If you haven’t noticed it yet, then by now Indiana Pacers is the number 1 team in the NBA when it comes to totals. The team roster doesn’t have any LeBron James or Stephen Curry, and yet it’s scoring in such a fast pace, that its name, Pacers, seems to suit it really well. But they used to be exactly the opposite several years ago, used to be an "under" team. So once again we have them tonight against the Trail Blazers, total is set at 240. Looks like the over is the best play for this one despite the high total. See our blog post about it: https://gamblingfreebies.com/2023/11/27/indiana-pacers-pick/ |
|
|
|
|
Would just like to add, just like efialtis who runs BTCGosu, this website might be less popular, but we've also followed with BCGame, glad to see they resolved all open cases here and as such they are still considered as highly valuble, definitely not the likes of 1xbet etc.
|
|
|
|
That was exactly my idea, I will close this thread only on Monday evening so that people still have 2 days to share their opinion in here. This is because the people were so heavily invested in this topic so it would be rough to just shut them out.
What will you do about the flag in the very first post in this thread? |
|
|
|
They are BROKE right now (reason why they stopped the signature campaign with icopress) and they need AS MUCH FUNDS as they can get.
Why do you think they are broke? Is there any reason for it? The house normally always wins, not loses. |
|
|
|
and the withdrawal also went smoothly, which did not also take up to 2 minutes for it to arrive in my designated account.
Likewise, we had one time $10k withdrawal after betting $5k on the NBA, it went smoothly, no issues whatsoever. It's really interesting to know why some users had these issues though, would be great if their rep could come here and explain. Let's hope it happens soon. |
|
|
|
|
This is all true but sports betting is different than Roulette. You have so many instances where you can have an edge...
For example NFL, NBA, prime time games, lines that don't make sense and more.
There is skill involved with this and it's not like a Roulette where the next red or black is at the mercy of a ball.
|
|
|
|
I hope they make the right decision I have some friends playing here also.
Likewise, it seems though a flag is active now.  |
|
|
|
Yep, the flag should be supported as BC.game team is ignoring the complaints here for a long time. But I think we have to give them a few more days to give the clarification. Because, the Casino Guru representative of BCgame have asked the mediator to give them a few more time to discuss about the complaints with their team (for the other two complaints). So, I believe they will also discuss about the issue of OP.
Totally agree. Let's give it a few more days, there seem to be developments. |
|
|
|
You are seeing this warning as you have supported the flag. Anyway, I had asked efialtis yesterday to inform BCgame team again about your issue, and he has forwarded it to them. I think they won't show the interest to clarify the issue here as long as their reputation isn't being destroyed.
Mahdirakib, do you consider supporting the flag? We'd like to hear back as well, per yahoo: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5473623.msg63154341#msg63154341We might support the flag just to apply the right pressure but we're giving it another day to see. |
|
|
|
OP or BC.Game? BC.Game's negative feedback was placed by me, it's there to warn the forum participants of the current situation the platform has. For OP... not sure why, I think he had a questionable history. A quick glance into their trust page gave a hint that his account changed hand and he immediately requested a loan? To be honest, I didn't really put the weight of his case into the scale as I was not overseeing his case, it's too... hard to navigate. A ruling made by AG was in OP's favor, though, they believe BC should honor the bonus --I only read the last post by their representative that's quoted by OP somewhere-- and paid him.
Yes, OP himself. Not sure why BCGame was online today but no posts made yet, there must be a reason why they can't disclose information. We are watching these threads as well, and also waiting for GekkeBelg to respond to our question. |
|
|
|
efialtis was aware of these accusation to some extent, he was overseeing the case of BC v. GekkeBelg.
Holydarkness, why does the OP have negative trust rankings? |
|
|
|
All big casinos have a lot of complaints, the bigger they are more people are trying to exploit it. I never had any problems with BC, and I can't complain about them. But I think that they should be more active here and they need to address some cases, why they are not doing that I can't say. Maybe they will show up here and give some explanations... many of us are waiting for that.
This Hello everyone, before using this platform, please take a look at the scam community. Their shadows are everywhere.
