Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 10:58:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 391 »
541  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: April 21, 2016, 09:39:39 PM
Incorrect. It rarely ends that way. Only for entirely broken regimes. Sorry Armstrong has all the data. He invested $1 billion collecting it.

In another thread you predict USA will break into regions. Is this not the definition of an entirely broken regime?

Edit: let me give you a quick, incomplete hint. Read Armstrong for the many details and points. The failed regimes were due to dictatorship and/or a bankrupt ideology (e.g. communism in the Weimar Republic).  When the population remains very productive and the debt is actually quite small (e.g. the debt is only $19 trillion in the USA but the productive capacity of the people is that much or more per year), then the society is not failed. We are going to see transition to a world reserve currency. This is not about total failure of government, except Europe is trying hard to achieve that again. China, Russia, USA, Canada, Australia, etc are no where near failed societies.

There is nothing new in the concept of world reserve currency. It can have many components this time, this doesn't change anything in how individual countries manage their economies and their budgets. Individual countries are pretty bad. For bankrupt ideology we have the welfare state. The productive population is shrinking, the liabilities of the governments are growing, you even said this yourself up thread, and there comes a point where society fails unable to bear the weight of liabilities. Enter hyper inflation.

I have read quite a lot of Armstrong, I don't agree with everything.

What is happening is the productive people are breaking free from the unproductive. This is why we need a world reserve currency that no country can abuse.

The elite are doing creative destruction on the nation-state central  banks and currencies. But the productive sector will refuse to become socialists. My X gen is giving the middle finger to that.

Socialism is failing. Those with that ideology will fail. It is not an ideology held by everyone not like in Weimar Germany when everyone was tears and in love with the almighty Socalists and then Hitler. Those who disagreed, were unable to mount any defense nor defection.

I suggest you review this post about Texans and Texas:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1049048.msg14621869#msg14621869

trollercoaster had a similar post about rural Australians.

The Internet makes it possible for us to communicate to each other. Ideological, propaganda shit can't be hoisted on us who are awake. Trump is proving many people are awake. They read blogs.
542  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The bottom will drop out of the alt market soon on: April 21, 2016, 09:36:10 PM
Incorrect. It rarely ends that way. Only for entirely broken regimes. Sorry Armstrong has all the data. He invested $1 billion collecting it.

In another thread you predict USA will break into regions. Is this not the definition of an entirely broken regime?

Edit: let me give you a quick, incomplete hint. Read Armstrong for the many details and points. The failed regimes were due to dictatorship and/or a bankrupt ideology (e.g. communism in the Weimar Republic).  When the population remains very productive and the debt is actually quite small (e.g. the debt is only $19 trillion in the USA but the productive capacity of the people is that much or more per year), then the society is not failed. We are going to see transition to a world reserve currency. This is not about total failure of government, except Europe is trying hard to achieve that again. China, Russia, USA, Canada, Australia, etc are no where near failed societies.

There is nothing new in the concept of world reserve currency. It can have many components this time, this doesn't change anything in how individual countries manage their economies and their budgets. Individual countries are pretty bad. For bankrupt ideology we have the welfare state. The productive population is shrinking, the liabilities of the governments are growing, you even said this yourself up thread, and there comes a point where society fails unable to bear the weight of liabilities. Enter hyper inflation.

I have read quite a lot of Armstrong, I don't agree with everything.

What is happening is the productive people are breaking free from the unproductive. This is why we need a world reserve currency that no country can abuse.

The elite are doing creative destruction on the nation-state central  banks and currencies. But the productive sector will refuse to become socialists. My X gen is giving the middle finger to that.

Socialism is failing. Those with that ideology will fail. It is not an ideology held by everyone not like in Weimar Germany when everyone was tears and in love with the almighty Socalists and then Hitler. Those who disagreed, were unable to mount any defense nor defection.

I suggest you review this post about Texans and Texas:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1049048.msg14621869#msg14621869

trollercoaster had a similar post about rural Australians.

