Maybe, maybe not.  The Chinese peeps presumably got inactivated virus inject for the most part, but with China, nobody knows.  I have yet to see any detailed study of the differences between the 'vaccine' technologies, or any real comprehension that there might be any.  Even within the dedicated scientific community which surprises me.

On factor about the mRNA technology is that the immune system is targeting free-floating spike protein.  Van den Bossche ascribes the over-production (and 'original antigenic sin' resulting in) non-neutralizing antibodies to some degree due to this state of the presented antigen.  These then assists the virus in the initial infection phase (explaining why the vaxxed are getting infected more than the pure-bloods) but does gum up the works in the lower respiratory tract when the virus would like to bind to virgin lung cells and infect them (causing acute disease.)

Anyway, when the virus figures out how to use work around the non-neutralizing antibody shield, Van den Bossche is claiming that the vaxxed are going to drop like flies, and it will probably happen fairly soon due to artificially induced high infection rates complements of the retards who thought that vaccinating during a period of high infection made sense(*).  Probably no amount of vitamin D is going to help these people unless the inactivated virus technology didn't produce the same non-neutralizing antibody results.  In that case, the vaxxed Chinese are probably closer to pure-bloods in terms of their immunological response potential.

* Dr. Fausti.  The guys is mainly a bureaucrat and there is no indication that he knows much about anything, but for sure his industry bosses and their techno-goons understand things pretty well.  Stretching so-called 'SARS-cov-2' into a three year + 'crisis' and turning the world's population into a bioweapons laboratory was, I feel, no accident.  It was deliberate and methodical and obviously (to me) well planned over at least a decade.  So, indeed, the strategy did 'make a lot of sense' after all.

Partly because it is a bad career move for 'medical professionals' to produce data which 'causes vaccine hesitancy'.  Bogus data gets framed in misleading ways (as you are doing here.)  Also, one can die from getting 'bitten by a cow' because there is a medical code for it unlike being killed by the experimental gene therapy injection.


Interestingly, we know some pre-scamdemic science about masks due to studies pushed for by surgeons who where sick of the anti-science nonsense around some of the procedures.

Somehow the scamdemic designers convinced the idiot classes that surgeons wear masks to keep from getting respiratory viral infections from the guy on the operating table or vice-versa.  I guess I really shouldn't have been surprised that it was so easy to do this.  Hell, even a good number of doctors and nurses probably now believe this as well such seems to be their lack of understanding of science and medicine.

For those had like to and can get into the somewhat deeper areas of scientific nitty-gritty than is the norm:

  https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-vanden-bossche-warning/

Some might remember that when Dr. Van den Bossche first 'came out', it was at a time when it was 'obvious' that the so-called vaccine was going to create immunity, stop infection and transmission, and 'end the pandemic.'  He said it wasn't, and he said why, and he turned out to be stunningly correct.  Ergo, it's worth my time to intently focus on what he is saying (and I learned a fair bit that I didn't know by doing so.)

I cannot shake the fact that he used to work for Gates.  A LOT of these highly credible sources (Van den Bossche, Malone, Yeadon, etc) have some interesting hisorical(ish, maybe,) ties to some of the main perps in the scamdemic.  Enough to make me wonder about them.  Anyway, specific information can be researched, evaluated, and pattern-matched so I appreciate it no matter what it's source.

If Van den Bossche is right, we don't have to wait to much longer before the shit hits the fan making me wonder if what's going on in Shanghai is yet another test-run which will be seen in the rest of the world before too long.  Just as soon as the virus figures out how to cast off one of the protective sugars of the injected and become lethal again.  The world is basically a bioweapons lab working at full speed to make this happen thanks to the high 'vaccine' uptake rate.

Those of us who were expecting a slower die-off as VAIDS takes hold might want to re-evaluate the path that this thing might take and blow the dust of the idea of ADE (as happened in the animal testing for coronavirus vaccines back in the old days when the did animal testing on non-humans.)

True.  Badecker is reasonable adept at trolling and does act as an incentive for me to put a little effort into my game.  He and I are not really orbiting the same philosophical centroid though (as I see it) so the observation is only half valid.  Whether he sees you guys as self-offered victim class entities and handy back-boards to bounce 'truth-shots' off of, as do I, I have no idea.

