Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 07:26:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 [82] 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
1621  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 12, 2014, 01:40:01 PM
This thread is now just a waste of time, Suddenly animals cant choose? I mean, c'mon, almost everything in existance, has been discussed here using less than 60 years of knowledge, and a shite book for those who impose by trying to save people from NOTHING.

We die, period, and no-one ever did come back from the dead.

At the end, we die, only then will we wish we knew what we already know.

We are fucked over by these religions period. Your kids are sexually abused, and your families are attacked and killed by these people, while they keep all the riches. (spoils of war) you POOR fuckers. (me too lol)

When will the church divy up all that gold and give each starving child enough buy the land they can plant food on? NEVER, cause they're to busy SAVING. (for themselves)

In fact, when will they do anything instead of getting their bashers to do it for them?

Cause they're all the fuckin same.. COWARDS.

If you had a choice, forced slavery, or belief in god, I know what you'd choose, cause you already have.. you chose slavery, whatever your excuse.
1622  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 12, 2014, 01:15:11 PM
This quote is a falacy:

"Nowhere in nature do we see nature selecting anything."

Do you see birds making nests underwater? No, they select tree's or buildings, and before buildings, where did the birds select? In a natural disaster like say a firestorm, Wildlife select "run away".. Does water, that can clearly flow in all directions, select 'up'? No, because it cant, unless we remove the gravity of the situation..

Natural selection.. exists, or we would not be able to, since it's safe to assume, we are of nature in itself.

"I can show you how there IS selection available to mankind, but you won't like what I show you."

I may not like what you show, but please do..?


Actually it's not selection at all.
Birds wanting to make their nests underwater are all dead. People going into the fire are also all dead.
So yeah they don't pass their innate behaviors to their offspring.

I guess your mum had you forced on her as opposed to choosing?
1623  Other / Off-topic / Re: Looking to start a donation project for Pakistan on: September 12, 2014, 01:14:07 PM
I think it's more like no-one is interested in crypto currencies period, only those with time to spend on their machines.. bitcoin cant help those in the flood, since it cant be handed over for food, get it? You got more chance of trading your iphone for a flying carpet, than bitcoin will be of assistance.. then there is of course, the transaction fee's.. ouch..
1624  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 12, 2014, 12:44:55 PM
This quote is a falacy:

"Nowhere in nature do we see nature selecting anything."

Do you see birds making nests underwater? No, they select tree's or buildings, and before buildings, where did the birds select? In a natural disaster like say a firestorm, Wildlife select "run away".. Does water, that can clearly flow in all directions, select 'up'? No, because it cant, unless we remove the gravity of the situation..

Natural selection.. exists, or we would not be able to, since it's safe to assume, we are of nature in itself.

"I can show you how there IS selection available to mankind, but you won't like what I show you."

I may not like what you show, but please do..?
1625  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 11, 2014, 01:16:36 AM
pmsl...
1626  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 10, 2014, 10:56:35 PM
Ffs, someone bring in some old/new/unmentioned religion that DOES'NT involve anything connected to christians or jews.. please reference something we can get our teeth into that we have'nt heard on our own doorstep before we slammed the door..
1627  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 10, 2014, 05:26:21 PM
If I were to say to you that our sun is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me? NO.

This is most likely because there is no (scientific) evidence..

If I were to say that Sirius is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me, YES, 'cause the Dogon tribe of Mali says so..

But the dogon also point out that the binary sirius is a mirror of our own sun.. meaning ours is a binary star.

But our sun is not a binary star according to science.

So how anyone expects to prove the existance of god when all possible science explaining the truth above is..

?
1628  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Illuminati discussion thread Do they exist? on: September 07, 2014, 09:38:55 PM
It's not the jews , It's the sionistes I guess .  Angry

Zionists, or jionists, or yionist.. ARE jews, masters of the masonic puppets.

Go lick them wounds..

No they arent. its all a tin foil teenage conspiracy. go back to stormfront mate.

