I never mentioned anything about 'life expectancy' nor did I imply it.  But over and over again you keep bringing it up because you think it is some attack on something I said, or you just want to flap your gums and it is the most scienc-ee word you know.

Here's what is actually happening in your pea-sized brain albeit at a subconscious level which is why I'll do you a solid and help bring it to your attention:

You have been programmed to believe that everyone will drop dead before age thirty unless they have modern pharma drugs.  That's what billions of dollars of advertizing and 'investment' into state funded schools buy them.

You are so indoctrinated you will go rabid-dog style and start chewing on anything you perceive as being a threat to your cyber-sponsors in big pharma.  Constantly going back to 'life expectancy' in spite of it not even being relevant is equivalent to the rabid dog attacking a tire instead of an actual animal.  Amusing to watch at least.  I've seen it on the internets before of course, but some of you noobs on this forum really take it to an extreme level lately.  It's at least a glass half full that you guys are going to be sterilized or killed by the 'vaccine' where 'my type' is more likely to make it through to the other side.  I mean, I think you guys are pretty much damaged beyond hope of repair.

The above user is to stupid to realize that his 'argument', or whatever it is, is not even relevant to the discussion going on.

He's also to lazy to point to any examples of his accusations of course.

Yup.  I guessed right.

Poor fella.  You really want to be smart don't you?  People who are intellectually challenged, or just beginners, can get sensitive in this way.  I get it.  Keep working on it.  I think you could understand the difference between 'life expectancy' and 'lifespan' if you ponder on it a little more.


The article had footnotes, and (Kanazawa 2008) seems to be this:

  https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200811/common-misconceptions-about-science-ii-life-expectancy

Personally I feel like Psychology Today is probably just another scientism rag (of the type that the Left wing intelligentsia considers the word of God), but this is a relatively unimportant topic and there is not a lot of reason to fabricate things.

Buy hey, if, for whatever weird reason, it makes you feel good to think that all cavemen dropped dead at or before age 30, be my guest.

Seems possible that this is just beyond your intellectual grasp, but from wikipedia:

  "Longevity, maximum lifespan, and life expectancy are not synonyms."

Just a quick scan and saw this article near the top of my search.  Won't vouch for it, but it makes sense with other things I've read over the last number of decades.

True enough because hunter/gatherer life ways tend to make for a tough lifestyle with a lot of risks.  That says nothing about geriatrics though.  Those who survived battles (male) and childbirth (female) likely often lived as long as people do today when they were naturally hardy, and most probably were due to multi-generational selective pressures and infant mortality.

In short, if one was 'lucky' enough to make it through the risky years to, say, age 40, it would have been realtively smooth sailing up into their 70's and 80's.  Probably much more smooth than it is for many industrialized people of today.

A long life was likely associated with the 'luck' of having kids and grandkids to help them out since it is a relatively common feature of hunter/gather groups that oldsters without such were turned out of the community to die.

---

Another thing I would point out is that there was likely the same 'bell curve' of people who are naturally perceptive and intelligent (and/or scammy) across place and time.  In the old days these people would stay in the community as healers and/or religious leaders.  It is quite amazing what some _real_ primitive healers were able to do with plants and such over a lifetime of studying them.  The thing which has change now is that someone from a less developed area and having some brains is likely to get sucked into the formal educational system and end up being a gall bladder specialist in an industrialized country.  This deprives more primitive areas of some of the talents that would in earlier times stayed among the community.

I had a good friend who was an OR nurse one time.  Their motto was "The bleeding always stops."

She also told me about an instance when a visiting surgeon hooked up a heart/lung machine backwards so it was pumping blood the wrong way.  When they figured it out after about 10 minutes it was to late and the guy died.  All the doctors and nurses involved kept their mouths shut and nobody knew what happened beyond 'he died in surgery.'

---

Edit:  For the benefit of the highly vaxxed millennials: 'the bleeding always stops' (spoken in dead-pan) means that the patient always follows one of two paths: they survive or they die.  No need to get too excited because the problem will go away one way or another.

Right general direction, but pretty lame at the moment.  I wouldn't touch it until it became clear whether it was or was not a honeypot.

Needed is something of a distributed wiki where evidence against the suspects (and exculpatory material for their benefit) could be stored.  Near real-time discussions about various potentially malfeasant actors could be ongoing.  Information could be curated by trusted parties (since the obvious 'defense' by the perps would be to try to spam it to death), but not lost.

I suggest NBT-coin.  For NuremBergTwo.  In this case, of course, evidentiary (and other) material is represented in the blockchain.

I saved my father's life by getting him away from a drug for Parkinsons which he didn't have, and away from the doctor who was pushing it on him.  His symptoms were classic for an excess of it, and I found the information on-line rather easily (back in 2001...search engines used to work back in the old days, but Google was just getting started on it's monopoly and was not a household name.)

My sister saved my mother who was very near death from chemo.  The nurse was doubling the dose.  When the one good doctor who was involved in her care found out he flipped out.  Dunno what happened to the 'angle of mercy' for her 'oversight' because by that time Mom was done.  This happened just last year.  I will say the death by overdose of chemo drugs is obviously not a quick or pleasant way to go.

These are not the only people in my direct family who have had such incidents either.  I really have to wonder if some people in the medical 'care' field don't work under a quota system and get compensated for money they save society...by killing people.

So, I couldn't agree with the good doctor more, and certainly it is the way I live (and maybe the reason I live.)

