this is pathetic.
he just calls people trolls and dances around the topic.
"i know something you don't know!!!" the piece of crap loves to feel like he so powerful.
he has nothing going for him besides this forum, so you know what, let him have it.
as I said before goat, go fuck yourself.
lol. On what account was that? |
|
|
|
Smoothie scammed me when he sold me his litecoin silver tokens. prove it wrong....  |
|
|
|
|
Lol at smoothie claiming i need to prove im not a watch and not the person who is calling me a witch.
this is still over your head lol. Its called troll bait and i wont fall for it.
|
|
|
|
when MP gave you back the bonds did you not enter into an agreement ?
The contract with gurty.. what changed between when you where going to pay 100btc each week or what it is ? it seems like you didnt pay anything, he got angry a yr later and you said nope thats it you were a meanie.
is that not what happened in both scenarios ? You talk about how you paid off your debts and how poor you were cause of it ? MP didnt get paid,so wtf you talking about, who did you pay ?
He believes that his debts should be paid by Theymos. lol Just because Peter borrows money from Paul and Peter gives money to a company that John worked for does not mean that John owes Paul money. Peter still owes Paul as he was the BORROWER. Of course goat can't get this as he thinks he has done nothing wrong even though he has violated his own contract(s) and agreements which were confirmed via PMs. i do not thing theymos should pay anything. Gurrty i think is owed nothing. But since theymos has gurrtys coins theymos can pay if he wants. This has been made more than clear. |
|
|
|
the facts are you did not tell them they would get 0.
You told them they would get something. In gurtys case it was written down in a contract.
with MP you said you would pay tomorrow or whatever. You did not say "no you are getting 0"
So you can say what ever you like. The fact is that you changed the wording and conditions years later.
and in summary, you are a scammer. a slimy piece of shit. You have no morals, no ethics, you are a disease on the human race.
im not the one who is trying to chage the wording. Are you a sock or just failed to read the thread? |
|
|
|
So what you are saying is anybody who goes into business with you may get 0 if they do not have their lawyer check every word that is said ? If wording was a problem why did you not tell them 2 years ago they would get 0 ? It seems like you are the one changing the wording, 2 years later. You ended up with a lambo and god knows what else. you really 'lost your ass' ay. when MP gave you back the bonds did you not enter into an agreement ?
The contract with gurty.. what changed between when you where going to pay 100btc each week or what it is ? it seems like you didnt pay anything, he got angry a yr later and you said nope thats it you were a meanie.
is that not what happened in both scenarios ? You talk about how you paid off your debts and how poor you were cause of it ? MP didnt get paid,so wtf you talking about, who did you pay ?
Yes there was an agreement and it was followed. Both people are just unhappy with how they worded it at the time. They want to adjust details years later. two years ago there was no reason for them to think they should get more than zero. they are trying now because they see i did well with litecoin. Im not going to pay people to not lie. but yes everyone should have their lawyer assist them with contracts. things like coming back two years later and saying ohhh when i said that i meant something else is just bullshit. Honestly i think they are trying to scam me. |
|
|
|
when MP gave you back the bonds did you not enter into an agreement ?
The contract with gurty.. what changed between when you where going to pay 100btc each week or what it is ? it seems like you didnt pay anything, he got angry a yr later and you said nope thats it you were a meanie.
is that not what happened in both scenarios ? You talk about how you paid off your debts and how poor you were cause of it ? MP didnt get paid,so wtf you talking about, who did you pay ?
Yes there was an agreement and it was followed. Both people are just unhappy with how they worded it at the time. They want to adjust details years later. |
|
|
|
|
I have been waiting to see how i scammed
something even theymos with all his power cant show.
|
|
|
|
What is TYGRR.BOND-P
a listing on a scame site called glbse. Theymos was owner and treasure of glbse. Your listing. Let us not be dishonest here nor vague. what i said is correct. No one doubts theymos was involved in the glbse scam. |
|
|
|
What is TYGRR.BOND-P
a listing on a scame site called glbse. Theymos was owner and treasure of glbse. |
|
|
|
Yeah man, it does seem pretty clear that yall did ink a deal for a redemption of 427 bonds before Pirate's ship had sailed. Mouse, the BTC value has changed drastically since then though, and I think it would be fair if you interpreted it as the cash value of 427 BTC was back then (around $5700 and change). That makes it easy since that's right around 10 BTC in today's money.
we made a deal for a value on a set date. How can this not be more clear? |
|
|
|
Lol. What is "it". The contract?