The Internet makes it possible for us to communicate to each other. Ideological, propaganda shit can't be hoisted on us who are awake. Trump is proving many people are awake. They read blogs.
543  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [neㄘcash, ᨇcash, net⚷eys, or viᖚes?] Name AnonyMint's vapor coin? on: April 21, 2016, 09:23:11 PM
I really liked Lamma Island when I visited there as a tourist many years ago.
Lots of expats not to developed and an easy ferry ride to Hong Kong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamma_Island

That is another choice to look into. That was the one some foreigner recommended to me a couple of years ago. Thanks for confirming you liked it and not so long ago.

Yeah I think Hong Kong is the easiest for me of my options for upgrading my environment later this year. I would return to the USA (and I might still do that), but then I can't bring my gf. I think it is unfair, she stuck with me when I was sick and I think she deserves to see something outside the Philippines. (it isn't like I can't find another female companion or date, for the trolls who will want to quote this)

I thought about Australia, given I know at least 3 guys there (2 from this forum and one old time friend from Philippines). I hear Australia is very expensive. And I don't think they will give her a visa, although I might consider Australia after Hong Kong (since might be more easy by that time to prove I am doing a real software startup and she is an employee).

Perhaps back to the USA in 2017 after Hong Kong. Probably can work out the visa for her by then, assuming my work plans succeed. And best for building a software company will be the USA.
544  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: April 21, 2016, 09:18:27 PM
chinese miners are true freedom fighters ... which of you in the west would risk your necks to run a quasi-legal operation under a communist, totalitarian regime? They chop heads off in china, the chinese miners probably have a stronger ethos for freedom than a lot of the part-timers in the west who pay lip-service to freedom and then hand fat checks to the corrupt governments and banksters while they get the shaft from them.

Bitcoin mining has gravitated to the strongest hands, just as it was designed to be ... you cant truly know freedom until you have truly known oppression.

It may be true, but it is still not trustless decentralization.

Power corrupts absolutely and it will be no different an outcome if the power of mining is vested in too few people's hands.

... that's a different topic that is in no way unique to China.

Smells like a lot of hurt white Western butt in here because they couldn't build computer hardware better, faster, cheaper than the chinese. Western white males measure themselves on technological success and they are getting pasted on the bitcoin hardware stakes so far ... time to up their game if they want to stay competitive. Harden up dudes.

Except there is a smarter white guy who is going to use SOFTWARE turn their ASICs HARDWARE in doorstops.

Relish the fact that you once (as in one post) schooled him (me) when he first arrived in 2013 in this forum as AnonyMint.
545  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: April 21, 2016, 09:02:41 PM
in the end historically it always ends in hyper inflation and gold going through the roof.

Incorrect. It rarely ends that way. Only for entirely broken regimes. Sorry Armstrong has all the data. He invested $1 billion collecting it.

Edit: you are entirely wrong on hyperinflation. The history is that only revolutionary and totally broken regimes hyperinflate. The world is composed of very strong regimes and they will not lay down their power by hyperinflating. Armstrong covers this in great detail in his blogs. Required reading material for you.

Your saying collapsing governments and exploding fiscal budgets are not exactly a recipe for continually strong regimes. What makes you think some modern regimes you refer to today as strong are stronger than those hyper inflating in the past?

Read Armstrong and then you will know. You have a lot of reading ahead of you.

Edit: let me give you a quick, incomplete hint. Read Armstrong for the many details and points. The failed regimes were due to dictatorship and/or a bankrupt ideology (e.g. communism in the Weimar Republic).  When the population remains very productive and the debt is actually quite small (e.g. the debt is only $19 trillion in the USA but the productive capacity of the people is that much or more per year), then the society is not failed. We are going to see transition to a world reserve currency. This is not about total failure of government, except Europe is trying hard to achieve that again. China, Russia, USA, Canada, Australia, etc are no where near failed societies.



The halving is not some insignificant event.

If you don't mind me butting in, Bitcoin is on a real roll as I write this. $453 on Polo's USDT market; Coindesk's index has pegged it at ~$450. So far, good call. Smiley

Exactly what happened the last time 3 months before the halving then crashed -40%. You can be sure I will be selling my remaining 4 BTC into this rise.
546  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The bottom will drop out of the alt market soon on: April 21, 2016, 09:02:07 PM
The halving is not some insignificant event.

