Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 07:01:17 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 548 »
1281  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Israel is evil. Finish them off! on: May 20, 2021, 04:25:46 PM

Would have been about 10 years ago or so that one of the religious leaders was advocating a 'final solution' for the Palestinians.  Back then the citizens of Israel were not on-board enough to go for it.  Apparently they now they are.

The parallels between the Warsaw Ghetto and Gaza Strip are pronounced and have been for a long time.  Plenty of 'Jews' have pointed this out over the years, but fewer and fewer, so it seems, as the situation in that place becomes more and more severe.

1282  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Do vaccines kill people? on: May 19, 2021, 04:38:24 AM
...
Check the website for the many links.

BOMBSHELL: Connecticut govt. secretly tells health care workers covid vaccines are DEADLY, but withholds the same information from the public[/b]

Today we bring you a shocking true story about covid-19 vaccines, the government of Connecticut, and an open admission that vaccines contain dangerous, even deadly substances (spike proteins) that are documented and known to cause vascular damage to human beings.

...
...


Technically not true.  At least per the theory of operation.

Theses gene therapies supply instructions via one method or another to induce your bodies own cells to produce spike proteins.  Bigger 'bang for the buck' that way.  That's certainly not a 'better' thing!

In theory the mRNA ones (Pfizer, Moderna) cause the creation of a maximum amount of spike protein depending on the individual's rate of pickup, then the process ceases.

The DNA vaccines (AstraZeneca, J&J, Sputnik-V) have the cell machinery make the mRNA also so there is yet another mechanism for things to run away.  Most of the 'self-amplifying RNA' mechods (e.g., Imperial Collage London's) didn't get injected...for this first round...

It's pretty clear that 'spike protein' is bad poo-poo.  Now that we know that at least some of what we consider 'covid' is lab created specifically for this scamdemic, it is extra interesting that it's been all about 'spike protein, ACE-2, spike protein, ACE-2, spike protein, ACE-2' from day 1 of this scamdemic.  It's especially interesting that spike protein is in a class of molecules which are particularly important to placental mammals.

1283  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Israel is evil. Finish them off! on: May 18, 2021, 01:25:35 PM
The people of Israel are evil.  This is known. We have all seen what happened with the Republicans in control.  Now it is our turn.  Who knows what these evil people have up their sleeve next. 
So I say finish them off now!

on what basis do you say all Israelis are evil, only Zionists are evil...

There are also many Israelis who are totally against their government's attack on the Gaza lane because many residents live side by side there. This is not a war between Palestine vs Israel but Hamas vs Zionist.

The technology (sensors and number crunching) exists now to 'know who is naughty and who is nice'.

The Talmud has some outlier definitions of 'naught and nice' which are not widely shared in the other belief systems in widespread use around the world.  As a 'Jewish state', it's expected that a fair number of Israel's citizens do bind to some of the philosophies and teachings of Judaism.

The 'threat' of what I would call the 'St. Peter technology' must be palpable for a fair number of souls.  Lots of people know that if the technology were turned on them it would not be a good day.  I would not rule out that this 'danger' is a bigger concern than the economic reset which is a mathematical certainty in any debt-backed monetary systems, and that this is one of the big (and almost completely hidden) factors in the so-called 'great reset'.  No matter what, the 'rats' (as we are called) must not be allowed to get a hold of this technology and employ it for civil ends.

1284  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Do vaccines kill people? on: May 17, 2021, 01:00:03 PM
With pertussis...the bacteria...

The coronabacteria? The one that causes COBAD-19?

Pertussis is a bacteria.  You can try moving your lips if it helps read better.

You can try arguing your point without straw people (or straw bacteria) but I know that's too hard for you. We just need to assume that COVID-19 vaccines are bad because bacteria.

You snipped 'pertussis' out of my text.  I added it back.  Anyone who can read can see that I was using it to describe an example of asymptomatic carriers cause specifically by a poorly implemented vaccine program.

I'm sure you believe that the covid-19 'vaccine' was rolled out with the utmost care and rigor...cuz reasons...but it is plain to any semi-coherent person that it was not.  Exactly the opposite in fact.  The reason people still need masks is that 'vaccinated' can still get and spread the thing which sounds a lot like it started out failed (unlike the pertussis vaccine which did work for a while.)  And no, it is NOT the common case that the vaccines never stop infection or transmission.  Up until the brainwashing of 2020 that would be laughable and completely nullifies any argument for 'herd immunity'.  But such a concept is well beyond your cognitive reach obviously.  Most other sheep-people's also so don't take it to hard.

