Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 09:51:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
1281  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 06:28:46 PM
Yeah, I said something along the lines of:

A: stop plagarising wiki I think, and

B: could you please make more sense, in your own words?

1282  Other / Meta / Re: Trolling and abuse by a forum member on: October 02, 2014, 06:21:19 PM
All I can say, is when I make an offer, jump. How high?

Depends on the offer I guess..

Bein a Scotsman, the offer wont last long.. Wink

Edit: I also have a few folks asking me to hack latium, saved in my inbox, point here being, that even though I say you'd have to pay me to re-install lat just to hack it, in my opinion, it aint worth it, if I was scamming, I'da been right there hagglin a deal for btc..

I'm smart enough to know that even though we delete posts, some org somewhere has a copy, and as long as there is no record of me being malicious, or attempting to hack for profit, I'm happy and free to do what I do.. it's not like I did not notify latium of their flaw(s), I just go about things differently, as only an aquarian would Wink
1283  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 06:15:54 PM
Post it again to remind me, in case you have'nt noticed, I been highlighting a scammer all day?
1284  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 06:11:39 PM

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this.  Wink

Yeah, I tried that, but if I had ignored him, I would not have been given external links that pointed out that I am not the only one that is raging that this guy is still attacking and scamming.. so un-ignoring, in my opinion, and pardon the pun, was a necessary evil.. Just a shame he made a mess of our lovely thread..
What is your response to that scientific evidence I posed?

Um, I deleted my reply mistaking it for vods replies, note the mess he left?

I think it was something along the lines of make some sense?
1285  Other / Meta / Re: Trolling and abuse by a forum member on: October 02, 2014, 06:08:51 PM


I offered OTHERS 50btc for YOUR TRUE name and address.. when you tried to claim it, I said EARN it, you have yet to do so, but am no here to do business on bitcointalk.org, I'm here


So lemme get this straight, you offered 50 BTC for Vod's dox and nobody but Vod answered?



~BCX~

You see it all..
1286  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LAT] LATIUM-World's 1st Viral CryptoCurrency (NEW AUTO APPROVALS/PAYMENTS) on: October 02, 2014, 06:00:55 PM
Well, I got 25 for free using fake accounts, I'll donate them to someone in this forum when and where I feel like it, cause Bitcoin IS the crypto currency.

If I get any more, I'll be sure to show how, until my GENUINE referals are paid.

Man it's only 5 lat!!!!
1287  Other / Meta / Re: Trolling and abuse by a forum member on: October 02, 2014, 05:55:29 PM
'Running around' is a figure of speech. And yes, you did offer $20,000. At the time of the post, the 'earn 50 BTC' that you mentioned was worth around ~$20,000.

Also, I'm going to have to ask out of curiosity, why didn't you prove you had 50 BTC?

I dont know him from adam, and tbh, it was too early to go to the bank to buy them.. this allowed me the time to realise, twas none of his business, after all, I was not here to do any form of business. But nearly fell into his trap, he apparently does this often, I've seen three site's with articles about him, nuff sed in that dept. The offer was to ANYONE, only HE had to EARN it which he failed to do. I dont do anything financial online, apart from accepting small donations from those who insist on 'helping' after I have helped them, and have done so since joining this site.. ok, I was not here for a long time, but was pen testing with sbhacker (in their forum they even have my origional suggestion of accepting bitcoin for payments WAAAAY back then), and this spread to the likes of haxorware and cable-wizards.. this obviously taught me to spot fishy characters.. tbh, escrow was the clue. Before I ever got involved in the search for proof of god thread, I noticed him selling, and many clammering for the deal, and him insisting on escrow, cant remember what I said, but I'm sure it wont be too hard for folks to find.. he gave his game away with only one word. He clearly never knew that as a dj of over 30 years, I have heard every pattern so many times, i only need 1 word or three beats to know the tune Wink

At the end of the day he was the evasive one, he shoulda jumped at that 50btc, his loss, just prove name and address, but voila, he missed the boat, tried to complicate things.. quite simple, too arrogant for his own good.

