I have never mined before. But I'm thinking of buying a GPU for Vertcoin Mining.
Any recommendations on which kind? Thx
I think nvidia is best in terms of hash/watt, maybe 750ti. |
|
|
|
and its only 2 posts above yours This thread is dead, see link above (right below giant font). |
|
|
|
no MAID
...just some placeholder token with no features? Exactly. |
|
|
|
|
No Lightning Network, no eMunie, no MAID, or anything else that is practically a foregone conclusion or most likely vaporware - it has to be released publicly (no alpha/beta/testnet/bullshit youtube videos) to be considered here.
|
|
|
|
i have big problem i can't send coins from my wallet 1 was trying to send 1million but it s say transaction it s to big so i tried lower until it work with 500000 but after i can send anymore it s always to big even 30000 make error message it is to big  what now ? send 1myr at time lol Not sure what your best option is. Maybe write a simple python script to send in batches of 1000 that says something like: import time
from bitcoinrpc.authproxy import AuthServiceProxy
#Address to connect with local wallet running as rpc server
url = "http://user:pass@localhost:50554/"
#Setup connection and check balance
conn = AuthServiceProxy(url)
data = conn.getbalance()
#Define address to send to
useraddress = 'YOURMYRIADADDRESS'
amounttosend = 1000
while true:
#Send coins
try:
print "Sending coins to {0}".format(useraddress)
senttx = conn.sendtoaddress(useraddress, amounttosend, 'test', 'test')
print "coins sent!"
except:
print "Failed!"
senttx = 'FAILED TX - RPC interface error'
time.sleep(10) Then if it's working, just let it run over night, if not try to adjust the amount or sleep time (if it's successfully sending but crashing after a bit). |
|
|
|
Why not? DigiByte will catch people's eyes. About HUC, was it originally both sha and scrypt, or did it hard fork to include that? I thought it was just sha and human mining when it got released. I don't mind paying credit to HUC, it's a very interesting coin, but it makes completely different use of the multi-algo concept. It is in no way a competitor. However, DigiByte is clearly a competitor.
It launched as dual-algo. Here is wayback machine from 2014 Feb 13, a couple weeks before Myriad launch: https://web.archive.org/web/20140213025702/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=435170.0re: DGB is a competitor, don't you think it seems kind of...desperate to be mentioning other coins in the ANN topic? |
|
|
|
Can Myriad change its topic to: [ANN] [MYR] Myriad 0.9.2.16 MERGE MINING REQUIRED UPDATE | The ORIGINAL multi-PoW with the fairest distribution. NOT DigiByteHonestly, I think it's pretty warranted. They don't give any credit to Myriad, and some of their writing has even been deceptive. I quote: September 1st, 2014: MultiAlgo hardfork at block 145,000. DigiByte plans & successfully deploys its second hardfork to allow miners to mine on five independent mining algorithms & is the first digital currency to make such a move. From their [ANN] thread. If you didn't know any better, would that not lead you to believe that DigiByte was the first? So what do you think? To me 1st Multi-PoW is too subtle. P.S. I'm NOT the developer of Myriad coin. Obviously. How do I put that underneath all my posts? You can add a signature in your profile. Technically Myriad is not the first multi-PoW. Huntercoin launched before Myriad, and uses both sha and scrypt algos (in addition to the "human mining" component). I'm not against changing the topic, but I don't think it's a good idea to put Digibyte in the topic. |
|
|
|
|
OK, bumped BTS down to 100 tx/s and left caveat. If someone has link to better info I'll be glad to check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know where I can find information about the distribution of DGB? The ANN post just says the premine is all spent, not what it actually was. Also, I think there was a supply reduction at some point, that also doesn't seem to be mentioned in OP.
|
|
|
|
I am going to be adding my comments about each of these coins in this post. Please check back on this post from time-to-time as I will be updating it as I complete my research gathering process. I will correct any incorrect information as I learn or it is pointed out to me. The statements below are what I think to be true based on the level of reading I've done to this point. BitShares 2.0- ...These issues don't matter as much with longer block times and/or lower expectation of tps, but if you are seriously expecting 1000s of tps in 3s block times sequenced (funneled) into a queue of witnesses then issues will amplify exponentially not just linearly.
- As far as I know, the 3s block time with 1000 tps will be vulnerable to DoS attacks in terms of incoming transactions, because it is known a priori which witness will be producing each block. All PoS shares system suffer this issue, but less of an issue until you start to go for very fast block times, very high tps rates, and very small transacted values for microtransactions with real-time dependency on performance. ...
