In my observation, 'corruption' is pretty much universal.  It seems to be a function of being a human in a society larger than a typical hunter/gatherer group, and it makes a lot of sense why this would be the case.

Seems to me that it is 'better' to have the corruption be pushed down to the lowest level possible.  In this case more of the money stays at the local level.  In the U.S. where the corruption lives more at the state, federal, and corporate levels, the 'trickle down' path for the stolen money is so long that little or none of it goes back to the community.  On an individual level most people get all of the mine-shaft and little or none of the mine.

C'mon man!  Do a real survey.  95% or more of the sheeple will NEVER stop complying no matter what is thrown at them.  That should be abundantly clear by now.

'Growning citizen pushback' is integral to the 'new normal' and 'great reset'.  The biggest problem the designers have is to how TO get people to resist.  In a funny way, it's probably the pliant masses who will cause the greatest hurdle to 'their plans'.  They overdid it on fluoride or something I guess.

Adolf Hitler is conspicuously missing.  He was the figurehead of the National Socialists party in Germany, and it is absolutely true that he organized and exploited German _social_ apparatus for the benefit of the nation as he and his party (and a plurality of the population) saw it.

In Germany's case  the socialism was fascist.  It was 'fascist' insofar as it represented the merger of state and corporate power.  Today we would call this something like a 'public/private partnership.'  The 'efficiency' of 'Private industry' was leveraged, but the state harnessed it in the name of 'socialism.'  And IMHO, it certainly was.

In some ways Germany's National Socialism worked to well and had to be killed off, but the controllers just moved it to a different continent and did some narrative management to label it more 'kinder and gentler'.  And for a long time it kind of was, but that's rather faint praise.

Didn't say when the torment would start relative to the sting.  But it does appear to be invalid because of the 'not authorized to kill' clause.  The dead bodies are really starting to stack up now.

There actually never were any 'commies' per-se.  'Capitalism' and 'Communism' are just a choice that bankers make for one region at one point in time to best meet their objectives.  They market whatever is going to sell.  But it is true that the playbook used by what are normally thought of as 'Communists' calls out plays which tend to result in a much higher body-count.  Starts with the significant political threats, but then tends to moves on deeper into the general population often enough.

Again, if the ranks of one side are thinned by round-up, 're-education', and execution, it would be much more likely to be at the hands of people who are more aligned with 'pinko-ism' for lack of a better word.  Or just 'Leftist'.  One way or another, the head drives what either hand does, and the head is in a plane well above the playpen filled with the philosophical toys it gives the Left, Right, Democrat, Republican, etc to play with.

The head is as alive and well as it ever has been so a study of history with an eye toward leveraging it's predictive power is prescribed (by Dr. Me.)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the Christian bible talk about, in the 'time of great deception', scorpions with stings in their tails making people sick in such a way that they will pray for death, but death will evade them?

Sounds like something the gene therapy could do if the designers, for some reason, so desired it.  In the fictional representation of zombies they look like they might be suffering a degree of discomfort.  Certainly they don't look like happy campers.

Possible.  The commies are warm to the strategy of secret kill lists (with millions of entries) and mass extermination of political enemies in the name of the revolution when they get an opportunity.  I won't argue against historical precedent.

Lol.  You are a veritable barrel of laughs.  It is a mighty struggle to get idiots like franky1 up to a basic (1980s-ish) high-school level about what DNA is, what a 'gene' is, what a cell nucleus is, etc.  Yet I persevere for the 'greater good' because that's the kind of guy I am.

As for (((them)))tube, it's already highly censored for anything 'anti-vaxx' except for baloney which the vaxx side put up themselves as part of a psychological operation.  They need to invent sock-puppets to fight with since they don't have any real science or arguments.  In short, there is very little to 'debunk' on jootube, and most of us have moved on to other platforms where there is a modicum of free speech.

I've been planning to self-quarantine in one of my compounds for well over a year.  It's been reasonably easy to predict that things would come to this from about 13 days after the start of the 'two weeks to flatten the curve' which proved to be the lie we (who are paying attention) figured it was.

My rural compound is not really ready for a comfortable quarantine, but getting it that way would be something to do.

I am estimating the culling might be over in a year or two.  Once the ditches are full up and covered over, and we are living according to the commandments on the Georgia Guidestones, it will be a new day.  Honestly, most of those commandments are not half bad.  Just have to hope that the Rosicrucian, or whoever commissioned the monument end up on top vs. technocratic fascists running things currently or (((another group))) circling like vultures.  And, or course, hope that even if the (postulated)  Rosicrucian meant what they said, they don't end up with whatever power they end up with going to their heads and corrupting them to much.


I'm not big on a world court, a new living language, beauty/harmony/love/infinite BS, etc, but many of the basic ideas (esp, 'avoid petty laws and useless officials') are on the right track.

The ribosome is what is being programmed.  The gene is the code which programs it insofar as it dictates what protein the ribosome will produce.

This is very basic stuff.  So basic that almost anyone can understand it and thus see through your techno-babble very easily if they choose to take a few seconds to do so.  You should up your game just a little bit at least.

If they are inserted into your cells and reprogramming your cells to produce the designer's protein, they are 'your genes' in that sense.

