Xialla,
I have pmed him and he replied saying that he was trying to dissuade people from "committing economic suicide"(I still can't find the relation between this and only quoting a part of our words"). Again according to him "When you put recommendations/suggestions/advice to commit economic suicide next to a warning, guess what part people ignore? The warning." But yet he Quotes our suggestion and then gives a "warning". What a genius, right?
Another thing was that he sarcastically said that OP should use blockchain.info online wallet which he removed it before giving us that feedback. TheButterZone, like i said in PM. Some people don't understand sarcasm. So you are putting them on risk. But you finally came to your sense(maybe?) and removed your post. And then you started quoting us, giving us no chance to mend/remove our post and then leave a feedback. Well played.
Posting the following quote which he pmed me for reference. He clearly states the post which he removed.
I'm using 2 different routes in an attempt to deter people from committing economic suicide:
1) Quoting replies in the topic where economically suicidal recommendations/suggestions/advice was given
2) Leaving neutral trust feedback with a link DIRECTLY to the replies where economically suicidal recommendations/suggestions/advice was given
When you put recommendations/suggestions/advice to commit economic suicide next to a warning, guess what part people ignore? The warning.
When I decided on the 2 routes, I removed this redundancy/moron bait, according to my
drafts:
You should definitely use an online wallet that is all but guaranteed to result in you losing your [btc]! blockchain.info!
[IMG]http://i1077.photobucket.com/albums/w465/JB5613/SARCASM_max600_zps3fd57182.jpg[/img]
Edit: He replied me through PM.
Okay. So according to you when someone or "me" put recommendations/suggestions/advice to commit economic suicide next to a warning they ignore the part where they have been warned about something related to that advice(source? I tried googling but found nothing). But looks like OP is now cautious and well informed about the risk after we warned him. So you are wrong. People do read warnings.
You still haven't clearly answered my question. Why do you have to remove your post where you "sarcastically recommended him to use blockchain.info online wallet"?(Some poeple don't understand sarcasm, you do know that right?)
I can't find any link between "You using 2 different routes" and removing your post.
By the way "suggest" and "recommend" are not the same. Suggest means giving an idea doing about something in general where one is not obliged to do so. Where as “recommend” means telling someone that a certain option is the best one available with no alternative.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/suggestSynonyms counsel, recommend, suggest
Bye.
Replied just like most of his post with a single word. Still not saying why he removed his post before giving us that feedback.
Edit:
Xialla, good thing you found them. Haven't marked them yet. Will be waiting.
Edit: Yup marked them now.
Edit: He changed his feedback with more twisted words saying that we told OP "to use the wallet anyway" through which he is trying to imply that we never warned him.
According to TheButterZone if someone says "Hitler did nothing wrong being a vegetarian" he will assume and quote "Hitler did nothing wrong" and start leaving misleading feedbacks.
Show Posts
There are some others Web wallets too, but blockchain is most popular walet 