If you don't mind me butting in, Bitcoin is on a real roll as I write this. $453 on Polo's USDT market; Coindesk's index has pegged it at ~$450. So far, good call. Smiley

Exactly what happened the last time 3 months before the halving then crashed -40%. You can be sure I will be selling my remaining 4 BTC into this rise.
547  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The bottom will drop out of the alt market soon on: April 21, 2016, 09:01:11 PM
in the end historically it always ends in hyper inflation and gold going through the roof.

Incorrect. It rarely ends that way. Only for entirely broken regimes. Sorry Armstrong has all the data. He invested $1 billion collecting it.

Edit: you are entirely wrong on hyperinflation. The history is that only revolutionary and totally broken regimes hyperinflate. The world is composed of very strong regimes and they will not lay down their power by hyperinflating. Armstrong covers this in great detail in his blogs. Required reading material for you.

Your saying collapsing governments and exploding fiscal budgets are not exactly a recipe for continually strong regimes. What makes you think some modern regimes you refer to today as strong are stronger than those hyper inflating in the past?

Read Armstrong and then you will know. You have a lot of reading ahead of you.

Edit: let me give you a quick, incomplete hint. Read Armstrong for the many details and points. The failed regimes were due to dictatorship and/or a bankrupt ideology (e.g. communism in the Weimar Republic).  When the population remains very productive and the debt is actually quite small (e.g. the debt is only $19 trillion in the USA but the productive capacity of the people is that much or more per year), then the society is not failed. We are going to see transition to a world reserve currency. This is not about total failure of government, except Europe is trying hard to achieve that again. China, Russia, USA, Canada, Australia, etc are no where near failed societies.
548  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [neㄘcash, ᨇcash, net⚷eys, or viᖚes?] Name AnonyMint's vapor coin? on: April 21, 2016, 08:30:25 PM
chinese miners are true freedom fighters ... which of you in the west would risk your necks to run a quasi-legal operation under a communist, totalitarian regime? They chop heads off in china, the chinese miners probably have a stronger ethos for freedom than a lot of the part-timers in the west who pay lip-service to freedom and then hand fat checks to the corrupt governments and banksters while they get the shaft from them.

Bitcoin mining has gravitated to the strongest hands, just as it was designed to be ... you cant truly know freedom until you have truly known oppression.

It may be true, but it is still not trustless decentralization.

Power corrupts absolutely and it will be no different an outcome if the power of mining is vested in too few people's hands.
549  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why Dash fails decentralization on: April 21, 2016, 08:30:02 PM
chinese miners are true freedom fighters ... which of you in the west would risk your necks to run a quasi-legal operation under a communist, totalitarian regime? They chop heads off in china, the chinese miners probably have a stronger ethos for freedom than a lot of the part-timers in the west who pay lip-service to freedom and then hand fat checks to the corrupt governments and banksters while they get the shaft from them.

Bitcoin mining has gravitated to the strongest hands, just as it was designed to be ... you cant truly know freedom until you have truly known oppression.

It may be true, but it is still not trustless decentralization.

Power corrupts absolutely and it will be no different an outcome if the power of mining is vested in too few people's hands.
550  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: April 21, 2016, 08:29:28 PM
chinese miners are true freedom fighters ... which of you in the west would risk your necks to run a quasi-legal operation under a communist, totalitarian regime? They chop heads off in china, the chinese miners probably have a stronger ethos for freedom than a lot of the part-timers in the west who pay lip-service to freedom and then hand fat checks to the corrupt governments and banksters while they get the shaft from them.

Bitcoin mining has gravitated to the strongest hands, just as it was designed to be ... you cant truly know freedom until you have truly known oppression.

It may be true, but it is still not trustless decentralization.

Power corrupts absolutely and it will be no different an outcome if the power of mining is vested in too few people's hands.
551  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Kindly help; R7950 farm, still usable for something? on: April 21, 2016, 08:21:01 PM
Whatever Ether uses, I just mine and sell the coins for BTC. I have no interest in the coin other than profit.
Feathercoin uses NeoScrypt.

On Ether I get about 19MH/s per 7950
On FTC I get about 400KH/s per 7950 (if I remember right)

I am just curious, roughly how much profit do you earn per day per 7950 GPU, after subtracting electricity?

Don't account for hardware amortization, just electricity cost.
552  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: April 21, 2016, 08:16:40 PM
There is no way to raise money other than print it or tax for it.