1288  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 05:32:27 PM

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this.  Wink

Yeah, I tried that, but if I had ignored him, I would not have been given external links that pointed out that I am not the only one that is raging that this guy is still attacking and scamming.. so un-ignoring, in my opinion, and pardon the pun, was a necessary evil.. Just a shame he made a mess of our lovely thread..
1289  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Moderation of (possible) FUD and insults on: October 02, 2014, 05:05:16 PM
I for one would like to thank whom-ever moderated my morning pains fairly today, considering I swear..

Swearing is only offensive (in my opinion) when used aggressively, I mean, I did walk through a busy wall street one day with an ex, and I thought my language was bad.. there are times when it's needed, and the best way in my opinion, to deal with swearing, is see who kiss's n makes up after a moment of madness..

But thank you bitcointalk for correcting the trolls abuse of the trust button and I hope ya get it together and clear out the scammers too, so that those who mine bitcoin on their own can hopefully use them one day knowing that trust is not as much required as it seems to be today.. I have faith that this site can do more than allow these people to blacken the name of the best start up currency of them all, and the one site that helped kick it off, dont be burnt by scammers.. just ban them..

But thanking you again.


Moderators don't have time to be investigators.



A kin dae that, giez a joab lol..?
1290  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LAT] LATIUM-World's 1st Viral CryptoCurrency (NEW AUTO APPROVALS/PAYMENTS) on: October 02, 2014, 02:28:58 PM
Latium is 5 years old? Wow.. the first post in this thread is dated May 15, 2014.

You'd think in 5 years they'd have learnt to stick with a working model, preferably one that works by guaranteeing success by paying out what it was SUPPOSED to..

So a wee script kiddie comes along and shows a wee flaw.. the simplest solution that would have worked would be to actually pay out instead of thinking they could secure one account per person, this can only be done with physical ID and a bank account, no, they tried to make it ip based, meaning that my kids cant go on their own computers and make their own account's, which it's fair to say, most would agree with, until they figured out that most folks could change ip.

Now they think it's a good idea to change the entire structure, pretending they are working on something more secure.. they kill the app, by releasing a new one, that add's another application that leaves a file running on your pc, in order to check that you are using only one pc. Well, I have only one pc, and the kids dont have any, so now they are relegated in the same way as the first attempt, meaning, if all you got is one pc, then NOT everyone on the planet can enjoy latium, because a family of 10 is only allowed one account?

C'mon, get a grip!

The best option for latium in it's infancy would be not to care how many people had how many account's, for then they would be able to spread the coin far quicker, which would help the 'proof of concept'  that a viral currency would work.. shame I'm louder huh?

Perhaps you'd like to pay me for my service's? (not in lat)

Only kidding, I already posted in this post how to fix the fall in price.. open lat up to everyone, get rid o that dodgy authenticator, dont care who or how many join using whatever address.. only then will lat be worth something.

Too late, it's nearly.. it is?




Its solutions are childish and primaries.


You do not "killed" latium kkkkkkkkkkk


If you're so smart and clever, Create a coin for you!


You killed Latium? kkkkkkkkkkkk


Yup.. it's no longer latium is it? Proof of concept? Viral? Well, how many people got paid as opposed to those who did not after signing up?

I killed latium.. next please Cool


I have helped over 100 people (my network and others) for remote access (team viewer, show my pc, vnc and others)
ALL who helped correctly and are happy received your coins properly.
ALL try ​​to circumvent, defraud, cheat and miss many records do not receive coins.
My affiliate "pending" may be people who do not know the registration or attempted to defraud the system

Latium is great!

You killed Latium?? kkkkkkkkkk


This is so wrong.. if I wanted to defraud this system, I would quite simply write an autobot to do it for me. I do not see latium as worth bothering about, for the referal claim I am making is my legit account. I did TEST using 2 accounts with one pc, and placed the proof here, I could have just posted it on any security related site, but it's just not worth the hassle.. and for me, not worth the customers I coulda brought you by doing so.

Your all missing one mega point.. if the governments of the UK, and USA wanted all that gold back, first they'd have to get you to part with your gold, so they get ya into bitcoin, by parting with cash and gold to get them, drag price down, oh, look.. next time it goes up, it'll cost 1btc for a bag o tatties.. you never did notice the war coming did you? What good will your bitcoin be when that lovely secure country of ours turns into the same mess as ukraine? What Isp? Sorry, bitcoin dont work in food shops Wink

And latium just dont work.

