This would be incorrect. If saving money were so easy people would not be in debt so much complaining for higher wages. It depends on what your starting income is to efficiently save money, and what the standard of living is. You can not live in New York City on a salary of 9 dollars per hour working 30 hours a week to the point of having money retire with, or take vacations, or cover medical costs, ect. If I were taking a financial plan, location would be a huge factor because expenses vary place to place which would offset the percentages you would need to save each month.

There is a lot of misconceptions and falsified images as to what physically happened the day of the attacks. To start off, most buildings are insured. If the point you're alluding to is that this is a giant insurance scam, then it's a bit of an overkill. The speed the aircraft was going at I could assume decimated it to the point of there being nothing left of it. Even after the initial impact, the plane burned. Also, there were actual reports of plane hijackings, so where else would those planes go? It would be very difficult to hide a hijacked plane. Witness reports can also be VERY deceiving under a situation like 9/11. See the following: http://www.simplypsychology.org/eyewitness-testimony.html

I think there is a gray area in between the two crowds you refer to. In a way, the price of Bitcoin is proportional to how successful it is which keep all people focused on the price, not necessarily the currency. This doesn't mean they don't care for the representation or technology Bitcoin holds, but price is a main component to the drive that people have towards it. Personally, I feel as if I fit into that crowd. The price of Bitcoin being up is great, makes us all excited, when it's down maybe not so much, but my interest in Bitcoin will not decrease just because of the price. As far as those that use Bitcoin as a "get rich quick" scheme, I find they will be heavily disappointed, especially with the current exchange rate. Bitcoin won't be hitting the mainstream public soon if ever.

Bitcoin would be first to hit mainstream so that's why I believe it's better. I could see it being more practical in day to day situations as companies like Dell, Dish, ect. have already adopted it. The community is also more bigger with Bitcoin which has its benefits.

I know the OP will never care to see this, but for discussions sake: Selling in markets where Bitcoin is uncommon is the best way to profit off BTC. In a few foreign markets where Bitcoin is highly valued due to multiple reasons, BTC can be sold at ridiculous markups because the demand for Bitcoin is too high and the supply just can't keep up. If you're entering this type of market you need to isolate yourself from other sellers which can be a problem. Notorious example is Ebay. We've all seen the ridiculous prices offered on Ebay that can range from a 20 to 30 percent increased price rate, and even at that they sell because the demand is huge. Like I said, it's all about the market. Find yourself a place where BTC is hard is highly valued and get straight sales at amazing rates for the seller.

Go to your local gas station or retail store and purchase prepaid gift cards then sell them on the forums for a discounted rate. You can keep your identity hidden for the most part, more so than an exchange for that matter.

Adding to what the user above me said, you should take a picture of the troop levels as well. Cleaning up the base a bit and getting a better base design will appeal better to a buyer which will help you get this sold as it is an extremely rush account.

There are multiple ways you can go about getting your money back through paypal. If a buyer paid with a stolen credit card, or using some sort of stolen or hacked paypal account, you're 100% ALWAYS will lose your money without hope. When an actual dispute is opened, the only way someone will win with digital goods is if they claimed their paypal was hacked. To honor PayPal's terms of service, they will be forced to reverse the transaction and the scammer will win. I'm not completely sure, but if there isn't a response to a dispute on a person's side, that will also trigger an automatic loss for the person who didn't respond.

I understand when this thread was posted, but for all those viewing, NOW would be an amazing time to buy. I see it stabling out at around mid 200's "ish". You're not going to bust out of your investment almost guaranteed. It's more than likely going to increase in price in the upcoming months. If not, it will not go down in my eyes which makes this a more than safe investment.

I only use my Bitcoins to purchase digital gift cards or fiat currencies. I tend not to buy products directly via BTC in case problems arise. It's much more easier to control where funds are transferred with gift cards and companies rather than use BTC to use on physical goods. I often sell gift cards as well at a discounted rate to purchase Bitcoin rather than go through a complicated exchange.

Not to be that guy, but....when I saw this title I immediately thought gambling...quick, painless, a hit or miss. Realistically, trade and sell goods. Easiest way other than investing and just letting money grow that way. Finding investment plans, that are safe at least, aren't the easiest though.

