Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 03:42:16 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
1521  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 26, 2014, 12:12:03 AM
Perhaps you'd like to purchase some shungite?
1522  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 26, 2014, 12:07:16 AM
Sorry BADecker, but am the decker aroond here, take the ruff wi the smoove homeboy, cause you aint got a clue wot a kin dae wae you usin nothin more than searchin for proof of god.. you spoiled your's, mine is greater than that Wink
1523  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 11:58:45 PM
The best bit is the timing in between.. now who wants to gamble their bitcoin that I can predict their god in its entirety based on what my gran taught me?
1524  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 11:55:03 PM
Syncronicity Wink
1525  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 11:49:07 PM
And to back up my claim: Dear BADecker, in 4 steps less than 4 beats, say what it is your trying to say.. I can handle the maths.. I know frequencies beyond your control. FACT>

I am only allowed to play with them because I am a better option than YOU>

TWAT

In 64 words, say what you have to say!!

Edit: Ps: Bet his backup takes the same time to respond Wink

Ooops..
1526  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 11:44:09 PM
BADecker.. you are a dick.. you remove the possibility of freedom by the tone of your god. You are impossing and antagonistic to the point you should be shot at stake for your cheek based on nothing more than abmjr's vibe at sbhacker dot fuckin com, you are a twat with the knowledge, but nothing to back it up that actually matters.. DICK!

Ps: It's not me, but you that 'spoil' the mass's.. hence.)

DICK
1527  Other / Off-topic / Re: Conscience on: September 25, 2014, 05:28:03 PM
There are 3 cheif functions of the conscience:

1). It WATCHES - Romans 2:14-15

Your conscience watches your actions to see if your actions line up with the inner law inside of you.

When you think of what you've done this past week, have your actions matched what you know is right inside of you?

God has placed your conscience in you to help you assess if you are living what you know to be right. Your conscience is watching you. It wants to help you.

I'll stick with the eye of awareness, or all seeing eye, thanks Wink
1528  Other / Off-topic / Re: Conscience on: September 25, 2014, 05:16:06 PM
There is one important aspect of a conscience that you conveniently over-look.
A conscience is what most of us use to determine right from wrong, and truth from lies,  and our own actions based upon our own conscience. Most of us have the ability to know the difference between right and wrong, truth & lies, etc..  and act accordingly and appropriately within societal norms.

Totally agree.. thank fuck am not in that dicks society, cause thats an abnormal one.
1529  Other / Off-topic / Re: Conscience on: September 25, 2014, 05:10:52 PM
A person is strong enough that he can talk his conscience down. He can convince himself that his conscience is a lie. As long as there is no catastrophe in his life that causes him to become weak, he can convince himself that his conscience is wrong. "There are no atheists in the foxholes."

This is part of the reason that, when a Christian and an atheist face off, the atheist usually winds up becoming angry. After all, he has to fight 3 things. He has to fight his conscience that is trying to push through all his lies. He is trying to fight the words of the Christian that are going against what he has convinced himself of. And, if the Christian uses the Bible in the debate, the Holy Spirit gets into the fray and tries to straighten the atheist out for his own good.

The atheist often loses it and becomes angry, or he becomes more or less of a blubbering idiot, something like Decky.

So, don't give up in your attempts to reach the atheist. But be gentle. After all, we are trying to save them from destruction, mostly self-destruction. And keep in mind that we are not trying to save them for ourselves. Rather, we are trying to save them for God, like ambassadors for Him. So, be gentle and patient with them.

The strongest atheist is the one that remains firm in his false beliefs in the face of the three witnesses (mentioned above) against him. Don't become irritated with him. Rather, step back and give him what he is asking for. Gently turn him over to God. If God can't persuade him, are you going to be able to?

Smiley

Now this was a bit offensive dude.. u sit here preachin god thinking you can talk about me as you have in your second paragraph?

1: I am not a fuckin athiest you fuckin I-D-I-O-T. If you have read any my posts, you know I believe in a far greater thing than you and YOUR religons lies, Your a religious freak cast out from your church.. YOU and YOUR chosen book are liar's, or you would not lie to others claiming I am what you call an athiest. I have never been angry at anyone here ever, I sit at home, my kids see me typing, and never hear a thing.. so tell me, where is this anger?

Blubbering idiot? I'M TYPING YOU FUCKIN I-D-I-O-T!

Next you'll claim I'm shouting.. Nah, again, I'm typing.

