Finally, after waiting 11 years.  No complaints on financial performance of Bitcoin up to this point mind you.  I just always saw real value (relative valuation and otherwise) in crypto as being in this blockade-busting space.  I got into Bitcoin as a result of being pissed off at Visa for the financial blockade of Wikileaks after all.  I mis-estimated that we'd have had to wait 11 years for such a dumb-fuck as Trudeau-Castro to make the mistake.

Anyway, 'Let the games begin.'   This should spur some development along lines which have been sorely neglected because, at the end of the day, most Bitcoiners are pretty much 'normies'.  More and more as time goes by it seems, but this should change things.

Here's why:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/5876rgion4a5/

I saw an even later one going with the same 'UK Health Security Agency' data but which also covered mortality, but don't see it now.  It was similarly alarming, especially considering that it only counted deaths from 'covid'.  Hints of why this is alarming comes from the all-cause mortality figures leaking through, and it appears more and more likely that the 100% increase in catching 'covid' if one is jabbed is simply an artifact of a general immune system decline among the jabbed who are catching other things as well at comparably higher rates.  In other words, VAIDS.  England at least had the good sense to do an about face of forcing the death jab.

As for the American data, when you are down in the 1/100,000 range, you can pay off a few people to falisfy a few death certs and get any rate figures you want.  Stories of paying off hospitals to get desired data have been a fixture of this who scamdemic from the start.  But you are welcome to try to put forth an alternate hypothesis about why the figures are different between the two countries by 20-fold.  I'd be interested to hear it.  Maybe for some reason Bojo wanted to fake like his government is responsible for killing and maiming even more people than they did, but I'd need to have some sort of plausible reason why he would wish to do such a thing.  Or maybe AstraZeneca is just that bad?

Oh yeah, another way the 'case' numbers are faked is to set the PCR to 20-some cycles when testing a jabbed person while leaving them at 40-some for people who are not.  In that manner you can get false positives on pureblood people who die from anything, and again, when you are at 10/100,000 it's not going to take a lot of fraud to get the graphs big Pharma and their 'public health' assets would like to see.

I think there is some hope for that depending on what particular batch one gets, but more importantly, depending on your own body's propensity for cellular transfection rate.  Some people's cells seem to pick up a monster dose and they are severely damaged.  Other people have no noticeable effect, and that is quite possibly because for whatever reason they don't have too many cells infected.

Hopefully also as good scientists ('white hats' so-to-speak) work on reverse engineering what these save-Mother-Gai eugenicists, profiteers, Luciferians, Kabbalahists, etc have done, it may be possible to re-activate the parts of the immune system that pharma needed to shut off in order to allow transfection and spike protein production.  Many good people are certainly working on it, though with limited funding and career difficulties.

Unfortunately, a cell which starts sprouting spike protein looks to the normal well functioning immune system like a cancer and it is dealt with with 'extreme prejudiced'.  Since this make the vaccine gene therapy less effective, the developers just turned off the normal immune system elements which fight cancer.  As could be expected by any thinking person, cancer rates have exploded since the jabs.  Of course they'll bury this by claiming that the cancers came from 'long covid' or some new HIV or some such.  And, of course, most people will believe anything the CDC and mainstream media say.  Oh well <shrug>.

Then why is your chart missing the last four months of data?  Is it because VAIDS is really kicking in in a big way of the last month or two?  I mean, the latest national data seems to show a 100%+ NEGATIVE efficacy for the de-pop shot gene therapy.  In other words, 'it means it's working' so to speak.

Another thing is that when you play the 'jabbed less than 45 days ago are unvaxxed' game, the chickens come home to roost as time goes by.  Especially as you run out of suckers who can be induced to roll up their sleeves.

It's especially ironic that VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) seems to be a condition which develops relatively slowly over several years as it progressively weakens the immune system.  Repeat administration of the gene therapy 'boosters' do seem to speed up the process.

---

More on-topic, good 'Doctors beg people to take Ivermectin'.  And for good reason!

Whoever took this clip was good enough to link to the fully show where the show-notes are.

Correct.

Obviously my experiments are not rigorous in almost any way.  I don't even know particularly what I was fighting although I think it a fair guess that in all cases it's been viral (or 'vaccine shedding' or 'broad area biological agent deployment', all of which are pretty hypothetical.)  Whatever I've had several episodes of seem 'flu-like' in most ways, and different from one another.