Checkmate.

The bolded is the path of least resistance, always taken by governments. Gold fares very well in hyper inflationary environment, what paper promises are worth is irrelevant.

That is a very oversimplistic understanding. And I don't have time to unravel your simpleton thoughts for you at this time.

I suggest reading Armstrong's blog from start to finish.

Maybe we could do this on video sometimes interactively so it would be more efficient to educate. I don't have time for writing it. Far too slow.

Edit: you are entirely wrong on hyperinflation. The history is that only revolutionary and totally broken regimes hyperinflate. The world is composed of very strong regimes and they will not lay down their power by hyperinflating. Armstrong covers this in great detail in his blogs. Required reading material for you.
553  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The bottom will drop out of the alt market soon on: April 21, 2016, 08:15:18 PM
There is no way to raise money other than print it or tax for it.

Checkmate.

The bolded is the path of least resistance, always taken by governments. Gold fares very well in hyper inflationary environment, what paper promises are worth is irrelevant.

That is a very oversimplistic understanding. And I don't have time to unravel your simpleton thoughts for you at this time.

I suggest reading Armstrong's blog from start to finish.

Maybe we could do this on video sometimes interactively so it would be more efficient to educate. I don't have time for writing it. Far too slow.

Edit: you are entirely wrong on hyperinflation. The history is that only revolutionary and totally broken regimes hyperinflate. The world is composed of very strong regimes and they will not lay down their power by hyperinflating. Armstrong covers this in great detail in his blogs. Required reading material for you.
554  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: April 21, 2016, 08:05:12 PM
Not all Americans are dependent on the government. And these conservatives are pissed off. They will not tolerate being forced to pay taxes to support the rest. And this will grow as taxes increase.

The liberals will stay with the government and will bankrupt it, as the conservatives will refuse to pay for it, and break (defect en mass organized) away.

Armstrong's model will not be incorrect.

Maybe, but from what I have seen most of the south is very much dependent on centralized government handouts.

Lets look at the states with the most food stamp recipients.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2015/01/17/cheat-sheet-states-with-most-food-stamps/21877399/

#1. Washington DC: Percentage of the state's population on food stamps: 21.97%
#2. Mississippi: Percentage of the state's population on food stamps: 21.74%
#3. New Mexico: Percentage of the state's population on food stamps: 21.5%
#4. West Virginia: Percentage of the state's population on food stamps: 19.96%
#6. Tennessee: Percentage of the state's population on food stamps: 19.58%
#7. Louisiana: Percentage of the state's population on food stamps: 18.67%

Now lets look at the states that are most dependent on federal spending overall
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700/

#1 Mississippi
#2 New Mexico   
#3 Alabama
#4 Louisiana
#5 Tennessee

So you have 20% of the population dependent on the government just for food aid. That does not include dependence due to health care and retirement benefits or everything else.  Most Americans are now dependent on the government financially and this is true of the south as well.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2014/07/02/weve-crossed-the-tipping-point-most-americans-now-receive-government-benefits/#1b67102c6233

Quote from: forbes
perhaps 52 percent of U.S. households—more than half—now receive benefits from the government

This dependency is true of red states also. Breaking away would disrupt the supply of 'free stuff' so I am very skeptical it will ever happen.

Chop off Houston and give it to Lousiana (or just make it inhospitable and they will migrate over to Louisiana), then Texas is ready to be its own country. And Texans view themselves more as Texans than they do as Americans. Have you been there? I lived there from 2001 - 2003.

They love their guns, God, and large pickup trucks.

The food stamps correlate with inner city mess and frankly with African Americans in the South (and the "cheap white trash" that has joined with them) whose work ethic was destroyed by the welfare system. Before welfare, the negros were hard working. After, they sat around the porch, got drunk, and the females produced entire absentee father(less) families (with numerous fathers per female).

This is not racist. This is a fact.

I was born in New Orleans and I attended those inner city public schools. I know first hand the situation. I've driven through Houston several times. Don't get me wrong, the majority of African Americans have elevated themselves with college education, etc.., and they will be welcome to migrate to the New Republic of Texas. I was so pleasantly shocked when I was at the UNO library in 1991 to see so many studious African American students.

