Why blame China for all the troubles?In any case, those who had significant assets were guilty of a market collapse.But agree it is absurd to think that all the rich people live only in China. It seems to be a scapegoat. It also seems that most people, including analysts, tend to ignore the fact that the market sometimes moves abruptly in one direction without any external factor. |
|
|
|
|
I'm looking for people to complete some really simple work like perhaps commenting something on Reddit or a few upvotes, etc. Only requirement would be a decent Reddit account.
Pm me on Telegram at @Astargath or here
|
|
|
|
There are some strong signs coming from China suspending cryptocurrency trading and make it illegal but Bitcoin had some rough weeks over the last months so this is a factor too. If something good does not come from China we will see miners capitulate and this will drag the price down even more so we must stay with an eye on the hash rate as well.
Who knows what the next weeks will bring into the markets but I don't think it will be good news with green candles ...and most likely we will see a 5k$ Bitcoin.
China has already suspended cryptocurrency exchanges and trading platforms in September 2017. This crash only happened because the bears were able to break below $7300 after weeks of downtrend. |
|
|
|
Er, could be a pretty big explanation for the BTC crash, the small crash does match what would happen if China went through issues, especially since that China's population isn't incredibly invested in Bitcoin, and prefer more stable coins, compared to BTC. There are a lot of Chinese whales, and there has been a lot of speculation that has lead to the theories that a lot of Chinese people are behind the small and large price movements of BTC, although - just theories. The thing is, this 'news' about China against Bitcoin are not news, China has banned Bitcoin trading long ago. Bitcoin has been in a downtrend for the past 3 weeks, almost. |
|
|
|
|
Rofl, remember when you said Trump was gonna get Impeached by Nov 20th, I do.
|
|
|
|
He is building a new cryptocurrency project called VSystems and he's the creator of two cryptocurrencies (Primecoin and Peercoin). Wonder why he wants to build another cryptocurrency and not continue updating his other Cryptocurrencies. I guess he has ideas that can't be built on the old cryptocurrencies
Exactly, my point athough, he has two huge projects and he turns out to develop another new one. to what extent and will there be any partnership and what ill they all promote or he plans to sell off the other two to focus on the new one. i know vsystem is already on the market. Yeah, I feel like V Systems is also not very popular although it's quite big already, I don't know if they lack marketing or what. |
|
|
|
This is expected even slower from what I expected before because he is very active in the VSYS project, he is trying to get trust from the community after releasing the new PoS consensus SPoS and promoting his current project right now.
Weird, the event was actually quite big, many CEOs of big exchanges were there, even CZ from Binance. |
|
|
|
I have used that guy´s services and I can fully recommend him - quick return, quality writing, nice dealing with. Will have more work coming his way shortly.  Thanks mate! |
|
|
|
According to our current understanding, there is doubt. It's a possibility only. But the multitudes of observable C&E facts of billions of people daily, completely destroys the idea of pure random, scientifically. Even science knows that they are at a point of odds where pure random doesn't exist... by the odds. It's like, "I know I just might win that lottery... because somebody has to win." But in pure random, nobody knows that there will ever be a winner.  We have discussed this extensively, the ''odds'' are not in your favor. How many things do you know that have a cause for sure? How many things are in the universe? Why do you think those are great odds? Just because some things have causes it doesn't mean others don't and in the atom level, it seems that they don't. Is it material/matter that is breaking down in radioactive elements? Or is it that there is radioactivity from an undefined source that is simply passing through the material, causing it to "half-life" into something that we haven't determined yet? Matter is made up of energy particles... the subatomic particles of electrons, protons, and neutrons. These particles are energy and matter. They are made up of other particles/energy-waves... as far as we can see. They are "glued" together so strongly that it takes something like CERN to break them apart. Why are there machines like CERN? Because we don't know enough to even say factually how the energy/matter subatomic particles came together. The suggestion that there is pure random in the breaking down of radioactive materials is almost the same as saying that there is pixie dust. We don't know. The idea of pure random in that way, can be applied to everything, including the way a leaf twists and turns in the breeze. But we know what it is that makes a leaf twist and turn, without being able to track any of the energy waves or molecules that hit the leaf. Similarly, the fact that material movement has been caused by material and energy, shows that there is cause and effect in everything. It is not scientific to say that there is pure random without knowing it, and in the face of only C&E being observed anywhere. Nothing is ever known 100% factually, your argument is bad. |