Btw I dont think you understand the deal. You can not change the formula two years later. Why do you think you can?
Oh but I'm not. I had simply corrected the formula to make sense. Why would I accept 427*4.85% when you were clearly paying 1.00 BTC per bond at the time. You even thanked Theymos for posting about that policy a few minutes ago. It was meant to be 427+(whatever the new payout rate is). But hey, you seem to be willing to go by the original "contract" of 427*(whatever the new payout rate is), which ended up being 4.85%. So pick your poison: Which formula do you want to go by? why do you think you get to collect interest and not have any risk for the bonds? You like gurrty are trying to play with words to claim you are owed something you are not. also in that theymos quote i said i dont know but i think... clearly it was 0 in the end after i looked into it. theymos is just selecting a few posts out of context to make me look bad but he still fails. |
|
|
|
Yes there was a conditional clause attached and you are the one who attached it. However if you attached it or not it does not matter. What you attached is exactly what the contract was for. Claiming you made a mistake when you attached the condition 2 years later is a bit weak. I did exactly what you asked me to do.
Any way these bonds were not guaranteed. Just ask theymos! Ok, great! Now we're getting somewhere. Since you're apparently willing to stick with our contract, then 427*4.85% = 20.7095 BTC. It said nothing whether Pirate actually paid out; only what the new payout rate was. And don't worry about the bonds being guaranteed or not. That only comes into play in the event of a default, and we made our deal before that happened  Lol. What is "it". The contract? Btw I dont think you understand the deal. You can not change the formula two years later. Why do you think you can? |
|
|
|
Tell me what I did wrong. Tell me how I did not follow the agreement.
Well, you said you'd send out Tuesday (08/21/12). There was no conditional clause attached to it such as "I'll send out Tuesday only if Pirate makes his scheduled payout." That's the deal we had, and that's why I had sent you back the bonds to begin with. I completed my half of the bargain, and it's still not too late for you to follow through with your end of the deal  Yes there was a conditional clause attached and you are the one who attached it. However if you attached it or not it does not matter. What you attached is exactly what the contract was for. Claiming you made a mistake when you attached the condition 2 years later is a bit weak. I did exactly what you asked me to do. Any way these bonds were not guaranteed. Just ask theymos! |
|
|
|
|
Thank you theymos!
I wanted to quote this because of your tendency to remove your posts once you realize you are helping me out.
Clearly MP did not want these back right away for 1 BTC. She even admitted today she wanted 1 BTC plus interest. She let it ride!
This is clear even from the "revised" formula.
BTW I did end up buying back shares. I'm sure you know how that worked out, lost my ass...
Thanks theymos for being the broker for this on GLBSE. Glad you made bank with the fees you collected and the profit you made from your inside knowledge and reading his PMs! By the way, what are you going to do with the GLBSE coin you still hold? Keep it for yourself?
Edit: just saw the begging address in your sig! You are too much theymos!
|
|
|
|
I find it interesting that after the rate change, the prices on this bond dropped to a point that the actual return is roughly at 7% again.  Definitely a steal, IMO. I was thinking the same thing. yeah very odd. i have been making reasonable time in paying people who want to sell at 1 btc. not sure why the panic selling. great deal for you guys. hell, i might start buying some back |
|
|
|
Here are some posts related to TYGRR.BOND-P that Goat deleted for some reason... i have said before if someone wants to sell i will buy at 1. they just need to let me know how much and give me a reasonable amount of time to get the funds to glbse.
thanks
Has this been revoked? no pirate is lowering his rates on some accounts (looks like bitcoin price increase finally cought him). Are your rates staying at 6.8%?
I don't know, i just found out myself. I'm not sure what I will get from Pirate. I will adjust as I said in the thread if the rates do get lowered. There was a set rule forthis. Thanks. If your account is applied "BTC 25,000 + 5%," as would remain for TYGRR.BOND-P? This should be clear as soon as possible. I just woke up and have not read the thread/contract but I think it will change to 4.85% |
|
|
|
Well I got some real life stuff to do. If you guys can get your shit together and make a case about me scamming or whatever I will come back and deal with it. anyway keep trying smoothie and theymos!  |
|
|
|
Do you not understand that it was not guaranteed?
O RLY? Bond face value is 1 BTC.
If BTCST defaults the bond will be worth 1 BTC.
If BTCST does not default the bond will be worth 1 BTC. Wrong bonds dumbass. Quoted for reference. Haha theymos removed his post. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