My best estimate is that within 6 hours the substance (in suggested or relatively high dosages) has a dramatic effect.  From 12->36 hours even more effect to the degree that I actually felt 'better than normal' in one case but I don't recommend the dosing that I used in at least one of those tests.  By 48 hours, I'll again start to feel mildly shitty again (but mostly don't take another dose if I already had two and a day later am done with the bug.)  My best estimate is that the substance has 'dropped out the peak' (if timed right) but it is less clear what impact it had on the whole duration of the event.  If any, it would have likely shortened it.

It's certainly a valid hypothesis that by taking Ivermectin on the first bout of illness it allowed for following bouts weeks later.  Again, without a lot more rigor and sample sizes and such, it would be impossible for me to deny this possibility.  Some countries have actually allowed genuine scientific studies of Ivermectin within the last year, but it's impossible to do in 'the developed world.'  I've not read any of these yet.  I'll be interested to see how their findings compare with my own.

I would stress again that THE reason I am willing to try these Ivermectin experiments on myself is because of safety profiles known before 2021.  Honestly, even when I got it it was under some political pressure which caused some supply/demand issues and I was unclear if I got bogus (or even dangerous) stuff or not.  I had it on pretty good faith that it was from the same suppliers who got doctors their personal supply.  After some personal experience, I developed enough confidence to suggest it for two people (and it provided seemingly good results for them too.)

Every semi-credible chart I look at shows that the de-pop shot is doing quite well at killing and maiming people, and, even as we cross the 40% increase in all-cause mortality for 2021, the killing fields are just starting to warm up.

Of course it will be the randomly appearing new form of HIV causing the 'Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome' which will be killing people like bugs, dontcha know?  Total coincidence and nothing do to with the injection or the genetic inserts from HIV when they designed the spike protein of course.

Two years ago at the 'two weeks to flatten the curve' juncture I would have drastically underestimated that such a high percentage of people could possibly be so gullible.  I also would have thought it was more correlated with IQ, but I didn't understand the mechanism of hypnosis at that time.

  https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/deep-dive-vaccine-acquired-immune-deficiency-syndrome-hiv-inserts-sars-cov-2-aftermath/

  https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/hiv-aids-compared-sars-cov-2-covid-19-darpas-immune-system-focused-bioweapon-agenda/

Have not watched the 2nd one yet.  Still going through some of the massive numbers of footnotes and links on the first.  Alas, it takes some time and effort to be informed about the world.  Most people just don't have what it takes.  Maybe they'll find the happiness they are promised by more simplistic presenters in Zuckerberg's 'metaverse' or whatever.

The story I get from NHS workers who've resisted complying with dangerous and unethical directives which clearly lead to loss of life is that they get fired.  Plenty of them have come forward in England proper and the various commonwealth countries.

As for Ivermectin, it appears that it's been known about since SARS-I and was even recommended (in secret DARPA correspondence) for use against future coronavirus outbreaks.

We 'conspiracy theorists' always figured that if/when 'they' did a broad spectrum biological attack on the peeps, they would have secret cures for themselves.  We always figured it would be some exotic thing.  Looks like it was plain old 'horse dewormer' which is (or was) available anywhere, and when one thinks about it, it makes a lot of sense to do it that way rather than trying to shuttle around some magic potion.  When the plebs figured it out the propaganda machine went into overdrive with comical and discrediting results...to the extent that they had any credibility left.

Did you see the pic of the vending machine selling Ivermectin in the Mexican airport?  I suppose it's probably true (in part because it seems scrubbed from Google/DDG images searches.)  I can only imagine how many people flew to Mexico and didn't even leave the airport in a desperate bid to save their loved ones.  I always said that Trump's wall was not to keep the darkies out; it was to keep the Americans in.  That's Obamacare for you.

I've been playing around with Ivermectin and relaying my results on one of these threads here.  It's as close to a 'wonder drug' as anything I know of.  Normally I don't take any pharma products unless I need to, and at 50-some years old I have very rarely needed to.  Any 'doctor' who tells you that Ivermectin is 'dangerous' it full of shit.  I've taken some pretty big doses in part to see what happens (and in part because I was targeting possible parasites and wanted them gone if they existed) and my experience is right in line with the amazing safety profile data published for this (Nobel prize winning) substance.

