That's the idea.  Get kids to question their parents, but absolutely not the corp/gov conglomerates (pharma/media/etc 'public/private partnerships') who actually run the world.   The few posts (of your few posts) indicate that you are something of a poster-child for this in paradigm.

Lots of people's parents are old enough to remember the 'old normal' which are not sufficiently aligned with desirable new-norms.  Inducing questioning/rejection of parents is a second-best to just taking the kids away into state custody, but doing so causes backlash and has actually led to the fall of socialist regimes historically.  It's been the proverbial 'straw that broke the camel's back' in some cases.

A related problem is that parents are instinctively protective of their kids health, fertility, etc.  It's wired in, and there is only so much the corp/gov can do with the wiring if it is not caught early enough.  Older generations who developed before the current technology was ready suffer from this programming defect an OTA upgrades are not available.  Yet.  The corp/gov state has kind of the opposite interest than do parents; people who are mentally damaged can be easier to control, and ones who are physically damaged are better consumers of pharma products.

Back in the late 1800's I think it was, some doctor theorized that keeping a facility, surgical instruments, etc, somewhat clean could reduce infection.  He had a wing of a hospital under his management and imposed what was for the time a high level of hygiene.  What happened?  Well, the mortality rate in his wing was something like 1/3 what it was in the industry and the rest of the hospital.  Most of the reduction in deaths were from a low rate of sepsis in his areas.

So the doctor was hailed as a hero!  Right?  Hell no.  He was hated by his peers and hassled by administration.  As I recall he was eventually kicked out of the hospital.  Ironically he himself died of sepsis in the end.  It wasn't until after his death decades later that they started mopping floors and cleaning surgical instruments and the guy's  contribution to medical science was even acknowledged.

Doctors tend to be among the most closed-minded and conceited people in the world.  The more people worship them as some sort of God's who fell to earth, the bigger their heads get.  Not all of them of course, but 'covid' has demonstrated that the percentage of worthless piece of shit scumbags in the medical system is distressingly high.

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis

Both the summary (above link) and the full article:

  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541280/

open fine for me in SE Asia with firefox built from source code on a unix-like system.

Not at all surprising.  I am currently in one of the least 'educated' places I've ever lived, and the neighborhoods which are the most impoverished are the ones who are making the best 'my body, my choice' decisions.  Somehow they mirror the decisions arrived at the the _retired_ industry scientists and Nobel prize laureates who suggest to be very very wary of these gene therapies.  Go figure.

It's the 'educated' middle management (including about 99% of the medicos) who are leaving a yellow puddle over the 'dreaded covid', terrorized by the clown-shoe propaganda, and rushing to get 'their' injections.

Whenever I think I cannot get more amazed at Orwell's precience (in this case, the dichotomy between the 'educated' middle management classes and the 'masses' vis-a-vis compliance with big-brother directives) I am wrong.

---

BTW, here is a new one:  Ryan totally rag-dolls the Politifact 'fact checkers', Yahoo News' real-time revisionism, etc:

  https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/more-aussies-have-died-clots-than-covid-2021-cdc-lies-study-shows-jab-reduces-antibodies/

Yup.  Their 'source' tends to be the idiot who generated some tweet with some semi-related content that they can use as the strawman to 'debunk'.  To be sure such idiot tweets do exist...and if they don't it's easy to generate one.

The so-called 'fact-checker's game-book is not that hard to figure out if you are an analytical person.

Speaking of, I mentioned earlier that 1) the deaths might be reported at a different rate than the non-fatal adverse reactions, and 2) there might be a hyper-sensitivity leading to better reporting rates.

I've heard credible insiders say that medical staff are being highly discouraged from filing VAERS reports for the covid jabs...and many medicos have never even heard of the system anyway.  Thus, the rate might even be worse than it was in the old-normal days.

OTOOH, it could also be that individuals filing probably is up, and there are organizations like Bigtree's who will help people do so.  So we are back to the possibility that the rate might be better again.  Hard to know.

From what I hear, every page of the system has a big fat warning that false filing is a federal crime.  I've not heard of anyone being prosecuted for filing false reports so I doubt that it happens very much.  Certainly not enough to account for the giant gaps in the numbers.  It's also interesting, and totally non-surprising to hear that the web interface is horibly buggy and makes it very easy to lose one's work and data if you wait to long on a page or whatever.


