nice advice, but using glbsee with tor seems a good thing to me. Nefario have you thought about using a Tor hidden service?
Really I'm only kidding, often the issue is the time since GAuth used on GLBSE is time based. Anyway, I've ordered a Yubikey so will adding this as a two-factor auth method as well.
|
|
|
I want to thank LWCoder for the absolutely awesome work he has put into this app,
You can now find this app on the front page of GLBSE, and to make things easier, to add the API key we now show a QRCode, so no more blistered fingers from typing in the code.
Once again, thanks to LWCoder.
|
|
|
Now you're just rubbing it in.
true, I'm sorry, at least I used a different thread, right? bitcoin powerhouse!! Lol, it was good to finally meet you at the conference.
|
|
|
Two things,
1) having this as an anonymous service is a no no, you'll run off with the coins you little scamp 2) If you did go legit, don't call it bitfair, you're just asking to get sued.
|
|
|
Just on the videos, we're going going to be looking at about a week to a week and 1/2 for the post production. Sound and video quality is pretty good.
|
|
|
well , I have enabled 2-factor auth and when it is used from firefox with tor, it didnt let me log in.
if i turn off tor, everything works again. ( using foxyproxy standart)
any hint?
Thank you.
Don't use tor.
|
|
|
haha, i realised that back in the day you had actually asked me to do a logo for you Too late, that ship has sailed.
|
|
|
Good question, to discourage people from submitting bad contracts, the application fee will cover a single application, so applicants had better get their stuff right if they don't want to waste funds.
I think somone has already offered to vet contracts on the forum.
I would be willing to look at people's contracts and rip them apart with brutal honesty. Maybe I could offer to look at a contract for 1 btc, refundable if the contract is not accepted by GLBSE? That sounds like a good idea.
|
|
|
We're making these changes because a lot of people have tried to create assets that we just can't approve, and most of the time it's just from terribly written contracts or schemes that don't really map onto a stock exchange.
So if somebody comes to you with a horribly written contract, will you take their deposit and tell them to try again, or will you have them rework the contract and continue without paying a second deposit? Good question, to discourage people from submitting bad contracts, the application fee will cover a single application, so applicants had better get their stuff right if they don't want to waste funds. I think somone has already offered to vet contracts on the forum.
|
|
|
Now you're just rubbing it in.
|
|
|
Latest update on the audit is that it's about 1/3 complete. If it's not ready before the vote, allowing adequate time for discussion and analysis then I will move the vote expiration date back.
|
|
|
I'd like to see announcements like this made through the GLBSE mail feature as well as the forum. I've never gotten mail through the GLBSE and it seems like that would be a logical place for these kinds of announcements.
Sure does, I'll see about that.
|
|
|
We need to have some guide lines published, what I had in mind was putting into catagories on how likely your asset is to be approved.
Wont be approved: drugs, weapons, prostitution related idea
Not likely: "Investment program" where the actual investment method is not being revealed, or something that is the same or very similar to well known scams.
Investment ideas where the business doesn't exist yet, and the issuer doesn't want to be verified.
Likely: Well detailed business plan and contract Fully verified Existing revenue generating activity
These would be guidelines and the final decision would rest with us.
Opinions on the above is very much welcome.
We're making these changes because a lot of people have tried to create assets that we just can't approve, and most of the time it's just from terribly written contracts or schemes that don't really map onto a stock exchange.
Hey, brothels are legal businesses in Australia and have great cashflow (way better than mining) This may be true, and someday I hope to have a GLBSE branch around the corner from Kings Cross (Sydney) where they will allow people to sell shares of themselves if they so wish :p
|
|
|
Tomorrow it is shashliki and bbq'ed lobster time.
You cold hearted bastard.
|
|
|
Can we have reasons explained?
I think this will answer your question: ...I'm going to issuing shares on the GLBSE...
Read that whole thread: It's golden! Do you have a link? I can't find that or I'm blind. Both are viable options. Here
|
|
|
We need to have some guide lines published, what I had in mind was putting into catagories on how likely your asset is to be approved.
Wont be approved: drugs, weapons, prostitution related idea
Not likely: "Investment program" where the actual investment method is not being revealed, or something that is the same or very similar to well known scams.
Investment ideas where the business doesn't exist yet, and the issuer doesn't want to be verified.
Likely: Well detailed business plan and contract Fully verified Existing revenue generating activity
These would be guidelines and the final decision would rest with us.
Opinions on the above is very much welcome.
We're making these changes because a lot of people have tried to create assets that we just can't approve, and most of the time it's just from terribly written contracts or schemes that don't really map onto a stock exchange.
|
|
|
The current application fee to list an asset on GLBSE is 8BTC.
From this Friday the fee structure will be different.
We are reducing the application fee to 5BTC, and increasing the listing fee to 7BTC.
When creating a new asset 12BTC will be charged, if the application is not accepted 7BTC will be returned but the application fee will not.
|
|
|
Are there any available for those of us who were only there in spirit? (To be sent by mail?)
Heh, we didn't keep them. But maybe someone can upload a pic of one they have.
|
|
|
|