God and 'the light' are 2 seperate entities, one creating the other.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. (Emphasis mine.) Oh boy. Now we have sound added. Or was it the written Word?  And here, you will eventually, (for I have no idea of your age) discover, that in the beginning, water existed. So did the dark above it. It was the 'Spirit' of god that created the first MOVEMENT as IT moved ON the water. To dis my introduction of SOUND is to forget a f(o)und-a-mental process, that purposefull vibration that filled the VOID with SOUND. If the water sat on nothing, or was not contained, it would be spread so vast as to appear as non-existant, yet the spirit of god moved ON/OVER the deep, not THROUGH the mist of time. To dis my introduction of SOUND is to forget your book, for the first word's EVER spoken, according to your book, were "let there be light" - The universe is a mental process, and we are all a part of that creation. |
|
|
|
I been saying it over and over.. I see god as the ALL SOUL. This could be defined as the universal consciousnous.. I dont believe we have 'seperate' soul's from each other, but that we have a PART of ONE soul, and THAT would be god, and any religion speaking in the name of god that CHOOSE's to grant THEIR member's right's over any other as a cult or sect, like say, freemasonry, rosicrucian, illuminate, judaism, bhuddism, catholic, protestant.. yeah, ya get the idea.. As for those nippy git's who think or make out that when I say I believe in god, means I believe in their's, is to make me understand why so many other religions want them dead. God willing of course  By "the universal consciousness" do you mean "the zero-point field." No. |
|
|
|
I been saying it over and over.. I see god as the ALL SOUL. This could be defined as the universal consciousnous.. I dont believe we have 'seperate' soul's from each other, but that we have a PART of ONE soul, and THAT would be god, and any religion speaking in the name of god that CHOOSE's to grant THEIR member's right's over any other as a cult or sect, like say, freemasonry, rosicrucian, illuminate, judaism, bhuddism, catholic, protestant.. yeah, ya get the idea.. As for those nippy git's who think or make out that when I say I believe in god, means I believe in their's, is to make me understand why so many other religions want them dead. God willing of course Well, even the Bible says that if God were to withdraw His Spirit and breath (another word for spirit), that all mankind would perish together. Have you ever tried to breath aurora borealis? Shocking to say the least!! |
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. That would never happen short of all of humanity being in a mass hallucination, as science is nothing but observations of the world around us. Meanwhile, a religious person says the sky is pink because their holy book said so That would be one thing if every observer of a scientists writings expressed only what the scientist said. Or if the many non-scientists understood what the scientist meant. But this doesn't happen the majority of the time. Because of this, the atheists are more to be pitied than all other propagandized people. Your desire to be ignorant is entertaining really. You've come up with so many fallacies and nonsense arguments for a god, but are unable to cite a single good source that shows evidence of one, then you say that atheists should be pitied because we blindly take what we hear, even though the scientific evidence has been reviewed by other scientists time and time again. Coming from somebody that thought the Higgs Boson proved god just because of it's nickname, you really don't have room to talk there Keep trying. Or maybe start trying? Sooner or later, if you try hard enough, you will see through the haze of faith in your religion, so that you can finally see the truth. I could sit here all day and dismantle your terrible arguments for a god, but you'll just keep coming up with new ones. You proved with the Higgs Boson you literally do 0 research before spewing out false info. It's really kinda funny that you belittle the person that has proved every thing you've said to me in this thread wrong. Believe what you want, but there is no evidence. Oh, and atheism isn't a religion Again, the strong evidence is found in (among other things) these: 1. There is simply no evidence of anything other than entropy, so how did all this start? 2. We see no evidence of complex machinery without a machine maker, so where did the complex universe machine come from? 3. There is no such thing as pure random, so there is no way that the complex universe could have happened by accident. 4. The fact of consciousness and conscience within people defies all scientific tracking except a very external one. So, when are you going to recognize the evidence and stop parroting the no-evidence idea? Or are you some kind of a political science propagandist? 1: big crunch seems to be the leading theory right now. Lack of knowledge doesn't prove a god 2: fine-tuned universe fallacy 3: makes no sense 4: God of the gaps, and we do understand consciousness on a basic level. Soon we will understand it more C'mon, give me a challenge  See? That's precisely the point. Anybody can simply say that they don't accept what was said somewhere else. If you study the 4 points I made above, you would see God. I understand how that might scare the heck out of you. But heck is just another word for hell, and you would feel a whole lot better with a whole lot less of hell in you. Thank you for threatening to burn me in a eternal fire instead of countering my points Hey, have no fear, god is here, I'll piss on ye tae save your soul.. |
|
|
|
|
1: Entropy is bullshit. A lame assed excuse of a word that makes people fall asleep.