So I see mass migration where conservatives move to majority conservative States that crack down and defect. And liberals migrating to the liberal States.

Yeah disintegration of the USA into regions.

Humans want self-determination. It is viewed as a fundamental right.
555  Economy / Economics / Re: Why better tech can't kill Bitcoin on: April 21, 2016, 07:59:39 PM
Alternative coins will never match Bitcoin because the distribution will never be as perfect as the distribution of something that initially had absolutely no value. There will never be a more technically advanced digital token that can take this particular characteristic away from Bitcoin, the perfect initial distribution. The perfect digital gold."

Source:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-better-tech-cant-kill-bitcoin-thomas-bartsch?trk=prof-post

I disagree and I know how to do it.
556  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The bottom will drop out of the alt market soon on: April 21, 2016, 07:52:53 PM
There is a very strong correlation.

There is some correlation, but making the projection that BTC will follow the gold price and going down with the gold price is more of a wild guess than a rational argument.

Please note, Armstrong latest blogs about the tangible assets indicate that crypto currencies could have the same role as property or blue-chip stocks, if and when the collapse will come.

Which is why CCs are correlated to the coming V crash slingshot of gold and stocks.

Especially it is a wild guess, because it is not clear at all whether the decline of gold and Armstrong's projection will be materialized or not. The decline of gold price is very much on the table - just like the opposite is. (I am talking about mid and long term).

Armstrong is much more sure than he is going to admit on his blogs. Do you own a copy of his gold report? The main open question is the timing. May/June, August or Q1 2017.

I'd guess it is in the realm of 80/20% odds that gold will decline to lower than $1050.

I fully understand what you say terms of the sovereign debt crisis and the unsustainability of the system. I totally get what Armstrong says and I subscribe to 90% of his analysis. However, you and Armstrong always forget that the central banks, the Troika and the crooks of Wall street are infinitely creative in coming up with all kind of solutions to preserve the status quo.  Armstrong could never imagine the central banks will come up with quantitative easing. Here we go, they did and bought another 5-10 perhaps even 20 years and a few elections for the establishment.
Logic dictates and history indicates Armstrong is correct and the system most likely will collapse at some stage, but there are many variables exist which could screw up and do screw up his projections from time to time.

Everything they've done correlated to his timing models, so they haven't extended anything that wasn't predicted.

You seem to not understand they are now trapped. Low interest rates causes a collapse due to bankrupt retirement plans. Higher interest rates collapses the governments due to increase in interest payments on the debt which will explode the fiscal budgets and cause governments to raise taxes egregiously.

It is all coming unravelled and there is nothing that can be done to stop it.

If they print more money, they lower interest rates. There is no way to raise money other than print it or tax for it.

Checkmate.
557  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: April 21, 2016, 07:51:02 PM
There is a very strong correlation.

There is some correlation, but making the projection that BTC will follow the gold price and going down with the gold price is more of a wild guess than a rational argument.

Please note, Armstrong latest blogs about the tangible assets indicate that crypto currencies could have the same role as property or blue-chip stocks, if and when the collapse will come.

Which is why CCs are correlated to the coming V crash slingshot of gold and stocks.

Especially it is a wild guess, because it is not clear at all whether the decline of gold and Armstrong's projection will be materialized or not. The decline of gold price is very much on the table - just like the opposite is. (I am talking about mid and long term).

Armstrong is much more sure than he is going to admit on his blogs. Do you own a copy of his gold report? The main open question is the timing. May/June, August or Q1 2017.

I'd guess it is in the realm of 80/20% odds that gold will decline to lower than $1050.

I fully understand what you say terms of the sovereign debt crisis and the unsustainability of the system. I totally get what Armstrong says and I subscribe to 90% of his analysis. However, you and Armstrong always forget that the central banks, the Troika and the crooks of Wall street are infinitely creative in coming up with all kind of solutions to preserve the status quo.  Armstrong could never imagine the central banks will come up with quantitative easing. Here we go, they did and bought another 5-10 perhaps even 20 years and a few elections for the establishment.
Logic dictates and history indicates Armstrong is correct and the system most likely will collapse at some stage, but there are many variables exist which could screw up and do screw up his projections from time to time.

Everything they've done correlated to his timing models, so they haven't extended anything that wasn't predicted.

