Trump is, and always was, just a tool.  His soul was bought and paid for a long long time ago.  Way back in his youth as a lackey and probable butt-boy of Roy Cohn.  Maybe even before that.


I voted against Hillary Clinton (breaking my rule of not voting in federal or state level elections.)  I don't especially regret it because his 4 years kinda interfered in some key ways with the implementation of a certain plan.  It got the Fabian Socialists and the Talmudic Judaics in kind of a power struggle and the former at least aware that someone else is gunning to steal their lunch.  Will they come to an agreement?  Or will they enter an internecine power struggle?  Hopefully (for the sake of humanity since either vision is one of doom) the latter will transpire.


It's probably well above Biden's pay-grade, and his senile mind won't even allow him to read a teleprompter about such 'advanced' topics.

You are leaving out one critical part of a rigorous study; the protocols.

It should be the case that a study is designed around a hypothesis.  The details of how the study is to be performed are known as the study protocols.  They should be agreed upon ahead of time.  The agreement should be between interested parties ('stakeholders' is the current buzzword).  The protocols should define exactly how the study is to be performed and what the observations lead to what understandings.  aka 'interpenetration.'

If the protocols are changed after the study begins it should be terminated and started over from scratch.

Science is like a chain being only as strong as it's weakest link.  That's what the whole 'citations' things is all about.  Any paper predicated on citations from a study which was not performed correctly and honestly is subject to itself become damaged.  That's why it is so important that 'scientists' be neutral and honest.  Unfortunatly that car crashed into the weeds a long time ago and we entered the new dark ages of 'scientism'.

  https://www.corbettreport.com/the-crisis-of-science/

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c01845?ref=pdf#

  --> Table 2. Leading mRNA Vaccine NanoparticleSA --> slide sideways a lot:

Pfizer/BioNtech(42−48)   BNT162b2 (plus other experimental variations)  ...
  self-replicating RNA coding for full-length S protein in its prefusion formation (additional variants with nonreplicating RNA, expressing RBD ...
    phases 1–3 completed FDA EUA


If you wanna be a helpful guy you can figure out what proportion of what populations got which of the Pfizer gene therapy treatments (BNT162b2, BNT162c2, BNT162b3, BNT162b1, BNT162a1, other?)

Or you can do as you almost always do:  Pull an assertion straight out of your butt-hole and present it like some sort of fact with zero by way of documentation and usually no basis in common sense.  Often not even any degree of coherence even.

I guess Clinton may not be the only ex-politician who has a 'huge Wiener problem' to quote the amusing quip by Big Pow.  These Kabbalah-ists are all the same...and when you study their religion a little bit it becomes more clear why.

Ann 'the man' Coulter actually turned out to be worth a shit in the end.  I'm suitable impressed by much of his work since figuring out that Trump was for sure a con-man early in his term.  I judge people by the content of their character; not by how well they hide their junk.

Yet another vaccine bait-n-switch.  This one a biggie.

Looks like some probably significant portion of the Pfizer/BioNTech IS 'self-amplifying' after all.  I know that there was every indication possible that Pfizer/BioNTech was NOT self-amplifying in the early days because I looked hard.  In fact I studied Imperial College's sa-RNA development and was very relived when it was shelved because anyone who understands this stuff a little bit should be scared as hell about both DNA methods (AstraZeneca, J&J, Sputnik-V) and self-amplifying (aka self-replicating) RNA flavors due to the danger of run-away spike protein codings.

Back in the 1970's for the bird flu fake pandemic the vaccine makers pulled the same stunt; certifying one formulation then switching to another for to inject the population.  Back then a couple hundred deaths was enough to shut down the game.  In modern times we are looking at thousands (or tens of thousand or hundreds of thousands) of deaths and maimings with no sign of slow-down on the horizon.  Obviously corp/gov learned better from their past mistakes than did the peeps.

