You've been continually quoting the bible as if we were supposed to learn from it, and insult folks who react to such lessons.. you've been doing it from the start.. this is why I choose to troll you, to remind you of what an arse you have been since the OP started this thread.
Again, you have ignored all other evidence, and if you come across something that smacks you in the face, you come out with the confuse and lose scenario, and move onto your next victim. Away and become a productive member of the human race, have a kid, so you can experience first hand, YOUR creative process.. oh, I forgot, you think that pubes your cock.
This is sooooooo like you. When you can't show how and where I have been blatantly quoting the Bible, you start talking about annal sex.  Dude, your that fuckin stupid you dont realise many people will read this ENTIRE thread, and know what it is YOU ask me to provide? I'm not you, I dont confuse and lose, and dont do external links, unless I deem it necessary, with regards to you, there is no fuckin point. Read from the start, and try grasp why folks KNOW you are are so full of shit. The crap you come out with is of biblical proportions, and you expect folks to BELIEVE you? Get it? WE DONT. Your too lazy to use your cock, and are obviously scared of a decent fanny, who the fuck will ever take your side? If you dont have a bitch someone else wants, your useless. Wake up. You are so comical! I never laughed in this forum so much as I do when reading your posts.  Good to see god shines through me with that creative process, far better than the shit you come out with.. As St. Paul says, whatever the reason, Christ (God) is preached. See? Bible bashin to the fuckin max, what does your last statement have to do with scientific proof of god? FUCK ALL |
|
|
|
You've been continually quoting the bible as if we were supposed to learn from it, and insult folks who react to such lessons.. you've been doing it from the start.. this is why I choose to troll you, to remind you of what an arse you have been since the OP started this thread.
Again, you have ignored all other evidence, and if you come across something that smacks you in the face, you come out with the confuse and lose scenario, and move onto your next victim. Away and become a productive member of the human race, have a kid, so you can experience first hand, YOUR creative process.. oh, I forgot, you think that pubes your cock.
This is sooooooo like you. When you can't show how and where I have been blatantly quoting the Bible, you start talking about annal sex. Dude, your that fuckin stupid you dont realise many people will read this ENTIRE thread, and know what it is YOU ask me to provide? I'm not you, I dont confuse and lose, and dont do external links, unless I deem it necessary, with regards to you, there is no fuckin point. Read from the start, and try grasp why folks KNOW you are are so full of shit. The crap you come out with is of biblical proportions, and you expect folks to BELIEVE you? Get it? WE DONT. Your too lazy to use your cock, and are obviously scared of a decent fanny, who the fuck will ever take your side? If you dont have a bitch someone else wants, your useless. Wake up. You are so comical! I never laughed in this forum so much as I do when reading your posts. Good to see god shines through me with that creative process, far better than the shit you come out with.. |
|
|
|
Instead of pointing to other links, do you think you could provide what you CLAIM is MASSIVE evidence, based on your last sentence |
|
|
|
Mair qualified in this department than you'll ever know.. And I probably have more (albeit reluctant) support than you for trying to prove god's existance.. note here I say god's existance, not YOUR god, who is clearly so fuckin evil, your the only one left suckin his balls and kissin his ass..
My God would NEVER use the foul language you are moving yourself into, again. Been drinking? No, just saying what needs to be said, and fuck your god, tell him am gonna kill him if I ever get the chance  |
|
|
|
You've been continually quoting the bible as if we were supposed to learn from it, and insult folks who react to such lessons.. you've been doing it from the start.. this is why I choose to troll you, to remind you of what an arse you have been since the OP started this thread.
Again, you have ignored all other evidence, and if you come across something that smacks you in the face, you come out with the confuse and lose scenario, and move onto your next victim. Away and become a productive member of the human race, have a kid, so you can experience first hand, YOUR creative process.. oh, I forgot, you think that pubes your cock.
This is sooooooo like you. When you can't show how and where I have been blatantly quoting the Bible, you start talking about annal sex. Dude, your that fuckin stupid you dont realise many people will read this ENTIRE thread, and know what it is YOU ask me to provide? I'm not you, I dont confuse and lose, and dont do external links, unless I deem it necessary, with regards to you, there is no fuckin point. Read from the start, and try grasp why folks KNOW you are are so full of shit. The crap you come out with is of biblical proportions, and you expect folks to BELIEVE you? Get it? WE DONT. Your too lazy to use your cock, and are obviously scared of a decent fanny, who the fuck will ever take your side? If you dont have a bitch someone else wants, your useless. Wake up. |
|
|
|
Proof, no matter what it may be, is a judgmental thing. It is a personal thing.