Prove they are'nt.. Yet another BAM who likes to convince the world his fellow brethren the paedo squad are nothing but a con's piracy theory.. Unles syou can come up with ONE of their secrets, go back to the fuckin lodge kafa luva
1629  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 06, 2014, 03:09:49 PM
How is this proof of God. It's just proof that we all descended from same couple. Actually you don't mention it but there is village in Africa who are closest descendants to this pair in the world. So scientist believe that is where they originally lived.

How is 'what' proof of god, ie, to what are you referring?

To say we came from one woman and one man is sick. There are millions upon millions of bacteria.. which millions of years ago, grew into some form of human, the problem most dont see, is that one of these bacteria washed up on one bit of land and started to crawl until they grew legs, titties, n that lovely sweetness we all love.. and the other was on a land mass at the other side of the world. Neither knew anything about walking that far, never mind having the knowledge of building a boat, but they did see more of their kind come out of the water.. most certainly more than one or two.. ie adam and eve.

The story of adam and eve is actually a story of where to find a certain knowledge, by biting from the apple, the stupid bastard choked, was saved by, and had a knowledge of whatever 'other' side, or dont folks know anything?

I guess you are referring to the dogone tribe of mali?

The source of the DOG star etc?

I can write pretty good, as in authoring a book. But my stories are a bit mediocre.

You have the wild stories, but your writing isn't so much the kind that people might like to read.

Maybe we should get together and write some wild science fiction. That's a good one you have there, where millions and millions of bacteria grew into people somehow. Now, we need to add the part about how they were struck by lightning, and that's when they got the idea to turn. And we need some kind of cataclysmic event that forced them to make the decision.

But there still isn't enough detail to make a smooth flowing sci-fi story. We gotta make a good part about where the bacteria came from in the first place. And we should figure out a plausible method for them to convert once they got struck by the lightning.

I was trying to get some ideas from all the different forms of evolution theory that have come and gone over the decades, but there are always too many holes in those stories. So, I looked at a lot of sci-fi stories, and the only ones that had enough info had way too many boring details.

Then again, there's so much science fiction out there that the odds of ever getting published are something like the odds that evolution could have happened... like, impossible. Besides, people are getting too smart, these days, to believe that nonsense anymore... or they simply don't have the time to care. Even the formal science sci-fi scientists are having to come up with ever wilder evolution theories, simply to keep their audience spellbound enough that they don't lose all their funding in the universities, etc.

Well, we should probably just forget the whole idea. But it is a thought. What if our evolution sci-fi stories became the dominant ones? We just might be able to make a lot of money off the true believers, like the university, evolution profs do.

Smiley

At last.. someone with an understanding enough to at least recognise something enough to coment.. there is no sci-fi story, that is nothing more than the remix of the same tune remixed by a plethora of writers taught the same pattern.. by adaption.

Sci fi is fake science, producing ideas discovered before you or I could copywrite it, simple using the technology of team viewer (latest adaption) like they do to fix your 'premium' account of your mobile Phone.. it is a business model used by many to confuse the mass's.. who in the end are blown up instead of those that implement the point it got to for someone to do so.

I for one will never accept as my religion as something I will defend knowing that they have broken their own laws period, by killing another human being, or allowing said process.. by using force instead of understanding why not to.. why not?

They broke their own law, and think they can make it ok.. using nothing more than a language they created in order to produce same results a multi meter is designed to produce, flame, form, and mind.

I dont mind if it dont matter.. <this refers the obvious..

With regards to publishing, I do have cert's in multimedia production, just cant be bothered with that direction..

The best kept secrets are best not shared online.. hahaha...

But there arte no secret's.. or they would not be able to re-produce..



You are right, of course. And maybe it is a good idea that you let it out that sci-fi is fake. But, in writing at least, I'm the kind of person who's sort of like Blackie DuQuesne in Doc Smith's Skylark series - I'm for direct action, first, last and always, in the formulation stages, that is. And it is true that, to keep from losing our audience, we should be kind of covert. But what could it really hurt to come right out and say, "fiction, not science fiction?"

Smiley

I guess I side with the OP and say, in the search for god, anything we can refer to that creates said image of god everyone agrees on, then maybe he'll find the answer, cause no-one here has 'concrete' proof. The evidence I have produced is concrete proof that the structure of many societies is contained within this thread, as is evidenced when you look out your window. They created this world, you and I did as we slaved away building it.. for THEM.