1285  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Do vaccines kill people? on: May 17, 2021, 07:17:02 AM
the bacteria

The coronabacteria? The one that causes COBAD-19?

Pertussis is a bacteria.  You can try moving your lips if it helps read better.

1286  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Do vaccines kill people? on: May 16, 2021, 08:27:42 PM

... And you can afford to be an antivaxxer because most people around you are vaccinated, so you're welcome.


Vaccines sometimes turn people into long-term asymptomatic carriers.
...


Not Covid-19 vaccines.

mRNA vaccines do not contain or produce pathogens.

There is no way for you to become an asymptomatic carrier from a covid-19 vaccine alone. 

You need to be infected with a real covid-19 virus to be a carrier.

Well, no shit.  That's what an asymptomatic carrier is!  You obviously don't understand the basic meaning of the phenomenon.

Though they (Pfizer studying their own product) found out that the so-called vaccine 'works' (reduces mild symptoms) in a matter of weeks, they've been trying to figure out if 'vaccinated' people can catch and spread the infection for half a year now.  The long delay on this rather easy and obvious thing to discover is almost certainly because the 'vaccinated' can and do catch and spread the infection and nobody wants to admit how much relative to the un-jabbed.

With pertussis, the vaccine makes it so that instead of getting a cough for a few weeks and clearing it, the wild strain lingers in one's body for months or years so you can spread it around that much more.  To make matters worse the duration of immunity for the vaccinated sucks and is getting worse as the bacteria evolves to around the vaccine (using the vaccinated to accelerate that process.)  The reason that real trials take years _approve_ is because it takes a while to discover ecological features such as this.

1287  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 08:13:14 PM
It is also unknown whether the rates of infection observed in the cloth mask arm are the same or higher than in HCWs who do not wear a mask, as almost all participants in the control arm used a mask.

...coupled with relatively high rates of non-compliance by the way.  Anyway, when they were wearing a cloth mask it is a null result.  They didn't seem to have trouble finding people wearing cloth masks so it's a fair bet that much of the time that was what the control group was wearing when they felt like wearing anything.  The differential between the cloth mask vs. control and control vs. medical doesn't seem to allow it, especially in the case of ILI.

Of course there is also a difference between picking up something during a limited study period and evading a _coronavirus_ for a year until an injection is ready.  Anyone who cannot see the difference, or even entertains the notion that such a thing is practical, is not in my opinion a very realistic person (to be polite about it.)

An alternate hypothesis is that straping a rag to your mouth all day not only causes the nasty visible effects of mask-mouth, but also traps the aerosolized virus (which zip right through the masks) allowing re-infection in a cycle.  A correlary is that that might have been the whole idea since cloth masks, and near zero quality control or training, were enthusiastically welcomed by the vax pushers.

Quote
Another limitation of this study is the lack of a no-mask control group and the high use of masks in the controls, which makes interpretation of the results more difficult.
[/quote]

Again, we now have the data from Texas and Florida.  Masks don't seem to do shit for 'infection' really.  They are a political and psychological tool to keep people in a state of panic and hopelessness and prep them for the injections.

1288  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 06:33:56 PM
I'll debunk your nonsense for the second time, but really, you should try actually reading the study rather than just skimming the abstract and assuming it fits your narrative.

Cloth masks (the type most people are told to wear) are much worse at stopping infection than when people are free to wear what they want when they want and often wear nothing at all (aka 'non-compliance').
That's not what the trial shows, at all. It shows that medical masks are better than cloth masks. That's all. The control arm of people who are "free to wear what they want" as you put it only had 2 people out of 458 who wore no mask at all. I'd hardly call that "often wearing nothing at all". Roll Eyes

Put on your thinking cap and see if you can follow this:  One group wears medical masks.  One group wears cloth masks.  One group wears one of cloth masks, medical masks, or nothing.  They go maskless more than the other groups.

