ocminer, occasionally I see the miner reporting things like: Found block for sia.suprnova.cc!
Accepted 1e73b3c6 Diff 8.407/1.000 BLOCK! GPU 1 But the pool seems to not have found a block, so something might be wrong. It's not. It's fine. No block yet, but hopefully soon. Still 20% bonus If you make the pool compatible with claymores miner, you will get a ton of miners.. like DCR Siamining.com is compatible with claymores miner. Claymore even uses siamining.com in his examples: |
|
|
|
What's the expected time to find a block with 10GH/s?
50% chance in about 5 days Hmm that's a bit long.. Anyone interested in testing a low stale / reject stratum enabled Mpos pool? ( https://sia.suprnova.cc) ? Msg me, no fees currently for beta testers and expected about 15-20% more payout with stratum How is stratum going to improve a miners payout by %20? (Unless you mean the bonus 20%, which you mentioned in a later post.) |
|
|
|
You guys are getting this wrong ...
Claymore miner makes the SIAcoins spread to more users.
This is GOOD.
Its no "big mining farm" but a ton of users, yes, some have many rigs and much power.
But for the COIN, claymore is good.
The rise of difficulty is also good for THE COIN.
Yes, it must suck for u guys who basicly mined this coin "alone" on low diff and got huge rewards(also enables big dumps).
Now its spread among a ton of users with 1 - 50 gpus.
Ton of users? The biggest guy on pool has a few hundred GPUs. How could it be good for the coin when big farms practically get it for free (or very cheap since it's dualmining) ? Sia and Decred will be a dumpfest and the only way for it is to go down if it continues like this. Look at Decred, it could never go up again. Sia made some nice growths but i doubt that it could continue like this. Dualminer is a plague, IMHO. What killed this coin was not dual miner. What killed this coin along with every other coin is pools! Most of these large farms won't run nodes and solo mine. Why is that. Well because these huge farms are the same people that run the pools. So not only are they greedy with the huge farms and try to hide their size with a pool. not to mention the fees used to grow their farms.. The idea of decentralization when all this hardware is in the wild along with unequal prices on resources leads all coins to one inevitable ending. If you can find one block a day or every other day I feel that is sufficient enough to be on solo. Sad to see this coin take such a beating because I think the concept is great although I can't seem to figure out the wallet and file sharing. Keeps telling me not enough hosts when I try to purchase space. And I have no clue what going price is. Keeping an eye on this Best Regards D57heinz Pools enabled anyone who didn't have enough hashing power to find blocks in a reasonable amount of time, to finally start mining and adding their hashing power to the network. Before that it was futile. However "If you can find one block a day or every other day I feel that is sufficient enough to be on solo." wasn't feasible with a lot of people. In testing we had people joining with 100-200GH at a crack. How do you think a person who had only 1GH was going to compare to operations of this size? Once the pool went live, we had someone connect with 600GH. The large operations were there either way, a pool simply exposes them. File sharing is currently broken IIRC. |
|
|
|
Is the rise of Sia over? I think this was only a pumped because there was no huge good news after the price went up. Or maybe we still haven't seen the best part yet?
The SIA was mined previously mainly by users, now, it is mined by the professional miners. So there will be dumps. So does it mean that SIA will be very much the same like bitcoin? Will the professional miners also become a cartel and have power over the SIA core developers and bypass the community? I hope it's not so. Is there a limit to the number of Sia coins that will be mined or this is limitless ? Thank you ! No, it is limitless. The block reward drops by 1 each block(Current reward is about 240,000.) Once block 270,000 hits, the reward won't drop below 30,000. So sia is slightly inflationary. |
|
|
|
What exchanges are trading SC? OP doesn't list such things...
Also, is there a place to view difficulty change over time? I see current difficulty in block explorer, but not past difficulty.
Exchanges listed on the right hand side: https://forum.sia.tech/http://siamining.com/stats lists 1 weeks worth of Difficulty changes. |
|
|
|
Hi xurious,
Is there any tips for nvidia cards? Got big rejection with nvidia with latest cuda driver.
Thank You.
Not sure. What is your setup like? Which miner? Windows or Linux? Driver? Etc. |
|
|
|
Recent payouts:
2016-07-11 01:25 UTC
2016-07-11 07:25 UTC
2016-07-11 13:25 UTC
2016-07-11 19:25 UTC
2016-07-12 01:25 UTC
The next one was expected at 2016-07-12 07:25 UTC, the unpaid balance was ~2400. But there is no payout yet...
upd: payout was triggered at 09:25 UTC. Is it every 8 hours now?
With a huge influx of users we had to catch up on payments a little bit. Now that the hashrate has settled, we are back to normal. |
|
|
|
Is there a minimum amount for payout?
It say 2000 SC on the homepage Found it now, thanks! Can this be set lower or will it stay for a while @xurious? It will be staying at 2000 SC for the foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
SiaMining.com went live this morning. Features:Pay-Per-Share - 3% fee - Get paid even with orphaned blocks. Long Polling support - Minimize those stale shares! Variable Difficulty - Improves network efficiency and provides more accurate miner statistics. No Account setup - Simply use your wallet address as the username for easy payouts. Worker Support - Detailed statistics of each worker. Quick Payouts - Payments every 6 hours. No waiting on block confirmations! Thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545699.0 is the 3% fee really necessary, what are the fee of the first pool? i thought high fee are there to encourage a good spread of the hash, we have already a good spread 3% fee is not a high fee for PPS. PPLNS does not pay for mining of orphaned blocks... PPS does. PPS pays for every valid share, even if your hash rate changes. PPLNS pays you for an averaged hash rate. |
|
|
|
Hi xurious,
Just mined at siamining for an hour, could you please inform me how to reduce the rejections? Seems like the rejections on my cards is really worst, do i have to set anything on my config?