For those who missed it:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/lRscm9iNwOWx/

A fair number of the apparently wildly exaggerated 'bodies in pits' seem to have been those of Azov human shield civilians who got so thirsty that they failed to comply with directives to stay put in the residential building basements, and got into line-of-site of Ukranian snipers on the tops of those apartment buildings.

The 'stories' from Western media came from 'Maxar' (CIA) satellite images (even when they had no satellites over the area at the time) and did NOT show pits if anyone had bothered to open their eyes, but instead exactly what Bartlett saw when she visited the site in person.  Graves.  The "30 meter wide pits" came from the 'mayor' of Mariupol who was apparently taking a break from having coke fueled gay sex orgies with Zelensky somewhere in Poland most likely.


The 'meme' of chasing out the Nazis in WW-II I guess you mean.  (I left the image in-situ because it is amusing.)

Russian strategy seems to be to go into areas, hand out some food, vacate to let the ultra-nationalist jack-boots exercise their vengeance on the population ensuring that the population will never support 'ukraine' again, then 'normalize' the area as a client state.  Brilliant, and quite awful when one things about it.

If I had to guess, I would say that Zelensky is basically on Russia's side to make sure that the end-game works out to Russia's liking.  That being a relatively friendly population who are somewhat grateful to be saved by whoever comes along to save them...and a lot fewer ultra-nationalists.

As for the Western arms pouring in, from what I've heard most of them are being sold to third-parties before they are delivered.  It's just a money laundering hub as has been the case for a long time and especially since the color revolution of 2014.  If the arms even touch Ukrainian soil is is a formality, and it wouldn't surprise me to find out that in a lot of cases they didn't even do that.  Whoever takes over the Russian client state will probably end up with a shiny new arsenal of weapons that did make it into caches on Ukrainian soil.  Some say it will be 'the Jews' who are looking for a 'new Israel'.  Time will tell.

Sounds like typical propaganda targeting standard-grade retards.

What I would guess would be happening would be, yes, people are analyzed as well as possible to see who, of the obvious civilians, is fervently anti-Russian and likely to be a security problem in the new SE Russian client-state areas.  They would be considered undesirables and strongly encouraged to head West.

Of course there are Nazi-ish fighters, mercenaries, foreign 'advisers', etc dressing up like civilians and trying to escape.  These are probably what the above propaganda are 'accidentally' mis-identifying in their article.  I'm sure they are being taken away to 'camps', but I doubt that there is a lot of 're-education' going on in said camps.  At least not re-education going on under design and dedicated efforts of the Russians.

Seems like civilians are dropping through whatever filters are in place by the millions and free to do what they wish.  A tiny fraction of them seem to be getting on buses heading for Zelensky-ville.  Seems like in areas in which combat has mostly ceased, the peeps are just getting back to life.

That's why I wouldn't consider public schools at this point.  If my kids learn how to make a quick-n-dirty pot pipe out of a soda can like I did, that's no big deal to me.  If they learn all about butt-sex, genital mutilation, and dangerous drugs such as hormone blockers from some creepy tranny satanist, it is a big deal.

I would have loved to have a ready supply of almost anything which could make a monster-daddy spit-wad back when I was in school.  And to think of the fun we could have had with a little catsup!

I'm guessing that the practical utility of putting this shit into kids bathrooms is that it will create a 'problem' necessitating the 'solution' of cameras and monitoring.  And THAT will be great fun for the kinds of degenerates that public school systems are hiring.  Probably a good money-maker too.

I used the Trump reprieve to get the fuck out of Oregon (and the U.S. more generally) since it obviously is no place to raise a kid, and any competent analyst could see the writing on the wall.  Thank God I did!

I don't agree with that.  The best bet is to have 'friends' which are a cross-section of society in my opinion.  I've certainly learned some of the most valuable lessons in life from my 'bad' friends, and as a consequence am able to cope in a diversity of societies and social structures.  Cloistering, in my observation, leads to viewing society through rose-colored glasses and/or viewing 'bad people' in mostly invalid ways due to lack of background experiences which make it impossible to comprehend necessary nuances.

I do agree agree with trying to be 'the ultimate teacher', but also try to get right up to the line then _try_ to save their asses before they fall into the abyss.

The interesting thing to me is that some of the 'best people' I know had truly frightful formative years.  Conversely, some of the biggest shit-heads had it all growing up.  A lot in fact.  Most people accept that there is a balance of 'nature vs. nurture'.  I tend to think that 'nature' is more predominant that 'nurture' compared to a lot of others.