Actually a de-populated world could have a ton of advantages for those who make it through.  If, somehow, the 'evil' forces behind this thing do get the deed done but somehow the prize slips through their grasp and the 'good' forces end up on top, things could be quite pleasant for a while.  Even if I were sure that the 'good side' would win and I would be there to enjoy the rewards, I would still fight hard against the operation.  This because it just isn't right to do people like they're doing, and there are other ways to resolve some of the very real issues that are vexing humanity.

To answer your question, though, of course I will do whatever I have to do up to and including 'going caveman style' if I had to.  I'd rather not.

I don't believe mainstream media outlets.  In the U.S., they have legal authority to flat out lie if authorized by the state department to do so, and the state department is free to do so in when an 'emergency' has been declared.  Thus, info from the U.S. is particularly suspect.

I'm a lot more convinced by one of the whistle-blower nurse who says that in her hospital, exactly 100% of those hospitalized with 'covid' have been 'vaccinated'.

In real life, I don't know of anyone in my 2 degree circle who has been hospitalized with 'covid', although I know a lot of people (including myself) who seemed to have picked up something somehow which was a bizarre illness with unusual effects.  Most of these happened months ago and in some cases at the kick-off when the 'two weeks to flatten the curve' thing started over a year ago.  I know of one person at least who was recently hospitalized not to long after getting jabbed.  Hospitalized with 'covid' of course.

---

I do know of a LOT of people in this 2 degree circle who have come up hot on a 'PCR test' and have been locked up in a facility.  The facilities can be an old building owned by friends/family of political figures and fixed up for the purpose.  A 'patient' gets some food and money to be 'positive' and spend 15 days in a facility so there is sometimes quite a desirable thing to come up hot.  While the 'patient' gets some money, a lionshare of it goes to other moving parts in this 'system'.  The newly minted 'molecular biology lab' won't say the cycle threshold they are using for the PCR tests, but it seems likely to be up in the 40's which is well past the point where the test is meaningless vis-a-vis 'covid disease'.

I know of one instance where a guy did NOT want to come up positive because he wanted to travel.  He was surprised to come up 'positive' because he had no health issues.  There was a lot of spraying of noxious stuff at the lock-up, and that night he developed a horrible cough which drove him crazy for a month.

The scam is not very hard to see, people.  It's also not hard to see what countries are playing it and what ones are not by looking at their declared infections and death numbers.

Nope:  Just the opposite.  Two of the people I pay the most attention to (and sometime fund) implore people NOT to just trust what they say and do their own research.  To back it up, both are also VERY fastidious about providing links to source material for everything they talk about.

Check out how it should be done:

  https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-381-who-will-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/

  https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/who-says-children-should-not-be-vaccinated-nanobots-az-vax-has-protein-breakdown-blood-clots/

Note the organized sequential links to the source material, then at the bottom of the page a comments section so people can add to or challenge the information provided.

As Corbett said, these (usually B&M Gates Foundation funded) 'fact checkers' tend to rely heavily on straw-man arguments.  That is to say, take something ridiculous that someone (often one of their own operatives most likely) said and 'debunk' that.  They know damn well that 99% of people are just going to look at the color code thingy at the top.

I don't remember ever seeing an open comments section on any of the 'fact checks'.   Any source of information without an open comments section is very suspect to me, and I don't use them very much for actual information about critical or sensitive subjects.

One of the few times I actually looked to find information on a 'fact check' site was when someone who claimed to be the family doctor of Bill Gates' family said that the kids were sharp, healthy, and unvaccinated.  Did the 'fact checkers' even bother to get a statement from Gates?  Of course not.  They 'debunked' the story by pointing out that the doctor was not acting ethically by exposing private medical information.  Lol!  What a joke.

Yup.  It's a fall-out from 'classic' old-school pre-scientism concepts such as observation, research, and critical thinking.

Your average 'global citizen' would never think to ask about how the 'fact checkers' came into existence and who funds their pay-checks, much less what that means for their work product.  To most people, that they calling themselves 'fact checkers' makes it obvious that they are credible in checking facts.  As further proof, Google and Facebook use them!

https://www.corbettreport.com/who-will-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/

The 'VICTOR' variant has that base covered already.

Actually, the 'Golf Tango' variant would be better named.  Or Golf Mike Oscar variant.

It (the 'delta', aka 'indian' variant) pretty demonstrably doesn't do shit:

  https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1407029848107802630

It's only goal in the propagandasphere is to further terrorize the idjut class give political cover for 'leaders' to keep imposing face shields on their peeps.  And that it's done.

