Who, in reality, drives someone like Rashford off the team? Only Amorim. Micheal Carrick has started on a high note, and much is expected of him moving forward.
I wouldn't take Rashford as a special parameter. I would rather say that it's a good thing that he left. How good a game-changer he is is shown by the fact that he is not a constant starter even in Barcelona. His laziness without contributing to defense is undesirable for the team, especially in the PL, where it is obviously one less player on the pitch. |
|
|
|
Jel moguce u Hrvatskoj imati mobilni broj bez verifikacije? Kod nas je to nemoguce od prosle godine, a ako sam dobro razumeo to je u skladu sa nekakvim EU propisima, pa je praktično bila obaveza verifikacije/registracije svakog pripejd broja. Na Telegramu me kontaktira izvesni/a Zala Jurić, nudeci ociglednu scam šemu a da pri tom nije čak ni sakrio broj telefona. Koliko vidim u pitanju je HR broj iz A1 mreže. Moguće da je neka AI šema, mada je konverzacijski prilično precizan, odnosno nema onih klasičnih translate grešaka, mada ne bih bio iznenađen da je neki naivac uložio novac, pa pokušava povući još nekog za sobom zarad malo referal profita.  4% zarade na 24h, deluje prilično legit, zar ne?  |
|
|
|
Now I'm wondering if you ever made that bet  Manchester city were totally outclassed in every area. Total dominate from Manchester United under the new boss, saw a different Manchester United. Well deserved. There were a couple of games where Man United looked very good, but mostly they lacked something to deliver the last blow to the opponent and bring the game to an end. Amorim could not find that something. I said earlier that it could easily happen that a new manager comes in, changes small details, and we get a completely different team. We will see how it will look against teams that do not primarily have an attacking moment. |
|
|
|
It turned out the result wasn’t what we expected, and neither team even managed to score.  It seemed like both Arsenal and Liverpool didn’t want to lose yesterday’s match, so a draw ended up being the choice for both sides. Even though it was a bit disappointing, Liverpool really knew what they had to do to avoid conceding, and they barely had any chances to score. I think it was an achievement for Liverpool to draw this match and not let the opponent score any goals. All Arsenal needed was one goal and that you would have made them win but it wasn't possible. In fact, I was surprised by how well Liverpool defended in this match. There were no shots on target by Liverpool. However, Arsenal did have four attempts but could not succeed in any one of them. Both teams conceded almost an equal number of yellow cards, and there was no rough play, no red cards. The possession of the ball was almost identical, but I think Liverpool would be happy with the result. Let's ignore Liverpool's inconsistency and very poor organization for a moment, but I really can't remember when in a season there were so many draws with teams from the top 6. Maybe it reminds me a little of the season when Leicester won the title, when the favorites also often failed at the moment when it was least expected of them. I'm only sorry that Liverpool, Manchester United, and Chelsea are far behind. I think there would be serious drama until the last game. Although we will probably have it like this. The CL continues in a few days, additional burden for some teams. There will be more convincing results here. The only thing that is symptomatic is that we see very few goals per game. |
|
|
|
Koliko to košta? Čini mi se da je tipa pol dolara po adresi ili tako nešto.
Ako rezultat nije neko randomized sranje nego stvarno provjeri kako spada, onda je to definitivno nešto što bi se trebalo koristiti na tjednoj/mjesečnoj bazi.
slackovic - imaš neki link na to? Sori, nisam tolko lijen nego sam baš u nekoj gužvetini zadnjih dana pa mi se ne kopa sam.
I dalje je glavni problem tih AML provera sto svaki servis moze imati neki svoj nacin. Niko ti ne moze garantovati da rezultat provera na jednom servisu, garantuje uskladjenost rezultata na servisu gde planiras slati svoje coins. Jedan od najociglednijih primera, kada je Whitebit targetirao eXch i sve coins koji dolaze odatle, automatski ih oznacavao kao visok rizik. U isto vreme, iste coine posaljes na Binance, bez bilo kakvih problema. Jednostavno, WB je to koristio kao borbu protiv konkurencije. Tu dodaj da WB ima gomilu nekih manjih resellera, na primer, na Best change su makar 3/4 WB preprodavci i svi filtriraju kroz njihov AML bot. |
|
|
|
I took a look at some of the cases on the first page of the Scam Accusation board that mention BC.Game's name, and it's the same as it was several weeks ago when I last visited that subforum. Players from India who are depositing or withdrawing rupees complain about not receiving their money. BC.Game is at fault for still providing that service, but so are whatever shady payment processors these people use because they obviously can't get the job done. It's interesting how many Indians are interested in gambling with fiat at a crypto casino.
BC.Game is also frequently included in the list of the Scam Accusation, but that is not the reason to believe that it has something bad in mind. Most of the accusations remain unanswered and others are a result of the misunderstandings of the users or third party concerns. The constant complains raised by Indian users concerning the INR deposits and withdrawals are however not encouraging. In case the local payment processors are not trusted, BC.Game also has a role in the further provision of those services without adequate protection or clear warnings to users. In one of their campaigns, I ended up as a moderator in the bc.game subreddit. Players also report problems they have with this casino there. Most of these appeals are not even approved (it's not my deal), nor are they even tried to be resolved. Coupled with everything that is happening in the scam accusations on the forum, I am quite convinced that there is a problem. |
|
|
|
I tried to log in on Bridgoro website for final testing, but it was impossible for me to solve stupid g00gle captchas  Can you please consider replacing g00gle captchas with hCaptcha.com, this is the same thing Bitcointalk forum is now using? There are other captcha alternatives I saw on other exchanges, and anything is better than g00gle captchas. Yeah, we are aware of the CAPTCHA issues and will be replacing it with a better one very soon. Thanks a lot for helping us with testing, buddy! Considering that you already use Cloudflare, maybe their Turnstile could be a good choice. I had the fewest complications with it, it is always enough to click on the checkbox for human confirmation Google is really easy to bot.
