your CLI bullshit sucks to be quite honest, the mining speeds are wayyy too slow. I mean 22 H/s CPU mining?! COME ONE! get that shit up in the kh/s range. Being CPU mineable is one of cryptonight's selling points. also enable solo mining from wallet on this shit where you get the entire block reward. it seems like lately these cryptonight coins have lost the ability to be solo mined. You guys really need to introduce a solo mining pool. and kick them CPU mining speeds up some.
Lol wtf are you talking about? He's just supposed to magically speed up your CPU? If you don't have aes support in your CPU it's gonna suck. I'm mining on an i5 dual core with aes and only get ~50 h/s. Also, the wallet supports solo mining, that's what I'm doing on my laptop, at least the CLI version does. Launch daemon and sync, launch wallet and type "start_mining #" where # is the number of threads you want to use. I've mined a few thousand, full block reward every time. |
|
|
|
abandoned ?
No. Working fine, so no bug fixes required since the last one. If more fixes are required, they will be provided. Future development plans are under consideration. As I stated (maybe it was the Speculation thread?), I will make an announcement in approximately two weeks. Does it requires lots of RAM like Monero in the beginning? If yes I would consider it a bug. It's not nearly as bad because of the 4 minute block time compared to 1 min for most of monero's life, and much lighter usage meaning much less txs so smaller blocks. It will need db implementation someday, but today is not that day (maybe 2 GB RAM usage or so atm). |
|
|
|
...
I think the fact that Cryptopia doesn't simply compile untrusted code rather makes them different from Cryptsy. Wasn't it malicious code injected by some coin (lucky7coin or so) that brought Cryptsy down in the first place..?
Supposedly, but I think it's widely believed that Vern just took the money and ran (to China), and the lucky7 exploit thing was just an excuse/ruse. Re: Cryptopia, they didn't open an issue on GitHub, and I'm assuming they didn't ask for help on irc. If you come to the land of trolls asking for help at the last minute, don't be surprised if you get trolled. |
|
|
|
Man, great job wrecking the price Cryptopia  I agree they're a decent exchange in general. I like the stand they took on ETH, but I am still shaded the fuck out by EDRcoin. Hopefully they get this sorted shortly and I can grab a few more before price recovers. Look, if the EDRC guys want to give us fees for trading among themselves then I dont care, they are doing it on multiple exchanges, and personally I don't really care, and normal trader can see its not real volume. If we started blocking coin devs from pumping there own coins we would have no users. As for us being "Crypsty" for having compile issues with ANC due to it contacting untrusted sites during compile time which is impossible with our wallet server security, then so be it, plenty of other sites to trade ANC without us "verning" you guys. Spend all week trying to do something for the ANC community, then just get shit on for it, just another day in crypto. Poor guys, (supposedly) soaking up hundreds of dollars in fees from EDRcoin scammers everyday, and still having to put up with shit from uppity shitcoin holders  I wouldn't say that I'm ANC community, I just have a few hundred coins on your exchange. I'm glad you guys got cryptonote integration working, and like I said, I'm glad you dumped ETH, but cmon, if you can't compile a wallet for a week and you can't deal with a little (mostly) good natured ribbing on shitcointalk, maybe you're in the wrong business... |
|
|
|
Hash Rate: 38.53 KH/sec Well, somebody jumped on that. When I left for travel like a week ago it was only ~2 kH/s. Just need to get it up by 400x more to get on par with Monero  |
|
|
|
Man, great job wrecking the price Cryptopia I agree they're a decent exchange in general. I like the stand they took on ETH, but I am still shaded the fuck out by EDRcoin. Hopefully they get this sorted shortly and I can grab a few more before price recovers. |
|
|
|
URGENT!!
Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.
Thanks
What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia. If an exchange is having issues its best getting out early an often as opposed to getting your coins frozen. It would be better for anoncoin if cryptopia figured it out, but if they dont its important to move your coins to either your own local wallet or to another exchange (such as exchanged.i2p). Dont get Vern'd I appreciate the advice, but I'd rather not be forced to liquidate my coins at a lower price, or open an account elsewhere to move them off. I tried visiting your clearnet site but was getting repeated certificate warnings (ignore first https invalid cert warning and another would pop right up) using chrome on my phone. Guess I should look at btc-38 or btc-e, I think one of them trades ANC. I really don't see how a hardfork can affect old coins that Cryptopia already has in its wallet. I have been getting a bit suspicious of them since they added that EDRcoin that supposedly does hundreds of BTC volume per day with extremely thin order books and trades nowhere else. Hope I'm not gonna get verngoxed for my 0.15 BTC I have there, but kinda too lazy to do anything about it honestly, plus there's a few coins I like to support that I don't think trade anywhere else. |
|
|
|
URGENT!!
Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.
Thanks
What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia. |
|
|
|
Yes but it redirects to myriadcoin.org instead of showing the network stats. Ohyea, I see. That's weird, maybe just had power loss on server or something. |
|
|
|
... Thanks for the info. Actually this does give enough info for a theoretical limit. Barring everything else CPU , Memory were Fast Enough, The United States Average Upload Speed: 5.2 Mbps translates to (.65 MB/s) Your Block Speed of ~120 Seconds , 120 seconds * .65 MB = 78 MB Maximum Block Size So at our present level of internet performance the Maximum your block size could be is 78 MB. That would be just enough time to transfer it to 1 other node. So odds are a real world max for 2 nodes to confirm is only 39MB or 4 nodes to confirm is 19.5MB. So real world wise your block size maximum could be ~19.5MB and no higher until the average internet upload speeds increase.  Hmm , With the Excess size penalty fees applied to miners, it will be in their best interest to keep the block sizes way smaller than the above sizes. People running nodes don't need to worry about upload speed if they're not solo mining, this logic only applies to solo miners and pool operators, who probably all already have connections more like 100 Mbps up at least. Although I don't think you want the propagation time of your block to be on the order of the block time, I think 10 s is probably too high already, so maybe 50 MB blocks are the maximum for now. But, the goal is that the max block size can scale with technology without human intervention. Google is laying 1 Gbps symmetric fiber connections all over the country, and when's the last time that communications technology just stopped progressing anyway? The idea is that there is flexibility built into the blockchain to accommodate technological innovation without having to go through the cluster that is fucking bitcoin atm. Who knows, there might be 1 Tbps connections at almost every home and business in ten years, and I bet bitcoin would still be bending over backwards to accommodate luke-jr's node running on his 28.8 kbps modem over a landline... |
|
|
|
Monero is capable of handling up to 1600 tps! For a pure POW blockchain this is quite a feat. It's just a large blocksize isn't it? Not much of a feat. It's not actually that large atm. It's an adaptive block size, and while I don't know the capacity right now, I'm pretty sure it's not anywhere near 1600 tps. It would take a long time of full or at least larger than median block sizes to build up the capacity of Monero's network. On another note, I think you'd have to weight the # of tps by security of transaction to make a meaningful compariosn. So, Bitcoin is the most secure, you can give it a weight of 1, and it has 3 tps. Much less secure coins like douchetacocoin that has a sha256 hashrate of 1 Th/s would be weighted by it's low security, so if it was capable of 1000 tps, it should be multiplied by it's terrible hashrate to give an effective tps rate of 0.001, or something... |
|
|
|
...PPS fee to be lowered to 3%...
3% gd. Who's mining there? Makes me think the rumors of f2pool being an arm of bitmain and/or btcc more legitimate. |
|
|
|
I think Monero is a legit project and they are not trying to scam anyone, they are putting hard work into making a coin that is fundamentally different from Bitcoin.
But like I said before, in the future we will have Confidential Transactions and a better and incentivized CoinJoin thanks to Schnorr signatures. And this will make "anonymous coins" a lot less relevant since all markets will be using Bitcoin anyway.
I think Monero is planning on deploying confidential ring transactions in the next six months. When would you guesstimate Bitcoin would get it forked in? Six years? |
|
|
|
Is there even one exchange where you can change FIAT for an altcoin? In particular are there exchanges where you can change fiat directly to Monero?
...
There is bitsquare, that I'm pretty sure you can trade dollars for XMR, but i don't think there's much volume there yet. |
|
|
|
Is this coin dead?
Not at all. New release changing one algo coming soon, and some tweaks to consensus rules. Also one of the few coins to be upgraded to modern Bitcoin v0.11+ codebase. |
|
|
|
|
We call it janus-logic: the super position of logical states that can only be implemented with quantum computing.
|
|
|
|
He's not lying. I bought this beauty for 27 XMR:  |
|
|
|
All we (the developers) know is we aren't pushing new inventions (ZeroLedger, etc) to Github @ 10 cents just bug fixes and features. If 20 cents comes we will push some of it. So by suppressing the price you are preventing new technology releases. Vanilla cash lead "dev", ripoff artist, and douchebag extraordinaire john-connor threatening to not release new features unless someone pumps his shitcoin (presumably so he can dump his stash). https://v.cash/forum/threads/brexit.509/#post-6739 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