What the hell have I just read??? Your making this all up and just having a laugh at our expense. Your trolling. I've been sitting on the fence wondering if your trolling or genuine. This last comment has just cemented my decision. Once in a while, in professional debates, the debate winner has loads of evidence, so that one can actually call it real, solid proof. Yet his opponent, who has been beaten hands down, simply will not accept the evidence as proof. While this doesn't happen often, it does happen. The debate judges might award the debate to the one who has the evidence, but this doesn't force the loser to accept the fact of his loss. I say this because you seem to have trouble grasping things of deeper thinking that are plainly out in the open. Keep practicing. You can catch on. Taking Gingko Biloba can help. I suppose, because it is me telling you, you won't even try it (the Gingko). The evidence is that you still haven't changed the "Your" to "You're" like I suggested... just because it was I who suggested it. Oh, and I'd like to point out another FACT: BADecker is not qualified to tell other people how to spell in english, since america has many different spelling's. He only does this when he lose's an argument. He uses the government's way of speaking down to folks when he's been butfucked.. The correct term for this mis-use of the english language, is confuse and lose, and ya gotta admit, he is one we ALL wanna lose.. By the same thinking, Decky ain't qualified to say that I'm not qualified, or is he? Mair qualified in this department than you'll ever know.. And I probably have more (albeit reluctant) support than you for trying to prove god's existance.. note here I say god's existance, not YOUR god, who is clearly so fuckin evil, your the only one left suckin his balls and kissin his ass.. |
|
|
|
Seems to me when it boils down to it, that since the universe is mental, then we are nothing but mere thought.. made of a rib? No. Of star's? No, but we live on one.. Science is NOT a faith, it is a tool that can be used to reach general consensus that something either is, or is not. I do not need faith to work with science, I need intelligence to figure the yet unknown. If I could prove god, would you accept it? BADecker fails to realise his book is a book of allegory, a book designed to make you believe in something from nothing. We are taught you cant get something from nothing. Me, I look at the rain, and say, um.. ? If I had proof, would you want it? No, because like BADecker, some have been alive too long to move from that single tracked brain they show the world they are stuck on.
You'd think for a minute, that it would take a scientist to prove god, because folks like BADecker would tarnish whatever evidence so as to suit his needs. It cannot take a BADecker to prove god, since shite is not considered as proof.
Ironically, for scientific proof of god, we need scientifically minded (in BADeckers opinion, athiest's) people, not brainwashed fools.
Someone please drop a postit in BADeckers inbox which reads:
The bible is not SCIENTIFIC PROOF.
Argue anything else, but this fact remains the same.
The Bible absolutely is not scientific proof for God! Proof, no matter what it may be, is a judgmental thing. It is a personal thing. One can be confronted with all the evidence of the whole universe, scientific evidence and otherwise, and still not accept it as proof. The reason that certain people are all upset with me (as shown by their comments and posts) since I started pushing the stuff listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is, people are generally reasonably honest. (The reason for their general honesty is another topic.) My reasoning is hitting too close to their honesty. They are starting to convince themselves, from the evidence, that God actually might be real after all. And nobody likes being wrong, especially when it is himself/herself that is telling them that they are wrong. BADecker, do not be confused.. Thanks for the exhortation. You have been continually stealing the OP's light solely for your own selfish reasons, by selectively ignoring better evidence than that which you have provided. The OP asked for scientific proof, not a fuckin bible class. Where is the Bible class in the evidence I listed as proof? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah ...
You've been continually quoting the bible as if we were supposed to learn from it, and insult folks who react to such lessons.. you've been doing it from the start.. this is why I choose to troll you, to remind you of what an arse you have been since the OP started this thread. Again, you have ignored all other evidence, and if you come across something that smacks you in the face, you come out with the confuse and lose scenario, and move onto your next victim. Away and become a productive member of the human race, have a kid, so you can experience first hand, YOUR creative process.. oh, I forgot, you think that pubes your cock. |
|
|
|
Proof, no matter what it may be, is a judgmental thing. It is a personal thing.