2: No living thing on Earth, or Earth, is a machine. The key here, is human's are BEING, as they form their own form, ALIVE, as is Earth, which form's it's own also. In a continual state of fluidity, this prove's it cannot be a machine, for it is akin to the water, with a little 'clay'
3: There was no accident. The water that the 'spirit'(aurora borealis) of god moved over was clearly at one with itself.
4: Seth speak's or Seth reversed.. very trackable, both internally and externally..
5. The second coming is of Jinn.
Now aint that a fact BADecker?
|
|
|
|
I been saying it over and over.. I see god as the ALL SOUL. This could be defined as the universal consciousnous.. I dont believe we have 'seperate' soul's from each other, but that we have a PART of ONE soul, and THAT would be god, and any religion speaking in the name of god that CHOOSE's to grant THEIR member's right's over any other as a cult or sect, like say, freemasonry, rosicrucian, illuminate, judaism, bhuddism, catholic, protestant.. yeah, ya get the idea.. As for those nippy git's who think or make out that when I say I believe in god, means I believe in their's, is to make me understand why so many other religions want them dead. God willing of course |
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. That would never happen short of all of humanity being in a mass hallucination, as science is nothing but observations of the world around us. Meanwhile, a religious person says the sky is pink because their holy book said so That would be one thing if every observer of a scientists writings expressed only what the scientist said. Or if the many non-scientists understood what the scientist meant. But this doesn't happen the majority of the time. Because of this, the atheists are more to be pitied than all other propagandized people. Your desire to be ignorant is entertaining really. You've come up with so many fallacies and nonsense arguments for a god, but are unable to cite a single good source that shows evidence of one, then you say that atheists should be pitied because we blindly take what we hear, even though the scientific evidence has been reviewed by other scientists time and time again. Coming from somebody that thought the Higgs Boson proved god just because of it's nickname, you really don't have room to talk there +1 Only speaks to belittle, never answer's the question, unlike his couragious counterpart bitchick, who at least accepted the question enough to actually answer.. commendable to say the least.. |
|
|
|
|
And hence why I saught god elsewhere, cause that book is just too out of date for today's intelligence.
The word is NOT god, or they would NOT be looking for it would they now, dear masons? Who was it that lost it? Hiram Abiff aka Jesus?
|
|
|
|
|
Ah.. so adam and eve existed before the dinosaur's? 64 MILLION years ago?
Since when was god 'recognised' (for want of a better word) as the light?
|
|
|
|
God and 'the light' are 2 seperate entities, one creating the other.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. (Emphasis mine.) Oh boy. Now we have sound added. Or was it the written Word? 3 And God said |
|
|
|
|
God and 'the light' are 2 seperate entities, one creating the other.
|
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. First off, do you read anything that is not in the bible? In particular, my earlier post's that clearly state I am not an athiest? I am a searcher. I have yet to choose. I believe in god, but not YOURS. Mine is superior in that he allows me to show you, your bible is the one that is in fact backwards. I mean c'mon.. God is the light, yet light existed only after how many other event's of actualisation, or day's? You try to belittle me, whenever I come up with a genuine scientific FACT that MAY prove or disprove the existance of god. In that when I speak for god, your right there preaching with me, but when I point out all the things that existed before god, like the WATER god moved over, you call me an athiest? You dont understand the reason people like me dont go to church is not fear of god, but people like you who just wont acknowledge that god's light is staring you in the face, and you deny him? When I said god said to remind them (people like you) that he is the light, all that happened here in my house, is I went to make coffee, and the thought occured to me that if god is the light, then he was created in the 3rd sentence of genesis. The fact he SAW the light prove's he cannot BE the light, for then light would exist. I like these argument's/debates with you, and hhope you can be just as thorough in your defense of god, just dont use the book, cause as I said.. for me to ask you, god must also work through me too, in order to point out these thing's no? What if god really did speak though me to ask you these points personally? It seems, and not only to me, that when things are from the bible, your there, but if it's not the christian bible, then it's crap? Let's try my style without making you cry: Genesis: 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Fair call, so they say etc.. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Earth (soil/dust) clearly existed, it just had no form, and hence is negated. darkness was on the face of the deep. This state's that the deep reflected darkness on it's face like a mirror. Now here if god was/is the light, he could not, scientifically exist. Note the 'spirit' of god, but NOT god, moved upon the face of the water. Now unless that water was 'contained', it would be spread over so vast a space that scot's mist would be a downpour compared to how fine the water particle's would be.. to move ON the water is to suggest the water was either ICE or CONTAINED. 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. Proving no light existed previous to the act of the eternal thought that grew in the abyss, which evolved into SOUND. Now, how's about stopping trying to belittle someone with a greater understanding of SCIENCE in this search for YOUR god, that even YOU probably need, just to comprehend that YOUR god answer's to mine? Relax, Decky. You are way ahead of the atheists, simply by recognizing that God exists! Sfunny.. am way ahead of genesis already.. I better put your book away.. just dont be taking anything I say personally.. But I did get ya all with the light.. |
|
|
|
|
I think it's obvious I know just a wee bit more than the copy n paste man.. how many thread's did you scout from this site alone just to copy n paste useless information, in particular, information we've heard over and over? I wish I was mod here, cause I'd delete 85% of your crap just to keep READERS on track..!