See the difference between me and you is you and your book are a sham wi a fuckin red face because NO-ONE wants you!!!!

Me, I produce scientific truths. 

Like the fact I am typing here, not speaking, not shouting, not angry, and cant wait for someone to msg me your ip. Only then will you PRAY with your HEART that I m not initiated into greater mysteries than you.
1530  Other / Off-topic / Re: Do You Believe The Bible To Be Historically Accurate? on: September 25, 2014, 04:52:02 PM
Do you beleive the Bible is historically accurate? Does it matter to you if it's not?
The bible can't even get the value of pi right.  A circle with a diameter of 10 does not have a circumference of 30.

The earth rotates around its own axis and also performs a circuit around the sun so the position of the sun in the sky could not stop for a few hours as per the biblical story.

Pi is a mathematical creation that came after the bible, no-one used it, no-one heard of it until it was invented whenever.. pi is not scientific fact, it is a measurement, that clearly does not recognise the missing constellation or 10 degree's of missing time-space, that whilst it is clearly there, has been erased. Pi was created to hide the 13th constellation and the space it takes up, including the circle having an actual circumference of 370 degree's, so go remix all your maths from pi into this FACT that pi cannot take part in.

Pi is a fuckin joke on mathematicians. Thats why it works for them.
1531  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 04:15:53 PM
Really sorry to say this BADecker, but the pyramid is over 64.000 years old. This itself kills all notions of the bible having any accuracy at all. Now if the bible was an analogy of a 'new' creation of an 'old' world order, or the one going out now kinda thing, then it may gain a bit strength, but the fact the sphinx is at least 10 times older than the pyramid.. I mean there are pyramids beneath japan's sea, that defy all claims made by any bible that creation was what, less than 10.000 years ago? Unacceptable to any decent thinker who has studied pyramids all over the world, albeit from a pc.. There are human remains that are far older too, so, for me, the bible is a load of croc, and dangerous at that.. I do accept there is some kinda guiding hand 'upstairs' that can be perceived in the guise of diety, but cannot accept any miracle claimed in the bible as being commited by one man.

Moses listening to a burnin bush, and even having a conversation with it.. people get locked up for that.. in truth the story of moses in a basket is the actual journey depicted over the land of egypt, I mentioned earlier in star maps.. Jesus coming back to life after 3 days of being dead. Twice. (crimbo and easter, same story)

I'd surprise many with the amount of knowledge I've gleaned from a book I've never read.. but then you'd have to go through the experience of dying to know that if you read a book, I do not need to, for the universal collective conciousnous in my opinion, is the evidence of that god. When I need information from the book you read, it will come to me as ordained by that god via the collective conciousnous or the ALL?

So I think it's safe to assume that we KNOW a DIETY exists of higher intelligence, that can create itself before anything else can ever exist, for if he is not himself created, then he cannot create, correct?

1532  Other / Off-topic / Re: Do You Believe The Bible To Be Historically Accurate? on: September 25, 2014, 03:59:45 PM
I am not religious so whether it is accurate of not, it makes no difference to me. The bible is a collection of stories teaching christian ways, it is not a history text book.
Anway, for me:
Yes, not only is it accurate, but its value is dependent on its accuracy.  The whole thing rises and falls on whether or not the physical death and resurrection of Jesus is historically true - it is the center, the foundation, of the Christian faith.

if the Bible is not historically accurate, then the faith is worthless.


Now, interestingly, there are those who believe the Bible is historically accurate, but, dont care.  They have no interest in acting on its message.

To quote this: if the Bible is not historically accurate, then the faith is worthless.

Hence I need facts Wink Now if the bible had facts that could prove whatever it's claims are regarding the beginning, I'd be all ears..
1533  Other / Off-topic / Re: A new Unix bug can pose bigger threat than Heartbleed on: September 25, 2014, 02:34:46 PM
"A newly discovered security bug in a widely used piece of Linux software, known as "Bash," could pose a bigger threat to computer users than the "Heartbleed" bug that surfaced in April, cyber experts warned on Wednesday. Bash is the software used to control the command prompt on many Linux computers. Hackers can exploit a bug in Bash to take complete control of a targeted system, security experts said. The Department of Homeland Security's United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team, or US-CERT, issued an alert saying the vulnerability affected Unix-based operating systems including Linux and Apple Inc's Mac OS X"

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/new-bash-bug-could-pose-bigger-threat-heartbleed-n211006