What the hell have I just read??? Your making this all up and just having a laugh at our expense. Your trolling. I've been sitting on the fence wondering if your trolling or genuine. This last comment has just cemented my decision. Once in a while, in professional debates, the debate winner has loads of evidence, so that one can actually call it real, solid proof. Yet his opponent, who has been beaten hands down, simply will not accept the evidence as proof. While this doesn't happen often, it does happen. The debate judges might award the debate to the one who has the evidence, but this doesn't force the loser to accept the fact of his loss. I say this because you seem to have trouble grasping things of deeper thinking that are plainly out in the open. Keep practicing. You can catch on. Taking Gingko Biloba can help. I suppose, because it is me telling you, you won't even try it (the Gingko). The evidence is that you still haven't changed the "Your" to "You're" like I suggested... just because it was I who suggested it. Oh, and I'd like to point out another FACT: BADecker is not qualified to tell other people how to spell in english, since america has many different spelling's. He only does this when he lose's an argument. He uses the government's way of speaking down to folks when he's been butfucked.. The correct term for this mis-use of the english language, is confuse and lose, and ya gotta admit, he is one we ALL wanna lose.. |
|
|
|
Seems to me when it boils down to it, that since the universe is mental, then we are nothing but mere thought.. made of a rib? No. Of star's? No, but we live on one.. Science is NOT a faith, it is a tool that can be used to reach general consensus that something either is, or is not. I do not need faith to work with science, I need intelligence to figure the yet unknown. If I could prove god, would you accept it? BADecker fails to realise his book is a book of allegory, a book designed to make you believe in something from nothing. We are taught you cant get something from nothing. Me, I look at the rain, and say, um.. ? If I had proof, would you want it? No, because like BADecker, some have been alive too long to move from that single tracked brain they show the world they are stuck on.
You'd think for a minute, that it would take a scientist to prove god, because folks like BADecker would tarnish whatever evidence so as to suit his needs. It cannot take a BADecker to prove god, since shite is not considered as proof.
Ironically, for scientific proof of god, we need scientifically minded (in BADeckers opinion, athiest's) people, not brainwashed fools.
Someone please drop a postit in BADeckers inbox which reads:
The bible is not SCIENTIFIC PROOF.
Argue anything else, but this fact remains the same.
The Bible absolutely is not scientific proof for God! Proof, no matter what it may be, is a judgmental thing. It is a personal thing. One can be confronted with all the evidence of the whole universe, scientific evidence and otherwise, and still not accept it as proof. The reason that certain people are all upset with me (as shown by their comments and posts) since I started pushing the stuff listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is, people are generally reasonably honest. (The reason for their general honesty is another topic.) My reasoning is hitting too close to their honesty. They are starting to convince themselves, from the evidence, that God actually might be real after all. And nobody likes being wrong, especially when it is himself/herself that is telling them that they are wrong. BADecker, do not be confused.. You have been continually stealing the OP's light solely for your own selfish reasons, by selectively ignoring better evidence than that which you have provided. The OP asked for scientific proof, not a fuckin bible class. Why come here and argue your case, when as you have just stated, even though it took me to say so, your book is in no way evidence of anything other than the FACT it is a book. Many people have clearly stated that which you regurgitate over and over as if it came from you. You underestimate the intelligence of many people here, and when these people provide better proof than you, you demand that proof, cause your too fuckin brainwashed to even contemplate the fact that many people here are more correct than you. The masonic evidence I provided is FACT, since freemasons are still around today. They cannot speak of it, so you will never recieve any evidence from them, it takes someone who has studied a plethora of books, not just one, to answer any relevant questions. I have clearly read one more book than you. The closest you will ever come to the truth, is the revelation given upon initiation into CERTAIN societies that will GRANT you the ability to view the dude with that ring on his finger, spoken of by ezekial, who incidently was around the 10th author of the bible BEFORE your moses. You dont even know how to see your entire life is written in that book of yours, cabalistically of course.. you deny your jewish roots. Never mind the maths. Answer