They bot through the audio, then type what is said, and bam... The downfall of making stuff handicap accessible.
It seems you missed the thread, or I just don't understand how this is related to the Bridgoro p2p exchange.  |
|
|
|
Thank you for reporting this.
It's good to know that you follow suggestions and react in a timely manner. We are aware of the MetaMask warning and are currently in direct contact with their security team to clarify and resolve the situation. You shouldn't have any problems here, the team behind Metamask is quite up-to-date, and they react quite quickly to false claims. At least I've had that experience before. We recently received several suspicious messages from unknown third parties requesting unjustified payments and threatening to report our domain. We did not engage with them and instead followed the official security and appeal procedures. It is obviously a form of extortion. First they reported you as a phishing site, and later they asked you for money for mediation in delisting from the black list. Finally, if you need help from the community to confirm the authenticity of the domain, you can always ask for it here. |
|
|
|
We are using our own fork of Electrum - therefore the latest official release is not supported.
I strongly suggest you to use Sparrow Wallet or wait to get an official Satochip Electrum plugin that will work with any Electrum official release (No ETA yet).
Have a wonderful day,
What is the procedure for an application like Electrum to have support for your hardware at some point by default, without the need for subsequent plugins? I guess the Electrum core team needs to add support for the chip you are using. That would make Satochip much more beginner-friendly. |
|
|
|
For those who don't know, Monarch and CSGOEmpire are actually very known and controversial in the CS scenario. Is there a tldr story somewhere, where I can get brief information about the whole thing? I don't need to know everything in detail, but I am interested if it concerns duel.com, which I also wear in my signature. I would rather hear a summary from a human than from ChatGPT. |
|
|
|
Changeum.io is blacklisted by Metamask. This is what it looks like when I try to open it. Is there anyone from the team who is active and can communicate with MetaMask to request delisting from this base?  |
|
|
|
I didn't know they stopped cooperating with holydarkness. It's a weird decision to be honest, and I don't see what they would have against a person trying to help the casino reach a fair decision. The Responsible Gambling issues aside, I remember seeing many accusations by players from India who had issues with fiat deposits/withdrawals in rupees. I don't know whether this is solely the casino's fault or if it also has to do with Indian banks, creating problems when money moves to and from online casinos.
What else goes on there right now that smells like scam to you? Is it the same as what oantt mentioned?
Look at the scam accusation board, accusations against bc.game pretty much dominate. Without delving into each accusation, I'm sure they can't all be characterized as complaints from angry players who lost money. It is obvious that things in bc.game are not in the best condition. We'll see after turning off holydarkness how everything will look like in the future, but I wouldn't be surprised if they slowly give up on this forum and the players from here. Certainly, bc.game is no longer a casino to recommend. |
|
|
|
|
BTC Addy: bc1qnhnz6lvg03uzyrrcljur4s95u5dalfkdwsnqru
Merit earned lifetime: 3000
|
|
|
|
Count me in.  |
|
|
|
Free raffle u organizaciji Cce.cash. Nagrada je $30, bez posebnih uslova. Oni koji su bili aktivni u njihovom ANN imaju pravo zauzeti dva slota. 🎉 The series of events continues! The latest raffle has just started — hurry up and secure your slot! ♻️ CCE.Cash 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 $30 in BTC!➥ Choose a slot to enter. ➥ If you posted in our ANN thread in the last 2 weeks — grab 2 slots! ➥ We’ll pick winners transparently using a fair draw tool. |
|
|
|
|
Slot #: 34, 46
BTC Address: bc1qnhnz6lvg03uzyrrcljur4s95u5dalfkdwsnqru
|
|
|
|
it is with burdened heart that I have to inform the forum and frequent overseers of SA board that I am no longer able to bridge any cases related to BC.
As far as I've noticed, the accusations against bc.game dominate the scam accusation section, and looking from the aspect of demandingness, you shouldn't be sorry that you won't be a part of it anymore. Looking at all the complaints about them, I followed their sub on Reddit (I happen to be a moderator there), and it's quite obvious that they have neglected customer support as well as their attitude towards users. |
|
|
|
If you want to test the service.
Write down that you want to participate and send your btc address.
We will send 100 $ to you for testing the service.
Rest you can keep it or keep swapping lol.
Eligibility is solely decided by me.
Regardless of this, I will give you some personal suggestions on the shortcomings that I have noticed. If you are already willing to invest in testing the service and get good feedback, my suggestion is to seek assistance from a proven manager in order to get the most for the money invested. |
|
|
|
The domains and the topics might be 1 day old.
But my service and my name is older than 1 day.
A platform is never finished. In the longrun the updates you push just becomes shorter and longer.
Can you give me your feedback ?
For example, this has happened to me several times already. It shouldn't happen too often on the live version.  For now, it might be a good idea to explain the fee structure, since the website says 1%-4%, although when the order is created, it looks quite different and has a much higher fee. |
|
|
|
If you want to test the service.
..
Wow, only one day old. I'm interested in testing this exchange, although it doesn't seem like the platform is finished. Maybe you went live too soon, there is a lot to improve. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