Bug? This has actually been known by myself since 98-99, and I found it online!! Along with how to create a root account on a unix system, using 98se. I should run an ftp server for those wishing to contribute to server costs lol, just to give access to a pentesters exploits..
1534  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 02:31:50 PM
God may exist, but the "god" of the religions we have throughout the world, does not. They differ so wildy in beliefs(polytheism, monotheism, etc and the people of those religion will all argue for theirs only. So that means, that the true God is either a collective of All religions on earth, or in none of the religions we have today)

Read this article....http://www.alternet.org/story/154774/the_top_10_reasons_i_don%27t_believe_in_god?page=0%2C3

500 years ago, everything "explained" by religion was false, and is now explained by science. (They believed earth was flat, geocentric model, etc)

500 years from now, everything that religious people believe as "miracles" or "fact", will be explained by science.



There's only one thing that can't be explained, and that's the origin of the universe itself. That's why I believe in an all encompassing being, "God", but definitely not the god of any religions known today, and they've all been proved wrong.

Oh fuck, there's someone who has the same albeit different (thank fuck) stand point I have.. ouch..

Totally agree with your last paragraph.. sorry i dont do external links from site's I visit, ya never know where they end up.. Wink
1535  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is there an ACTUAL working bitcoin app? on: September 25, 2014, 11:44:24 AM
I stick with what I call audio OS, or OS's that you can load a plethora of softsynths in without lag etc.. win98se in my opinion is the best audio video OS ever, shame they had to fuck it by adding the ntfs..

And many win98se audio applications are simply the best, fuck all this cloud shit where you store your saved work on someone else's computer.. most dont realise tiat this act gives them your rights to your music, as they recorded (stored) it for you, first, by the simple act of you clickin save.
1536  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 11:15:45 AM
Kl, thankls, but I've probably collected them all in the 90's before many were removed from online by google, which is no longer a search engine, but a shite catalouge of masonic/jewish brands..

Here's a very weird fact: The first rite of initiation was held in the pyramid 64.000 years ago, ok, I know, I said that several times. What is more interesting is the rite in question, is today claimed by freemasons as 'evidence' of their existance before even the bible, for they claim it is a masonic ritual, under the guise of the rite of mithras. But freemasons are gullible fools, who clearly believe that after their initiation into the mysteries, they are told the truth and nothing but..

Wait a minute.. if the rite of mithras is masonic, and the masons are older than the bible, how come all the masonic so called 'secret' passwords are all, incidently, from the bible?

Or is this where the (plethora of) bible(s) came from?

Now we're getting into territory that finally looks to preceding events we CAN trace, and with facts that can be found anywhere.. gimme dem factual books, but please omit the masonic ones, meaning written by anyone with their form of education.. or should that be elucidation lol..
1537  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 09:45:16 AM
Well, it has to be said, that there has been so much written from the 'christian' perspective, that one should wonder how on earth we survived the last 2000 years. So a guy worked miracles, yet there is no proof of these miracles. Christians attribute everything they say, to god, despite having no actual proof of the sucker.. I mean, c'mon, what was the actual point of god being born as Jesus just to show you what I, God, as Jesus, can do.. did he leave any hints that we could part the red sea? NO. Miracles? Prove them. No-one can, period. For if the Red sea was parted, the debris in the water would also be cast with the water to either side of the gap the people of exodus would have used to travel through.. 2000 years later the evidence of the red sea being parted would be VERY visible today, considering there is a mountain of bones from animals who had no 'business' being at the part of the planet where they (apparently) are not indigenous, and thousands of years older than the parting of a sea.. this is bollox

What I think most christians CANT accept, is that every non-christian see's christianity's excuse for everything is blame it on god. How many christians are following that madman obama? All of them.. but he's a muslim no? So America, wake up, you are no longer a christian entity, you are a nation of muslim killers, which is why the only support you have for the bombing of syria is from their local neighbours.

Just when you think christianity rules the world, you realise you are, like all masons and jews, about to be hounded out of existance, just so we (the seekers) dont need to hear about miracles that are impossible to comprehend, never mind prove.

CHRISTIAN churches everywhere with locked doors (no wonder) sitting on pagan ley lines, or intersections, which in turn are best viewed as spiral's. The very reason churches have steeples is to bring this spiral closer to the etheric vehicle known as aurora borealis, which is in fact the MAGNETISM which in turn becomes akasa which flows to the nerves and tissues.. hence the micro/macro-cosm.

