bitcoinwonders010
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:01:27 PM |
|
ok the dev doesn't want to tell us now, will the dev tell us later. if not is someone not able to figure out how he does it
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:08:53 PM |
|
we will reach 0.005btc =1X so what does this coin make so special?
first anon coin with pos[/b][/size] will reach 0.005btc in the near future !!!n the near future!!!
|
|
|
|
mitache365
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:09:08 PM |
|
you will be paying a lot more then 85K
laugh
|
BTC
|
|
|
AFaQ
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:22:45 PM |
|
I dont get this black coin was PoS and anon first....
|
SPACE
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:25:39 PM |
|
the price goes up again!!! and this time we are ready for 200k satoshi!!!
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:26:49 PM |
|
the price goes up again!!! and this time we are ready for 200k satoshi!!!
0.006!!
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:28:14 PM |
|
the price goes up again!!! and this time we are ready for 200k satoshi!!!
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:29:14 PM |
|
the price goes up again!!! and this time we are ready for 200k satoshi!!!
0.006!! [/b][/size][/size]
|
|
|
|
ifightformerkel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:35:43 PM |
|
it can easy go to 0.04 or higher
work the anonnymous wallet?
|
|
|
|
mitache365
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:36:10 PM |
|
the price goes up again!!! and this time we are ready for 200k satoshi!!!
Do you really have any explanation why will be 200k and will take place in the 13th coinmarketcap or just fantasing? because I see it under 30K Satoshi within 2 days. I looked at the coin, it jumped nearly 1,000%. I think it's another coin from which someone will make lot of money, and the rest ... you know. not trolling, just be carefull ppl usually got blind thinking will be rich in a day
|
BTC
|
|
|
Nicolaas.R
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:41:16 PM |
|
my wallet says : minting your weight is 271 networkweight is 16207 Expected time to earn reward is 1 hour(s)
The weight is climbing but "Expected time to earn reward is 1 hour(s)" never changes it says so now for 40 hours. And no reward
Any one els with the same problem?
|
|
|
|
Ezravdb
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:43:08 PM |
|
it can easy go to 0.04 or higher
work the anonnymous wallet?
LOL
|
|
|
|
ifightformerkel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:43:27 PM |
|
this coin has a 1600 btc volume only on poloniex over 850 btc
|
|
|
|
solid12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:49:52 PM |
|
For all those questioning how this could come out of nowhere and work when Dark has been worked on for months, let us not forget TIPS/Fedora has had a basic coin mixer for awhile now and came out with no fan fare or 2,000 thread pats on the back.
Let me also remind everyone BCN has had ring signatures out for 2 years now, yet we have been hearing for months Dark is the FIRST anonymous coin which is a blatant lie.
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch. It's pretty ingenuous, instamine 2 million coins, keep btctalk dangling for months with every little tiny update, building hype and anticipation, meanwhile selling those coins for as high as 80 cents to a dollar when it was just a normal coin with no anon function, then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot. Now that MRO is getting interest all of a sudden now we are hearing Evan is investigating ring signatures or "something better" but how can it be better when we were told the masternode method is "perfect"?
Also people attack the dev of XC for being semi-secretive when Evan his holding many of his secrets to his chest too.
I will admit first-hand I'm not a coder, but I also know human nature and just because it takes 1 guy months to work on something when he is the only guy on the block doing it doesn't necessarily mean someone couldn't come along and do the same work in weeks. Time is a luxury when you have no competition.
|
|
|
|
Alisho
|
|
May 25, 2014, 06:56:31 PM |
|
For all those questioning how this could come out of nowhere and work when Dark has been worked on for months, let us not forget TIPS/Fedora has had a basic coin mixer for awhile now and came out with no fan fare or 2,000 thread pats on the back.
Let me also remind everyone BCN has had ring signatures out for 2 years now, yet we have been hearing for months Dark is the FIRST anonymous coin which is a blatant lie.
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch. It's pretty ingenuous, instamine 2 million coins, keep btctalk dangling for months with every little tiny update, building hype and anticipation, meanwhile selling those coins for as high as 80 cents to a dollar when it was just a normal coin with no anon function, then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot. Now that MRO is getting interest all of a sudden now we are hearing Evan is investigating ring signatures or "something better" but how can it be better when we were told the masternode method is "perfect"?
Also people attack the dev of XC for being semi-secretive when Evan his holding many of his secrets to his chest too.
I will admit first-hand I'm not a coder, but I also know human nature and just because it takes 1 guy months to work on something when he is the only guy on the block doing it doesn't necessarily mean someone couldn't come along and do the same work in weeks. Time is a luxury when you have no competition.
+1
|
|
|
|
Ezravdb
|
|
May 25, 2014, 07:20:48 PM |
|
Isn't it anonymous*?
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
May 25, 2014, 07:24:07 PM |
|
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final? However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention. then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree. XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
|
|
|
|
Brilliantrocket
|
|
May 25, 2014, 07:30:24 PM |
|
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final? However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention. then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree. XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution. And then it'll be a POS Darkcoin clone.
|
|
|
|
atcsecure (OP)
|
|
May 25, 2014, 07:31:40 PM Last edit: May 25, 2014, 09:01:45 PM by atcsecure |
|
For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdfhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdfThe principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform one the of the details we are still working out is the autonomous "supernode" function and best methods to prevent bad-actors.. We have implemented PKI and will leverage that as part of entire solution
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
dida
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
|
|
May 25, 2014, 07:37:15 PM |
|
For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdfThe principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005, the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day Insanely good work Dev. !
|
|
|
|
|