Now, the cloth mask people had the worst outcome as far as getting sick.  Your only argument might be that the amount of time the control group people were wearing medical masks was so protective that it overcame the different and greater threat of maskless vs. cloth.  That's a stretch (if not mathematically impossible) given the relative differences in the three groups.

I would have gladly volunteered to be in the deliberately maskless group if it were 'ethical' to have such a group, but then I have a functional immune system and have not been scared shitless about a coronavirus which my chances of dying from are about 0.001%  This study was before the plandemic of course, so I'd have to adjust.  If I was working in a ward with, say, TB, then I would use a mask due to the way that particular bacteria is spread in that particular disease.  Masks do have their place...it just isn't with aerosolized virus spread over a long duration.

In all groups (cloth, control, and N95)
N95 masks were not studied in this trial, at all. In fact, the three people who did wear a N95 were actively excluded.

Congratulations on finding a bonafide error for a change.  I should have said 'medical masks'.

the 'protection' is pretty poor at stopping jack actually.
It is impossible to make this claim based on this trial since there was not a "no mask" control group. You are speculating based on nothing at all.

We are all still waiting with baited breath for the massive catastrophe you guys promised in Texas and Florida on account of their governors inviting the peeps to throw the mask in the trash and start living as humans again.  What gives?

1289  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 03:01:37 PM

Cloth masks (the type most people are told to wear) are much worse at stopping infection than when people are free to wear what they want when they want and often wear nothing at all (aka 'non-compliance').

In all groups (cloth, control, and N95) the 'protection' is pretty poor at stopping jack actually.  You can lower your risk some for some things, but if you are in some sort of a 'global pandemic' from aerosolized virus for years on end, you are gunna get hit no matter what you do.

I really don't specialize in remedial reading so I cannot help you much more than that...'Doctor'.

---

Thankfully the plandemic was a fraud built mostly on the season's common cold, or something fairly non-threatening built on top of it,  Most people got it and got over it without even knowing it as is the common case.  After the several month block typical of a coronavirus lifecycle the hype was build completely on fraudulent testing and mainstream media lies and scaremongering.

'They' needed an excuse to fuck with spike protein for reasons which will become all to apparent in the coming years.  The 'gain of function' seems to be to get the spike protein a legitimate target, but as a SARS-cov-2 constituent it was, thankfully, not a big deal for most people.

1290  Other / Politics & Society / Re: India covid19 crisis on: May 16, 2021, 02:47:38 PM
India is considered as an under developed country and its hard to control the virus if it outbreak in these countries. Unfortunately the virus outbreak in India despite the fact that they were the first few nations who started vaccinated their people in early stages. Too many people have lost their life in this crisis.  Sad

The population is too huge and the government is helpless. If they had implemented some sort of family planning measures a few decades back, then the situation would have been much better now. I have relatives and friends in India and I have stayed in that country for many months. I would say that the uncontrolled population explosion has to be blamed for 99% of the issues there. Actually this is not something that is unique to India. It is applicable to most of the third world countries, such as Nigeria and the Philippines.

Yeah, it's the White Man's Burden to help keep these darkies from breeding like rabbits.  'Fellow Whites' often enough when they engage in certain specialties helpful in such a task so it seems.  Pharmakia for one.  Media fueled inter-ethnic strife for another.

Fact is that most of the issues with 'overpopulation' come down to it being more difficult to keep puppet regimes in power with a large and growing population, and it's expensive in direct proportion to {N} just in plates of rice considering that the peeps need two plates per day so as not to revolt.  in hopes of a more equitable share and better life.  That money could be going into the accounts of international bankers which is, obviously, a much more desirable landing zone.  It is (or at least was at the time the concept gain traction 'independently' among the Western liberal intelligentsia) a high level national security interest of the U.S. to control population in certain specific countries such as The Philippines for the expressed reason that U.S. industry needs natural resources.  See Kissinger's NSSM 200.

I hope you are sure that you have not been influenced by propaganda in your (almost certainly genuine) concern for the plight of the Indian masses. I'll freely admit that was for most of my life.  I was a minion doing the bidding of true psychopaths.  Letting India help themselves over what actually IS a fairly obvious problem is preferable to me compared to 'helping' them since it is very difficult to sort out the impulse behind such 'help'.  You stand a pretty good chance of being the guy 'helping' by hold the girl's arms still as your good buddy rapes her.  Or 'helping' by getting rid of the dead body.