|
|
|
All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity. You don't need radiation to think that pure random might exist. All you need is to watch the way a leaf blows in the breeze on a warm summer day. You have no idea where the molecules of air that hit the leaf are coming from, or where they are going. It seems like pure random. The difference between the physics of the twisting, blown leaf, and atomic radiation are, we understand the principles of the physics of the leaf a whole lot more than we understand nuclear physics. Science probably will never understand the physics of the radioactive atom until they understand that the nothingness of empty space is filled with a material that is entirely different than matter... matter which is essentially energy with complex activities going on between the parts, all held in place by the "material" of empty space. ''All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity.'' That's a baseless assertion, unfortunately, you cannot prove that. You need to keep up with science. All you need to do is Google "refurbishing CERN." Scientists themselves are showing you that they don't know enough about radioactivity. Nobody has to prove it to know it. Fallacy, scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity doesn't automatically mean, true randomness doesn't exist. As far as we can tell, it does, right now. But you seem to think that not knowing enough about radioactivity means they know everything about radioactivity. Why? Because you are using it as an example that pure random DOES exist. According to our current understanding, yes, true randomness does exist. If we adopt your philosophy of only trusting things that we know for sure, as in 100% factual, then we wouldn't trust anything. According to our current understanding, there is doubt. It's a possibility only. But the multitudes of observable C&E facts of billions of people daily, completely destroys the idea of pure random, scientifically. Even science knows that they are at a point of odds where pure random doesn't exist... by the odds. It's like, "I know I just might win that lottery... because somebody has to win." But in pure random, nobody knows that there will ever be a winner. We have discussed this extensively, the ''odds'' are not in your favor. How many things do you know that have a cause for sure? How many things are in the universe? Why do you think those are great odds? Just because some things have causes it doesn't mean others don't and in the atom level, it seems that they don't. |
|
|
|
All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity. You don't need radiation to think that pure random might exist. All you need is to watch the way a leaf blows in the breeze on a warm summer day. You have no idea where the molecules of air that hit the leaf are coming from, or where they are going. It seems like pure random. The difference between the physics of the twisting, blown leaf, and atomic radiation are, we understand the principles of the physics of the leaf a whole lot more than we understand nuclear physics. Science probably will never understand the physics of the radioactive atom until they understand that the nothingness of empty space is filled with a material that is entirely different than matter... matter which is essentially energy with complex activities going on between the parts, all held in place by the "material" of empty space. ''All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity.'' That's a baseless assertion, unfortunately, you cannot prove that. You need to keep up with science. All you need to do is Google "refurbishing CERN." Scientists themselves are showing you that they don't know enough about radioactivity. Nobody has to prove it to know it. Fallacy, scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity doesn't automatically mean, true randomness doesn't exist. As far as we can tell, it does, right now. But you seem to think that not knowing enough about radioactivity means they know everything about radioactivity. Why? Because you are using it as an example that pure random DOES exist. According to our current understanding, yes, true randomness does exist. If we adopt your philosophy of only trusting things that we know for sure, as in 100% factual, then we wouldn't trust anything. |
|
|
|
All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity. You don't need radiation to think that pure random might exist. All you need is to watch the way a leaf blows in the breeze on a warm summer day. You have no idea where the molecules of air that hit the leaf are coming from, or where they are going. It seems like pure random. The difference between the physics of the twisting, blown leaf, and atomic radiation are, we understand the principles of the physics of the leaf a whole lot more than we understand nuclear physics. Science probably will never understand the physics of the radioactive atom until they understand that the nothingness of empty space is filled with a material that is entirely different than matter... matter which is essentially energy with complex activities going on between the parts, all held in place by the "material" of empty space. ''All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity.'' That's a baseless assertion, unfortunately, you cannot prove that. You need to keep up with science. All you need to do is Google "refurbishing CERN." Scientists themselves are showing you that they don't know enough about radioactivity. Nobody has to prove it to know it. Fallacy, scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity doesn't automatically mean, true randomness doesn't exist. As far as we can tell, it does, right now. |