If there is one person here who I would bet money did NOT get the coviads gene therapy injection into his own arm it would be are friend oileo.

Drifting farther afield just because Ritter is kind of a poster-child for the phenomena, but...

...There seems to be some sort of a weird thing going on with having 'done time' (literally) and being 'released' from some sort of an understanding of silence and free to speak one's mind (but still not give away certain secrets.)  Examples include military officer Ritter, the lobbyist Abramoff, scientist Mikovits,  CIA dude Kiriakou, and some others I cannot think of off the top of my head.


Yeah, I just don't see any reason why the Russians would want it, especially since the peeps in that are are likely to be much less friendly (even in the post Zenensky period.)  I don't really fully buy the argument of 'de-nazification' which strikes me as mostly a PR-friendly excuse.  The benefits of chasing the Nazis into the West is probably not worth the hassles, costs, and risks, and they would just back-fill when the area is vacated anyway.

Unlike Ritter, I think it's highly unlikely that Russia has any interest or incentive to put boots on the ground in the West part of Ukraine.  I suspect that by now, given the course of things, they will probably cement a land-bridge on the Black Sea in the South (which will consist of client states rather national integration.)  My guess is that if they just leave Kiev alone, Kiev will align with the Russia/China/BRICS/every-other-sensible-country block naturally since the all the West has to offer is sexual degeneracy and 'sustainable' anti-science economic suicide.  At least once the petro-dollar system completely collapses in a way that nobody can miss.

If Poland (and others) re-take 'their' (temporarily Ukrainian) territory via 'peacekeepers', it will have been part of script agreed upon well before Russia crossed the Eastern borders several months ago.  The longer they wait, the more packed up the place will be with guys sporting swastika tattoos.

Not any more.  They have been replace by these things called 'intellectual property' and 'captured regulatory agencies' in the 'new normal' technocratic dictatorship.  That's why Pfizer and the FDA wanted 75 years to release the 'study' data on their gene therapy injection.

The amusing thing is that if Dr. Fausti proclaimed that his partner Moderna had magic pixie dust which would treat urine to make it 'safe and effective' for injection, most people would do it happily.  To do their part for 'the greater good' of course.  And if 'the science' showed the the procedure needed to be re-done monthly, well, 'that's the science'.

I used to wonder how in the hell could you get the Babylonians or Aztecs could bring their kids in to be sacrificed by the priest.  After the covaids psy-op it is quite a bit more clear to me.

I don't recall RT, Putin, etc having much to do with my initial assessment that a lot of Western press and social media psy-ops were fake.  The fakes stand by themselves are have stood the test of time.  If you have material of Putin saying clearly that there were not Russian boots/tracks on the ground at a time when their were, I missed it.  They may have passed off some of the initial actions as part of the civil war with DPR doing the shooting, but I don't remember it specifically one way or another.  It's certainly not the case that I watch Kremlin propaganda like a hawk and as a sole source of truth.

Early on it kind of looked like the whole thing could have been a Western fake war.  After a while it became clear that yes, there was some real shooting going on, but it bore little resemblance to the garbage that the Western corp/gov media was supplying.

To the degree that Russia 'faked me out', it was by trying to take an especially light touch on civilians, infrastructure, etc.  Seems that that was an experiment which produced mixed results and ultimately they switched to a more standard mode of achieving their objectives using typical military force.  Through it all, what (relatively little) Russia said through their official channels and more closely controlled media outlets (e.g., RT) tended to be terse and factual.  Other entities said all kinds of wild things either under sanction of the state or not.  That is to be expected.

As usual for me over the last decade or so, the highest grade of info in my own ranking is spontaneous, accidental, or dedicated citizen 'man-on-the-street' type reporting.  It remains the case that it's fairly easy to tell a local civilian who just stumbled out of being held captive as a human shield for Azov vs. some USAID employee who was holed up in a 'theater' with a bunch of others citizens but stepped out for a minute just before 'the Russians' bombed it.

Seems plausible, and I put it forward as a hypothesis before.  Maybe that is where you got the idea.

I've heard from (reports of) some foreigners working in Shanghai that the people who are most likely to 'test positive' for 'covid-19' are also those who seem like the type who would have a relatively lower 'social credit score'.  In other words, not say enough good things about the nation's leadership and that sort of thing.