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/DsrLvjardHaO/

Pharma lobbied hard (world-wide) for the ability to inject anything they wanted into the peeps for these emergency use authorized (NOT 'approved') trials.  And they got what they wanted.  There is zero reason to think that one 'Pfizer' is the same as another 'Pfizer'.  They never claimed that, and they are now stating otherwise.  Likewise any other maker presumably.

None of the manufactures ever stated that they were NOT putting magnetic nano-particles into their substance either BTW.  The denials come from mainstream media and 'fact checkers' who have no way to know, and who also are perfectly free from a legal perspective to lie to your face.

This vid of a guy trying to pay off is daughter to not become a gene therapy trail participant hit's somewhat close to home.

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/pC4Wux5xR27i/

I would council anyone in such a situation (wife and kids bent on gene therapy) to think about just packing up and leaving the country.  You've lost that hand to Big Pharma and the corp/gov state and are just pouring good resources after bad.  In a lot of cases you can just get a fresh start elsewhere.  Why stick around to watch (and fund) the slow deaths of people who've been programmed to hate you?

And if your family and loved ones die a slow death in S.E. Asia under the influence of globalist money, at least it won't cost you as much as it does in the West.

Given the people involved in this scamdemic it seems quite possible that the slipped in their own little genetic contribution to a lot of these jabs.  Jeff Epstein was friendly with a lot of the creeps, and he was bent on 'seeding humanity' with his genetics.  (Would be interesting to know more about the individual who became these fetal cell lines used to grow some of these gene therapy components.)  If that turns out to be the case that you are getting some degenerate creep 'grafted into your family tree' with these shots, then continuing financial support of family members such as the disgusting tik-tok heifer makes you pretty much a 'cuck' in a real sense of the word.

Probably it is worth some people's time to step back and ask 'what is a country?'  Is it the people?  Or is it the resources?  Who installs the management of the country?

I posit that 'the country' is more the resource/'debt' in most instances, and especially the U.S..  After 100 years of private central banking an enormous debt has accumulated.

So then, what is a 'threat to the country'.  I posit that the biggest threat to most countries is their internal population.  In a country such as the U.S. with no external enemies who are powerful enough to threaten it, the most likely 'failure' (to service the debt) would be due to actions of the population.  Even if a nation's population is not a threat (thanks to, say, years of public education and fluoride) they still compete with the debtors for resources.

So then what is 'defense' of the country against 'threats'?  What is the DOD actually defending?  Why did the DOD funding to Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance to cook up, with help from China, the reason for a 'covid vaccine' exceed by an order of magnitude the pitiful few million contributed by Fausti/Collins'?

As for China, I think the CCP holds the all-time historic record for the most citizens killed.  60,000,000 or some such in the 'great leap forward' alone if memory serves.

I will again posit that there is no special difference between the U.S. and China.  They are both a couple of tools clattering about in the international banker's toolbox.

---

Another thing that people need realize is that an 'effective' weapon is frequently NOT an exquisitely lethal one.  Toe-popper mines for instance.  Basil-II had it figured out a millennia ago when he had the vanquished Bulgar's eyeballs plucked out leaving every 50'th guy with one eye to lead the rest home.  The Bulgar's never again posed a challenge or threat.

With the 2020 event, a dead person is not going to be willingly taking the gene therapy.  The weapon developed was tuned for the task at hand.  That doesn't mean it wasn't any good or that they 'failed' to do 'better'.  The jury is still out on that one because it's hard to predict the future, and I continue to believe that we are only at the start of this thing.

Word to the wise:

Obviously I've been scouring on this Fauci tsunami.  It's pretty clear to me that the charges which are causing this spectacular implosion have been carefully and expertly placed.  It also appears that there are some notable (and safe) sacrificial lambs who have been prep'd for some time.  Fausti, Dasnak, Baric, etc.

I would council to look hard and deep before jumping on any particular savior figure's bandwagon.

Most 'sustainable' methods of converting energy suffer from a massive Achilles heal.  Namely, in order to build out enough capacity to service peek loads, you have to design such that a lot of energy is going to waste at off-peak times.  Solar is a good example, but wind, tidal, hydro, etc suffer from the same basic issue.

