Nisam siguran koliko je moguce izbeci robotski glas, ipak je to sve AI generisano.
Nasao sam ovo, https://www.naturalreaders.com/
Neki od ponudjenih glasova zvuce podnosljivo, opet pretpostavljam da zavisi i od materijala koji treba da se cita, lokalizovane reci ce verovatno zvucati losije.
Ono sto mi se cini zanimljivo, mozes klonirati svoj glas ili neki koji je prihvatljiv uhu, poput SirJohnVonSlotty-jevog na primer. 
Placena verzija nudi premium glasove, mozda to jos bolje zvuci.

It's a matter of personal preferences. It is certain that there are a lot of people who would appreciate it if they had the option of mixing Ethereum, Litecoin, Solana, etc...

I'm not sure how realistic it is to expect to have an XMR>XMR mixer when Monero already has a high level of privacy. If you mean BTC>XMR, it's no longer a mixer but an exchange, and there are services offered for that, like Trêvoid

I respect the intention to be flexible and compromise to get closer to the client, but why does it have to go that way? As 'anonymous' in this industry, you would have to offer something more than what well-known competitors offer. All those who do not see the posts here do not know that there is a possibility of customizing your offer, and all these are lost potential clients.

You are not the only one who got that impression. It has been pointed out to them several times here, but they appear to be satisfied with the current status. In the end, BC does its job for profit, we can't blame them much for that. The only question is how long-term it will affect their reputation as a reliable service.

This kind of analysis is always welcome. Unfortunately, all mixers have been banned from this forum, which is an additional reason why there is less and less talk about this topic here. It was moved to the Altt forum, but it doesn't have nearly as much traffic as here.

The only reason why anyone gives themselves the right to demand KYC and source of funds is because of the simplicity of blocking crypto funds. At the same time, the user does not have many options for appeal or other action against such behavior. Especially when 'smaller' amounts are involved, like your case.

You should write a budget, how much you are willing to pay for this kind of service.
Additionally, the use of the escrow service is mandatory, and nobody will want to chase you after a month for payment.

It is part of the broken review system on Bestchange.
If the exchanger writes any response, even if it doesn't bring anything new or solve the problem, the complaint is closed as solved and gets a neutral tag. It can be noticed that only a few exchangers have negative feedback from users, which is quite unrealistic because we have seen dozens of accusations here on the forum against BC partners.

Yes, it makes sense to use mixing services.
As for the AML score of each of them, it is influenced by many factors, and there is no clear pattern. In essence, it is important how the service, to which you will later send your Bitcoin, checks your coins.

For example, you have Jambler's partners who will always deliver you Bitcoin with a very low AML risk score, because their coins come from mining pools or registered CEXs, so they are considered quite clean.

By the way, altcoin mixer services have started to appear lately, so if you prefer another currency, there are options for that as well.

The result of such measures always brings the opposite result than expected.
High taxes have always stimulated the black market and finding ways to avoid paying them. By increasing the percentage, the willingness of people to take risks by avoiding the payment of levies also increases, and vice versa. Why would anyone risk anything if the state demands a small percentage of the money earned?

There's really no need to share some AI-generated promotional posts here. There are people on this forum, not Google's spiders. You have received several useful reviews here, and it would be much better for you and your users if you participated equally in the discussion, possibly answering the users' questions.
No matter what you think, your current strategy is more of a negative point than improving the rating of your exchange.

Every major global crisis (COVID-19, Russia vs. Ukraine war) initially brought a drop in the value of Bitcoin, so that it was the first to recover compared to all other assets.

What is perhaps a more serious relationship to monitor is against the USD, where the dollar has lost 10% in value since the beginning of the year (Trump's mandate).

At the time of ICOmania, similar methods were often used to bump ANN threads. Campaign participants left applications, proof of work links, and other campaign things. Then it was really a mess and it was stopped and banned, and many ANNs were completely deleted.
From the functional side, such posts are useless for the service and make the thread unreadable.
Since you already have a campaign thread, it's best to post it there, and if you don't want further discussion, lock this thread.

I'm not sure what this is; it seems to me to be something related to a signature campaign or some bounty. Either way, this has no place in an ANN thread. It's quite disruptive to the flow of the discussion, and I don't think it's even following the forum rules, at least according to some interpretations.

Treba napomenuti da freebet cesto zna biti tricky. Moras okrenuti lovu makar jednom, i sav dobitak je tvoj. Zvuci super, ali u stvarnosti nije bas laka lova. Tako na primer, ako se kladis na x1.05 jer je kao gotovo siguran win, dobijas samo tih 0.05 sto si osvojio. Freebet je bio samo free osnova kojom mozes da se kladis.

It doesn't matter what risk score you received, but what score was calculated by the service you are sending coins to.

Mixers like Mixtum give a very low risk score of 5-20%
At the same time, funds from no-KYC exchanges are often classified as medium risk because they are recognized as originating from an unlicensed exchange. Although traditional CEX doesn't pose a problem with receiving it. At least I haven't had such an experience.

Whale je svakako vredan registracije, moja preporuka. Cesto imaju nekoliko razlicitih nagradnih igara u isto vreme, ko ih vse prati pretpostavljam ima solidne sanse. Ja sam nekakav baksuz sto se tice tih random nagrada, ali sam dobio nekoliko na Whale, mahom freebet ili odredjena igra i uvek je bilo dosta lako za claim i withdraw na kraju.

In my case, I needed USDT, regardless of the network, because I used it to pay for some service, and all options were acceptable. I used ERC20, because that wallet was "at hand", and I did this comparison only later.
I believe that this can be useful to someone in the future when they change a larger amount.

I cannot say with certainty whether this is true or not, because I have not personally had such an experience. Still, in a direct conversation with their support, they claimed that if the user does not want to pass KYC, the funds will be refunded to the user, and the order will not be processed.
As far as I understand, they use their own liquidity and are not dependent on a third party, which enables them to stop the swap process if they can no longer control the funds.

When you talk about different fees depending on pair, it is even more interesting that, for example, the BTC to USDT conversion fee differs depending on the network. For example, it is more favorable for users to use BEP20 than ERC20, and the most unfavorable is on the TRX (trc20) network.
The difference can be up to 1%.