|
|
|
|
I'd also like to show you the internal colour's of an old tv, red, green and blue. Now if the sky does not actually exist, it cannot be blue. And grass is not green. Explain the science that makes me say this?
How do these three primary colours make grass APPEAR green, and the sky APPEAR blue?
Those incidentally direct relatively specific electromagnetic radiation into one's eyes. Your a fuckin nutjob pal, spoiling this thread all on your own. |
|
|
|
|
I'd also like to show you the internal colour's of an old tv, red, green and blue. Now if the sky does not actually exist, it cannot be blue. And grass is not green. Explain the science that makes me say this?
How do these three primary colours make grass APPEAR green, and the sky APPEAR blue?
|
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. First off, do you read anything that is not in the bible? In particular, my earlier post's that clearly state I am not an athiest? I am a searcher. I have yet to choose. I believe in god, but not YOURS. Mine is superior in that he allows me to show you, your bible is the one that is in fact backwards. I mean c'mon.. God is the light, yet light existed only after how many other event's of actualisation, or day's? You try to belittle me, whenever I come up with a genuine scientific FACT that MAY prove or disprove the existance of god. In that when I speak for god, your right there preaching with me, but when I point out all the things that existed before god, like the WATER god moved over, you call me an athiest? You dont understand the reason people like me dont go to church is not fear of god, but people like you who just wont acknowledge that god's light is staring you in the face, and you deny him? When I said god said to remind them (people like you) that he is the light, all that happened here in my house, is I went to make coffee, and the thought occured to me that if god is the light, then he was created in the 3rd sentence of genesis. The fact he SAW the light prove's he cannot BE the light, for then light would exist. I like these argument's/debates with you, and hhope you can be just as thorough in your defense of god, just dont use the book, cause as I said.. for me to ask you, god must also work through me too, in order to point out these thing's no? What if god really did speak though me to ask you these points personally? It seems, and not only to me, that when things are from the bible, your there, but if it's not the christian bible, then it's crap? Let's try my style without making you cry: Genesis: 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Fair call, so they say etc.. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Earth (soil/dust) clearly existed, it just had no form, and hence is negated. darkness was on the face of the deep. This state's that the deep reflected darkness on it's face like a mirror. Now here if god was/is the light, he could not, scientifically exist. Note the 'spirit' of god, but NOT god, moved upon the face of the water. Now unless that water was 'contained', it would be spread over so vast a space that scot's mist would be a downpour compared to how fine the water particle's would be.. to move ON the water is to suggest the water was either ICE or CONTAINED. 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. Proving no light existed previous to the act of the eternal thought that grew in the abyss, which evolved into SOUND. Now, how's about stopping trying to belittle someone with a greater understanding of SCIENCE in this search for YOUR god, that even YOU probably need, just to comprehend that YOUR god answer's to mine? |
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the what-ever day Before then it was dark. If god is the light, he could not have existed to create anything before the light was created!! |
|
|
|
|
Planting a seagull's feather in the ground and saying to the teacher who asked what I was doing: It'll grow into a seagull and fly away..
|
|
|
|
|
Better let facebook know.. so you can find out if your really the dad.. pmsl
|
|
|
|
Facebook made me know the horrors of baby spam, if you have any friends who actually want to get pregnant delete your account as soon as you can.
As long as they dont delete the burd wanting to get pregger's.. pmsl.. however will she do that with no volunteers? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