Stake also had a time where we've seen 5-10 scam accusation posts and then Stuna replied to one of them and that showed what was really behind all this. Whilst it's important to attend and respond to many accusations as possible, you need to also appreciate there are lots of scammers trying to take advantage of the sites - from our experience, as users, we placed a $5k bet on the NBA with BCGame, if it won the $10k withdrawal would be processed instantly. But you see users with an issue of $3k withdrawal being flagged, so it's not the amount, it's what the user is doing. Now how many resources they choose to dedicate to these scammers and to respond to accusations on so many forums e.g. Bitcointalk, AskGamblers, CasinoGuru - it's up to them. But Stake has also stopped responding to some scammers here and it brought "quiet" in the forum where you barely see accusations against them, genuine users with genuine issues must receive responses, but when bad guys take advantage of it - that creates a problem for everyone, that's the main issue here. Nonetheless we also asked BCGame to share some insights here and respond, but please take what we say into consideration as well. |
|
|
|
But then why is there now this warning above the BC.game thread exactly after the moment Cointrader supported my flag?
It looks extremely likely his support did the job.
You need a support from 1 more member, if we for instance support it then the flag would be active. We were reading what holydarkness said: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5473729.msg63144313#msg63144313"I tried to delay this feedback as long as I can in hope that they'll deescalate the situation by addressing the concerns, but it gets piling instead of decreasing." It's concerning for us as well, so we'd support the flag and it's now active. We have asked them to look into this and sent them links to this and what holydarkness posted, we want them to succeed and for that we believe they should resolve the issues - we think they just grew which is why they don't use this forum too much, also many Crypto forums and groups are growing as well, so Bitcointalk might not be what it used to be, but still, the lack of response or resolving issues - this must be resolved, we agree with you on that. UPDATE:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088875.msg63085684#msg63085684I see the user has habit to try using many casinos and after a while, with some withdrawals, he got troubles and not all cases he received all money back. I don't know why he would prefer to take so much risk this way. If he has good gambling skills, he can win on big and trusted casinos and will not have withdrawal problems.
Someone posted this, please explain it, otherwise we can't support the flag. |
|
|
|
So do they have physical addresses in some of the Asian Countries? Or the whole thing is just online?
The bottom of the site states: THIS SITE IS OPERATED BY LONE ROCK HOLDINGS N.V., REG# 148107 – ABRAHAM DE VEERSTRAAT 7, WILLEMSTAD, CURACAO. LICENSED TO CONDUCT ONLINE GAMING OPERATIONS BY GOVERNMENT OF CURACAO LICENSE NO 365/JAZ, SUB-LICENSE GLH-OCCHKTW0710132018 © COPYRIGHT 2020 LONE ROCK HOLDINGS N.V. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. GAMBLING CAN BE ADDICTIVE. PLEASE GAMBLE RESPONSIBLY. 18+ TO PLAY. LONE ROCK HOLDINGS N.V., REG# 148107 – ABRAHAM DE VEERSTRAAT 7, WILLEMSTAD, CURACAO. The owners could be from anywhere but you probably could get more info via these licenses? |
|
|
|
What happened:: SBRForum has issued an official warning against BetInAsia.BetInAsia is an agent allowing users to deposit/withdraw funds and play using their platforms, such as OrbitExchange. The benefit of playing on such a platfrm is that you have an access directly to BetFair, one of the biggest betting exchanges in the world, that is normally blocked in many countries, but using an agent you can bypass the block and bet there using a platform like OrbitExchange. BetInAsia is providing you an access to OrbitExchange, however those who deposited large amounts with them discovered BetInAsia STOLE THEIR FUNDS by placing intentional losing Cricket bets on their behalf! This is not a joke, it's real. Such bets allow BetInAsia to steal user funds through the exchange. It happened many times and BetInAsia ignored these users, and now SBRForum has issued a warning against them. DO NOT USE them as agents, they would steal your money, be aware! For more info and to see so many examples of stolen funds read here: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/sportsbooks-industry/3720440-warning-orbitxch-betinasia-7000-lost.htmlScammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2234393Reference Link: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/sportsbooks-industry/3720440-warning-orbitxch-betinasia-7000-lost.htmlAmount Scammed: Over 6 digits of $$$ from users Payment Method: Crypto Additional Notes: Once again you can read it all here: https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/sportsbooks-industry/3720440-warning-orbitxch-betinasia-7000-lost.htmlThe user "optional" is from the SBRForum team, it's an official warning! Please stay away from BetInAsia!
|
|
|
|
I changed course from being a casino affiliate to working with problem gambling
Can I ask what made you make that change? |
|
|
|
|
Can I ask why the locking feature was implemented?
Just tested the site today with high rolling and it looks like it's forcing you to wager your own deposit - why not do what Stake is doing, you can deposit and must wager at least once (not twice, even if the odds don't matter)... or maybe it's only once but sports wagering doesn't count and then it needs to be fixed?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