Now, if instead of sinking the excess capacity into waste heat you can use it to 'make money', it becomes cost effective to build out facilities sufficient to service customers in peek load times.  Proof-of-work crypto fills the bill nicely.  Ergo, it is actually a benefit to those who would like to build 'sustainable' facilities which will 'save the earth' (if you are the kind of innumerate mouth-breather who buys that Rockefeller funded global climate change via CO2 bullshit.)  Or could be.  Good luck getting financing for something which could support a distributed owner-operated mathematically-backed currency systems from the monolithic debt-backed financial sector.

To dumb it down a little, bitcoin could and probably will run on 'free energy' meaning energy which would otherwise have to go to waste.

Could Satoshi (or the Satoshis as the case may be) have predicted that a properly designed mathematically-backed monetary solution could foster a distributed energy system (where individuals can afford to build out larger home-based solar systems) as a side effect of having a distributed monetary system?  We may never know (but I personally don't seem much evidence for it to be honest.)

---

As an aside, I personally harbor suspicions that nuclear fusion (free clean energy in unlimited quantities) has been for a while now an option but it would to disruptive and 'breeding among the useless eaters' needs to be brought under control before it is 'rolled out'.  This would obviously have an impact on proof-of-work based crypt-currencies.

I think you are mixing up 'contribute good content' with 'form a circle-jerk with a clique of sad-ass wankers.'  I didn't realize until oldovlobo's comment that high 'merit' nets you footer-spammers extra $$$ on your wares.  That makes participation in mutual merit-pumping schemes even more pathetic.

Nothing new about that, and it came with a lot of credible backup (and obvious dots) from a long while back.  In particular, there is a lot of tie-in between the people and organizations who had a likely hand in the engineering...and other similar engineering..., and who also have a hand in the 'vaccination' which is supposed to 'treat' it.  It gets MUCH worse.

Dr. Fausti is, as we used to say, 'up Shit Creek without a paddle.'  He's about to be fed to he wolves.  That should be fun because he was the feature of such a 'cult of personality' operation that it would have made Joe Stalin blush.  I doubt that most of these idiots (a lot of my friends and family shamefully enough) will be able to let go their savior figure very easily such was the magnitude of the corp/gov sponsored mind-fuckage.  The cognitive dissonance will only add to their vaccine damage mental woes.  Probably 'Orange Man Bad' will help them through their grief for another year or two though.

I would urge the people who matter to not let the Dr. Fausti thing draw away attention from the real issues.  He was a minor cog in the wheels of what's going on here.  Don't let him become an effective scapegoat and let the big fish get away.  If we do so, they WILL be circling around to bite off another limb.

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/0faTJx5l9pbR/

I left it in to see if you or anyone can catch it.  It's exactly what I said; trying to pass off the hospitalized number as the number of 'breakthrough cases' since these show how the so-called vaccine doesn't work for shit...at least if by 'work' on means keeps people from getting 'covid'.  It's kind of a good example of using bullets in a devious way for propaganda (re-named 'Public Relations' after WW-II) in fact.

Oh, the link got trimmed by accident.  Oops. <chuckle>.  Here it is again for convenience: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FgULx6LqwOoP/

I'll go with what the boots-on-the-ground say.  Like various funeral home workers:  Nothing unusual in workload...until the vaccines started when things got busy as hell.  https://www.bitchute.com/video/vAKN1y02o82h/  Lots of medical people are saying the same thing.  And I saw with my own eyes how quite several hospitals were during the time frame when we are supposed to be in the biggest pandemic in over 100 years and the news was reporting non-stop about the overloaded medical system.  

If it looks like a scam and quacks like a scam, it's probably a scam.  Tossing money around will achieve any 'figures' that you want for your 'narrative'.  Only certain people control that kind of money.