Despite the proof we dream.

And can go inbetween.

Nuff said..
1630  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 06, 2014, 02:39:51 PM
How is this proof of God. It's just proof that we all descended from same couple. Actually you don't mention it but there is village in Africa who are closest descendants to this pair in the world. So scientist believe that is where they originally lived.

How is 'what' proof of god, ie, to what are you referring?

To say we came from one woman and one man is sick. There are millions upon millions of bacteria.. which millions of years ago, grew into some form of human, the problem most dont see, is that one of these bacteria washed up on one bit of land and started to crawl until they grew legs, titties, n that lovely sweetness we all love.. and the other was on a land mass at the other side of the world. Neither knew anything about walking that far, never mind having the knowledge of building a boat, but they did see more of their kind come out of the water.. most certainly more than one or two.. ie adam and eve.

The story of adam and eve is actually a story of where to find a certain knowledge, by biting from the apple, the stupid bastard choked, was saved by, and had a knowledge of whatever 'other' side, or dont folks know anything?

I guess you are referring to the dogone tribe of mali?

The source of the DOG star etc?

I can write pretty good, as in authoring a book. But my stories are a bit mediocre.

You have the wild stories, but your writing isn't so much the kind that people might like to read.

Maybe we should get together and write some wild science fiction. That's a good one you have there, where millions and millions of bacteria grew into people somehow. Now, we need to add the part about how they were struck by lightning, and that's when they got the idea to turn. And we need some kind of cataclysmic event that forced them to make the decision.

But there still isn't enough detail to make a smooth flowing sci-fi story. We gotta make a good part about where the bacteria came from in the first place. And we should figure out a plausible method for them to convert once they got struck by the lightning.

I was trying to get some ideas from all the different forms of evolution theory that have come and gone over the decades, but there are always too many holes in those stories. So, I looked at a lot of sci-fi stories, and the only ones that had enough info had way too many boring details.

Then again, there's so much science fiction out there that the odds of ever getting published are something like the odds that evolution could have happened... like, impossible. Besides, people are getting too smart, these days, to believe that nonsense anymore... or they simply don't have the time to care. Even the formal science sci-fi scientists are having to come up with ever wilder evolution theories, simply to keep their audience spellbound enough that they don't lose all their funding in the universities, etc.

Well, we should probably just forget the whole idea. But it is a thought. What if our evolution sci-fi stories became the dominant ones? We just might be able to make a lot of money off the true believers, like the university, evolution profs do.

Smiley

At last.. someone with an understanding enough to at least recognise something enough to coment.. there is no sci-fi story, that is nothing more than the remix of the same tune remixed by a plethora of writers taught the same pattern.. by adaption.

Sci fi is fake science, producing ideas discovered before you or I could copywrite it, simple using the technology of team viewer (latest adaption) like they do to fix your 'premium' account of your mobile Phone.. it is a business model used by many to confuse the mass's.. who in the end are blown up instead of those that implement the point it got to for someone to do so.

I for one will never accept as my religion as something I will defend knowing that they have broken their own laws period, by killing another human being, or allowing said process.. by using force instead of understanding why not to.. why not?

They broke their own law, and think they can make it ok.. using nothing more than a language they created in order to produce same results a multi meter is designed to produce, flame, form, and mind.

I dont mind if it dont matter.. <this refers the obvious..

With regards to publishing, I do have cert's in multimedia production, just cant be bothered with that direction..

The best kept secrets are best not shared online.. hahaha...

But there arte no secret's.. or they would not be able to re-produce..

1631  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 06, 2014, 02:23:22 PM


How come this drawing would have been done if the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist? It's impossible!
Thus it exists!

Ramen


Ramen to that!

Off Putting.. attention seeker with nothing.. :0
1632  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 06, 2014, 10:30:56 AM
How is this proof of God. It's just proof that we all descended from same couple. Actually you don't mention it but there is village in Africa who are closest descendants to this pair in the world. So scientist believe that is where they originally lived.

How is 'what' proof of god, ie, to what are you referring?