this: If god's chosen people are jewish, where does that leave you? Dumb fuck. Preach all you want, your not only not a jew, your denying a woman a kid. You are a non-productive member of a sad society, that in all honesty, is about to be swept away by the eastern traditions.. Proof is not a judgemental thing, it is reality based, fact or not. Have you ever used an ociloscope, maybe a multimeter? When you have a headache, you take snake poison to take the pain away.. (yes, painkillers evolved from snake venom) where is god in all this? Nowhere to be seen, for he is not of this world. Now how the fuck you think your gonna be saved, when by your own admission, folk's here know what a silly cuntin idiot you are for denying ALL and ANY evidence that would be considered by most sane people. The 'crazy' maths at the start of this thread I provided is found in your book. Yes, it is. If you wanna find god, do the maths. What, you cant count? Cant join the dot's? (<- A MEGA hint - origional fractal's anyone?) You would still deny it all. You are an epic fail. When I provided certain masonic passwords, it was only to show that to an extent, I am more qualified than you to take part in this thread. And that my reasoning is sound, despite my arsehole like way of going about things. You fail to realise, there are more masons than christians, and these people know what I say is true, you, can simply be swept away in a sea that god will never part for you. This maths is gematria, and the fact I mention certain books, is solely for the reader to see the proof for themselves. In practise, by DRAWING the images the maths produce, you become ONE with that which you are trying to prove. The only evidence that comes close to providing proof, is nothing more than the EXPERIENCE gained whilst drawing the true images of the magic square's.. strange huh, how the maths is on a plethora of website's, yet not one single site has the images drawn by hand? Just the maths? Because drawing the square's is akin to creating the image of god, not just the creation, but the actualization of said image, which invoke's ALL other subordinate's to god, and grants whatever they are assigned to do. All I have done, is provide whatever I can to show YOU how wrong you were to use the bible as evidence, which you have done throughout this thread, alienating not only you from many, or many from you, but millions from your society. I mean, who would wanna be saved by you when you cant admit your worshipping a jewish, not christian, diety. Christianity was created by the jews. This was done to make folks believe in one thing, while the jews did another. That 'another' is best viewed in what is classed as a hoax, the protocols of the learned elders of zion. Read that and tell me that's a hoax. Shame you cant see it's instructions being carried out all over the world, as we speak. All in the name of YOUR god, no-one else's.. |
|
|
|
Away get laid you, surely it's gotta be better than arguing from a book that, by your definition, is the ONLY evidence? Care to explain your god without using anything the bible has to offer, or any work's by other people? What, you dont have the power of creation at your finger tip's? Must be me |
|
|
|
|
See? The universe is mental.
There are three parts to being a human, physical, yeah, we're here, astral, yup, we are 'apparently' made of stars, and mental. We thought ourselve's here. And here we are. Your earliest memory is of you constructing your body inside another universe, that being your mother. When you first saw the light, you were being born. between born and 3, you were more astral and mental whilst your body adapted to take on board these other two passengers. Where are you in all this? YOU dont exist as a single entity. And never will.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to me when it boils down to it, that since the universe is mental, then we are nothing but mere thought.. made of a rib? No. Of star's? No, but we live on one.. Science is NOT a faith, it is a tool that can be used to reach general consensus that something either is, or is not. I do not need faith to work with science, I need intelligence to figure the yet unknown. If I could prove god, would you accept it? BADecker fails to realise his book is a book of allegory, a book designed to make you believe in something from nothing. We are taught you cant get something from nothing. Me, I look at the rain, and say, um.. ? If I had proof, would you want it? No, because like BADecker, some have been alive too long to move from that single tracked brain they show the world they are stuck on.
You'd think for a minute, that it would take a scientist to prove god, because folks like BADecker would tarnish whatever evidence so as to suit his needs. It cannot take a BADecker to prove god, since shite is not considered as proof.
Ironically, for scientific proof of god, we need scientifically minded (in BADeckers opinion, athiest's) people, not brainwashed fools.
Someone please drop a postit in BADeckers inbox which reads:
The bible is not SCIENTIFIC PROOF.