Who gives two fucks about 'merit'?  It's an obviously gamed-by-losers shit-show (and you guys in the 'merit cycling club' are a poster-children for the phenomenon.)  An 8000 'merit score' tells at a glance who the 'social media influencers' are.  Don't need to even read the posts because it is entirely predictable what social media inflencers are going to say.  Also the attitude of 'Ban!', 'Delete!', 'Cancel!' fits the mold perfectly.

A 'activity score' (and decade of posting history) tend to be a lot more meaningful.  To me at least.

I don't remember that one.

But anyway, it's very very common for 'crazy conspiracy theories' to be planted for the purposes of making people close their minds down to all non-orthodox information and to later 'debunk'.  They can then use such stories to conflate with practical and well researched information in an attempt to get ordinary people's eyes to gloss over.  It's a pretty obvious strategy and often it's easy to spot a mile away.

According to the CDC, the mortality rate of people getting 'covid' after the 'covid jab' (aka, 'breakthrough cases') is 18%.

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/FgULx6LqwOoP/

That's significantly higher than the claim of fatality rate in non-jabed peeps in any age category.  This observation must, however, be tempered by the known efforts to tamp down the numbers of 'breakthroughs' since it is politically embarrassing for the so-called 'vaccine'.  This they do by not counting 'covid' in jabbed people unless they need to go to the hospital where with non-jabbed people a count is made of all people who are 'suspected' of having 'covid'.  Thus, it is likely that there are a lot more 'breakthrough cases' of people who are surviving but they are not counted (which would bring the fatality rate down from it's impressive 18%.)

---

In another recent vid:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/TPrL6Qev8Vd0/

Not sure why this doctor would perjure himself in a congressional testimony.  Maybe you can think of some reasons?  Trump supporter?  White supremacist?  Russian bot?  Gun owning Texan?

Just a word of caution about VAERS and the Harvard study...we on the right side of this thing don't have a requirement to make asses out of ourselves because we have the facts and the logic.

The Harvard study happened before the plandemic and the start of one of it's primary goals; getting people injected with genetic modification technology and other things.  Seems that prior to the scamdemic relatively few medical professionals had even heard of VAERS...in spite of their legal obligation to use it.  That has changed somewhat so it is _possible_ that the reporting rate is somewhat less dismal than the 'less than 1%' which the Harvard study found.

It is also possible that since jabs are such a non-ignorable element of the scamdemic, a higher percentage of adverse reactions are being reported.

It is also possible (and I would say likely) that reporting rates are not linear to the severity trend grade.  In other words, deaths may now and may always have been reported at rates higher than the average found by Harvard.

There are a lot of 'maybe's.  There should not be.  If the regulatory agencies were not totally captured, they would be all over resolving these questions by deep and open analysis.  Any blind fool can see that the opposite occurred and continues to occur.   When Harvard released their study they had ideas on how to rectify some of the 'problems' with VAERS.  The CDC (I think it was) who commissioned the study stopped even returning their calls.  Obviously the grave deficiencies and neglect of VAERS is not a bug; it's a feature.

I guess you missed the MIT 'infiltration' report.  Here's another run-down:

  https://www.thecognitiveman.com/ce/covid-19/mit-researchers-infiltrate-anti-maskers-and-are-stunned-to-discover-they-do-science/

  “Anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how
   scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naive realism
   about the ‘objective’ truth of public health data.”

Nicely said, MIT.

In the same way that owning shares in Google makes you 'turn into Google.'


That's the goal of a variety of psychological operations.


Even better!  You would be able to back-calculate the Fatality Rate of diphtheria to find out what numbers you are going to need to prove that people started becoming infected less only when the vaccine came out.  And thus, that sanitation and nutrition has nothing to do with solving the problem of communicable diseases, or at least not communicable diseases for which there is a (supposed) vaccine available.  We can ignore sore points such as scarlet fever...especially if we don't mind looking like desperate pharma-bot creeps.

Edit: 'dying --> 'becoming infected' to be fair and accurate about Oily's argument.

'They' are laying the foundation for the 'hive mind'.

Once a quota of people are infused with SPIONS, the network infrastructure (mis-known as '5G') will be activated and all injected people will become part of the hive mind.