To say we came from one woman and one man is sick. There are millions upon millions of bacteria.. which millions of years ago, grew into some form of human, the problem most dont see, is that one of these bacteria washed up on one bit of land and started to crawl until they grew legs, titties, n that lovely sweetness we all love.. and the other was on a land mass at the other side of the world. Neither knew anything about walking that far, never mind having the knowledge of building a boat, but they did see more of their kind come out of the water.. most certainly more than one or two.. ie adam and eve.

The story of adam and eve is actually a story of where to find a certain knowledge, by biting from the apple, the stupid bastard choked, was saved by, and had a knowledge of whatever 'other' side, or dont folks know anything?

I guess you are referring to the dogone tribe of mali?

The source of the DOG star etc?
1633  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Illuminati discussion thread Do they exist? on: September 06, 2014, 09:59:17 AM
It's not the jews , It's the sionistes I guess .  Angry

Zionists, or jionists, or yionist.. ARE jews, masters of the masonic puppets.

Go lick them wounds..
1634  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 06, 2014, 09:57:57 AM
Well, I too am at the end of this, for aside's from those that like to fill threads with comments and pictures completely un-related to the topic in question, most of which are useless in the search for diety.., for instance, quoting books that are apparently 'god's' books, or holy books.

The evidence for 'diety' or a 'false idol' is everywhere..

Quite simply, millions of people go to pray. Fact. The rituals they do can indeed produce result's, though wether this is a result of prayer is debatable in itself.. note however I say 'ritual' instead of 'pray'.

This evidence is like yin and yang.

There are those who use a system I shall call magic which HAS proven over and over again, works.

The 'good' go to hallowed ground and do things like that 'lord's' work, the bad do the same in an opposite manner, for they worship the opposing factor's work. Regardless of which side they choose, the system used is identical, asides from one FACT. To get results considered 'Good', they go in one direction. Do get 'Bad' results, they go in an opposite direction. This is scientifically provable, for there are government's who plaster icons from either side, all over their building's, advert's etc, in the guise of logo's, another way of writing LOGOS which is the scource of all. For this LOGOS sent forth 3 devine sparks.. Flame, Form, and MIND. In the Emerald tablets, or any of the holy books, All 3, (holy trinity, three rays of light??) are scientifically PROVEN to exist, recognised more today as Flame form and fashion, or mind body and soul, to name a few, this trinity producing the human being. The origional 7 planets which the days of the week are named after, start from 3 to 7. The 'Key of the 7' found in the Emerald Tablet's shows us that there is NO 0, 1, or 2. Instead, the first '3' is shown as a triangle, that same triangle found at the center of some very factual material found online. The key of the 7 starts from 3, and finishes at 9, showing only seven FACTS from the universal language, maths. These FACTS are the days of the week, named after their respective planets, or lords.

All is repetition, the key to magic.  The Fact that churches etc exist proves nothing. That they are built to the maths of nature is SOMETHING, and VERY provable.

You see, most cant see the bigger picture, despite me dotting bit's of evidence everywhere throughout, what, 3 or 4 threads?

Nuns, priests, etc, that do their gods work do so from a church. These 'should' (for want of a better word) be doing the GOOD work, and practice what they preach.

So who are their opposing factor? For the laymen, I'll say occultists do the devils work, or the bad/evil work.. Freemasonry is occult, worshipping the dark science's, or quite simply, they do everything the preists do, but in the opposite direction, each step, each raise of the hands etc..

Both side's would NOT be doing anything resembling these 'ritual's' if they got NO results.

In the search for scientific proof of god, this is the path you must walk, in order to collect the same evidence that gave the powers that run this planet, ie, governments, their power.

Remember, magic is only knowledge unknown. Once known, it is not only wisdom, it is power.

Stonehenge was torn apart to prevent an evil one being born on this earth, an evil one whose father was a seventh son who fucked his seventh child (daughter) who was then killed on the bluestone (from atlantis) altar, on the night of a certain full moon. The daugter was with child, (pregnant), and at the point of this unborn childs birth, another child was killed at the same time, one goes out, one comes in. How many 'christian' movies show this same reminder to prevent this shit happening again?

