Seems the proof for ETE isn't there. All your links are is talk without proof, or even process. Nobody has divulged the process with even a little bit of certainty that any of that is evolution (ETE). All of it might be abiogenesis a multitude of times over. Maybe more than once for some creatures. Prove that it isn't abiogenesis. Or prove that it isn't God creation in the form of like-begets-like. All of your examples have only one proof... a big bunch of hot-air-talk by people who don't know for sure.

Time for us to wake up and stop paying money to those ignorant evolutionists. They will never be able to prove evolution exists. The more they try, the more they run out of stuff to try. All they do is try to state that adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like are evolution... just so they have something that is evolution.

Some time back, they dropped abiogenesis from their definition of evolution. Once they realize that abiogenesis might have happened for every different kind of plant and animal, they will probably add it back into the evolution definition.

Then, sometime, they will find that God created everything, and they will try to call creation evolution, just so that they have something that is evolution.  

Have you tried this :


Go ahead, it's free.

What are you even yammering about. It has been known for ages that the universe has different creators. Look at all the artists who create music, or pictures, or machines.

But there is only one Creator of the universe. The quality and complexity of what He created when He created the universe, shows that He is God by definition.

Atheists get upset after a while, if they are shown that they understand deep down that God exists. Their religion of non-religioin doesn't cut it. If I had such a religion, I would probably hate religion, too.

Thank you all for your inputs I will take a look at the sites and post weekly if you guys could support me will be also awesome .
As I go along I will give you guys shoutouts I know I just started this but Thank you for all the support . If you have any ideas let me know and I could give a try.
Thank you guys.

^^^ In your opinion, what's the purpose of you asking questions that were answered right in the post you quoted? Seems to me that if you can't provide proof of evolution, that evolution is a hoax... at least as far as you are concerned.

^^^ Oh, that was simply you not accepting science. All you were doing is trying to show that religion isn't religion by not accepting that your religion is a religion.

Why do atheists hate religion? Because atheism is a hoax.

^^^ Notice how Astargath twists my warnings about the dangers of Hell, because he has his head in a hole in the sand like an ostrich who is unwilling to look at reality. It's the standard Astargath lie, promoting indifference to the coming doom.

That's a good point. A camera at that height would have no FE atmospheric refraction to prevent it from seeing the edge, and beyond.

This is discussed in the God proof thread over in the Off-Topic section.

There is an evolution of dogs in dog breeding. But most people don't call it evolution. They simply call it breeding. It doesn't change one kind of animal to another.

There is talked about, an evolution that changes one kind of animal to another. It is the kind that many say turned a single cell creature in the waters, into a succession of different animals resulting in mankind and the other animals we have today... something that happened over hundreds of thousands or millions of years.

Dog breeding evolution is obviously true, as is the evolution of the Model T to the many models of Fords we have today.

There is no proof of evolution of the kind where single cell creatures changed into other kinds of animals, and finally into humans, over hundreds of thousands or millions of years. All of the so-called evidence of this, can be attributed to something else that does not work like that evolution would.

We don't know from that evidence that such was the way that things happened, or if it happened another way. And we won't know until we can at least build a precise time viewer, to photograph the DNA of strings of ancestor/descendant animals in the past.

So far, all the proof you offer could be proof of several things, some of them not evolution theory evolution. You can guess all you want. But we don't have proof for evolution.

Evolution is a hoax.

Btw, thanks for helping me to say it in different ways, so that people who read my posts can start to understand that evolution is a hoax.

^^^ Albert Michelson, Edward Morley, Georges Sagnac, Alexandre Dufour and Fernand Prunier, that's five scientists not two and they're all big names.



"It's Photoshop but, but it has to be" -- NASA explaining how photographs of Earth are made.