Me personally, I was only showing different methods kids would use to circumvent latium's security, albeit in my own way, am not really bothered about unpaid referal's on legit account's, for this legitimises my tests in my opinion.. so many people are losing out on a good price because a white coat pointed out that people were not being paid..

Latium in the guise it had when I first joined legit, is NOT what is being sold now, it has no 'proof' of the concept, that it is a viral currency, (word of mouth?) The only thing people into crypto are really worrying about is bitcoin.

And even though I will continue to show hacks for lat, it will stop when my legit account gets paid it's referals.

And I am gonna hack that authenticator just to show how they do it.. Wink
1291  Other / Meta / Trolling and abuse by a forum member on: October 02, 2014, 02:08:29 PM
How did that appear since his crap? Cause this could be a police matter..


It's not a police matter...

You are running around telling everyone you have 50btc, trying to get people to invest in your ideas.

I just asked for some proof.  It would take literally two minutes for you to sign an address with 50btc if you have that much.  

You are a liar, and people need to know what your posts are worth.



Ok, dick, let's pretend we're doing this the proper way.

You claim I am a liar, allow me to quote this: 'You are running around telling everyone you have 50btc, trying to get people to invest in your ideas.'

Since when was sitting at a computer 'running around?' (Lie number 1) and what exactly was I trying to get people to invest in exactly? (Lie number 2)

The proof you require is a service I am not willing to provide you, for you fail to provide any form of identification, or business address/company information, which I require here in the uk, for TAX purpose's, in order to legitimise your claim, and henceforth I must charge, as I deem this an administrative service you cannot afford to pay. To receive the proof I require 150btc, as I deem 1 btc as equal to £1.00, for I am a private dealer in BTC, and hence set my OWN price. In effect, I offered ANYONE 50BTC for your name and address, NOT YOU. I clearly stated to you to EARN your claim by providing said information before any actual agreement was reached, which YOU failed to do.

A smart man would say, but you deleted your posts.. and the smarter man would re-post them ALL from their inbox.. you have not done this. Everyone knows why. You'll probably come up with some excuse that you deleted the copies of my posts sent to your inbox, or set your inbox to not receive copies of new posts, which in this business model, people DONT do.

But the ones I kept, are, incidently the ones that prove how predictable you are. It never crossed your mind that we have spoken before, and that you were the one demanding escrow, from many others, I made a wee comment, and you were nothing but abusive to me, even though I was a potential customer.

This was my early warning, to watch for the scammer trying desperately to get folks to buy his product using escrow, and incidently,you mentioned escrow before I EVER offered 50btc to ANYONE. As soon as you mentioned escrow, you killed any chance of getting any business from me, even when I asked what escrow was, you ignored the question, and dived deeper into hot water thinking i was a wee tiddler of a fish.. only that was my bait, that's how blind you are.. by not answering what escrow was, you in effect lost any trust from me, that I would require, in order to do business with you. You are so dumb you probably thought I was stupid enough to send btc before receiving any product, A product you made no attempt to at least show.

I must make this very fuckin clear, you need to borrow the witch's hat fi next door, put it on your head, and sit in the fuckin corner, oh how I wish I could scud you right now.. thankfully a friend from RT is reading all this..

And lie number 3?

Canada is not where you claimed it was.

Now tell me, why would I not delete the posts that god, in his wisdom, told me not to?

Glad I learned something in 'scientific search for the proof of god'..

I met god, and a scammer like you. Me, am just a potential buyer, and you lost a potential customer.

Branding me as untrustorthy for your bullshit is better advertising of you being a scammer than I could ever hope for, for it will show people who YOU are, without the 10.000 faked email addies..

Thank you, world, for reading this. This is the mentality of bitcointalk.org's top scammer Vod.. read it all here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg9050672#msg9050672

decide for yourself, and do me a favour, someone point out that at no time did I offer 20.000, (lie number 4) he made that up with his imaginary punter..

Me, I'll just continue havin a barry wee bitty scottish banter wi decent folks that know whit am fuckin sayin Cool

Right now I'm finding it interesting how the police in canada are also coming and taking what they want.. just pure gangsta shit.. how long dya think Vod would handle the police removing all his equipment for investigation into his stalking, and his grandios claims?

