin.net - already forwards to GitHub downloads page
charts.litecoin.net - price, hashrate, pools charts
watch.litecoin.net - something similar to bitcoinwatch.com
faucet.litecoin.net - litecoin faucet
p2pool.litecoin.net - p2pool node
electrum.litecoin.net - Electrum server

Please feel free to discuss projects you have in mind.


626  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Litecoin v0.6.3 released! on: July 26, 2012, 06:12:55 PM
I used the win32 binary version...

Which win32 binary? I just finished building them.
627  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 26, 2012, 06:10:46 PM
New binaries released:

Windows (zip): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32.zip
Windows (exe): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32-setup.exe
Linux (tgz, 32/64-bit): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-linux.tar.gz
Mac OS X: https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-macosx.dmg
628  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 26, 2012, 06:09:24 PM
New binaries released:

Windows (zip): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32.zip
Windows (exe): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32-setup.exe
Linux (tgz, 32/64-bit): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-linux.tar.gz
Mac OS X: https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-macosx.dmg
629  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Litecoin v0.6.3 released! on: July 26, 2012, 06:07:16 PM
New binaries released:

Windows (zip): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32.zip
Windows (exe): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32-setup.exe
Linux (tgz, 32/64-bit): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-linux.tar.gz
Mac OS X: https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-macosx.dmg
630  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: July 26, 2012, 06:06:16 PM
New binaries released:

Windows (zip): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32.zip
Windows (exe): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-win32-setup.exe
Linux (tgz, 32/64-bit): https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-linux.tar.gz
Mac OS X: https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-macosx.dmg
631  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Litecoin v0.6.3 released! on: July 26, 2012, 05:02:53 PM
I have the same error Sad
And I had to delete folder database to make the previous version work again. That may happen to you too, so do this in that case.

Nothing has really changed from the previous release. You may want to build with IPV6 disabled. Please check the build readmes for how to do that.
632  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: July 26, 2012, 11:14:44 AM
I added a new checkpoint to repel the potential 51% attack.
It is important for all pools and exchanges to use this new code.
For now, please grab the source and compile yourself. I will work on the binary release soon.

To get the code, grab the 0.6.3 branch:

Code:
git clone git://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin.git
cd litecoin
git branch -f 0.6.3 origin/0.6.3
git checkout 0.6.3
cd src
make -f makefile.<your os>

Mac OS X: https://github.com/downloads/litecoin-project/litecoin/litecoin-0.6.3c-macosx.dmg

Windows binaries coming in a few more hours.
633  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BBQCoin is dead, cool! on: July 26, 2012, 10:07:08 AM
And why is everyone giving up? We are not being 51%ed at the moment, it's the perfect time to rally people to help.

I'll help. Should I bring the chicken or the bbq sauce? :p
634  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 26, 2012, 09:02:19 AM
What will happen if the 74.3% at http://pool-x.eu/net will not have this upgrade?
Will it infact make the 51% attack easier?

If some people have upgraded and some have not and BCX releases his fork, we will effectively have a forked network. For those that are on the BCX fork that want to switch to my fork, they can delete their block chain and download and run the new client.

If this happens, I will make a post about what to do.

How interesting though. A forked chain, any chance two chains could co-exist down the road? Could some people just stay on one, and have a separate Lite economy?

You can probably stay on a separate chain. Nodes on the other chain will start banning you because you keep sending them invalid transactions. So you will eventually only be talking to nodes on your chain. But if the pools and exchanges are on the other chain, you may not be able to do much with your coins.
635  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 26, 2012, 08:44:05 AM
What will happen if the 74.3% at http://pool-x.eu/net will not have this upgrade?
Will it infact make the 51% attack easier?

If some people have upgraded and some have not and BCX releases his fork, we will effectively have a forked network. For those that are on the BCX fork that want to switch to my fork, they can delete their block chain and download and run the new client.

If this happens, I will make a post about what to do.
636  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Broke my virginity on: July 26, 2012, 08:33:43 AM

That would suck if BCX's chain overwrote your first mined block. :p
637  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 26, 2012, 08:32:54 AM

What would happen if BCX didn't let us know about the attack?

PS: Will this change in the code help us against an announced attack?

Nope. If BCX indeed forked the chain hours ago, this checkpoint would cause his fork to not be accepted by the people that have upgraded.

The normal defense for a 51% attack is just having more hashpower than the attacker. I do not think BCX can match the current network hashpower, but to play it safe, I'm adding a checkpoint.
638  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Litecoin v0.6.3 released! on: July 26, 2012, 08:03:55 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=47417.msg1055265#msg1055265
639  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 26, 2012, 08:03:08 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=47417.msg1055265#msg1055265
640  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 26, 2012, 08:01:47 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=47417.msg1055265#msg1055265
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!