In a legal sense, the genes are actually owned by the patent holder who can also exercise some legal claim over the cells operating on their program.  In other words, 'you' as a newly minted trans-human.

Says the guy who happily wears his muzzle, hunkers down in his rental room for weeks on end, and takes an experimental gene therapy treatment all driven by the terror of last year's common cold.

There is no doubt that there was gene editing.  They (claim to have) took genes sequenced in China and transmitted electronically, made some gene edits for the generated spike protein to hold certain unusual states longer, encapsulated the edited genes in lipid nano-particles, and had a fluid ready for injection in just two days.  Damn these guys are fast!  'They' being Moderna in this case.

That's gene therapy.
 
Since the substance doesn't provide 'immunity', it's not a 'vaccine';  Recipients of the substance can still contract, culture in vitro, and pass on the viral infection to others.  All the thing does is 'lessen mild to moderate symptoms', and even that is nothing more than a claim made by the makers of the substance, and at best their research was skimmed by corrupt bureaucrats who get paid to stamp things.  Ergo, it is a 'therapy'.  The argument that it is a 'medical device' probably also has some merit.

To be a little bit more accurate in the wording, the Harvard study found that reports were filed for fewer than 1% of the vaccine adverse events which occurred or where suspected.

To be honest about things, one has to recognize that some of the 1% probably are incidental and/or coincidental, and some of the other 99% probably would be as well.  If there were any interest at all in 'vaccine safety', the whole mess would be analyzed and cleaned up.  The opposite is happening, but VAERS is practically all we've got and fairly useful (and fairly alarming) anyway.

If one can accurately characterize the data, 1% is plenty to get quite a good picture of what is going on using relatively basic statistical tools.  Again though, it's obvious that the study needed to characterize the system is being strategically neglected.  Not at ALL surprising.


It seems pretty evident that a LOT of doctoring of the data is now going on to try to cover up the carnage.  Record ID's that go missing and turn up again in edited form much later (if at all.)  Further, some doctors admit to being to scared to file anything even when they think it appropriate because of reprisals by various parties.

Getting mad at you for making a decision like this is grounds enough for dumping her even if the injection doesn't have any ill effects.  Very possibly she'll not be able to have kids.  If you want kids, try to knock her (or someone) up and get through the first trimester at least before you marry her.

This could be shaping up to be a real 'Handmaid's Tale' type of a situation.  Or it will be physically impossible to have kids at all without the assisting hand of the corp/gov medical/industrial complex...and shelling out a ton of money.  The people currently running the show have always seemed to think they should issue a license for breeding.  Seems like everyone I knew in the states before I left had to get some fertility treatment even before the scamdemic and gene therapy treatments, but to be fair, most of my friends were on the older side of idea.

A 'gene' has been a sequence of nucleotides on a nucleic acid framework since I was in highschool.  DNA or RNA doesn't matter.  It's funny to see Forbes try to do an emergency marketing redefinition of this basic science term.  Someone should tell them to have their operatives with a wikipedia commit-bit do their part first at least.

Even if they can get their re-definition of what a 'gene' is done, it only helps for the mRNA gene therapy (Moderna, Pfizer.)  Most of the rest (J&J, AstraZeneca, Sputnic-V, etc) are DNA gene therapies.  The only common ones which are not gene therapy are Sinovac, Sinopharm, and Bhah-whatever from India.)  At least if the Chinese and Indian makers can be trusted which is doubtful.


It's 'easy to understand' because they are free to say whatever they want, and they dumb it down for sheeple.  The only challenge is to stay on top of the flip-flops.  And, for people like me, the art of double-think where I try to hold multiple conflicting set of knows simultaneously.

Yup.  They all are, but DeSantis takes it to a truly clown-shoe level.  As for the oaths, it's quite possible that they took care of that little detail years ago at some lodge somewhere.

Seriously, you hardly need Facebook social media data and Mercer's AI to figure out that being on the right side of the scamdemic will pay political dividends.  Lots of the Zionistas are getting on that band-wagon.  Maybe they are booked in the roll of being the 'light unto the nations' who promise to vanquish the Dr. Evil villains at the WEF and UN?  Time will tell.

That doesn't actually make any sense.

Even though I don't actually feel comfortable having vaxxed people around my house because their are still some unknowns about the whole gene therapy spreading issue, I still don't discriminate against them.  I don't mind telling people my reasons for my choices, and in fact I consider it something of a duty.

As for listening to 'the other side', I don't mind doing it but it's not really very equitable because the details of 'your side' is well known and can be picked up just by listening to any corporate media outlet for 10 minutes.  It is utterly contentless for the purposes of doing analysis because there are almost never any links to real science, and when there are it says the opposite of that the barkers are saying when one bothers to read it.  There is not anything very interesting to learn unless one is analyzing at a lower level how they are hypnotizing the sheeple.

If you trust the people telling you that, fine.  Go get your gene therapy if you like.  Just don't participate in pressuring me to make a different decision.  Doing so makes you someone who is assaulting me and posing a threat to me and my family.  Hopefully there will be an opportunity to balance the books in a fair and impartial court (Nuremberg-II) and you'll hopefully be categorized as just a duped fool rather than a higher level player.  If this does not happen things get progressively more ugly.