Get a life dunce, and git back in the corner.. so I can PERM ignore ya.. shame bitcointalk are doin nothing about this.. I'm beginning to believe bitcointalk, (not what it used to be) latium, (defunct) and Vod (Goyim) are all one person.

Peace Wink
1292  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LAT] LATIUM-World's 1st Viral CryptoCurrency (NEW AUTO APPROVALS/PAYMENTS) on: October 02, 2014, 12:57:07 PM
Latium is 5 years old? Wow.. the first post in this thread is dated May 15, 2014.

You'd think in 5 years they'd have learnt to stick with a working model, preferably one that works by guaranteeing success by paying out what it was SUPPOSED to..

So a wee script kiddie comes along and shows a wee flaw.. the simplest solution that would have worked would be to actually pay out instead of thinking they could secure one account per person, this can only be done with physical ID and a bank account, no, they tried to make it ip based, meaning that my kids cant go on their own computers and make their own account's, which it's fair to say, most would agree with, until they figured out that most folks could change ip.

Now they think it's a good idea to change the entire structure, pretending they are working on something more secure.. they kill the app, by releasing a new one, that add's another application that leaves a file running on your pc, in order to check that you are using only one pc. Well, I have only one pc, and the kids dont have any, so now they are relegated in the same way as the first attempt, meaning, if all you got is one pc, then NOT everyone on the planet can enjoy latium, because a family of 10 is only allowed one account?

C'mon, get a grip!

The best option for latium in it's infancy would be not to care how many people had how many account's, for then they would be able to spread the coin far quicker, which would help the 'proof of concept'  that a viral currency would work.. shame I'm louder huh?

Perhaps you'd like to pay me for my service's? (not in lat)

Only kidding, I already posted in this post how to fix the fall in price.. open lat up to everyone, get rid o that dodgy authenticator, dont care who or how many join using whatever address.. only then will lat be worth something.

Too late, it's nearly.. it is?




Its solutions are childish and primaries.


You do not "killed" latium kkkkkkkkkkk


If you're so smart and clever, Create a coin for you!


You killed Latium? kkkkkkkkkkkk


Yup.. it's no longer latium is it? Proof of concept? Viral? Well, how many people got paid as opposed to those who did not after signing up?

I killed latium.. next please Cool
1293  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LAT] LATIUM-World's 1st Viral CryptoCurrency (NEW AUTO APPROVALS/PAYMENTS) on: October 02, 2014, 12:53:49 PM
Latium is 5 years old? Wow.. the first post in this thread is dated May 15, 2014.

You'd think in 5 years they'd have learnt to stick with a working model, preferably one that works by guaranteeing success by paying out what it was SUPPOSED to..

So a wee script kiddie comes along and shows a wee flaw.. the simplest solution that would have worked would be to actually pay out instead of thinking they could secure one account per person, this can only be done with physical ID and a bank account, no, they tried to make it ip based, meaning that my kids cant go on their own computers and make their own account's, which it's fair to say, most would agree with, until they figured out that most folks could change ip.

Now they think it's a good idea to change the entire structure, pretending they are working on something more secure.. they kill the app, by releasing a new one, that add's another application that leaves a file running on your pc, in order to check that you are using only one pc. Well, I have only one pc, and the kids dont have any, so now they are relegated in the same way as the first attempt, meaning, if all you got is one pc, then NOT everyone on the planet can enjoy latium, because a family of 10 is only allowed one account?

C'mon, get a grip!

The best option for latium in it's infancy would be not to care how many people had how many account's, for then they would be able to spread the coin far quicker, which would help the 'proof of concept'  that a viral currency would work.. shame I'm louder huh?

Perhaps you'd like to pay me for my service's? (not in lat)

Only kidding, I already posted in this post how to fix the fall in price.. open lat up to everyone, get rid o that dodgy authenticator, dont care who or how many join using whatever address.. only then will lat be worth something.

Too late, it's nearly.. it is?

It's not 5 years old...

I stand corrected Wink
1294  Other / Meta / Trolling and abuse by a forum member on: October 02, 2014, 09:11:54 AM
Thats now 3 hours you've been stalking me dude, it is a police matter, for my uncle peter who owns a silver mine in canada, is also a police officer, and I got all the time in the world.