  "How to tell the vaccinated the truth about why they feel bad all the time"
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/zAkcz4Ygvfoh/

I wouldn't really call it a 'large experiment'.  More a re-set of how research and development is done.  Now we'll 'do it live' so to speak. _{Won't we Rick?}

As for the tracking, that's really not a problem because random sampling from a sufficiently large pool will give a very precise result.  Lord knows we now have a sufficiently large pool for a bunch of stuff including gene therapy subjects using a variety of techniques.

Probably the biggest reason why not too much Western effort was put into Crimea was 'and then what'.  The population was overwhelmingly pro-Russian so it would have been a bitch and very ugly to do much with it.  While the sentiment of the Crimeans was heavily shaped by population shifts and ethnic cleansing operations under the Soviets, it's kind of an 'is what it is' scenario.

It's important to note that there is not one unified Ukraine with 'pure-blood Ukrainians' up to the border.  Operations such as the Holodomor whittled down the 'native' population and forced immigration filled in in some areas enough to where they can and are maintaining autonomous control of large swaths of the country.  And if they didn't, they would probably be subject to fairly extreme atrocities by the western-backed 'Ukrainians'.

Since the Soviet population engineering (a common characteristic of Communist rule) happened generations ago, there are plenty of people who are mixed culturally, genetically, and philosophically.  Most people on both sides fear what would happen to them personally if the other side got the upper hand, and rightly so I suspect.

Interestingly, some of the Russian-speaking Ukrainians I know have a pretty strong negative feeling about the Soviet Union, and it certainly has spilled over to Russia more generally.  They seem to not trust or like anyone, and that even applies to they who are 'Jews' and their feelings toward Israel in some cases.  I think that that is exactly the correct mindset to have.  For anyone.  Few if any 'leaderships' see any population as anything more than a tool.

---

I would council anyone who thinks that the WEF's 'great reset' plan sounds like the way to go to be prepared for the basic Soviet tactics to be employed until there are only about 1-in-10 people left.  That will be 'sustainable'.  People who think they can be in that 10% have at least a logical (if very evil) reason to support them.  People who have not made that calculation are simply grist for the mill.

Putin seems to be one of the WEF's 'Global Leaders for Tomorrow' people along with the likes of Merkel, Gates, Orban, Sarkozy, Blair, etc.  The school did a re-brand in 2004-ish as Young Global Leaders where you start to see Trudeau(Castro), Arden, Zuckerberg, Gabbard, Crenshaw, etc.

WEF seems to have, as a strong enough item of importance to crow about in their media, the notion of 'toppling' of the U.S..  A major war which the U.S. lost decisively would probably do the trick (although I would argue that it wouldn't even take that and/or that it's already been accomplished in a quiet way which left a facade; a significant military capability under direction of a globalist super-state.)

Putin seems to also be somewhat under control of the Kabbalahistic Sabbatean branch of Judaism who were instrumental in inserting Trump for his little gig.  The relationship between this group and the WEF crowd is not yet very clear to me.  My best guess is that the Sabbateans are the money people and they provide that (necessary) service to the WEF because they plan to ultimately appropriate what the WEF has built.

Continuing with my Ivermectin notes from above:

Whatever 'sickness' I had for this last episode threatened to cause more joint pain than the last.  Another difference is that it is having at least some impact on my upper lungs.  I have unusually strong lungs I think just based on my history which I won't go into.  This morning I felt a little more shitty, and if I coughed hard I could even feel a little bit of pain in the upper part of my lungs.  Maybe.  Anyway, I downed two Ivermectin.

The results so far have been typical.  Noticeable relief in 4 hours, and almost complete alleviation within 6.  Now, 12 hours after the dose, I feel basically fine, but I do have dense but modest amounts of phlem in my nose and trachea at least.  I haven't been able to generate a good oyster since I quite smoking (25 years ago) and still cannot under my present condition.

At this point in my Ivermectin experiments I can with decent reliability predict what impact it will have at what times for whatever family of 'flu-like' ailments is going around my present city and country of domicile.  Many many people are complaining of very similar observations: Seemingly individual instances of ailment often with a short duration fever, and it has now been maybe 6 weeks since the complaints started.

Nothing is GRAS (Generally Regarded As Safe) absent as much data as is needed to assess safety.  At least not before the regulators were totally bought and paid for by the entities they are supposed to be regulating.  Long term safety data associated with the particular types of lipid nanopartical formations use in the two mRNA gene therapies in question is missing, or locked up as a trade secret.  The FDA wants 70 YEARS to release this data and have gone to court to try to get it that much time.