And you are proud to be represented by a senile pedophile with a meth-head kid?  OK.  I mean, I'm not a big fan of Trump and his fam, but I've got to hand it to the Dems; they found someone who was even more loathsome.  No mean feat!

If a hospital has 'pediatric beds' but doesn't take pediatric patients, it's relatively clear what is going on...and why the medical/industrial complex captures so much money.

Nope.  Mere months ago it was a 'crazy conspiracy theory' by us 'anti-vaxxer nutcases' that they were setting up to have continuous boosters as a fallout of this plandemic which is based on the common cold.

They are relying on the relatively new phenomenon that people have less memory than an average goldfish these days.  It's a fair bet that the ever increasing 'childhood vaccination schedule' is in significant part responsible for this phenomenon, though other devices are certainly a factor as well.

Although they used a lot of standard industry techniques as well, it is not common to use nanothermite for pulverization the way the did on the tall towers.  Certainly not at that time several decades ago.  The substance was in widespread use in underground fracking though so I've read.

Building 7, on the other hand, was pretty much classic, and pretty well executed by most industry analyst's judgements.

Here's a handly little trick which works on most browsers.  <ctl-f> brings up a search function where you will immediately find such things as:



The marketing departments and state department psychological groups have determined that it's bad publicity to force experimental gene therapy injections on people.  Unfortunately for them, it takes a while for re-definitions to work their way through the systems.  In the mean time, mRNA injections continue to be 'gene therapy' as any logical person who has even a tiny amount of knowledge about the subjects can plainly see.

Reading the CDC's 'facts.html' serves as a great illustration of how duplicitous this wing of the medical/industrial complex is.  It's full from start to finish with the worst kind of obvious propaganda techniques.  The FDA is lagging the CDC, but will get there soon.

People (like me) who predicted, before the gene therapy injections were even being used, that there would be 'new strains' and these would be used to justify the endless boosters, there is not much to change one's over.

Israel seems to have totally missed the statistical 'signal' of heart inflammation among youth which became rapidly apparent to the rest of 'the nations' when they started mainlining their peeps.  This supports my pre-jab conjecture that Israel was likely to get special formulations, and especially with a guy like Bourla running to company.

I would say that for only $62/head, @satanyahu did very well for his tribespersons.  This is especially true as they probably just sent the bill to the American taxpayers anyway so, who cares what it costs?

It's also interesting to note that while the standard time period for 'confidentiality' in the Pfizer<-->{nation} agreement details is a decade, Israel seems to be a special case where things are kept secret until 2050.  It's all very interesting.

For people who want to go a step deeper, here's a link I've posted before:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LArxUakFsFs&list=PLTF9h-T1TcJj4AOPCxGxOUTH0IVmaH7_8

The dude really is a gifted lecturer and the production value is pretty good.

The guy is a pro-vaxxergene-therapier, or was when they made the last vid on the subject some months ago.  Oh well.  Actually, in the naivete of the producers, they went on in glowing terms about the DNA vaccine (in addition to the mRNA ones) because, apparently, they were not read-in on how sensitive the subject was and how it must be avoided at all costs.  They got the message fairly quickly and there is a pretty funny edit stuffed into their vids on the topic.

The senile creeper strikes again:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/wXlJFA6R8pzM/

Reminds me of when Hillary collapsed from 'pneumonia' then the body-double came out of Chelsea's apartment to grab and infect some little kid.  Great choreography there!  Or maybe it was?  It's possible that by that time they decided to do Trump for 4.  Maybe the even planned ahead enough to have him stampeding Democrats to get an experimental gene therapy to ward off last years common cold.  Who knows.

Anyway, I can only imagine the panic they have going on in their meetings to try to figure out what the hell to do Biden.  Is it true that if he kicks the bucket this early they do a new election rather than letting the VP sit out the term?  Maybe that's how they get Trump back in?

'They've' been pushing hard on just that for a while now.  When it was trial-ballooned in California to 'save the environment' and 'prepare for climate catastrophe', you would not be surprised to learn that many Californians thought it was a swell idea.  At least you would not be surprised if you know much about the state of California.

These 'models' are exactly what the whole global warming scam is based on just FWIW.  For a scientismist, the more wrong you are, the longer your life as an 'advisor' out of academia is, and the more funding you get.  You just have to make sure you are wrong in a way that favors the globalist's pet projects (like carbon taxes, economic shifts (e.g., moves to production to 'communist' China), etc.)

A dead give-away that such a scam is underway is when a 'scientist' won't release his/her code and/or data-sets.  For some reason this is seen especially at certain 'educational institutions' based in London, or at least out of the U.K..

OK.  It's not really a comparable categorization based on the text alone, but I get the point.  To a degree I am guilty as charged insofar as I do look down my nose at most people, but at what is probably a significantly different vector that Ms. Clinton.  (They don't look like a potential blood-meal to me.)

In a practical sense, I think it is quite fair to suggest that some people have a better understanding of macroeconomics that others, but I also understand how the suggestion that one person is in any way more knowledgeable than any other person is verboten in left-wing circles.

In Hillary's defense (since I'm not a very politically correct person and don't strive to be) I'll agree with her that many, if not most, Trump supporters are 'deplorable'.  At least any of them who remained supportive after he proved his Israel-First stance and used a false flag 'gas attack' to bomb Syria.  Of course Talmudic Jews could in some ways be forgiven for continuing to support the man.  Because, you know, 'deplorable' and all.