What makes you think we had a deal, arrangement etc? Your kidding yourself on numpty..

I offered OTHERS 50btc for YOUR TRUE name and address.. when you tried to claim it, I said EARN it, you have yet to do so, but am no here to do business on bitcointalk.org, I'm here to talk in off topic threads and don NOT conduct ANY financial business online, you are doing your usual, trying to scam people into giving account details, in the form of asking for proof, if you are a legitimate tax paying business, you would have no problem providing said request, did you? NO, because as I said you are a coward. Twisting things to your way in the vain hope of getting people to pay you for a service that is NOT requested, you are a twisted, sick, delusional person, and I hope you are banned, cause I dont care if I leave, but I'd rather bitcointalk.org has the sense to know I am nothing more but your latest attempt at scamming, and am not stupid enough to send nae cunt 50btc without FIRST receiving my purchase.

Fuck OFF WEIRDO!!!


Back to ignored!!!

Thank you bitcointalk, for your kind consideration.
1295  Other / Meta / Trolling and abuse by a forum member on: October 02, 2014, 07:49:59 AM
There should at least be a very clear place where the obvious trolls/abusive/scammers can be identified, and blocked, even if it is from a particular thread.. This vod has gone way too far, where to deal with that?

See that red writing below my avatar? I dont trade online, buy or sell online, or is vod one of your members/mods?

How did that appear since his crap? Cause this could be a police matter..

I sat in a thread for a long time, he just turns up and starts playing games, being abusive, would'nt go away when asked, kept trolling, get him told, or the police will be involved in his harrasment..

And please reset my trust, not that I need it? Correct me if I'm wrong, but this appeared when I clicked 'ignore' - now he tries to make out we had some kinda deal, and to pay using escrow? I've read that in other threads, same tactics. If this was in the street's I'd deck him.

Where do we contact mods who just see the obvious? Without stupid rules that mean nothing?

Edit: Scientific proof of god.. I tried deleting MANY posts just to tidy up the thread.. he just wont stop trolling me, this is akin to stalking in the uk, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal over there too.. if he is allowed to stay in this forum, after what I have read in this thread, then I have a legal case.

Yes I swear, yes, it may offend, but those I have offended, know I swear, and still talk to me, this vod needs banned.

Ps, if your looking for a FAIR mod, I'll volunteer.. I'll even hunt the trouble, beng a tester Wink

[MOD NOTE: Split from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=787267.0]
1296  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LAT] LATIUM-World's 1st Viral CryptoCurrency (NEW AUTO APPROVALS/PAYMENTS) on: October 02, 2014, 07:46:12 AM
Latium is 5 years old? Wow.. the first post in this thread is dated May 15, 2014.

You'd think in 5 years they'd have learnt to stick with a working model, preferably one that works by guaranteeing success by paying out what it was SUPPOSED to..

So a wee script kiddie comes along and shows a wee flaw.. the simplest solution that would have worked would be to actually pay out instead of thinking they could secure one account per person, this can only be done with physical ID and a bank account, no, they tried to make it ip based, meaning that my kids cant go on their own computers and make their own account's, which it's fair to say, most would agree with, until they figured out that most folks could change ip.

Now they think it's a good idea to change the entire structure, pretending they are working on something more secure.. they kill the app, by releasing a new one, that add's another application that leaves a file running on your pc, in order to check that you are using only one pc. Well, I have only one pc, and the kids dont have any, so now they are relegated in the same way as the first attempt, meaning, if all you got is one pc, then NOT everyone on the planet can enjoy latium, because a family of 10 is only allowed one account?

C'mon, get a grip!

The best option for latium in it's infancy would be not to care how many people had how many account's, for then they would be able to spread the coin far quicker, which would help the 'proof of concept'  that a viral currency would work.. shame I'm louder huh?

Perhaps you'd like to pay me for my service's? (not in lat)

Only kidding, I already posted in this post how to fix the fall in price.. open lat up to everyone, get rid o that dodgy authenticator, dont care who or how many join using whatever address.. only then will lat be worth something.