1291  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 11:29:27 AM
What a long winded way of saying "I have no evidence".

What an easy out on the digging you promised.  'Doctor'.

1292  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 11:27:04 AM
For two your 'P', wearing masks or socks or whatever to 'fight against' an aerosolized coronavirus starts out stupid AF by any medical or scientific standards

Have you finally found some evidence to back up your often-repeated-but-never-substantiated claim? Or should I go dig up that one post one made where you actually attempted to provide proof of your nonsense, only to realize the trial you linked to actually proved the exact opposite of what you thought it did?


Dig all you like 'doctor'.  Your hole just gets deeper.

Good thing for fake doctors like yourself that they can state that a published paper resulting from a double-blind study says the opposite of what it actually says and an army of mouth-breathing drones will just go with it 'because doctor'.  That's the world we live in.  Kudo's for understanding the grift and executing it fairly well.

1293  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 11:06:13 AM
You do perfectly reasonable thing P (wear a mask), therefore you would also do stupid thing Q (crawl around on all fours), and even more stupid thing R (convince other people to crawl around on all fours), therefore P is also stupid/we shouldn't do P.

Pretty much textbook definition of a slippery slope fallacy.


Even in your formulation, it is not a 'slippery slope'.

For one, there is no 'disaster' in having the peeps crawl around on all fours and it might have some advantages.  Especially for the fashion knee-pad and glove industry.

For two your 'P', wearing masks or socks or whatever to 'fight against' an aerosolized coronavirus starts out stupid AF by any medical or scientific standards (except for psychological torture which is why the same techniques have been seen in places like Gitmo.)  Add on face-shields and it becomes truly clown-world from the get go.

1294  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 09:12:57 AM
-snip-
Careful you don't injure yourself on that slippery slope you built there.

Good strategy!  If your comment makes no contextual sense whatsoever, just snip the original.  Genius!

1295  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is AstraZeneca vaccine: safe or not safe? on: May 16, 2021, 08:16:21 AM

Yes, exactly. There is risk attached to anything. Driving a car. Eating food. Walking down the road. Existing. The key to this is understanding probabilities, and then applying logic...

Around 700 people per year in the USA die from falling out of bed. Does this mean we should sleep on the floor?

If the same people who told you to 'social distance' and wear masks told you it was necessary, I have zero doubt that you would do it...or at least try to influence others to do it.

If they told you to walk on all four's to 'stay below the covid cloud' I expect that you'd be producing all kinds of data showing that it was the 'right thing' and 'obvious' and 'patriotic' and all that.  Anything to 'save granny' dontcha know.

1296  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Joe Biden is President of the United States of America on: May 16, 2021, 08:11:22 AM

Unconfirmed rumors say 75 year old brooklyn-born actor Kevin Dalton



Ah, so that's the guy who is on the reels of CSPAN footage groping little kids.  Not Biden at all.  What a relief!  Maybe America is OK after all and I will repatriate.

1297  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Do vaccines kill people? on: May 16, 2021, 07:58:24 AM
the sub-standard vaccination methods which are very much more limited than natural immunity through infection.
Go and Google images of polio survivors and iron lungs and see just how good natural immunity is, if you were lucky enough not to die in the first place.

My dad had polio as a kid.  15 years later he was 'tending hook' meaning he was the guy who climbed most of the way up a 250 foot tree, cut the top out, rigged it with cable, then fitted a 1000lb block at the top.  I think it fair to say that he was not in an 'iron lung'.

To be fair, my great aunt also had it and she was pretty fucked up needing braces and a crutches for the rest of her life.

The famous pic of kid in 'iron lungs' was a publicity stunt to scare the shit out of people.  Basically a consolidation of a lot of the tiny minority who suffered bona-fide and permanent diaphragm paralysis.  Yes, it did happen, but it was not very common really.  It also actually happened that about half the population were injected with SV40 monkey cancer virus which was a component of the vaccine at that time.  4 out of 4 of my grandparents got cancer.  And both of my parents as well (though my dad was probably just told by the medicos that he had it and probably didn't because he ignored the diagnosis and it never amounted to anything.)