You seem to not understand they are now trapped. Low interest rates causes a collapse due to bankrupt retirement plans. Higher interest rates collapses the governments due to increase in interest payments on the debt which will explode the fiscal budgets and cause governments to raise taxes egregiously.

It is all coming unravelled and there is nothing that can be done to stop it.

If they print more money, they lower interest rates. There is no way to raise money other than print it or tax for it.

Checkmate.
558  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: April 21, 2016, 07:34:38 PM
(I don't mention the Dash jokers, it's not even worth discussing if we talk about privacy.)

I know what you mean, it's really too bad because I think Evan Duffield is a marketing genius.

You are confusing marketing with promotional hype (lies actually) to speculators. Marketing is a not just promotion, it is a much broader discipline+art. Dash has 0 mainstream users. Evan is a marketing dunce (and a fraudster). To see real product and ecosystem marketing, watch what I do over the next year with JAMBOX.

Yeah Evan is a good snake oil salesmen. They were a dime a dozen in the USA of the 1800s. That is nothing close to the skill of Software Product Marketing.

I don't want to argue that here. Bring it over the Altcoin Discussion forum where there is plenty of argumentation on all those details.
559  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [neㄘcash, ᨇcash, net⚷eys, or viᖚes?] Name AnonyMint's vapor coin? on: April 21, 2016, 07:19:17 PM
The main reason for wanting to get out of the Philippines, is the tropical sweltering climate makes it really difficult to work in the daytime in fresh air without airconditioning. Even with ceiling and floor standing fans, I am still sweating. I am well adjusted to the heat and can even jog in the midday heat, but this is not ideal for my concentration, athletics, and also I think it doesn't help me cure what ever chronic digestive tract infection I may have (fungal?).

Let's compare the climate of Davao:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davao_City#Climate

To the airport of Hong Kong (which is next to Lantau Island):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Hong_Kong#Statistics

The other reasons for wanting to leave the Philippines are the daily brownouts, frequent Internet connection problems, boredom with the lack of athletic and scenic outlets for leisure time activities, and the lack of international cuisine. Local cuisine is okay, but after 10 years I am tired of it.

Also the noise from neighbors (e.g. a piano played by kids loud enough that my earplugs aren't sufficient) and that for example the bathrooms and kitchens aren't well designed and appointed, e.g. the shower sprays onto the toilet and so after someone takes a shower I get to walk on a wet floor and sit on a wet toilet.

One thing that has kept me here other than not really having enough funds to move, is that I own a 2003 model diesel Isuzu SUV here.

I think Hong Kong is the most likely next destination for me, as soon as I can afford it. Looks like Mui Mo on Lantau Island is the best combination (for now, although massive development plans are promulgating now for community feedback) of rural environment, hiking/jogging trails, affordability, public transport access to Hong Kong island, quaint beach life, quaint restaurants with international cuisine, and modern apartments (with I assume reliable+fast Internet access).

http://defence.pk/threads/pictures-of-hongkong.46439/page-13

I even see basketball courts (this is a small neighboring island):

https://bluebalu.com/2013/08/18/hiking-discovery-bay-to-mui-wo-and-back/

I spend roughly $300 a month for my main house here in Davao in a nicer, walled security subdivision, and another $80 monthly for a crappy house up on the cooler hillsides, which I maintain so I have two Internet connections with the two major ISPs (Globe and Smart) in case one is offline then I can drive to the other. Ditto for the brownouts, since rarely brownout in both locations simultaneously. It is roughly a 15 - 20 min drive if no traffic (and I am often awake in the night for the cooler fresh and sleeping in day in aircon). That is not including the cost of my two Internet connections ($60), electricity for both locations ($80), water ($8), diesel ($50), and food ($300+).

For Mui Mo, I would need to spend roughly $1500 monthly to get something decent (although this might decrease by 2017 if the HKD peg breaks as Armstrong is predicting):

http://www.squarefoot.com.hk/search/?area=4;district=4;type=rent;layout=11;sort=pa
http://www.squarefoot.com.hk/property/21201623/
http://www.squarefoot.com.hk/property/21011775/

I am estimating my transportation and food would be at least double in Hong Kong.