Now I am aware that PoW has analogous failure modes in that coordination load is driving centralization and the 25 - 51% attack exists, but just because that is so it doesn't mean PoS is a solution. And I maybe someone actually has a solution. We will have to wait for that solution to appear and make a choice between lesser evils in the meantime. - DPOS claims[1] that by having the stakeholders in the system vote, that the controlling group which is the corporation comprising the developers is not in control. Well publicly listed entities allow shareholders to vote, and that doesn't absolve the classification of investment securities. Ostensibly Bitshares is trying to not run afoul of the criminal and civil liability that results from unregistered investment securities, but my interpretation of the law[2] is they may be still acting as a controlling group since investors depend on them to add value to the investment and the future performance of the investment (again I am not making any declaration that they are or are not, I am raising awareness on this issue for potential investors and participants).
...
I will try to update it once a week or two, I appreciate your (and everyone else's) input on the matter. I generally agree with most of your points. I'm not a big fan of PoS, especially this delegated variety where users of the system are expected to constantly monitor the block signers, and especially the latest updates with all the membership and referral bullshit. They do apparently have very high fees now (20 BTS I think but couldn't confirm this), so that may help mitigate DoS. I've updated the BTS column of the table to question a little bit their tps, fees, reflect that they've made 2.0 transition, stealth and confidential transfers, and their multisig. |
|
|
|
|
OK, small update - Crypti is opensourced, Syscoin has beta marketplace, Nxt has some bitcoin atm using them as sidechain, and I updated my coins I own section.
|
|
|
|
|
Lol endorsed by Spoetnik, MrPump, and BitcoinExpress, how much more legitimacy could you ask for?
|
|
|
|
OK, will update syscoin and crypti in next few days.
Just a friendly reminder to note that Crypti is open source since a few weeks.  I know, I know, need to update. Have you guys gotten any good entries to DAPP contest yet? |
|
|
|
it looks like an IRC-coordinated job by a competitive exchange who cannot afford to have 0% trading fees.
What exchange CAN afford to have 0% trading fees? How do they make money? Cryptsy charges .5% fees on withdrawals, that means a $100 grand withdrawal nets them a whopping 500 dollars and how often is that on such low volume? I honestly don't know how they stay in business in the first place. I thought they charged 1% on withdrawals? |
|
|
|
I think coinmarketcap prefers/requires stock block explorers, like insight or something, because they want to use the same api calls for everything.
tell me the API call they use and it shall be built. In the meantime this is pretty much the authoritative source - http://unitus.info/json/supply.phpSubmitted a request for them to update their block explorer, we'll see if they reply. |
|
|
|
Wallet 0.9.2.16 will not open.
Assertion Failed! error
Windows 7 64bit trying the 64 bit version wallet.
If it's the first time that you run 0.9.2.16 you need to start with the -reindex flag I think. |
|
|
|
|
Is it just me or do they look exactly the same? Also, wtf is orangecoin?
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to see a list of currently guessed guesses?
|
|
|
|
|
I think coinmarketcap prefers/requires stock block explorers, like insight or something, because they want to use the same api calls for everything.
|
|
|
|
If BARR can't destroy at least 30% of the total supply of 3 altcoins in 1 week, then altcoins are a failure. BARR will certainly be a failure in that case, and altcoins in general as well. Because it will mean that people are determined to hold dead coins until they lose 100% of their money. But I don't think people will choose to keep altcoins that they're unable to sell at any price, instead of burning them in exchange for BARR.
We'll see by the end of November, and if altcoin users agree then we'll burn more in December. Well, we'll burn more in December anyway, because we're altcoin users ourselves and we already agree.
Can you stop spamming this shit already? Didn't you just make a topic called "It's time to let go of your altcoins" or something like that? But are you offering to buy those altcoins from those people? I am. Do you think they will just "let go" of coins they've spent money on? I'm offering them an exchange if they destroy their coins. That's the only way they can let go without losing - there's not enough BTC on offer to buy all those coins, but there's enough BARR. "But why should they give up their coins for BARR?" Why should they give up their coins just because you said so? Seems like I'm saying the same thing you are, except I'm also doing something instead of just talking about it. He's telling them to sell for btc, you're asking people to exchange for some useless nxt asset, at the same time that nxt itself is crashing to all time lows. Not exactly apples-to-apples. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