The evidence is everywhere, for the evidence of EITHER god or the devil, me, I think they are ONE, we can prove the devil but not god? Gimme a fuckin break.. the only people wanting this evidence DONT believe in either, or have zero un-natural experience's, that would make them question the FACT that something governs (controls) this 'magic' that, of course, the majority, do not WANT believe in, regardless of the evidence.
 




1635  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 05, 2014, 10:52:43 AM
A scary image of the scientific proof of god..

Man sends voyager up into space, and send's it on it's merry way never to return.. always heading 'out there' gathering space dust..

There is a saying that if we could travel so fast across the universe we'd see ourselves..

When Voyager get's to the other side, it will exit the universe, by exiting every lifeform on earth's face, at the same time..

Ok, this is nonsense, but the only way to show the true image of god, if there 'should' be one.
1636  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 05, 2014, 10:41:23 AM
I notice so many people from 'bible' faith's are replying to this thread.. And not many others.. So many.. countless quotes from what is best described, as the youngest book in religion.. a good 60% of these quotes are written to say who was who, where what came from, and all of them, come from one book, that is only just over 2000 years old, but I'll add another thousand just to keep whomever happy.. 99% of 'religious' support for god comes from only 1 book again.. This proves to me just one thing so far.. that the most arguments come from 'believer's' of what this book says.

If this was my thread I'd (politelly) ask NO masons to post here, for they wont say the name JESUS in a church. The Jews wont say GOD.. many religions dont want any image of 'their' god anywhere.. but apparently god is not just everywhere, he IS EVERYTHING.

(note the last full stop Wink

In effect, for what is taught, is that the spirit lives on in our children. As spirit creates the form (grow) in their fathers almost identical image.. as jesus states, what I am you shall become.. But he aint my dad.. this may explain why thou shalt not create any graven image.. just by building a church, mosque, the builders create the 'graven' image, that is carved/built onto this earth.. perhaps there is a reason we are not to do this.. If you knew the rituals held by freemasons in your church, and you DO believe in GOD, would you go back to your church to listen to the preist who allows it? Yes, and in doing so support the evil commited in your church.

'think not in angles - for surely they will follow thee' (hounds of the barrier that guard the hidden pathway)

Now think of the symbol of freemasonry.. nothing BUT angles.. think of the cross.. the star of (king)david..

Think I'm talking nonsence? My avatar was created after I saw a particular image carved into the wall of roslin chapel (thats how it is now spelt here Wink that image is of the tetragrammaton.. it is carved so deep into the wall one would (should) question how it was created, and in all places, a church.. for it took time to create this. Whilst I sought to find what this image represented, I came across the instructions for the creation of where, what should be in a certain ritual. This avatar of mine represents the 5 elements, earth, fire water, air and spirit. A defence against what is not only commited in YOUR church, but all over the face of the earth.

Do your research into the history that destroyed stonehenge, yes there is one.. use google maps to find how many other stone circles 'orbit' stonehenge (orbit, as in dotted around) and if you zooom out just enough to see the other constellations 'engraved' in the land.. you'll probably believe there is no upside down pyramid.. (incidently, google wont show this on your maps, but it does exist, in egypt)

I'm getting bored trying to find proof of god, when pit against bible lovers.. for they really do allow the evil to be commited by at least one member of their family, a freemason. Then go to the same spot the mason carried out his ritual. (or will attend one in a church)

Scientific proof, is also defined as accepted by the majority through experience of the many.. and hence 'witnessed'

It is a scientific fact that rituals produce effects, be them for good or evil.

In this guise the word 'ritual' is another proof of god, since so many ritualists know the desired effect's of the cause.

I'm not a ritualist, or into any that stuff, but have read a lot of them..

Someone of a spiritual nature or better, governs these 'laws' which are for use of EITHER good or evil.

Perhaps we should ask for proof of allah? Most here would shut up, through a simple lack of knowledge.

1637  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 04, 2014, 06:25:31 PM
Depends on what do you mean by "God". If you think God is a person, who sends good people to heaven and bad people to hell - then no. His rules are impossible to follow. If they were true, no one would ever go to heaven.