|
|
|
I have recently adopted a beliefs and psychology from the Hindu faith. It has helped me a great deal understand why bad things happen to good people. The law of karma has given me see a different perspective on life. I also think traditional therapy like CBT and other western mental health techniques can also make people much happier. I was told I would face a 6 month wait on the Irish national health service to see a counsellor but ended up using an online therapist with this company: https://anamcaratherapy.com/. it is sad to have to pay privately for good mental health care, the government should do better. As an agnostic I would say that it is easier for me to accept things as they are rather than trying to find a philosophical reason behind every cause. But when I am depressed I search for the reason and actually I believe that things might have a cause because nothing can be in action without a cause. The the philosophy of karma is actually indeed very soothing towards stress and it feels like every pain is a way to wipe the past sins and to be free from a stain in the loop of space time. ''because nothing can be in action without a cause'' No one knows this and there are no experiments possible to prove it right now. Physicists, for instance, do think true randomness exists as predicting when a radioactive atom will radioact is impossible. Perhaps because we don't know how or because true randomness exists. All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity. You don't need radiation to think that pure random might exist. All you need is to watch the way a leaf blows in the breeze on a warm summer day. You have no idea where the molecules of air that hit the leaf are coming from, or where they are going. It seems like pure random. The difference between the physics of the twisting, blown leaf, and atomic radiation are, we understand the principles of the physics of the leaf a whole lot more than we understand nuclear physics. Science probably will never understand the physics of the radioactive atom until they understand that the nothingness of empty space is filled with a material that is entirely different than matter... matter which is essentially energy with complex activities going on between the parts, all held in place by the "material" of empty space. ''All that is, is scientists not knowing enough about radioactivity.'' That's a baseless assertion, unfortunately, you cannot prove that. |
|
|
|
I have recently adopted a beliefs and psychology from the Hindu faith. It has helped me a great deal understand why bad things happen to good people. The law of karma has given me see a different perspective on life. I also think traditional therapy like CBT and other western mental health techniques can also make people much happier. I was told I would face a 6 month wait on the Irish national health service to see a counsellor but ended up using an online therapist with this company: https://anamcaratherapy.com/. it is sad to have to pay privately for good mental health care, the government should do better. As an agnostic I would say that it is easier for me to accept things as they are rather than trying to find a philosophical reason behind every cause. But when I am depressed I search for the reason and actually I believe that things might have a cause because nothing can be in action without a cause. The the philosophy of karma is actually indeed very soothing towards stress and it feels like every pain is a way to wipe the past sins and to be free from a stain in the loop of space time. ''because nothing can be in action without a cause'' No one knows this and there are no experiments possible to prove it right now. Physicists, for instance, do think true randomness exists as predicting when a radioactive atom will radioact is impossible. Perhaps because we don't know how or because true randomness exists. |
|
|
|
|
I think that's just typical technical/legal jargon, not plagiarism. Did you find something else or just that part?
|
|
|
|
REBUTTED: No. We'll be back where we were before recordings, when a person's word as to what he saw or heard is proof. And the word of an AI is never trusted.
Just a statement with no reasoning as to why it might be valid. Perhaps you have a hard time understand this. With the ability to create speech that can not be differentiated between fake and real, what a person heard cannot be trusted either. That would be quite a specific case though, where someone somehow hears a voice that is actually AI made. |
|
|
|
The whole system is trash. Politicians should try to 'defeat' the other politicians with better policies, plans, etc. They should show why they are actually better for the country not stupid shitty 10-year old personal attacks. Hey, Trump is an idiot so vote for us, but what are we actually going to do when we get the power? Ehh, we will see. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