Prior to the 'new normal' a part of 'approving' a drug was letting the victim and their doctor know what was in it (via an 'insert' which is still to my knowledge 'intentionally left blank' in all cases so far.)  The argument about 'trade secrets' is bogus because nobody else could get approval with stolen technology.


One of the main problems was that the initial story circulated to the peeps (medical professionals, John Doe, etc) is that the injection components stayed in the muscle into which it was injected.  That was a bald-faced fuckin' lie.  Authority to tell any lie necessary to get needles into arms seems to have been granted.  Maybe under 'national security' prerogatives?

Anyway, these LNPs have an affinity for certain organ tissues and migrate to them over a period of time.  The ovaries and spleen where the two main organs which had such an affinity (with Pfizer at least) and that is known because the Japanese requested the biodistribution surveys from Pfizer and the data leaked.  (Japan declined Pfizer, at least initially, and also rejected batches of Moderna which were full of metal chunks and other weird shit.)

What, exactly, the U.S. FDA knew about the bio-distribution issue remains to be seen, and again, if they get their way, that could be 70 years out.


It seems quite clear to me that if an injection is mis-applied and goes into an artery or vein, a lot more of the the LNPs than desired hit the heart.  Athletic people have bigger arteries for increased blood-flow, and probably more well functioning hearts which make them even more prone to damage when the mRNA infects heart cells.  Seems to me that the designers of the scamdemic kinda wanted to see what would happen in the case of an accidental 'mainline' because the the guidance for this intermuscular injection was to NOT aspirate which is a method whereby a person doing the injection can detect if they hit a vessel or not.

An amazing amount of stuff about this 'covid-19' operation stinks to high-heaven.  In fact, almost every aspect which can be seen at all.

The background infection rate is probably the most critical piece of info in deciding on a rational policy, and it is never published even two years later.

The best data I have is that from not long after the 'two weeks to flatten the curve' in early 2020, the number of people who'd been exposed and developed antibodies in S. Cal was about 25%.  Most of them had no idea.  That is the basis for my statement that SARS-cov-2 is pretty much on par with any common cold.


I think there are probably a lot of people in my category who are familiar with the rather amazing technology that has been talked about, patented, etc and are wondering if perhaps some experiments with some of it were a part of the plandemic.  It's clear by definition that trying the mRNA cell re-programming technology out on the masses was exactly what happened, and it's a fair suspicion that various groups were granted permission to try out other things too.  Note that it is about as close as it's possible to get to a 'fact' that the different 'batches' from, say, Pfizer had vastly different outcomes for people who got one batch vs. another which is a pretty good indication that there were experiments of one sort or another going on.

That's quite a long way from 'knowing' that there are '5G masts' in the so-called vaccine.  It's simply a fairly rational question to ask...though it's not likely that and answer would be given without a fair bit of 'working over'.  Obviously the current FDA, CDC, etc are not going to ask, and not going to tell what they know.

<fake-dr-oeleo mode>


Comes from butt-fucking.


Nah, you're doing it wrong.  What you wanna do is wrap the base in a bunch of duct tape, get a long pipe which fits pretty well down to the bend, then give it a good reef.

</fake-dr-oeleo mode>

Heather McDonald (who I'd never hear of):

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/uuwgcrFZw5m5/

When I first saw it, I wrote it off immediately as phony and thought no more about it.  Now it seems that it is being reported by the MSM as real, so I went to look again.  Looks even more phony in this vid to me.  People don't shuffle their feet when the pass out (in my non-medical experience.)  The look on her face was over-acted, and the soundtrack has a thump in the wrong place for a skull fracture.

I'm 95% sure this is a psy-op.  Not sure what it is meant to would accomplish exactly.  Washed up old has-been actors are exactly the kind of people who are desperate enough to play these roles.  They generally use Epstein/Maxwell type operations for the younger folks like Justin Trudeau-Castro to play Prime Ministers and such.

Continuing on with the 'Ivermectin experiments'...

It continues to be the case that nearly everyone I know have a situation where their whole families have periodic shitty feeling episodes which often include a short-duration fever.  There are actually helicopters flying over my city at a MUCH higher rate than was the norm (poor country) and people are getting suspicious, but in fact the same things health things are being reported (to me) in more rural areas where a helicopter is never observed.