I could certainly imagine doing certain sorts of 'corrective procedures' to people who may be a 'threat to society'.  The state of technology is probably such that the 'correction' might not be even very noticeable by the subject.  The 'quarantine facilities' wouldn't be your grandfather's re-education camp.  The subject may just notice that they feel a little more 'happy' after a stay in their box.

Again, I simply require somewhat less validation of a lot of the info put out by RT or Putin, Lavrov, etc.  But I don't think that you really understand the concept of validation.

What I see in NY Times and pretty much all of the corp/gov mainstream media of the West are distinct expressions of Kabbalah.  One of these is that the Elohim 'creates worlds' by speaking in Hebrew (which I wouldn't doubt is the lingua franca in the corporate editorial offices and various offices of the U.S. State Dept.)  'Truth' is defined by what promotes a particular 'narrative' which, when believed by the goyim, furthers progress toward a particular chosen goal.

I personally was indoctrinated into post-enlightenment philosophy where 'truth' is an objective thing.  The CNN pedo-nest can sometimes get the weather right, and are a good source of info on what their programmed normie minions are thinking, but as far as actual direct information on important matters they tend to be especially useless.

Doesn't seem that way to you and other 'normies' perhaps, but there are some people who have a more developed sense of the world or are just wired differently.  I'm perfectly happy to give credit where credit is due even if it is to a mortal enemy, and I am just as happy to significantly critisize entities which are most dear.  Especially myself.

I've mentioned this before, but my observation is that Western corp/gov is SO into being decietful that they cannot help themselves from the practice even when it tangibly hurts their possition on it's face, but more commonly does serious damage when they are caught in a lie or tangle of them.  It's bizarre.  Anyway, that seems to have opened the door for an the alternate of just being pretty straightforward and honest.  Russia seems to have picked up the ball and run with it, although their basic strategy seems limited to information for external consumption.  They still seem to lie to their own people with abandon.

So, yes, I'm much more willing to weigh Russian information higher out of the gate than info originating within Western corp/gov entities.  It's a conditioned response.


Yeah, so what?  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to predict how aggressors will spin their agressions.  It's pretty much universal, and I poked a little fun at Russia (my supposed pay-masters) for it as well.  Although I've been anticipating the likelihood (of Poland wanting to take a chunk and/or be given a chunk which is contaminated with Nazi dingle-berries), the only recent conjectures I saw was from that guy in Cyprus (at the moment) and I linked it.  Most likely he had read the RT article and probably other info sources as well.

I'm glad you believe this because it scratches my trolling itch, but as I've said before, I don't have a dog in his fight.

As for Russia, I said it before and I'll say it again; I believe it most likely that they are simply playing a role in a script which was pre-determined before this show even kicked off.  At that level I don't see any 'good guys' or anyone who I would side with or support.  Russia and China are the pre-assigned winners in this act...and later will be pitted against one-another.  ('Winners' in an economic sense as most things are.)  I just need to accurately assess the situation so that I can adjust things in my personal life such as what countries I do business in.

As a former soldier I will not hesitate to recognize unexpectedly professional behavior on the part of anyone who displays it.  I've not seen many credible reports of widespread unprofessionalism on the part of the Russians, or even the Eastern forces of the civil war.  That's not to say I've not see a ton of obvious propaganda about war crimes and such, but this never comes with validation.  This professionalim surprises me.  My assessment of the observation are two-fold:  1) Russia (and friends) are winning handily and maintaining good command and control, and 2) it indicates that they are planning to be around (as background controllers at least) for a while and thus do care somewhat about the 'hearts and minds' of the notoriously fickle local populations.

Again, the Ukrainian 'defenders' of the South and East with their human shield strategies and such did a fantastic job of making the Ruskies seem like God's gift from Heaven to the local populations and a good bit of apparently relatively organic on-the-ground citizen journalism substantiates the idea that it is exactly how many of them feel.  For now at least.  I personally think it likely that this was part of the pre-agreed script.

Of course Poland would never 'attack' or 'invade' Ukraine.  They might just do a 'special military action' and put 'peacekeepers' there to 'help protect' the areas they want some control over and resources from.  Much like Russia is doing in the South and East in fact.  Maybe 'democratic' elections would 'prove' that the people of Western Ukraine would want to become part of Poland someday.  Or maybe part of New Israel.  Who knows?

The problem Poland would have would be how to manage the Nationalists...at least the ones which have not been taken care of already by the Donbass people and Russia.  The Russian intel guy says that they are actively soliciting persons in Kiev right now who would work with them to mitigate that looming hassle.