Yep, it supposed to be paid weekly, every 7 days, but it's not. Let's patiently wait for Lutpin for reply:)

Is someone taking any measures agains the suspects we are listing here?

I see that Chetty still has 50 merits from soniclord for "Yes, yesterday he wrote that he had left 9% of his coin" (google translate)

This post also got 20 merits for an ANN
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2610748.msg26567634#msg26567634

This really necessary? Do we really need to drag another trusted member into this...?

Yes, but that doesn't mean that we share shipping information. Why would you do that? That's a huge liability on their own.

I do not know, and given the recent collusion I probably might not want to know.

I am not sure how that is relevant, unless you're trying to imply that MJ reported Og or gave someone the information to report Og (if he even has their information)?

There is?

I wouldn't know. Unlike OP, who is strongly supported by OgNasty, I do not keep the DOXX of people who I have traded (or have not traded) with. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The SEC could come knocking on the door any day, so who knows?

Holding more than 500 BTC in escrow as of time of writing. What is it that you fail to understand?

But what if he gets hit by a bus?? don't you see that as BTC has matured there are better offerings?

you are young so you wont remember vinyl to tape, tape to CD.. but as newer better technology comes out the older stuff dies out - your Hero is a Dinosaur and I am disappointed that theymos is still backing this antiquated dog and not engaging 2 of 3 or even something like 3 of 5 for the forums funds. This isn't about OG's integrity it is what happens when he finally gets nailed for running an illegal security, or he gets hit by a bus? or his dodgy wiring kicks out in his shanty DC and he dies..

these are things that are all beyond your comprehension Killyou.

No. If you aren't self-biased, then you would complain about very similar cases not solely about you.

CET is holding more. Your point is exactly what again?

why would anyone serious about protecting funds use nastyshack? really? the most pretentious poster on the forum who "is better than multisig" ??

really - a single point of failure for for an ICO isnt an acceptable risk - hence why OG only gets the tiny escrow deals now - just check out his public escrow address.. its not what it once was, well there is that and the fact that he didn't pay the BTC he borrowed back in full.

Maybe that is what this is all about? he wants Lauda off DT as Lauda is stealing the escrow business from him?

Have you ever considered that one of the major reasons behind this was the competition in the escrow business?

Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here).

There was a time before when the admin was trying to adjust the forum settings and allowed even newbies to add avatars but it was turned off by the admin and that made those avatars permanent until such time that the rank reached a level that allows the member to avatars. So in your case, you need to wait until you reach full member rank then a link will appear in your settings that will allow you to upload pics to be used for avatars.

But off course there's an exception if admin will remove that for you.

If you are looking for someone in dire financial straits, you should take a look at OP who was scamming for pennies per escrow deal or the other one living in a shack.

My mental faculties are very fine, and far beyond those of the colluders. Thank you for asking.

Wrong[1]. You are only stating these due to inherent bias from your own negative rating.

---

[1] I literally posted an example of a very old negative that I pulled a few days ago. Naturally, you didn't read this / chose to ignore it and spread lies.

I meant I would be willing to put my funds in an escrow while we are exchanging, in order to assure the customer's safety. I was not attempting to say that I was trying to act as an escrow.

Most exchanges want KYC documents, most exchangers around here have very high minimums and fees. I'm just offering something for the users that feel like they're without a solid option or interested in finding a lower fee (as long as I break even I'm happy).

There are plenty of reasons for users not to want to use a regular exchange.