Too late, it's nearly.. it is?
1297  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 07:13:10 AM
It's a shame that bitcointalks most prolific scammer called vod, who scams using escrow, is allowed to ruin any thread he visits to hide his ploy of eventually trying to scam people using escrow, whatever that is..

Kinda ruins decent threads, wether these conversations are offensive to some or not, at least the thread was moderating itself quite fine until he comes along.. yes I say fuck alot, and probably offended once or twice, and that the english find the scottish language offensive, but at least whenever I have been a bit rude to people I knew when to quit, as I am not here to abuse other people for no reason what-so-ever, unlike vod who jumps in trying to scam using escrow at every opportunity. In my opinion, this scammer should be banned from the forum.. just to keep bitcointalk's good name.. but then bitcointalk is known as a haven for scammers.. like vod.

So I will give what is the definitive answer to the OP's question:

Scientific proof that God exists? There is NO answer.

Anything after this is hopefully just a good old bit of banter, cause it was a damn good question, and in my eye's, challenging at times, but for me, vod killed it with his pish arsed bullshit.. so there is the answer.. hopefully it does'nt spoil anything, but it is the actual answer to the question. Cool


And if any decent moderators can delete vods comments I'm sure we'd all appreciate that he came here off topic, kept it off topic, and whilst it is clearly an off topic thread, it's a thread that has managed to stay ON topic in an off topic thread, that is, until he came along, I'm sure most other posters here will agree, that even after deleting my comments to get back ON topic, he is still here trying to fuck it up, despite knowing I have 'ignored' him. This shows clear intent that he is not here to take part.

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.
1298  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 06:37:53 AM
Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam lived thousands of years apart, they were not a couple.

Quote
The concept of “Natural Selection”, sometimes used synonymous with
"Survival of the Fittest”, is often touted as the magic process that when added to mutation will result in advancing steps of higher and higher species and the success of evolution.

This is completely wrong, there are several "forces" operating as natural selectors, not only "survival of the fittest", in many species sexual selection by the females dictates the future of the specie.

In Evolution there's no "higher and higher species."

Quote
But it is never a process that will give you a new species.

This is pretty big claim and proof of this will give Nobel prizes, a place in History and a ton of money.

Another place where people go wrong is not understanding that it's simply the thing that produces the most offspring and happens to live that evolves... Not the survival of the fittest.

Thank GOD for fresh talent Wink
1299  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 06:32:33 AM
50btc is nothing to me, after all, I make a minimum of 5000 people dance every weekend at 8000 a pop, you stay behind that keyboard sucker..

Cool, sign the address please.

You lose, because you are a coward. I will be taking this up with bitcointalk staff, due to the fact, that you have used this type of ploy before, trying to get folks to use escrow.. you used the same abusive tactics, and as far as I am concerned, bitcointalk should be concerned that people like you are allowed to decimate peoples threads for your own gratification, whilst hiding the fact you are trying to scam them using escrow.

You are now ignored, but take this on faith: You have pissed off so many people on this forum, that you will pay a higher price than you would have, if this was just a once off for you, by talking to me, then I'm sure the staff would ignore me, but it's not is it? Away answer yer fuckin self. IGNORED!!!!

And I suggest others do the same.
1300  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: October 02, 2014, 06:19:20 AM
Earn 50btc, tell me your name and address, and we'll correct this once and for all, or am I correct your nowt but a coward?

I am willing to do so!

You're talking $20,000, so I doubt you have that much money.  Can you sign an address holding 50btc?

This forum is all about proof, so unless you can prove you have 50 bitcoins, I doubt anyone will take you seriously.

See? That's how easy you are programmed. I dont need to prove Jack shit to you, you used the same methods when trying to sell something, sadley, your ploy of getting people involved in something they should'nt is all over the forum, as is evidenced by the fact your gonna suggest I use escrow, it's you who give bitcointalk a bad name, did I say I was gonna give YOU 50 btc? NO. I said earn it. When I asked for your name and address, did it occur to you that a plethora of members here will no doubt take me up on that 50btc?

Watch and see.. again, your nothing but a coward hiding behind a keyboard thinking your name and address is safe.

50btc is nothing to me, after all, I make a minimum of 5000 people dance every weekend at 8000 a pop, you stay behind that keyboard sucker..
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!