Argue anything else, but this fact remains the same.
|
|
|
|
There is of course, a perfectly reasonable way to discover the age of the sphinx.. top left facing the sphinx, is a room. Not only is there a room (sealed, was it ever open?), but inside this room, there is a branch of tree. This is FACT, and no-one knows how the room was made, never mind the branch being inside the room. Let's just smash the sphinx, and grab that branch for carbon dating |
|
|
|
|
Shh.. he's clearly stupid, or would'nt deny ANY other evidence.. figure it out folks, he's only here to hijack the OP's thread with no proof of his own, never mind what he's saying, which we all know, is enough to make us puke..
|
|
|
|
|
Incidently, if you'd like to see freemasonry, take a good look at your passwords list, you know, the one you use to hack well, anything requiring a password. Did you know that if you knew the masonic password's you'd not only have a better list than any top hacker, but the algorithm's used behind EVERYTHING the box in front of you is capable of.
See 8.
|
|
|
|
|
Size: The 'complete' universe is far too massive for 'a' god to exist.. I mean, come on, someone figure's out how to create life from nothing, makes a universe so vast it never end's, and in the end, all they can do is create one faggot, which is clearly wrong, so takes a spare rib to cook up some chinese bird? Since there are BILLIONS more galaxies than there ever will be humans, I wonder why an idiot such as god would choose to stick them.. well, here, on this one ball. To do what? Fuck? I guess that leaves BADecker looking for his god. Consider this:
I cant, by my own admission, find scientific proof of god, but this means neither can anyone else. Why?
Because, we are god, there is no-one else.
|
|
|
|
It really bothers you guys that we might have all been created by chance doesn't it?  Lol, this is quite good.. it really, really would, however, piss 'em off more to realise, WE not ony CREATED our reality (and still do), we created a planet far off in space.. no? What do you think your standing on? What, you can predict the future (create it with the power of the spoken word), but you cant create a planet? Now who's the dafty.. Ytolan, if anything, is THAT dietie's ONLY power, but since there are more than one god, as is proven by all other books relating to gods and their subordinates etc.. what, they dont count? So Thoth does not and did not ever exist? Then neither can god, since it's reasonably safe to assume, that ANY name of god you can come up with is THAT which you seek, with one problem.. god has a sister |
|
|
|
|
What I get my kill at, is no matter what they link to, THEY, including BADecker, cant help quoting or linking to other links/posts that are not of their creation, and HOPE people will click said links.. um, no, this is the search for SCIENTIFIC proof, not a bible bashing class for virgins with nothing better to do than chew on the bible, cause it taste's more of fish than their own ma's pish..
|
|
|
|
If you have proof of God, please provide it, this means scientific proof, not a page that has writing on it.
Proof that freemasons held the first initiations in the pyramid 64.000 years ago can be found all over the web.
...
If we didn't have the web, Freemasonry would be extremely obscure. Yet the Bible has existed far and wide long before the web, and even more now that we have the web. Look at all the translations that have come about since the Internet started, because the Internet makes it easy to reach the world. http://www.biblegateway.com/Look a you, off on tangents already, if you cant povide scientific proof of god, shut the fuck up. Oh, I forgot, your on the bob-dole.. cant get a job? I wonder why.. even your ma's quite busy recently, I bet you never figured out why she keeps going down there, coming back, going down, coming back.. oh wait, whatever is that in her mouth? It's one thing to wipe your mouth on the curtain, another to wipe cock on bible huh? |
|
|
|
The only proof you can come up with is shite mate, proven by nothing more than freemasonry holding it's rituals in the pyramid 64.000 years ago. You deny this fact, yet say the sphinx is less than 2000 years old? Have a nice day continuing to make an epic, biblical arse of yourself..
That's just it. You say stuff is fact with no proof. At least I have proof of the existence of God - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. And where do you come from with the idea that I say the Sphinx is less than 2,000 years old? Are you starting to dream things and then think that they are real? You haven't been drinking again, have you? EDIT: What's taking you so long? Can't find it, can you! By denying the age of the sphinx, which you do by claiming the age of the bible.. The sphinx is the age of the planet, or at least, the age of the terain in that area, since NO volcano's have erupted there since before even your maggot infested book were converted from tree's.. Type JaBaalOn in google, 64.000 years ago.. first rights held in pyramid was held by freemasonry: Morals and Dogma. There's your fuckin proof, now hold your church door open, there's a mason wanna fuck your ma on the altar.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
