Please let me know if your public node turns to be stable and if so I will add it as a resource in the OP
Based on my own testing, it is rock solid stable. Very fast network connection but it has a data transfer cap after which it costs me more fiat $$. The only problem I encountered is that this server (VPS with Ubuntu 16.04) has only 4GB memory, so it has to swap out the blockchain when it loads, and swap it in when it saves. This is really only a problem on saving because it results in a "busy" message when a remote wallet attempts to sync during the blockchain save operation. Obviously it would report as busy even with more RAM, it just takes longer to save given the memory limitation. I might modify the source and recompile it so it does not periodically auto-save, which would effectively give it more uptime. I plan to keep this server up indefinitely. I'm also working on a second server (physical box) with more memory but which will have a lower speed connection that is uncapped. Once I have the second server up, I will post a detailed description of my steps in case anyone else wants to spin up their own public node. Thanks. You can get rid of this autosaving feature by commenting out this line in the source code and then recompiling: https://github.com/aeonix/aeon/blob/master/src/cryptonote_core/cryptonote_core.cpp#L591It will still save on exit or if you type 'save' in the daemon, but it will stop doing the autosave every hour or day or whatever. |
|
|
|
Lol cryptogasm clearly bought at 170 sat  Why am I always out of town away from wallet when these type of things happen  |
|
|
|
|
Quote spam. It's a thing. Don't let it make your threads five million lines per page.
Edit: I'm just saying there's no need to keep quoting long conversation threads, you can just snip it to the last comment to keep comments from becoming gigantic. I'm all for digibyte activating segwit.
|
|
|
|
Hello folks, I'm looking into doing some exploratory CPU Mining and I find AEON to be quite interesting. I have not been able to find a profitability calculator for it and I was wondering if anyone knew of one? Thanks!
There's really no such thing as a profitability calculator for CPU mining, afaik. I think your only real options are Aeon, Monero or other Cryptonight algo coin, or a Yescrypt algo coin (Myriadcoin or BSTY I think). So, maybe mine for a day on each and see what seems best. |
|
|
|
I dont see the difference. I could have made 100x better sub skin within 10x shorter period of time and have gotten more feedback to my thread. Ur problem is that u remade an existing theme instead of making ur own. And ur stole a branded logo design from google. A letter g suggests it has already been used somewhere, perhaps as a google accounts logotype. If u search it u will find it. It's just the naut theme with the groestl 'g' from the previous theme. It took me 10 min, so I find it a bit surprising you could have made a 100x better sub skin in 60 seconds  You're welcome to mock something up on a dummy sub and I will copy it over. |
|
|
|
|
Is acception really a word...? Exception yes, but acception?
Google says yes, but obsolete. I think acceptance would fit better. Anyway, sorry for being pedantic, please carry on with your regularly scheduled pumping, trolling, etc.
|
|
|
|
VTC is not pumping because of segwit. The volume is off the charts and suggests somebody with very deep pockets has taken an interest in this coin. Price will easily go at least 2x 3x from here with much less money needed.
Looks more like random polo pump to me, not someone taking a serious interest. You think someone was taking a serious interest in Bitcoin plus or Bytecoin or the twenty other complete garbage coins that pumped off the chart in poloniex recently (not saying vert is garbage, just that a polo pump doesn't mean much). It's not a random pump, somebody has planned this for some time. By taken an interest I did not meant long term interest. I meant somebody with deep pockets has decided to play with this coin and the current price/volume suggests he is not done yet. I agree, think there was too much money flowing through to be random. Timing started with this period too and looks like Segwit might finally win. I think someone with deep pockets both bought a ton and rented some serious mining power to make sure it goes through. I don't mean random like someone just woke up one morning and decided to pump Vertcoin, of course there was probably long accumulation period and the timing was done to coincide with big push for segwit activation. But just look at the charts on polo - every single coin pumps occasionally, often for no identifiable reason. Recently it was Bitcoin plus, Bytecoin, pinkcoin, and others I can't think of off the top of my head. Vertcoin was about due, and I think they just choose segwit drama to provide some hook to get people to buy. |
|
|
|
why is this dead shitcoin being pumped on polo, must be the dev pumping and dumping on noobs to rip off their arses and make more money what a desperate guy  The dev is an undergraduate college student with little to no money, afaik. I don't think he's organizing pumps that are doing $10M+ worth of volume a day. |
|
|
|
I've got 4500 VTC stored in a offline wallet (from about 2 years ago), can I continue to keep it there?