Several days ago I woke with a sore nose/throat yet again, and yet again it progressed into body aches over the day (although more joint aches than a genuine sickness several weeks ago.)  As an experiment I went ahead and downed a few Ivermectin.  By the normal 6 hours I was feeling at least not worse.  The next 24 hours felt kinda crappy (and kinda 'zoned out' or 'relaxed' which is common for me with this drug) but less crappy than I would have predicted given the instigation of this 'flu'.  The next day (today) I was feeling more crappy so I downed one more.  Now, about 6 hours later, I feel pretty 'great', but also a little 'relaxed' as mentioned above.

---

Relatedly and more on-topic, my country (of current domicile) has every 'covid-19 vaccine' known to man by this point so it seems.  A lot of it 'donated' by wealthy countries.  When it expires, someone in 'authority' signs a paper saying that the expiry date is 'extended' and still good-to-go.

There seems to be kind of a kind of a competition between the 'big fish' local officials who've authorized 'big fish' jabs (Pfizer,  Moderna, Sinovac, etc) and smaller local officials who seem to have something going with the various smaller pharma companies to help in testing out their wares.  in my area here was some Taiwanese and another Chinese testing going on replete with reports of police telling unsophisticated rural farmers that they would go to jail if they refused the jabs.  The big-fish seem to have caught wind of it and have now made laws against more local operations.

In fairness, I should say that these are things I've read somewhat in the local papers and somewhat from what I've heard word-of-mouth on the street, and neither source is particularly reliable, but it's exactly the kind of cluster-fuck which I would expect to see.  In point of fact, I chose a 'developing world' domicile (well before the scamdemic started), precisely BECAUSE I predicted a disorganized cluster-fuck in SHTF scenario.  A more 'orderly' society could efficiently march people right into the gas chamber.  A less organized country should have a lot more out-of-the-way holes to hide in.  Seems to be playing out just as I projected.

Fortunately for me is has been a LONG time since I expected any government to help with my protection in almost any way and my default position was to just take that role on for myself.  My taxes are nothing more than the extortion fees I pay for corp/gov racketeering, and I certainly don't expect effective oversight of financial or medical systems as part of the deal.  Thus it's not a big deal to move to a less 'developed' society.  Soon we'll see the effects of 'natural selection' pressures differentiating people who, by nature, loved big brother and those who don't.  I'm cautiously optimistic that the dynamics will favor me.

Once again I ran across an example of Kaufman and Lanker using psychological methods (spurious assertions, disruption, filibuster, etc) to waste peoples time and confuse less technical people, so I looked into this turd a little bit more.

Kaufman is a 'Forensic Psychiatrist' which is indeed a real thing.  Relates mostly to how to deal with criminals (or more generally, the incarcerated) using drugs and other techniques.  His published work reflects this, and it seems that up until the plandemic he was busying himself working on methods of bio-metric tracking of people, ostensibly to 'prevent suicide', and was meeting with a variety of like-minded people in pursuit of this goal:


_{Interesting handshake they've got going there.}

Seems that as of the plandemic he re-branded as a 'natural healer' selling Alex Jones style 'tinctures' and what-not.  I'm guessing that his profits from that are dwarfed by the revenue he gets for his role in the psy-op.  Basically, if you listen to this shill, you cannot even START to deal with the plandemic until you prove to him that 'viruses exist'.  But there is a catch of course:  you cannot use microscopy, gene sequencing, etc because he doesn't believe in these technologies.  Very handy for the people running the psy-op indeed.

Here's a little reference material on Kaufman and the 'no-virus' psy-op for those who want to move on to dealing with actual problems associated with the scamdemic:

 - https://www.activistpost.com/2021/12/nobody-can-prove-the-nonexistence-of-viruses.html

 - http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/fired-up-dr-andrew-kaufman-is-a-kosher-shill-9-24-20/

 - https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/has-the-virus-been-isolated-yes

---

It's worth note that I am NOT saying that there is such thing as 'SARS-cov-2' coronavirus, or even that 'viruses exist'.  It's abundantly clear to me that the difficulty in studying 'viruses' has been used to effect in past scams (e.g., the so-called 'Spanish flu'.)  Although I believe that 'viruses' probably do exist, and feel it most likely that SARS-cov-2 is a (lab developed) one, I still consider it hypothesis.  All I am saying is that Kaufman, Stefan Wanker, etc are some shilly and non-trustworthy pieces of shit, and suspect this on the basis of listening carefully to a lot of their bullshit first-hand.