In my opinion Bitcoin will not compete with fiat currency. There should be a voice of a typical, low income to mid income citizen because they are the type of people that would make the switch from fiat to Bitcoin. Rich people would never trade their wealth for BTC so there input wouldn't be as highly valued, under the circumstance fiat still has value of course. But going to my main point, there is no reason for them to adopt Bitcoin unless fiat currency goes corrupt so I feel the mainstream public won't take the initiative to hop on an unstable currency. Hypothetically speaking, if the economy were to completely crash and fiat currency is completely worthless, people would take on precious metals as value faster they would Bitcoin.

What you should do is put the two suggestions together. Give out 2-3 vouch copies to people who are willing to do the method provided in this Ebook to its full extent. Choose reputable Hero members. Next, use an escrow for every download to ensure buyers are not paying $149 for a picture of a giant cookie. Use an escrow agent who is able to escrow digital downloads. Lastly, put basic previews of the contents in the OP even after vouch copy reviews to give people an idea of what this is about. It's almost like you're not even trying to pitch the Ebook which makes me believe the contents of that download is a bunch of rubbish.

Some people have businesses that ship Amazon products to other countries where it's not readily available. For the US, Canada, ect, Amazon is easy to access and has a wide category. Others in foreign countries purchase US Amazon cards to have access to all the products and have it shipped to their own countries. This is one way someone might possibly utilize thousands in Amazon, but 20k seems far fetched.


Perhaps he gets a discount on the cards he buys as he purchases in great bulk.

Completely agree. The IRS has been hopping on Bitcoin ever since it hit mainstream. It's been ridiculous how much they actually want to destroy the currency by putting regulations on something that is based on decentralization. But that's to be expected. It's competing against the banks. If inflation with the US dollar increases, they are worried more and more people will adopt Bitcoin and use it over fiat.

This is so counter productive. What you're doing here is wasting money. There is absolutely no way you could get enough Bitcoin to destroy that would have a notable affect on the price.

Would like to register again.

Posts: 698
Address: 19K5AGmw1ePReNfWSCtkFvipK1FgT2NLwm
Bet: http://luckyb.it/browse?search=ddca877f9e9028a8015093dbe8091c99963e4f6940a8b6bdc6d5b54443ea28e0&day=


Thanks!

Top 3 picks:

Luckyb.it: Instant pay out, no waiting for confirmations, and the game has an interesting plinko style game. Chat is nice as well.

Primedice.com: Most reputable dice site out there. Simple and easy layout but that is personal preference.

Bitcoinvideocasino.com: Jackpots are crazy high (Slots jackpot is 500 BTC among smaller jackpots). Slots are pretty fun. No confirmation wait when depositing credits.

As a side note, it seems you have negative feedback by two people in default trust as well as negative intrusted feedback which makes this account almost worthless. Consider lowering your price.



I removed it. It was just 11 words, wasn't intended to increase the length. My thinking was, the meta forum I could see would be a tempting place to put account sales so I was informing the OP that he was mistaken on that. IMO it was worth mentioning and it was probably helpful to the OP. I don't want to clutter up moderator reports with simple "move thread" requests as if they don't have their hands full already. Might as well use the move thread feature if it's there. Respect your opinion though so I went ahead and removed it.

One could say the first sentence of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026091.msg11102482#msg11102482 is completely contradicting what you said about adding to the conversation. So I don't see why you are being hypocritical here especially after you completely repeated my statement which was the first post in a rephrased way. By your way of thinking, you did that just to increase the post length as nothing new was added to the conversation in that statement. Of course this wasn't the intention but you can see that just because text isn't adding to the conversation directly does not make it an attempt to increase post length or irrelevant.  I think it's always relevant to point out when a post is in the wrong section. It's a valid statement to make to a user who is mistaken. In case you do check back on this thread please PM me if you want to discuss it further, we don't need to start a flame war or anything based on a disagreement of opinions so please don't take this offensively. We're all entitled to them. But going back to my first point, I wasn't trying to increase post length intentionally.

Thank you!