Just want to make sure I don't lose my coins because of some change happening.
Yes, you can keep it there. |
|
|
|
Hi guys. Need help. i stuck on sinchronization of block chain!!! 2 days i see this message
Block with id: <2fb394d67664ed3d20939a533c7c13088001b49e63f2e892af2315d81c90a442> failed to add transaction to blockchain storage
[P2P3]tx with id: <04136f79f83d366137f37af3c6c3754fe59353a1247fabd9f358e2b85372d1a7> in block id: <2fb394d67664ed3d20939a533c7c13088001b49e63f2e892af2315d81c90a442> already in blockchain
try to sinchronize on final update of aeond on linux
i try to synchronize from 0 block
That is a very strange error, as that block is from 2 years ago. Are you by chance trying to use a 32 bit build? Linux x64 aeond build from this repository - https://github.com/aeonix/aeon.gitnow i've deleted everything in .aeon and start from begining Did you have any power outages or unexpected shutdown or you killed aeond with 9s or anything when you were trying to sync the first time? |
|
|
|
Bitcedi
Because
- Running for almost 2 years
- Assets on bitcoin are booming as result counterparty value is rising
Sense...this post makes none. |
|
|
|
VTC is not pumping because of segwit. The volume is off the charts and suggests somebody with very deep pockets has taken an interest in this coin. Price will easily go at least 2x 3x from here with much less money needed.
Looks more like random polo pump to me, not someone taking a serious interest. You think someone was taking a serious interest in Bitcoin plus or Bytecoin or the twenty other complete garbage coins that pumped off the chart in poloniex recently (not saying vert is garbage, just that a polo pump doesn't mean much). |
|
|
|
... The network is a separate layer from the witnessing, but if you mean the progression of transactions, or that its actually usable, lets go with that. Each user can change 1 witness and witnessing goes on as usual, it doesnt affect how the DAG looks like at all. Its the majority of witnesses which matters, as long as a majority exists, even if several witnesses are replaced with many many other, and only 6 remain, it all still works. The other question, but a user replaces all or 2 witnesses with his own, has been answered, those are invalid transactions. An attack on Byteball is possible only if already existing witnesses collude and conspire. As you see, it is a very genius concept, a major major invention by Byteball, so it is hard for simpler minds like CfBs to fully grasp it. But he does like to post pictures, look a few pages back when he tried to compare Byteballs DAG to Ethereum blockchain with pictures, . He hasnt even read the whitepaper, is just trolling and spreading FUD, every single one of his posts in this thread has been with intent to FUD. I haven't dove deep into the technicals of this coin, but from what I understand currently all 12 witnesses are controlled by tonych, so at this point an attack is possible if tonych becomes malicious or if he is coerced into doing something. To me, it's not clear how the transition from one person controlling all 12 witnesses to having them be distributed is likely or possible to occur - it would require active intervention on behalf of (almost) everyone making txs on the network, right? Most people don't care about stuff like this, especially if this doesn't happen early - the more users the higher proportion of them will be casual users who don't care about technical stuff like this. |
|
|
|
Block time is 4 minutes. However, the last couple of hours there have been fewer than expected blocks. It happens.
The number of coins don't matter, although the size of the transaction in bytes can make a difference (bigger txs are harder to fit in a block).
Block explorers that I know of
minergate.com
chainradar.com
Thanks ... all of my transactions have shown up. Probably it did take a lot of block space since my wallet is filled with 0.5 transactions from mining. Yup that is exactly what causes problems like this. I had the same issue on other coins. Is there a good solution for the large number of transactions from mining? I've considered periodically consolidating my miner earnings into a separate wallet. Not really. Consolidate periodically. Solo mine. Start your own pool with higher payout threshold. |
|
|
|
Guys,
Please spell out BTFD & STFT. Some people don't know what they mean including myself. No offense or calling names. thanks.
Btw, was GRS approved by Polo accurate?
BTFD = buy the fucking dip. Assuming STFT = sell the fucking top. No idea about poloniex. |
|
|
|
Woof... some forgotten bids just got landed on. Wonder if I should hold on to this or take the instaprofit.
Might be a good idea to take the insta profit, considering BTC might keep pushing up, alts might take a deeper dive. |
|
|
|
|
Lol don't drag me into this shit please. I have exactly two accounts, this one and poptartcat which I started start Nyancoin thread (the real #1 shitcoin without segwit). Groestl does have an iOS wallet I believe though.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