I had never considered Zambia.  If this guy is representative then I probably should.

How do you know what they guy (or me for that matter) does NOT post after doing some research?  The fact that the guy follows up with a correction is laudable and something I almost never see from 'the other side.'  If anything differentiates the 'two sides', it is this propensity for accuracy and self-reflection.

I must say that this thing just sort of looks photo-shopped to me.  For my part, I would not spread this particular thing around without some due-diligence.  It doesn't actually make much sense that Obummer would be doing photo-shoots in such deep-state operations at that point in time.  On the other hand, right now would be to get a cheap 'debunkable' thing to 'go viral'.

At least figure out if they guy had even been to china at that time period.  This would have been immediately after gain-of-function research was chased out of CONUS (without special exemptions.)  Of course this could argue FOR it being an important enough re-boot for the prez to make a photo-op.  Whatever the case, it seems a little to convenient given the exposure of the shady research happenings of that time period (and this one.)

They've got a blind-mans-buff grope-fest going on on Philma's privately curated self-moderated thread about whether vaxxers or anti-vaxxers are going to take the hit on this thing.  I rarely comment on self-moderated wank-fest threads, and I think this open thread spawned from that one.  So...

It is pretty obvious that the same people who cooked up the virus had _earlier_ cooked up the so-called 'vaccine'(*).  This is a who's-who of Western-associated military/industrial complex actors.  They are shady as fuck, and have been involved in all kinds of past malfeasance from the anthrax stuff on down.  Now people will talk a little about Dr. Fausti's measly $3M or whatever funding the Wuhan gain-of-function research which is at least being blamed by many for the 'SARS-cov-2'.  What almost nobody will mention is that Fausti's $3M pales in comparison to the $39M which Peter Daszak's 'Eco-Health Alliance' middle-man got from the U.S. DOD.

Upshot:  Anyone who is stupid enough willingly take an injection developed by the same group of people who funded the development of the virus which is supposed to justify the injection pretty much deserved to be eliminated from the gene pool.


* Clearly, back in the early days, they didn't know if it would fly to re-label their gene therapy as a 'vaccine' and thus ride the zero-liability train associated with 'vaccines'.  Trump, in his earlier sales-pitching of this thing, used to use the word 'therapeutics' (and others) just in case.  Turned out they yes, people are stupid enough to switch to the term 'vaccine' even for a gene therapy which doesn't even provide immunity.

It's about as obvious as the nose on one's face by now that the virus was made for the so called 'vaccine' and not the other way around.  That's why Moderna had a liquid injectable two days after 'downloading the genetic sequencing results from China.'  China and the U.S. worked hand-in-glove on this hoax because they are both just puppets of the banking powers above them.

The so-called 'vaccine' is in most cases just re-labeled gene therapy techniques which was designed to involve the ACE2/Spike_Protein for certain reasons.  They were ready long before Jan 2020.  (Some companies in India and China rode the gravy-train and cooked up a quick-n-dirty old-school inactivated virus vaccine because the testing protocols were designed so that anything would 'succeed'.)

The LNP component of these mRNA gene therapies are irrelevant to the 'vaccine'/virus genetics but are utterly critical as a lot of work must have gone into making them have an affinity for specific tissues (e.g., the ovaries.)

I've never heard anyone say that it does.  Strawman arg.


I've never heard of anyone who thinks that.  Strawman arg.

Maybe real arguments would be more persuasive.  Even better if you can back things up with links to real information.  Of course if you don't have any, you'll have to just go for the ridiculous strawman argument I suppose.  Knock yourselves out.

Tim Truth did a piece on this:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/4CVmg3vR6Xr5/

Edit:  Here's an interesting one from the comments in Tim Truth's vid:  https://onemileatatime.com/news/american-airlines-canceling-hundreds-of-flights/

Self-moderated threads are for sad-ass losers who know going in that they cannot sustain an argument.  It's pretty self-evident.

Interestingly, one can reliably predict the attitudes and personalities who are correlated with that sort of behavior.  Not surprisingly, people who are politically aligned with philosophies of 'equity' are well represented.  Basically people who need a crutch in order to be intellectually competitive are drawn to this philosophy.  Censorship and 'cancel culture' help provide the crutch they need.

I almost never read or participate in a 'self-moderated' thread because such a thing is intellectually repugnant.  It's also often times a tactical or strategic tar-baby.  I'm glad it is allowed on this forum, however, because it is a great filter for separating the intellectual wheat from the intellectual chaff.