My goodness!

How nice if Bitcointalk also implement this puppet labeling strategy. The place would be a lot safer and nicer. 

Cool. That means logo, splash image, wallet, paper wallet, ANN thread, Twitter, FB and Reddit headers, wallpapers and backgrounds for the website as well.

TheCloser, I take it you are comfortable with anonymous 'devs' dominating the ANN thread with their coin releases? I'm not.
To be honest, I'm not sure what research or education anyone can obtain from these new accounts.
I would rather have known developers launching coins. Only then can we conduct proper research.
Yes, there are inherent risks in crypto, but I'd like to think it's more than just the blind luck of the draw.

Anyway, the "wild west of crypto" is not something we should be proud of.
The romanticization of the wild, wild, west - the American frontier - often makes people forget the savagery, lawlessness and ignorance of the era.

I don't think we could do this. Do you think it/they/Github could/would?


Yes, that is true. I've read how the FBI would sometimes spend up to a decade on cases.
But the jurisdictional constraints would be enormous here.

It can't be eradicate completely, I agree, but reducing it would be a good start.
Just to share with you, I stumbled across two 'devs' in the past 2 weeks with a total of five coins.
I told an exchange owner (and provided evidence) that one of the devs, with a coin just added the previous week, was trying to get another one listed.
The exchange owner laughed, and the next day, the second coin was listed. 

I am not familiar with the situation with the giveaways, but I can sort of imagine why it was banned and why coin owners would be annoyed with it.

I see. Thank you for the explanation.

I wasn't aware of that. Did they give a reason for the removal, Spoetnik?

In recent months (years?), we have been bombarded with an uneding series of coins from fresh, brand new alt accounts. In the past month alone, I've lost count at the number of 'anon' coins released with accompanying kiddie whitepapers. That, by itself,  is not the problem.

The problem lies in how this anonymity allows a 'dev' to easily create multiple accounts to release multiple coins designed exlusively for exchange pump and dumps and IPO scams.

By enacting a minimum activity count requirement for ANN thread starters, say, 100 activity, these 'devs' will have to invest time in the forum before being able to launch their coins.

Some would argue that people can still nurture alt accounts to fulfill the 100 activity requirement, or even just purchase accounts.
However, the post history behind these accounts will still be valuable for forum participants to judge the merits of the claims made by individual developers.
An account that spent 3 weeks collecting giveaways before suddenly announcing the launch of a fancy new coin will hardly be taken seriously, right?

Some would even argue that scams, P&D and fake IPOs can be perpetrated by established members. Sure, but they can only do it once using that account.

The mods of this forum are known for their grinding, bureacratic anti-change policy.
But if enough people lend their support to this proposal, I believe they might just eventually be sufficiently motivated to make this change.

Unless there is some really, really, super good reason that I cannot possibly imagine, there is absolutely no logical reason why we should continue to allow coins to be released by zero-post alt accounts.

What say you?

Bump.
Thoughts, dev?

@hobopete, @Cryptourologist , kiss and make up already, will ya guys?
You two are clearly very intelligent and experienced guys, so let's do away with any unpleasantness.
For now, let's take a deep breath and laugh at Brazil: http://imgur.com/fUostqs

Thank you for the support and encouragement, armin22, Dexter12, Presstab, Bumberchute and David. 
If chosen, the final logo can be edited based on the feedback of the community, and we can then move forward to the rest of the required artwork (splash, wallet, etc.)

I think many are unaware of what this deal truly means and its significance Uro.
Essentially, this provides a cloud-based platform that ensures easy scalability of Uro-related infrastructures - from payments systema and online wallets to exchanges and other block chain applications. Blockcypher's multisig API also provides a greater level of security for service providers and end users.

Something a little different - blue-steel and spaced themed.



Bigger: https://i.imgur.com/kZNGYFu.png

Clearly not the same person? That is the same person - but credit to you for creating a new line of attack that will probably be picked up by your brethrens soon.

As for your 'evidence', you do realize the same commercial site also listed Apple and Microsoft as insolvent right? You do realize that using the official Australian government site, nothing out of the ordinary is seen. The link was provided repeatedly in the previous pages. What kind of due dilligence are you conducting?

Further, you speak of price volatility as if it is something alien in the crypto world. How long have you been trading in alt coins?

EDIT: Before you respond again, I want to read through the pages and observe how several newbies have been here for hours attacking this thread - one even for almost 12 hours. Does that seem natural to you?

1. It is the same person.
2. If you are using the standard of guilty until proven innocent for Uro, shouldn't you be using the same standards on every other alt coins? Should every coin be punished by every accusations made, no matter how ridiculous?

But Christopher, there is no bigger scammer than you on this board? 

Hasn't he been providing that all along?
People have been accusing those of being false/lies, but none of the accuser have actually the balls to ask him directly - aside from alt accounts here.

Yup.
So many alts in a single thread trying to clog every page.

Hey moron. Don't edit my comment when you quote me.