If people actually cared about 'polio' they would STOP doing the vaccine because reverted vaccine strain is causing most of the 'cases' in most places these days.  If wild strain comes back, then start vaccinating again.  The hypothesis that this global vaccination program is one of Gates tax write-off pet projects to limit population growth is much stronger than the hypothesis that that freak cares much for little niggers and other goyim.

1298  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Israel is evil. Finish them off! on: May 16, 2021, 06:41:44 AM
Whatever Israel is or does, remember two things:
1. The name "Israel" comes from God to the people of Israel;
2. Even if they are wicked, many of them are descendants of Ancient Israel. And God made great promises to protect them, such as, Genesis 12:3:
"I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you."

Protect yourself from them. But be aware that God punishes all who disobey his commands. He will not break His promises to the descendants of Israel, which includes punishing them for their wickedness. Protect yourself, but let God punish them, or at least treat them well after you put down their wickedness.


'They' wrote much of your bible, and re-interpreted/re-wrote/re-published it numerous times.  It's a big reason for getting control of as many publishers as possible irrespective of the cost.  What the fuck do you think they are going to say?

One thing that 'they' and I are equally in awe of is how easily so many of you so-called 'Christians' are led around by the nose.  They pretty much own Catholicism after 'vatican-II'.  It's mind-blowing.  At least there still our some old-school Christians who are not buying all this very well funded 'Christain-Zionist' crap.



Isaiah and other parts of the Bible found in the Dead Sea caves, show that there was little difference between as early as 400 BC, and copies of the 1100s that we have today. They were serious about keeping the Word pure for the last 2,000+ years. Why wouldn't they have been serious about it right back to the time of Moses?

While it is true that the Israel leaders might be wrong, many of the people are descendants of Ancient Israel... as probably are many of Lebanon.


I don't believe in 'bloodlines' and all that crap.  It makes no sense mathematically and it's the domain of the most dispicable of psychopaths.

Here's the type of people who currently inhabit 'the promised land' in their own words:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/i7ZeQzFpKJUC/

Ironically many of them can trace their biological lineage to ancient Khazaria more directly than to the 'levant' or 'Greater Israel', but it's all a bunch of garbage anyway.  The guy who archives this stuff (and comments on it) seems to have had is actual web-site removed from the internet.  At least it seems that way from my seat:  https://www.knowmorenews.org

1299  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Israel is evil. Finish them off! on: May 16, 2021, 05:50:41 AM
Whatever Israel is or does, remember two things:
1. The name "Israel" comes from God to the people of Israel;
2. Even if they are wicked, many of them are descendants of Ancient Israel. And God made great promises to protect them, such as, Genesis 12:3:
"I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you."

Protect yourself from them. But be aware that God punishes all who disobey his commands. He will not break His promises to the descendants of Israel, which includes punishing them for their wickedness. Protect yourself, but let God punish them, or at least treat them well after you put down their wickedness.


'They' wrote much of your bible, and re-interpreted/re-wrote/re-published it numerous times.  It's a big reason for getting control of as many publishers as possible irrespective of the cost.  What the fuck do you think they are going to say?

One thing that 'they' and I are equally in awe of is how easily so many of you so-called 'Christians' are led around by the nose.  They pretty much own Catholicism after 'vatican-II'.  It's mind-blowing.  At least there still our some old-school Christians who are not buying all this very well funded 'Christain-Zionist' crap.

1300  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Do vaccines kill people? on: May 16, 2021, 03:06:19 AM

... And you can afford to be an antivaxxer because most people around you are vaccinated, so you're welcome.


Vaccines sometimes turn people into long-term asymptomatic carriers.

They also form an ecosystem where pathogens mutate more readily in order to evade the sub-standard vaccination methods which are very much more limited than natural immunity through infection.

They are also a huge drain on society with all of their auto-immunity and other health problems.  When they get channeled into the chronic illness track and dependent on 'modern medicine' they quickly deplete their financial resources to where they cannot afford a pot to piss in.  Then we healthy people who can still think clearly enough to hold high paying technical jobs have to foot their bills.

If that isn't bad enough, it seems that some of the latest generation gene therapies are design such that the 'vaccinated' shed their degraded condition to others in the community who were smart enough to avoid being participants in the drug trial.

Thanks for nothing.

Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 548 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!