So my base monthly expenses (not including other things such as $256 month child support in USA, credit card debt installments, Internet services such as Skype, $100 salary for my gf who does all the cooking & cleaning, etc) would increase from roughly $880 to $2250. And I'd probably keep the $80 or $300 rental in the Philippines to store my car and things. Overall I would increase my monthly expenditures from roughly $1400 to $2850. So roughly double my monthly expenses.

If the crowdfund is successful, I will probably make that upgrade to my environment  by about October or November, as Hong Kong starts to cool off. The summers in Hong Kong are nearly as hot as here in Davao, so no advantage.

I tried to think of other places where I could relocate such that my filipina gf could likely attain a visa with minimum fuss and would be as convenient and affordable and I can't think of any. Any suggestions?

Note it is likely (according to Martin Armstrong's model which I ascribe to) for the USD to become very strong in 2017, so the increase in expenses would be mitigated if my funding is coming in US dollars. Hopefully the coming global economic contagion might slowdown the plans to transform Lantau island from 100,000 to 1 million population.

I am not looking at Hong Kong as a permanent destination. Perhaps 6 months to a year until the next stage of JAMBOX is achieved. Perhaps maintain an office in HK if turns out there are game developers or other reasons to have an office there ongoing.




Edit: ground beef (w/egg and Worcestershire sauce), mozarella cheese, tomato, lettuce, and (no high fructose corn syrup) Heinz ketchup sandwiches on whole wheat French bread again tonight! I am so tired of eating a monotonous strict diet of tuna soup, eggs, oatmeal, raw carrots, and steamed greens. No ill effects from eating this yesterday. If I can eat the food I like again, I can gain back some of my strength. I need that brain food.

After feeling strong yesterday and sleeping, I woke up with diarrhea. I've been high dosing with sublingual oregano oil since awakening roughly 4 hours ago. The oregano oil seems to be getting it under control although I still feel a bit under the weather (but not worse than a mild flu feeling). Actually my body feels strong with that food and I sleep very well.

So this is another confirmation that my 4 year chronic illness is an infectious agent impacting my digestive system, which makes sense given the chronic phase began 4 years ago after being hospitalized for an acute peptic ulcer and h.pylori infection.

I mentioned previously that the oregano oil seems to have greatly diminished the occurrences of the pimples on face or tongue that precede a chronic fatigue syndrome relapse in the past. As well cleared up the "70 year old" skin look on my shoulders and upper back. And my CFS episodes are much milder. And mostly I just need to sleep more whereas before so insomniac.

The oregano oil is working great. Diarrhea appears to have abated. I am really hoping I am underway to being cured. I feel very hopeful with the way I can handle food and basically reverse any bad symptoms quite rapidly with high doses of the oregano oil.

I think it is time to get out of this sweltering climate. Need a change.
560  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why the darkcoin/dash instamine matters on: April 21, 2016, 06:49:08 PM
Quote

The salient distinction is that mining influence in Bitcoin has nothing to do with how many tokens you own. And mining expenditure is ongoing whereas staked masternodes are only deposited once.

We've already explained this before. I am not going to explain again why staking is not secure.

Mining influence in DASH has nothing to do with how many tokens you own either. Miners govern the coin in exactly the same way as other PoW coins - they can fork a chain at any time.

Masternodes/DGBB create an additional governance layer, providing, right now, funds for all sorts of beneficial projects directly from the blockchain.

Nobody is saying it's perfect, finished or a replacement for mining. It is, however, a good working solution <in the present> to the governance issues and decision making malaise that stunt the growth of other coins.

Masternodes can corrupt the security of the InstantX and the anonymity.

Evolution is building more corruptible features on masternodes.

Masternodes concentrate the coin supply to those who own the masternodes by paying them a dividend (up to 50% per annum according a chart that was on the Dash website last year), and the masternode has no significant ongoing cost, as the stake deposit is only made once.

The decentralization of the mining is irrelevant when the coin supply is largely controlled by those who instamined and have been concentrating their percentage of the coin supply, thus they can force any protocol change they want, because ultimately it is payers who control which protocol they sign their transactions to.

I don't have time to get in a detailed debate with you, but rest assured I can destroy all your arguments when I am ready to. That time is coming... just wait...
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 391 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!