This is the best formulation of a proof that God in the Bible/Quran/Other religions is man made. Probably has a logo too.

“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”

There are forces in the Universe that we do not understand yet. It's a proven fact that everything has a magnetic field. We are all connected. Literally. Science has proven that. Planets even have auras. So again - depends on your concept of god. But to believe in Jesus, or Satan is hilarious.

Just because god has been misinterpreted by religions doesn't make the concepts of jesus or satan any less true.  Jesus did exist, nature always has a way of rising one person in the position to discover, share and rebel against a greed based society to the farthest extent.  When you are in that position and reach that state of consciousness, you realize a few things: death is inevitable, living in fear of death is illogical, pain is a manifestation of ego, if you live a life of spreading peace you will feel no pain when you die, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain by beholding the position of jesus.

Jesus is beyond a universally singular person.  Jesus is a soul, the spirit of god.  Jesus is the one.  He is neo, it matters not what form he takes.

Satan is also not a singular being.  Satan is the concept of the material world, ego, negativity.

This spiritual universe has been personified in order to be portrayed in terms humans can comprehend.  God is well beyond any one humanoid being.  God is light, god is love.

At first you appear intelligent enough to know what your talking about, then I noticed this notice that is not worth noticing, but I noticed it anyway lol, Jesus was a human being, the apparent son of god, but he was most definately NOT GOD

You're not thinking in terms of a unified perspective.  Jesus is god, but so are you.  Jesus is not a god above or separate from others, he is simply a man who evolved before others.  We are all god, we are all Jesus.

My birth certificate says otherwise.. now there is scientific proof!
1638  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 04, 2014, 06:23:55 PM
Depends on what do you mean by "God". If you think God is a person, who sends good people to heaven and bad people to hell - then no. His rules are impossible to follow. If they were true, no one would ever go to heaven.

This is the best formulation of a proof that God in the Bible/Quran/Other religions is man made. Probably has a logo too.

“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”

There are forces in the Universe that we do not understand yet. It's a proven fact that everything has a magnetic field. We are all connected. Literally. Science has proven that. Planets even have auras. So again - depends on your concept of god. But to believe in Jesus, or Satan is hilarious.

Just because god has been misinterpreted by religions doesn't make the concepts of jesus or satan any less true.  Jesus did exist, nature always has a way of rising one person in the position to discover, share and rebel against a greed based society to the farthest extent.  When you are in that position and reach that state of consciousness, you realize a few things: death is inevitable, living in fear of death is illogical, pain is a manifestation of ego, if you live a life of spreading peace you will feel no pain when you die, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain by beholding the position of jesus.

Jesus is beyond a universally singular person.  Jesus is a soul, the spirit of god.  Jesus is the one.  He is neo, it matters not what form he takes.

Satan is also not a singular being.  Satan is the concept of the material world, ego, negativity.

This spiritual universe has been personified in order to be portrayed in terms humans can comprehend.  God is well beyond any one humanoid being.  God is light, god is love.

Jesus WAS a human being.. and he is dead, pure and simple.  He is Hiram Abiff.. the stupid cunt that lost THE word.. Neither of these is RA, And Neo was just plain fuckin Neo, he never took any other form. He is Keanu Reave's, a human being. An Actor.. You were only supposed to take the blue OR red pill, not both lol.. Neo is also not a singular being.  Neo is the concept of the material world, ego, negativity.

God is NOT love, he is the creator OF.
1639  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 04, 2014, 06:13:05 PM
You cant prove something that is supossedly infinite, how do u measure infinite?  Roll Eyes

Another good one, look up  Shocked
1640  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Best Movies on: September 04, 2014, 03:36:27 PM

I don't have any favorite movie and I think that having favorite-things shows one's inability to deal with changes.

Yesterday I've seen Eyes Wide Shut and I've been impressed. It's really good.

Recently I saw Under the Skin : it's a masterpiece, mindblowing.



Re: under the skin.. very fuckin boring.. a yawn.. scarlet's WORST movie, apart fi seein her nude of course..
Pages: « 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 [82] 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!