I think christians should stop debating the pro's and cons of YOUR RELIGION, and start providing what the op requested, scientific proof, meaning, NO FUCKIN BIBLE SHEITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Geez.  Relax dude.  The Bible is just a book of stories.  The Koran is also just a book of stories.  Why can't you (and others) simply enjoy the stories, take in the lessons learned, not read it LITERALLY and enjoy life.  Don't get so worked up.  Life is too short (unless your religion believes in reincarnation).  Smiley Smiley Smiley

People are afraid of what they don't know/understand and are reacting emotionally. Classic.

Show me a single person in this thread you can prove is all emotional, considering all you are reading is written by scripting bots.. just like the stock exchange..
1538  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 25, 2014, 09:43:52 AM
Well, it has to be said, that there has been so much written from the 'christian' perspective, that one should wonder how on earth we survived the last 2000 years. So a guy worked miracles, yet there is no proof of these miracles. Christians attribute everything they say, to god, despite having no actual proof of the sucker.. I mean, c'mon, what was the actual point of god being born as Jesus just to show you what I, God, as Jesus, can do.. did he leave any hints that we could part the red sea? NO. Miracles? Prove them. No-one can, period. For if the Red sea was parted, the debris in the water would also be cast with the water to either side of the gap the people of exodus would have used to travel through.. 2000 years later the evidence of the red sea being parted would be VERY visible today, considering there is a mountain of bones from animals who had no 'business' being at the part of the planet where they (apparently) are not indigenous, and thousands of years older than the parting of a sea.. this is bollox

What I think most christians CANT accept, is that every non-christian see's christianity's excuse for everything is blame it on god. How many christians are following that madman obama? All of them.. but he's a muslim no? So America, wake up, you are no longer a christian entity, you are a nation of muslim killers, which is why the only support you have for the bombing of syria is from their local neighbours.

Just when you think christianity rules the world, you realise you are, like all masons and jews, about to be hounded out of existance, just so we (the seekers) dont need to hear about miracles that are impossible to comprehend, never mind prove.

CHRISTIAN churches everywhere with locked doors (no wonder) sitting on pagan ley lines, or intersections, which in turn are best viewed as spiral's. The very reason churches have steeples is to bring this spiral closer to the etheric vehicle known as aurora borealis, which is in fact the MAGNETISM which in turn becomes akasa which flows to the nerves and tissues.. hence the micro/macro-cosm.

I think christians should stop debating the pro's and cons of YOUR RELIGION, and start providing what the op requested, scientific proof, meaning, NO FUCKIN BIBLE SHEITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Geez.  Relax dude.  The Bible is just a book of stories.  The Koran is also just a book of stories.  Why can't you (and others) simply enjoy the stories, take in the lessons learned, not read it LITERALLY and enjoy life.  Don't get so worked up.  Life is too short (unless your religion believes in reincarnation).  Smiley Smiley Smiley

Relax? Give christians a chance and they'll kill anything.. relax? I prefer books of facts.. like I said, why is it only bible bashers talking about their perspectives on their chosen books characters as if they actually existed? I agree Religious books are nowt but a bunch of morals dictated by the morality police, or as I call them, interfering basteards.. and after 120 years you will come back.. just in another body, another family, another country.. what you kill in this life you become in the next blah blah..
1539  Other / Off-topic / Re: need someone for change my ip on: September 25, 2014, 09:38:12 AM
Bunch o noobs advice here 4 sure, change nic mac ffs..
1540  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is there an ACTUAL working bitcoin app? on: September 25, 2014, 12:36:23 AM
With regards to XP, and it being a dead os, well, not entirely, see, here in the uk, the gov is paying microsoft to continue with updates for xp. Personally, I never use internet explorer, and un-install it in it's entirety upon installation of said os.. firefox or palemoon, and even these make me wanna puke, so overbloated I wonder why they dont just go back to the origional version, since most anti virus's will pick up any malware/virus's before they do damage.. imagine.. windows 98se.. now there's a lesson on how to get rid of a decent os..

As for linux, haha.. it's a mess.. every possible key combo recorded on a 64 key keyboard before initial release.. now what does this mean I wonder.. hey, it's in the chip.. anything you think you can do on linux was recorded before linux was a viable system.

I am an audio engineer, and have xp, linux (backtrack), and 98se on seperate hard-disks, and simply choose which os to boot from using the f12 key, nae feckin aboot..

But I see no reason to move to an os that requires twice the memory for less than half the performance..

And I never save material made by me online Wink

And I just dumped bitcoin.

Fuck all this update crap.. go plant a tree time..
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!