This is my new wallet address to mine at: be518d988db409854dec0c824e8749b1b496b7e65b103a2d44b2a6dede10a13b183e175162e4
Appreciate for your help.
Thanks.
Are you using AMD? Update your drivers. GoMiner likes 16.4+ drivers. |
|
|
|
Linux users can download and compile our poolmod3 branch of gominer: $ go get github.com/SiaMining/gominer
$ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/SiaMining/gominer
$ git fetch
$ git checkout poolmod3
$ go build And use: ./gominer -H siamining.com:9980 -Q "address=YourSiacoinAddress&worker=YourWorkerName" Have done this for nVidia 970 and only getting 568Mh under Debian 8 x64. What's wrong? - SIA CUDA Miner was giving 1028 when solomining. Klaust did a sia cuda miner. It's been working well with siamining.com. There is a windows release here: https://github.com/KlausT/Sia-CUDA-Miner/releases/tag/4.00Edit: Seems the miner isn't submitting as many shares as it should. |
|
|
|
So no pool miners for linux? Only claymore?
The one I found looks like its solo only
http://siamining.com/helpFrom our help page: Linux users can download and compile our poolmod3 branch of gominer: $ go get github.com/SiaMining/gominer
$ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/SiaMining/gominer
$ git fetch
$ git checkout poolmod3
$ go build And use: ./gominer -H siamining.com:9980 -Q "address=YourSiacoinAddress&worker=YourWorkerName" |
|
|
|
SiaMining.com went live this morning. Features:Pay-Per-Share - 3% fee - Get paid even with orphaned blocks. Long Polling support - Minimize those stale shares! Variable Difficulty - Improves network efficiency and provides more accurate miner statistics. No Account setup - Simply use your wallet address as the username for easy payouts. Worker Support - Detailed statistics of each worker. Quick Payouts - Payments every 6 hours. No waiting on block confirmations! Thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545699.0
|
|
|
|
SiaMining.com went live this morning. Features: - Pay-Per-Share - 3% fee - Get paid even with orphaned blocks.
- Long Polling support - Minimize those stale shares!
- Variable Difficulty - Improves network efficiency and provides more accurate miner statistics.
- No Account setup - Simply use your wallet address as the username for easy payouts.
- Worker Support - Detailed statistics of each worker.
- Quick Payouts - Payments every 6 hours. No waiting on block confirmations!
Update 8/14/2016- We have rolled our own miner that is under testing. In testing it's out performing GoMiner on identical harware.
- SiaMining now supports Claymore's Stratum protocol. See http://siamining.com/help for a command example. This works with both Claymore's Miner.
- Klaust's CCMiner also supports the SiaMining Stratum!
- API Has been udpated.
Update 7/21/2016 |
|
|
|
Dual mining is actually bad for miners, the reason is simple. If people can mine both coins at once they no longer have to choose an algo to mine and it raises the hash rate in both. Where if they had to choose a single coin then hash would be removed from one coin and used to mine on another.
Anyway Nano has released a Beta Sia pool, the stats or payouts are not really working yet but the hash is already sky rocketing. Profitability is likely doomed on sia pretty soon.
Yup. Hashrates gone from 5TH to 11TH in about two weeks. No, this is a good thing for the coin. It means people are interested. Sia is obviously not aiming to be just a pump n dump. Try to think long term if u can...not "omg difficulty climbing so high right after release!" High transactions would show interest in the coin. High hashrate shows miners can make a profit at the moment. |
|
|
|
Dual mining is actually bad for miners, the reason is simple. If people can mine both coins at once they no longer have to choose an algo to mine and it raises the hash rate in both. Where if they had to choose a single coin then hash would be removed from one coin and used to mine on another.
Anyway Nano has released a Beta Sia pool, the stats or payouts are not really working yet but the hash is already sky rocketing. Profitability is likely doomed on sia pretty soon.
Yup. Hashrates gone from 5TH to 11TH in about two weeks. |
|
|
|
What pools for mining there except nanopооla?
Siamining.com will be up and running later today. If you'd like to start on the beta (and we'll do some behind the scenes changes to live) you can start here: siamining.com/testing. |
|
|
|
Selling SIA gominer + configuration on the SIA privat pool
the price of 5 ETH or 0.1 BTC
ETH: 0xedf1dcd7748f70b1a9d22ac5092ead997ae72f4f
BTc: 1NCx2z3N13dTk1e3eSaSEGn5ovG2HAAiKF
Has anyone purchased this? Is it working? |
|
|
|
|
Here's my vote for cgminer as well. Besides the initial launch day, I got my cgminer settings close and just left them. What would really be good is in the end a database could be sorted out for this. Take your driver/opencl/card combo and find a close match in the DB. Then tweak the settings around a bit. Once it found the fastest, it would upload the data.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
